Tell that to the Syrians.
Advertisement

by Xadufell » Sun Sep 18, 2016 4:35 pm
Grinning Dragon wrote:Why would anyone waste a good bullet on the likes of CNN anyway? I don't understand why anyone would get that worked up over a bunch of dipshits, christ if their shit show is getting you that worked up, just turn the damn thing off and go for a walk/run/ride.

by Myrensis » Sun Sep 18, 2016 4:38 pm


by Pope Joan » Sun Sep 18, 2016 4:41 pm
Myrensis wrote:Jumalariik wrote:Ok. You're entitled to the view that terrorism is over-hyped. I was just saying that if we assume terrorism to be a problem, Islamic terrorism would be the key issue to solve.
Also, if Clinton and Obama were so worried about mass killings, they'd start some Common Sense Islam Control.
75% of violent crime is committed by men. 95% of mass shootings are committed by men. Yet they're only about 49% of the populaton. Doesn't it concern you that less than half of the population is responsible for the overwhelming majority of violent crime and mass shootings in particular? Don't you think we need to stop kowtowing to men and institute some common sense male control?

by Saiwania » Sun Sep 18, 2016 4:43 pm
Purpelia wrote:And none of that is a requirement for statehood.

by Xadufell » Sun Sep 18, 2016 4:45 pm
Grinning Dragon wrote:Why would anyone waste a good bullet on the likes of CNN anyway? I don't understand why anyone would get that worked up over a bunch of dipshits, christ if their shit show is getting you that worked up, just turn the damn thing off and go for a walk/run/ride.

by Geilinor » Sun Sep 18, 2016 4:47 pm
Xadufell wrote:Myrensis wrote:
Of course, the Syrians are also Muslims, which is weird, because why would the violent Islamic hivemind dedicated to the destruction of western civilization be fighting itself?
That's like asking: Why did the Christians oppress other Christians?
Religious infighting doesn't help any religions' image, certainly no less Islam's.

by Eol Sha » Sun Sep 18, 2016 4:48 pm

by Novus America » Sun Sep 18, 2016 4:53 pm

by Geilinor » Sun Sep 18, 2016 4:54 pm

by Internationalist Bastard » Sun Sep 18, 2016 5:00 pm

by Novus America » Sun Sep 18, 2016 5:05 pm

by Geilinor » Sun Sep 18, 2016 5:06 pm

by Outer Sparta » Sun Sep 18, 2016 5:08 pm
Saiwania wrote:Purpelia wrote:And none of that is a requirement for statehood.
ISIS is still taken as a joke internationally. No governments would take them seriously were it not for the fact that they're a security threat for the entire Middle East region and can cause problems on a global scale with regards to terrorism.
The Kurdish portion of Iraq and Syria does not have a formal state on the map, but they arguably are much more of a state than ISIS is. The Kurds are more organized, can govern on an autonomous basis, and their Peshmerga is militarily far more powerful. But most importantly, they have a somewhat realistic path to actually getting an independent state in the long term. ISIS has nothing going for it in comparison.

by Outer Sparta » Sun Sep 18, 2016 5:10 pm
Jumalariik wrote:Myrensis wrote:
75% of violent crime is committed by men. 95% of mass shootings are committed by men. Yet they're only about 49% of the populaton. Doesn't it concern you that less than half of the population is responsible for the overwhelming majority of violent crime and mass shootings in particular? Don't you think we need to stop kowtowing to men and institute some common sense male control?
1. There is such thing as a joke.
2. Yes, in a sense, it is useful for people to try to figure out why males are the overwhelming perpetrators of violent crime. Thing is, Islam was violent from the start, and it is written into the Koran. It is an inherent part of World Islam. Violence could theoretically be a natural part of being male, in which case we would have to look at male and see what to do.

by New Werpland » Sun Sep 18, 2016 5:11 pm
Jumalariik wrote:Myrensis wrote:
And that might actually be noteworthy, if not for the fact that you just pointed out yourself how ludicrously low the number of 'terrorism deaths' are. There are 3.3 million Muslims in the US...yet about 5 of them total have been responsible for an average of 7 deaths a year, which again works out to about 0.002% of murders in the US in that time period. So tell me again how the 'serious people' know this is an obvious existential threat.
Ok. You're entitled to the view that terrorism is over-hyped. I was just saying that if we assume terrorism to be a problem, Islamic terrorism would be the key issue to solve.
Also, if Clinton and Obama were so worried about mass killings, they'd start some Common Sense Islam Control.

by Jumalariik » Sun Sep 18, 2016 5:27 pm
New Werpland wrote:Jumalariik wrote:Ok. You're entitled to the view that terrorism is over-hyped. I was just saying that if we assume terrorism to be a problem, Islamic terrorism would be the key issue to solve.
Also, if Clinton and Obama were so worried about mass killings, they'd start some Common Sense Islam Control.
Implying "Common Sense Islam Control" wouldn't just provoke more terrorism.

by Outer Sparta » Sun Sep 18, 2016 5:32 pm
New Werpland wrote:Jumalariik wrote:Ok. You're entitled to the view that terrorism is over-hyped. I was just saying that if we assume terrorism to be a problem, Islamic terrorism would be the key issue to solve.
Also, if Clinton and Obama were so worried about mass killings, they'd start some Common Sense Islam Control.
Implying "Common Sense Islam Control" wouldn't just provoke more terrorism.

by Outer Sparta » Sun Sep 18, 2016 5:43 pm

by Outer Sparta » Sun Sep 18, 2016 5:46 pm
Jumalariik wrote:Soldati Senza Confini wrote:
I mean, you're more likely to be injured with a power tool than by Islamic terrorism....
You're more likely to die by alcohol than by guns.....New Werpland wrote:Implying "Common Sense Islam Control" wouldn't just provoke more terrorism.
Implying it was a serious policy proposal.

by Jumalariik » Sun Sep 18, 2016 5:49 pm

by Imperial Union of America » Sun Sep 18, 2016 5:50 pm

by Washington Resistance Army » Sun Sep 18, 2016 5:51 pm
Imperial Union of America wrote:This is why we can't let refugees into our country. Potentially bringing terrorists with the. Infact, I think we should just ban Islam and deport it.

by Imperial Union of America » Sun Sep 18, 2016 5:52 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Equai, Escalia, Kenowa, Pizza Friday Forever91, Saiwana
Advertisement