Christian Conservatism wrote:Thanks to email leaks we know Hillary wants open trade and open borders.
Good.
Advertisement
by Christian Conservatism » Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:07 pm
by Eol Sha » Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:07 pm
Christian Conservatism wrote:Deplorable was almost as bad as the Wall Street speaches leak. She actually had the nerve to call innocent Americans deplorable just because she thinks theyre racist and sexist. I don't hear her calling ISIS deplorable. She needs to get priorities straight.
by The Adonalsium » Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:11 pm
Christian Conservatism wrote:Deplorable was almost as bad as the Wall Street speaches leak. She actually had the nerve to call innocent Americans deplorable just because she thinks theyre racist and sexist. I don't hear her calling ISIS deplorable. She needs to get priorities straight.
by AiliailiA » Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:12 pm
Cannot think of a name wrote:"Where's my immortality?" will be the new "Where's my jetpack?"
Maineiacs wrote:"We're going to build a canal, and we're going to make Columbia pay for it!" -- Teddy Roosevelt
Ifreann wrote:That's not a Freudian slip. A Freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean your mother.
by Galloism » Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:12 pm
by Galloism » Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:13 pm
Ailiailia wrote:Christian Conservatism wrote:Which pretty much means Trump has the edge, if you actually bother to unskew the poll.
Marist College are A rated pollsters, with a bias of R+0.7
So if you want to go unskewing results, it's Clinton up FOUR points not a damn draw.
But I'll give you a chance to make your case. Show us a source where they unskew the poll, or if you "bother" to do it yourself, show us your calculations.
by Navaronia » Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:17 pm
Christian Conservatism wrote:Deplorable was almost as bad as the Wall Street speaches leak. She actually had the nerve to call innocent Americans deplorable just because she thinks theyre racist and sexist. I don't hear her calling ISIS deplorable. She needs to get priorities straight.
by Christian Conservatism » Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:19 pm
by Navaronia » Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:20 pm
Christian Conservatism wrote:Trump in the lead
It should be a bigger lead considering how awful Clinton is, but whatever.
by The Adonalsium » Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:20 pm
Christian Conservatism wrote:Trump in the lead
It should be a bigger lead considering how awful Clinton is, but whatever.
by Arlenton » Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:21 pm
Christian Conservatism wrote:Trump in the lead
It should be a bigger lead considering how awful Clinton is, but whatever.
by Christian Conservatism » Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:21 pm
The Adonalsium wrote:Christian Conservatism wrote:Deplorable was almost as bad as the Wall Street speaches leak. She actually had the nerve to call innocent Americans deplorable just because she thinks theyre racist and sexist. I don't hear her calling ISIS deplorable. She needs to get priorities straight.
I feel like Hillary Clinton's "Basket of Deplorables" is pretty much true. Especially now. there are no innocent americans under white sheets
by Eol Sha » Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:22 pm
Navaronia wrote:Christian Conservatism wrote:Trump in the lead
It should be a bigger lead considering how awful Clinton is, but whatever.
I would like you to keep in mind, Mister Christian Conservatism, that this article may be biased or skewed like you stated the other polls in favor of Hillary might be. Also, from quickly glancing at this source it seems like it could be in the Los Angelos area and not in general.
by Vavax » Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:23 pm
Navaronia wrote:Christian Conservatism wrote:Trump in the lead
It should be a bigger lead considering how awful Clinton is, but whatever.
I would like you to keep in mind, Mister Christian Conservatism, that this article may be biased or skewed like you stated the other polls in favor of Hillary might be. Also, from quickly glancing at this source it seems like it could be in the Los Angelos area and not in general.
by Galloism » Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:24 pm
Arlenton wrote:Christian Conservatism wrote:Trump in the lead
It should be a bigger lead considering how awful Clinton is, but whatever.
It's like you're in your own universe.
Navaronia wrote:Christian Conservatism wrote:Trump in the lead
It should be a bigger lead considering how awful Clinton is, but whatever.
I would like you to keep in mind, Mister Christian Conservatism, that this article may be biased or skewed like you stated the other polls in favor of Hillary might be. Also, from quickly glancing at this source it seems like it could be in the Los Angelos area and not in general.
by The United Territories of Providence » Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:24 pm
Arlenton wrote:Christian Conservatism wrote:Trump in the lead
It should be a bigger lead considering how awful Clinton is, but whatever.
It's like you're in your own universe.
Hillary Clinton wrote:Well, everything you’ve heard from Donald is not true. I'm sorry I have to keep saying this, but he lives in an alternative reality.
by Socialist Nordia » Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:24 pm
Christian Conservatism wrote:Trump in the lead
It should be a bigger lead considering how awful Clinton is, but whatever.
by The Adonalsium » Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:24 pm
by Galloism » Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:24 pm
by The Portland Territory » Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:24 pm
by Navaronia » Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:25 pm
Eol Sha wrote:Navaronia wrote:I would like you to keep in mind, Mister Christian Conservatism, that this article may be biased or skewed like you stated the other polls in favor of Hillary might be. Also, from quickly glancing at this source it seems like it could be in the Los Angelos area and not in general.
No, LA Times produces national polls. Also, LA wouldn't vote Trump in a million years.
by Galloism » Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:27 pm
by Navaronia » Mon Oct 10, 2016 6:27 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Benuty, Click Ests Vimgalevytopia, Elwher, Ifreann, Repreteop, Rio Cana, Talibanada, The Vooperian Union, Tungstan, Uiiop, Valentine Z, Zancostan
Advertisement