NationStates

Posted: **Sat Sep 24, 2016 1:24 pm**

The New Sea Territory wrote:
Arumbia67 wrote:One of my professors claimed the violence was okay, because white people spit on them. No I'm not kidding.

If I spit on you, would you turn the other cheek?

I certainly wouldn't start rioting and burning shit. C'mon. A bit of an escalation there.

Posted: **Sat Sep 24, 2016 2:01 pm**

National Socialist Republic of Poland wrote:"Peaceful Protest"

These retards need to be taught their place. If they are so convinced that Black Lives don't matter in the first place, let's prove them right! Quarantine ghettos and gun them down in the streets. After all, most black "communities" are welfare sinks that eat more money than they make. The race war is soon, and the whites are going to win.

Surprise surprise, the thread devolves into racist nonsense.

Posted: **Sat Sep 24, 2016 2:02 pm**

Dahon wrote:Shooting an unarmed anyone is wrong. So is trying to burn a reporter alive in protest.

Except Kevin Scott was NOT unarmed, he brandished a firearm, then ignored instructions to drop said firearm

Posted: **Sat Sep 24, 2016 2:04 pm**

Charlotte shooting: City to release police videos Saturday

http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/24/us/charlotte-keith-lamont-scott-shooting-video/index.html

About time.

Posted: **Sat Sep 24, 2016 2:10 pm**

Free Missouri wrote:
Dahon wrote:Shooting an unarmed anyone is wrong. So is trying to burn a reporter alive in protest.

Except Kevin Scott was NOT unarmed, he brandished a firearm, then ignored instructions to drop said firearm

So where was it then?

Posted: **Sat Sep 24, 2016 2:13 pm**

Vassenor wrote:
Free Missouri wrote:Except Kevin Scott was NOT unarmed, he brandished a firearm, then ignored instructions to drop said firearm

So where was it then?

You can't see what was in his hands from a cell phone video taken from afar.

Posted: **Sat Sep 24, 2016 2:16 pm**

Vassenor wrote:
Free Missouri wrote:Except Kevin Scott was NOT unarmed, he brandished a firearm, then ignored instructions to drop said firearm

So where was it then?

Well, based on a link from that story...

Right about there.

Posted: **Sat Sep 24, 2016 2:16 pm**

Dahon wrote:Shooting an unarmed anyone is wrong. So is trying to burn a reporter alive in protest.

Shooting an unarmed person who is not a threat is wrong.

Shooting an unarmed person who's actively doing something harmful isn't wrong.

Posted: **Sat Sep 24, 2016 2:19 pm**

"We didn't start the fire..."

Posted: **Sat Sep 24, 2016 7:55 pm**

As someone who lives in Greensboro which is right by Charlotte, fuck. From my experiences with the Charlotte Police Department they seem like a well-trained bunch, at least regarding the epidemic of stupid drivers that has been plaguing them for years. Though they also seem to be doing a very good job seeing as only a handful of people have actually died in these riots and none of those were by the police.

Anyway, imo the peaceful protest failed as soon as people started rioting, those who want to protest peacefully and in an orderly fashion should schedule at a different time, or different place, because unfortunately they are standing shoulder-to-shoulder to the Rioters and will be treated suspiciously as potential rioters/victims.

Posted: **Sat Sep 24, 2016 8:42 pm**

Ava Ire wrote:
National Socialist Republic of Poland wrote:"Peaceful Protest"

These retards need to be taught their place. If they are so convinced that Black Lives don't matter in the first place, let's prove them right! Quarantine ghettos and gun them down in the streets. After all, most black "communities" are welfare sinks that eat more money than they make. The race war is soon, and the whites are going to win.

Surprise surprise, the thread devolves into racist nonsense.

It only took five pages to get this blatant. I was expecting it sooner to be honest.

Then again, we have Nancy-no-post there with an obvious name made four days ago. Methinks this opinion might not be one the poster in question actually holds.

Posted: **Sat Sep 24, 2016 9:21 pm**

Herador wrote:
Ava Ire wrote:Surprise surprise, the thread devolves into racist nonsense.

It only took five pages to get this blatant. I was expecting it sooner to be honest.

Then again, we have Nancy-no-post there with an obvious name made four days ago. Methinks this opinion might not be one the poster in question actually holds.

The post was handled by Moderation. There's probably little point in dwelling on it.

Posted: **Sat Sep 24, 2016 9:27 pm**

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Herador wrote:It only took five pages to get this blatant. I was expecting it sooner to be honest.

Then again, we have Nancy-no-post there with an obvious name made four days ago. Methinks this opinion might not be one the poster in question actually holds.

The post was handled by Moderation. There's probably little point in dwelling on it.

Only five pages in and this thread seems to be keeping y'all plenty busy.

