To the more fun part or the more safe part?
Advertisement

by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Tue Oct 04, 2016 11:02 am

by Dytarma » Tue Oct 04, 2016 11:03 am

by Petrolheadia » Tue Oct 04, 2016 11:06 am
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:Petrolheadia wrote:I would object.
To the more fun part or the more safe part?

by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Tue Oct 04, 2016 11:07 am
Petrolheadia wrote:The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:So is driving a car. At least this is more fun.
I disagree on both.
If you are a good driver, driving is not dangerous. Maybe if it is dangerous for you, then it's time to get a bus pass?
And being shot would be always scary, while driving is either dreary or fun.

by Petrolheadia » Tue Oct 04, 2016 11:13 am
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:Dytarma wrote:I'd be more safe in car out of gas on a highway than in a cannon about to fire me to who knows where.
Sense it would be point to point with only one possible stop per cannon, you would know.Petrolheadia wrote:I disagree on both.
If you are a good driver, driving is not dangerous. Maybe if it is dangerous for you, then it's time to get a bus pass?
And being shot would be always scary, while driving is either dreary or fun.
Being a good driver doesn't mean your safe from bad drivers on the road.
29,989 People died in the US from car crashes in 2014.

by Impaled Nazarene » Tue Oct 04, 2016 11:13 am
Great Nepal wrote:...what happens when one person lands and another person lands on top of them...
Kiaculta wrote:Oh, Kar, you silly sack of shit.
Soviet Haaregrad wrote:Bickering ist krieg.
Infected Mushroom wrote:isn't this a bit extreme?
Finland SSR wrote:"Many dictatorships are oligarchies.
Many democracies are oligarchies.
Therefore, many dictatorships are democracies."
-said no one ever. I made these words up.
Genivaria wrote:"WHY!? Why do this!? Thousands of planets and trillions of innocent lives gone! For what!?"
"It seemed like fun at the time."

by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Tue Oct 04, 2016 11:16 am
Petrolheadia wrote:The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:
Sense it would be point to point with only one possible stop per cannon, you would know.
Being a good driver doesn't mean your safe from bad drivers on the road.
29,989 People died in the US from car crashes in 2014.
So what? Most of these deaths are driver's fault.

by Dytarma » Tue Oct 04, 2016 11:18 am

by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Tue Oct 04, 2016 11:22 am

by Nochov » Tue Oct 04, 2016 11:23 am

by The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp » Tue Oct 04, 2016 11:27 am
Nochov wrote:I have a better idea for public transport.
Okay, so the government makes these long strips of paved terrain, called "roads". Then people can buy tickets, called "cars", which propel themselves on these "roads" while the passenger rides inside it. To refresh a spent ticket, the passenger could just swing by a ticket booth called a "petrol station" to charge their ticket right back up.

by Stellonia » Tue Oct 04, 2016 11:48 am

by Minivanistan » Tue Oct 04, 2016 1:41 pm
The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:Nochov wrote:I have a better idea for public transport.
Okay, so the government makes these long strips of paved terrain, called "roads". Then people can buy tickets, called "cars", which propel themselves on these "roads" while the passenger rides inside it. To refresh a spent ticket, the passenger could just swing by a ticket booth called a "petrol station" to charge their ticket right back up.
Sounds boring.

by Stellonia » Tue Oct 04, 2016 1:45 pm
Minivanistan wrote:The "road" can be left alone for now, other than deciding what Mach rating makes the most reasonable speed limit.


by Minivanistan » Tue Oct 04, 2016 2:14 pm

by Stellonia » Tue Oct 04, 2016 2:21 pm
Minivanistan wrote:Stellonia wrote:No more than Mach 0.1. Maybe up to Mach 0.12 for interstate highways.
In that case, we will substitute AU for Mach.
The later I can leave the house and make it to work on time, the more sleep I can get after all.
Oh, and Sunday driving will be strictly limited to driving on Sundays.
Violators will be subject to ballistic censorship by predator drone.

by USS Monitor » Tue Oct 04, 2016 2:32 pm
Petrolheadia wrote:The Derpy Democratic Republic Of Herp wrote:So is driving a car. At least this is more fun.
I disagree on both.
If you are a good driver, driving is not dangerous. Maybe if it is dangerous for you, then it's time to get a bus pass?
And being shot would be always scary, while driving is either dreary or fun.

by Minivanistan » Tue Oct 04, 2016 2:36 pm
Stellonia wrote:Minivanistan wrote:In that case, we will substitute AU for Mach.
The later I can leave the house and make it to work on time, the more sleep I can get after all.
Oh, and Sunday driving will be strictly limited to driving on Sundays.
Violators will be subject to ballistic censorship by predator drone.
We are now one-tenth of the distance to the Sun. It's pretty damn cold up here, without any atmosphere to trap heat.

by Nochov » Tue Oct 04, 2016 3:16 pm
USS Monitor wrote:Petrolheadia wrote:I disagree on both.
If you are a good driver, driving is not dangerous. Maybe if it is dangerous for you, then it's time to get a bus pass?
And being shot would be always scary, while driving is either dreary or fun.
Just because you are a good driver doesn't mean everyone else is.

by USS Monitor » Tue Oct 04, 2016 9:36 pm

by Nochov » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:55 am
USS Monitor wrote:Nochov wrote:That's where Darwinism comes in. We'll breed better drivers by letting the poor ones be outcompeted. Aah, the beauty of nature.
Doesn't work. Massachusetts has terrible drivers, but we have the lowest rate of traffic fatalities in the US because our roads are too much of a mess for people to get up to high speeds where they will die when they crash.

by Major-Tom » Wed Oct 05, 2016 8:57 am
Nochov wrote:USS Monitor wrote:
Doesn't work. Massachusetts has terrible drivers, but we have the lowest rate of traffic fatalities in the US because our roads are too much of a mess for people to get up to high speeds where they will die when they crash.
As a counterexample, here in Russia traffic is awful, but everyone I know is either a good driver, not a driver at all, or dead.
The system works.

by Minivanistan » Wed Oct 05, 2016 9:32 am
USS Monitor wrote:Nochov wrote:That's where Darwinism comes in. We'll breed better drivers by letting the poor ones be outcompeted. Aah, the beauty of nature.
Doesn't work. Massachusetts has terrible drivers, but we have the lowest rate of traffic fatalities in the US because our roads are too much of a mess for people to get up to high speeds where they will die when they crash.

by Nochov » Wed Oct 05, 2016 9:50 am
Major-Tom wrote:Nochov wrote:As a counterexample, here in Russia traffic is awful, but everyone I know is either a good driver, not a driver at all, or dead.
The system works.
Uh....Russian drivers are notoriously shit. Every dash cam footage of shit drivers ever is drunken and aggressive Russian drivers not knowing how the fuck to be normal.

Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Corporate Collective Salvation, Fartsniffage, Gallade, New Texas Republic, Peacetime, The Pirateariat, The Selkie
Advertisement