Updated: Multiple terror attacks across US

by **Kravanica** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 5:51 am

Thermodolia wrote:
Kravanica wrote:The Minnesota stabbed referenced Allah according to the police chief, and an ISIS wing claimed responsibility. That's about it. Nothing else on the other two attacks.

The Minnesota and NY/NJ attacks aren't related though.

I know. That's why I said there's nothing else on the other attacks.

by **Thermodolia** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 5:52 am

Kravanica wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:The Minnesota and NY/NJ attacks aren't related though.

I know. That's why I said there's nothing else on the other attacks.

Clarifying, just in case

by **European Guilds** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 6:02 am

Thermodolia wrote:
Freefall11111 wrote:

You both realise the response to this will be "yes, but if you ban all immigrants, then there's no problem"?

Ok but what if he entered as a tourist and overstated his visa? What do we do then? Become best Korea?

Trump will make America into an even better Best Korea than Best Korea! We'll be the best Best Korea!

by **Implacable Death** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 6:02 am

Vassenor wrote:
Freefall11111 wrote:

You both realise the response to this will be "yes, but if you ban all immigrants, then there's no problem"?

Sadly some people have no compunctions about hijacking tragedy to justify their bigotry and hate.

Right back at you, sweetheart. Some people have no compunction of hijacking tragedy to justify their own agenda of the poor oppressed other and unbridled immigration which will always make the immigrating party better, not the regular man and not the person doing the immigrating.

by **Frenline Delpha** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 6:07 am

Vassenor wrote:
Freefall11111 wrote:

You both realise the response to this will be "yes, but if you ban all immigrants, then there's no problem"?

Sadly some people have no compunctions about hijacking tragedy to justify their bigotry and hate.

Be careful were you step. There's a lot of broken glass around you.

by **Thermodolia** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 6:07 am

Implacable Death wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
Sadly some people have no compunctions about hijacking tragedy to justify their bigotry and hate.

Right back at you, sweetheart. Some people have no compunction of hijacking tragedy to justify their own agenda of the poor oppressed other and unbridled immigration which will always make the immigrating party better, not the regular man and not the person doing the immigrating.

Excuse me. What are you trying to say?

by **Freefall11111** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 6:08 am

Implacable Death wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
Sadly some people have no compunctions about hijacking tragedy to justify their bigotry and hate.

Right back at you, sweetheart. Some people have no compunction of hijacking tragedy to justify their own agenda of the poor oppressed other and unbridled immigration which will always make the immigrating party better, not the regular man and not the person doing the immigrating.

The immigrating party is not the person doing the immigrating?

Excuse me?

by **Pranovia** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 6:09 am

Vassenor wrote:
Freefall11111 wrote:

You both realise the response to this will be "yes, but if you ban all immigrants, then there's no problem"?

Sadly some people have no compunctions about hijacking tragedy to justify their bigotry and hate.

Very true.
Tragedies are tragedies. Let's not turn it into a pro/anti-immigration debate.

Would you like it if you want to transfer to a better school, but they banned transferees because one or two sucked?

by **Jumhuriyah Hindustan** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 6:11 am

Many are gonna jump on the ebul muzlim bandwagon now.. brace yourselves, comrades!

by **Nazeroth** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 6:14 am

Jumhuriyah Hindustan wrote:Many are gonna jump on the ebul muzlim bandwagon now.. brace yourselves, comrades!

Perhaps they shouldnt make it easy for us...

by **Implacable Death** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 6:15 am

Freefall11111 wrote:
Implacable Death wrote:
Right back at you, sweetheart. Some people have no compunction of hijacking tragedy to justify their own agenda of the poor oppressed other and unbridled immigration which will always make the immigrating party better, not the regular man and not the person doing the immigrating.

The immigrating party is not the person doing the immigrating?

Excuse me?

The person who is doing the immigrating is the immigrant. The immigrating party is the person/people opening the doors. The regular man is you and me who has nothing to do with the power and money and who just wants to be left alone.

by **Thermodolia** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 6:16 am

Nazeroth wrote:
Jumhuriyah Hindustan wrote:Many are gonna jump on the ebul muzlim bandwagon now.. brace yourselves, comrades!

Perhaps they shouldnt make it easy for us...

Let's all just wait until the FBI makes their report. That way no one gets hit by the mods for flaming/trolling/baiting

by **Freefall11111** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 6:17 am

Implacable Death wrote:The person who is doing the immigrating is the immigrant. The immigrating party is the person/people opening the doors.

Is English your native language? Because nobody uses these terms in this manner.

Implacable Death wrote:The regular man is you and me who has nothing to do with the power and money and who just wants to be left alone.

You have nothing to do with money? I'm sorry you're broke.

by **Thermodolia** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 6:17 am

Implacable Death wrote:
Freefall11111 wrote:The immigrating party is not the person doing the immigrating?

Excuse me?

The person who is doing the immigrating is the immigrant. The immigrating party is the person/people opening the doors. The regular man is you and me who has nothing to do with the power and money and who just wants to be left alone.

While you may want to be left alone not everyone does. Besides your term "The immigrating party" still doesn't make any sense.

by **Herador** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 6:19 am

Thermodolia wrote:
Implacable Death wrote:
The person who is doing the immigrating is the immigrant. The immigrating party is the person/people opening the doors. The regular man is you and me who has nothing to do with the power and money and who just wants to be left alone.