Posted: **Sat Sep 24, 2016 9:31 pm**

Not surprised at all. Especially considering how BLM supporters riot immediately when someone is shot and just happens to be African American. Of course, you can tell they'd act like uncivilised rabble knowing how wilfully ignorant they are towards the actions of the individual shot, just focusing on the fact that: One, the individual shot was African American. Two, that a cop was the one who shot them. This is appalling. And then, we get to the point where some of these supporters begin to act like barbarians towards anyone or anything just for the fun of it.

Posted: **Sat Sep 24, 2016 9:33 pm**

Montesardo-East Adanzi wrote:Not surprised at all. Especially considering how BLM supporters riot immediately when someone is shot and just happens to be African American. Of course, you can tell they'd act like uncivilised rabble knowing how wilfully ignorant they are towards the actions of the individual shot, just focusing on the fact that: One, the individual shot was African American. Two, that a cop was the one who shot them. This is appalling. And then, we get to the point where some of these supporters begin to act like barbarians towards anyone or anything just for the fun of it.

'Black Lives Matter' and Rule of Law are mutually exclusive.

Posted: **Sat Sep 24, 2016 9:38 pm**

The New Sea Territory wrote:
Kravanica wrote:Whatever.

I'm more inclined to trust the police chief and the multiple polices officers than I am to trust this one woman.

Lel. Trusting police.

If it's a black cop is he more trustworthy? Cause the shooter was a black cop. But hey, he's a cop, he's practically an honorary white guy amiright?

Posted: **Sat Sep 24, 2016 9:39 pm**

Imperial Union of America wrote:'Black Lives Matter' and Rule of Law are mutually exclusive.

I concur. Undoubtedly, peaceful protest doesn't seem to exist in the BLM vocabulary. Unlike the Civil Rights movement in the 60s, it seems that BLM has no goal and actual purpose other than cause chaos and disruption. How BLM supporters wish to gain credibility by acting like this is beyond my comprehension.

Posted: **Sat Sep 24, 2016 9:52 pm**

Montesardo-East Adanzi wrote:
Imperial Union of America wrote:'Black Lives Matter' and Rule of Law are mutually exclusive.

I concur. Undoubtedly, peaceful protest doesn't seem to exist in the BLM vocabulary. Unlike the Civil Rights movement in the 60s, it seems that BLM has no goal and actual purpose other than cause chaos and disruption. How BLM supporters wish to gain credibility by acting like this is beyond my comprehension.

I think BLM is just a front exploited by politicians for their own political purposes. the actual BLM are probably organized by liberal organizations(i heard reports that most arrested protesters had out-of-state ID's in North Carolina). Some of those protesters are just using it as an excuse to steal, loot and commit other acts of infamy.

There is no organized political movement seeking to overcome some perceived problem. Just a bunch of troublemakers and the people exploiting this artificial tension created by the Media's false yellow journalism. Don't get me started on who owns the media, the usual liberal suspects.

Ever since that whole Zimmerman trial, ABC, MSNBC et al and the usual suspects(Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton) have been stirring up shit for their own gain(For the media, views. For Jesse and Al, political). They are trying to stir black people up against the White Race for their own gain.

The sad reality is, that black people commit far more crimes and kill eachother at a higher rate than cops do. the Media always say when some white cop shoots a black guy.

But what you may not have known is that the cop that shot that armed thug in North Carolina was fucking black. They went and made this a race issue when it is not a race issue. It's a bunch of isolated incidents where thugs are shot by the police and the media, Jesse and Al make it sound like they just got lynched by racist white people for no reason.

Here's a good question; Why the fuck aren't Asians having all these issues with the police? Why are the Asians statistically better off, in some cases even better than whites? When was the last time we had an Asian riot because the police treated them like shit? Asians are a minority and have been treated like shit in the past, too. We didn't lock blacks up in concentration camps and take all their shit away like we did with the Japanese, and the Chinese were practically dispensable slave labourers on our railroads and mines throughout the 19th centuries.

I have an idea what the problem is, and i know the solution.

Posted: **Sat Sep 24, 2016 11:40 pm**

Imperial Union of America wrote:
Montesardo-East Adanzi wrote:I concur. Undoubtedly, peaceful protest doesn't seem to exist in the BLM vocabulary. Unlike the Civil Rights movement in the 60s, it seems that BLM has no goal and actual purpose other than cause chaos and disruption. How BLM supporters wish to gain credibility by acting like this is beyond my comprehension.

Here's a good question; Why the fuck aren't Asians having all these issues with the police? Why are the Asians statistically better off, in some cases even better than whites? When was the last time we had an Asian riot because the police treated them like shit? Asians are a minority and have been treated like shit in the past, too. We didn't lock blacks up in concentration camps and take all their shit away like we did with the Japanese, and the Chinese were practically dispensable slave labourers on our railroads and mines throughout the 19th centuries.

I have an idea what the problem is, and i know the solution.

Well, we didn't enslave the Japanese and Chinese for over 200 years, and then try to stifle their social and economic opportunities via systematic discrimination, i.e. Jim Crow, for half a century (though, this isn't to say Asians weren't subject to any systematic discrimination). So, you know, that's food for thought too.

