Update: The Palace in Thailand has announced the death of King Bhumibol Adulyadej at the age of 88 – see here.
As with all death threads, moderators have asked users not to attack others or gloat.
Source: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-thail ... 290R8?il=0
This king has been in the throne since 1946, 6 years before the Queen Elizabeth II. The news that the Thai king's condition is unstable concerns me greatly due to political tensions. According to Reuters:
Anxiety over the king's health and an eventual succession has formed the backdrop to more than a decade of bitter political divide in Thailand that has included two military coups and often-violent street demonstrations.
What sets Thailand apart from many European monarchies is that the punishments for insulting the monarchy (lèse-majesté laws) are very tough and heavily used.
Vajiralongkorn is the heir apparent and not only he is the only son of Bhumibol Adulyadej, he is 64 years old and he’s widely disliked. In the Commonwealth, Prince Charles is the heir, currently aged 67, but next in line is Prince William, aged 34, followed by Prince George, aged just 3.
So how important do you think the succession issue and the health is to the current state of Thai politics, and what potential new issues Thailand could face if Bhumibol Adulyadej passes away? For me, I am personally concerned that grave tensions deep down beyond the cover of the lèse-majesté laws are very likely if King Bhumibol Adulyadej passes away, given Vajiralongkorn’s less-than-stellar reputation.