While you may want to be left alone not everyone does. Besides your term "The immigrating party" still doesn't make any sense.

I think it means, like, "immigrating" as the action one takes when going through the process of accepting an immigrant?

by **Implacable Death** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 6:19 am

Freefall11111 wrote:
Implacable Death wrote:The person who is doing the immigrating is the immigrant. The immigrating party is the person/people opening the doors.

Is English your native language? Because nobody uses these terms in this manner.

Oh, I'm sorry I offended you with unorthodox phrasing.

Implacable Death wrote:The regular man is you and me who has nothing to do with the power and money and who just wants to be left alone.

You have nothing to do with money? I'm sorry you're broke.[/quote]

Again, now you're just being facetious. Or am I to believe that you have the multiple billions at your beck and call that Soros and his ilk have?

by **Freefall11111** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 6:20 am

Implacable Death wrote:Oh, I'm sorry I offended you with unorthodox phrasing.

Inventing terminology is as "unorthodox phrasing" as explosions are "rapid unplanned disassemblies".

Implacable Death wrote:Again, now you're just being facetious. Or am I to believe that you have the multiple billions at your beck and call that Soros and his ilk have?

I'm positively impacted by immigration, so let's go with yes, I'm literally George Soros.

by **Ifreann** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 6:22 am

Freefall11111 wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:Ok but what if he entered as a tourist and overstated his visa? What do we do then? Become best Korea?

Ban anyone ever moving. Can't have any terrorism if everyone is stuck in place.

What if people start terrorising themselves?

Thermodolia wrote:
Implacable Death wrote:
Right back at you, sweetheart. Some people have no compunction of hijacking tragedy to justify their own agenda of the poor oppressed other and unbridled immigration which will always make the immigrating party better, not the regular man and not the person doing the immigrating.

Excuse me. What are you trying to say?

"The Liberals too!"

by **Implacable Death** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 6:23 am

Freefall11111 wrote:
Implacable Death wrote:Oh, I'm sorry I offended you with unorthodox phrasing.

Inventing terminology is as "unorthodox phrasing" as explosions are "rapid unplanned disassemblies".

What's your point, exactly? You're just attacking me for using admittedly wonky language now? Is that really all?

Implacable Death wrote:Again, now you're just being facetious. Or am I to believe that you have the multiple billions at your beck and call that Soros and his ilk have?

I'm positively impacted by immigration, so let's go with yes, I'm literally George Soros.

Oh, then I know what you are.Apart from facetious and capable of blowing things up immensely. You're part of the pity industry. You know, the industry that somehow moves millions of [currency] around and gets so many subsidies, but doesn't actually produce anything?

by **Freefall11111** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 6:23 am

Ifreann wrote:
Freefall11111 wrote:Ban anyone ever moving. Can't have any terrorism if everyone is stuck in place.

What if people start terrorising themselves?

Ban existence.

by **FelrikTheDeleted** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 6:25 am

Implacable Death wrote:
Freefall11111 wrote:Is English your native language? Because nobody uses these terms in this manner.

Oh, I'm sorry I offended you with unorthodox phrasing.

Implacable Death wrote:The regular man is you and me who has nothing to do with the power and money and who just wants to be left alone.

You have nothing to do with money? I'm sorry you're broke.

Again, now you're just being facetious. Or am I to believe that you have the multiple billions at your beck and call that Soros and his ilk have?[/quote]

In regards to the unorthodox phrasing of which you utilised; does this not make it hard for both others and yourself too communicate?
I find it fairly reasonable for someone too point out unorthodox phrasing when involved in a debate.

by **Freefall11111** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 6:27 am

Implacable Death wrote:What's your point, exactly? You're just attacking me for using admittedly wonky language now? Is that really all?

It's hard to understand what you're even saying, which suggests you're not a native English speaker. If you aren't, then we can pop open Google translate and try to translate phrases from your native language that actually make sense in English. Literal translations generally don't work.

Implacable Death wrote:Oh, then I know what you are.Apart from facetious and capable of blowing things up immensely. You're part of the pity industry. You know, the industry that somehow moves millions of [currency] around and gets so many subsidies, but doesn't actually produce anything?

Yes, I am capable of "blowing things up immensely", moving (((currency))) around, and getting subsidies out of thin air for nothing. I'm basically a god, really, and I control the people who provide you with internet, phone service, and electricity.

Clearly nobody else has ever benefited from immigration but god-like figures like me.

by **Pranovia** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 6:27 am

Pranovia wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
Sadly some people have no compunctions about hijacking tragedy to justify their bigotry and hate.

Very true.
Tragedies are tragedies. Let's not turn it into a pro/anti-immigration debate.

Would you like it if you want to transfer to a better school, but they banned transferees because one or two sucked?

Just requoting my statement.

by **Thermodolia** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 6:29 am

New news NY, NJ bombings: Man wanted ID'd, terror cell likely involved, officials say
http://www.cnn.com/2016/09/19/us/new-yo ... index.html

by **Implacable Death** » Mon Sep 19, 2016 6:29 am

Pranovia wrote:
Pranovia wrote:Very true.
Tragedies are tragedies. Let's not turn it into a pro/anti-immigration debate.

Would you like it if you want to transfer to a better school, but they banned transferees because one or two sucked?

Just requoting my statement.

It's their house, their rules. It would suck but they are within their rights.

Updated: Multiple terror attacks across US

Who is online