Great Kauthar wrote:private industry
I'm sure nothing can go wrong with this.
I mean, It's not like private industry corrupts and mutilates everything it touches.
Advertisement
by New Grestin » Sat Oct 01, 2016 10:56 pm
Great Kauthar wrote:private industry
Let’s not dwell on our corpse strewn past. Let’s celebrate our corpse strewn future!
Head Bartender for The Pub | The Para-Verse | Writing Advice from a Pretentious Jerk | I write stuff | Arbitrary Political Numbers- Best Worldbuilding - 2016 (Community Choice)
- Best Horror/Thriller RP for THE ZONE - 2016 (Community Choice)
by Saiwania » Sat Oct 01, 2016 11:01 pm
Aclion wrote:Except now you have a single company with control over the top level domains, and since they are a private entity they're not subject to first amendment restrictions on censorship.
by The Forsworn Knights » Sat Oct 01, 2016 11:33 pm
Saiwania wrote:Aclion wrote:Except now you have a single company with control over the top level domains, and since they are a private entity they're not subject to first amendment restrictions on censorship.
ICANN isn't a private commercial company. It is a non profit organization which has been placed in charge of the maintenance of root DNS servers and managing IP address allocation, which in terms of IPv4- there is a limited pool of at any given time. So far as entities go, ICANN is seen as reliable and this has the support of virtually the entire IT industry. This doesn't really prevent any new top level domains from forming nor additional root DNS servers from being added in different geographic locations.
by Saiwania » Sat Oct 01, 2016 11:52 pm
The Forsworn Knights wrote:I don't trust the phrase 'Non profit' after seeing a lot of people make extreme amounts of money every year without having to pay as much in taxes.
by Indira » Sun Oct 02, 2016 7:44 am
Great Kauthar wrote:http://fortune.com/2016/09/30/internet-oversight-transfer-saturday/(Reuters) – A long-planned transfer of the internet’s technical management from the U.S. government to a global community of stakeholders is expected to take place on Saturday despite last-minute attempts by conservative politicians and officials to delay the changeover.
The U.S. Department of Commerce is due to cede stewardship of ICANN, or the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, as scheduled after a lawsuit seeking to halt the transition was denied by a federal judge in Texas on Friday.
The U.S. government has been the primary manager of the internet’s address book since 1988 largely because it was invented in the country. Critics of the handover have attempted to block or delay it on grounds it could jeopardize free speech online, claims that the Obama administration and technology companies have said lack merit.
The lawsuit filed on Wednesday against the federal government by the Republican states of Arizona, Texas, Nevada and Oklahoma argued the handover was unconstitutional and required congressional approval.
ICANN, a California-based nonprofit, manages the database for top-level domain names such as .com and .net and their corresponding numeric addresses that allow computers to connect.
After the transfer, ICANN will be governed by a collection of academics, technical experts, private industry and government representatives, public interest advocates and individual users around the world, in what it calls a “multi-stakeholder process.”
So lads, our liberty is gone now. Barack Obama continues his crusade against freedom, and sells the internet to foreign countries. A collection of "academics... private industry and government representatives" means you could have foreign countries, like Saudi Arabia and China controlling the internet. What do you all think of this???
Senator Cruz' Press Release on it
by The Forsworn Knights » Sun Oct 02, 2016 7:44 am
Saiwania wrote:The Forsworn Knights wrote:I don't trust the phrase 'Non profit' after seeing a lot of people make extreme amounts of money every year without having to pay as much in taxes.
A non profit just means that an organization has a purpose other than making a profit like a traditional business would. It spends whatever economic surplus or budget it gets on further achieving its mission rather than distributing it to shareholders. An NPO doesn't necessarily lose money and isn't always a charity.
by New Chilokver » Sun Oct 02, 2016 7:47 am
About User Hong Kong-Australian Male Pro: Yeah Neutral: Meh Con: Nah | | [1] | [2] | [3] | [4] | [5] | [HOI I - Peacetime conditions] Head of Government: President Sohum Jain Population: 195.10 million GDP (nominal): $6.39 trillion Military personnel: 523.5k IIWiki | There is no news. | | Other Stuff
|
by Lady Scylla » Sun Oct 02, 2016 7:53 am
The Forsworn Knights wrote:Saiwania wrote:
A non profit just means that an organization has a purpose other than making a profit like a traditional business would. It spends whatever economic surplus or budget it gets on further achieving its mission rather than distributing it to shareholders. An NPO doesn't necessarily lose money and isn't always a charity.
Except I can think of at least three 'Non-Profits' that scam the everliving hell out of their customers and employees, even going so far as to repeatedly blatantly steal from employees to pay for the extreme bonuses of the upper management.
by Pope Joan » Sun Oct 02, 2016 7:54 am
Saiwania wrote:The Forsworn Knights wrote:I don't trust the phrase 'Non profit' after seeing a lot of people make extreme amounts of money every year without having to pay as much in taxes.
A non profit just means that an organization has a purpose other than making a profit like a traditional business would. It spends whatever economic surplus or budget it gets on further achieving its mission rather than distributing it to shareholders. An NPO doesn't necessarily lose money and isn't always a charity.
by Ethel mermania » Sun Oct 02, 2016 8:22 am
Lady Scylla wrote:The Forsworn Knights wrote:Except I can think of at least three 'Non-Profits' that scam the everliving hell out of their customers and employees, even going so far as to repeatedly blatantly steal from employees to pay for the extreme bonuses of the upper management.
And this is where I'll repeat again, that ICANN has been in charge of doing this already for several decades. This doesn't change anything, this is their job, all it does it make it official that 'ICANN does this, not us (US Govt)'.
by Kravanica » Sun Oct 02, 2016 8:42 am
by Kravanica » Sun Oct 02, 2016 8:42 am
by European Guilds » Sun Oct 02, 2016 8:44 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Skilles, Sublime Ottoman State 1800 RP, Turenia
Advertisement