Posted: **Sat Sep 24, 2016 11:41 pm**

Ha!

I find this funny. I dunno why, maybe it's cause...

Why the hell would you try that?!

Posted: **Sat Sep 24, 2016 11:45 pm**

Ava Ire wrote:
Imperial Union of America wrote:
Here's a good question; Why the fuck aren't Asians having all these issues with the police? Why are the Asians statistically better off, in some cases even better than whites? When was the last time we had an Asian riot because the police treated them like shit? Asians are a minority and have been treated like shit in the past, too. We didn't lock blacks up in concentration camps and take all their shit away like we did with the Japanese, and the Chinese were practically dispensable slave labourers on our railroads and mines throughout the 19th centuries.

I have an idea what the problem is, and i know the solution.

Well, we didn't enslave the Japanese and Chinese for over 200 years, and then try to stifle their social and economic opportunities via systematic discrimination, i.e. Jim Crow, for half a century (though, this isn't to say Asians weren't subject to any systematic discrimination). So, you know, that's food for thought too.

Asians had to sit in the back of the bus. Asians couldn't use the pools during 'white hours', Asians weren't allowed to sit in the 'white areas' during segregation. Were they enslaved? In some cases, yes. They were also very abused and cheated even when they did get paid. Not to mention the Chinese exclusion act and general racism. Order 9066 was only part of what they encountered. They had segregation and racism just as much as blacks in this country. Though they were never enslaved, but slavery is not an excuse for current African problems in the States.

Posted: **Sat Sep 24, 2016 11:54 pm**

Imperial Union of America wrote:
Ava Ire wrote:Well, we didn't enslave the Japanese and Chinese for over 200 years, and then try to stifle their social and economic opportunities via systematic discrimination, i.e. Jim Crow, for half a century (though, this isn't to say Asians weren't subject to any systematic discrimination). So, you know, that's food for thought too.

Asians had to sit in the back of the bus. Asians couldn't use the pools during 'white hours', Asians weren't allowed to sit in the 'white areas' during segregation. Were they enslaved? In some cases, yes. They were also very abused and cheated even when they did get paid. Not to mention the Chinese exclusion act and general racism. Order 9066 was only part of what they encountered. They had segregation and racism just as much as blacks in this country. Though they were never enslaved, but slavery is not an excuse for current African problems in the States.

"Were they enslaved? In some cases, yes."
"Though they were never enslaved..."

Uh, hard to make up your mind, huh?

Posted: **Sat Sep 24, 2016 11:58 pm**

Ava Ire wrote:
Imperial Union of America wrote:
Asians had to sit in the back of the bus. Asians couldn't use the pools during 'white hours', Asians weren't allowed to sit in the 'white areas' during segregation. Were they enslaved? In some cases, yes. They were also very abused and cheated even when they did get paid. Not to mention the Chinese exclusion act and general racism. Order 9066 was only part of what they encountered. They had segregation and racism just as much as blacks in this country. Though they were never enslaved, but slavery is not an excuse for current African problems in the States.

"Were they enslaved? In some cases, yes."
"Though they were never enslaved..."

Uh, hard to make up your mind, huh?

Well, technically, enslaved is not the right word. In some cases, they had to work for free as indentured servants. Other times they were paid very, very low wages. They were abused and their lives viewed as..not worth much. Not the same as slavery, more akin to sharecropping, really.

Posted: **Sun Sep 25, 2016 12:38 am**

Montesardo-East Adanzi wrote:Not surprised at all. Especially considering how BLM supporters riot immediately when someone is shot and just happens to be African American. Of course, you can tell they'd act like uncivilised rabble knowing how wilfully ignorant they are towards the actions of the individual shot, just focusing on the fact that: One, the individual shot was African American. Two, that a cop was the one who shot them. This is appalling. And then, we get to the point where some of these supporters begin to act like barbarians towards anyone or anything just for the fun of it.

I know, right. They should be more like white people and find legitimate things to riot about.

Like pumpkins.

Posted: **Sun Sep 25, 2016 12:43 am**

Vassenor wrote:
Montesardo-East Adanzi wrote:Not surprised at all. Especially considering how BLM supporters riot immediately when someone is shot and just happens to be African American. Of course, you can tell they'd act like uncivilised rabble knowing how wilfully ignorant they are towards the actions of the individual shot, just focusing on the fact that: One, the individual shot was African American. Two, that a cop was the one who shot them. This is appalling. And then, we get to the point where some of these supporters begin to act like barbarians towards anyone or anything just for the fun of it.

I know, right. They should be more like white people and find legitimate things to riot about.

Like pumpkins.

This excuses it how? Both the example you have provided and the riots taking place conducted by BLM supporters are extremely stupid.
I don't see the point of this post.

NationStates

Charlotte Protests And Riots Thread