Right Wing Discussion Thread The Fourth

[PaNTuXIa]

>A crony capitalist can be really left wing

The guy purposely crashes markets and loves immigration as a means of undercutting labor. I find it ironic that the right is opposing him and not the left.

I don't think it is ironic at all. The right has a pathological need to focus on individuals who embody things they don't like. Whether it's Soros, Barack al-Kenyan al-Marxist ibn Hussein Obama, Ayers, Saul Alinsky or any of the other conspiratorial right-wing figures.

The left (at least, the far-left) on the other hand cares more about classes as a whole. I don't particularly care about all the individual actions of one man. I want to overthrow the ruling class altogether.

And that's my point. I think Soros might just be interested in funding your revolution.

[Nusaresa]

The reason I bring Soros up is because I used to think that the elite we're primarily neoliberal or conservative, but as I dig deeper, I find that to be not true.

Rich people and the bourgeoisie aren't as uniform as they seem to be.

Whatever makes a profit and keeps everyone under our heels mate. It's all business.

Are you trying to give us alcohol poisoning?

It's all part of The Eternal Hungarian's plan!

[violent shrieking]

[The East Marches]

He needs better PR like Warren "The Railroad Baron" Buffet. That guy knows how to play the game and look like good guy.

That he does. But he's also rich enough to play such a ridiculously long game that it doesn't much matter.

That's true too.

[Grinstead]

The reason I bring Soros up is because I used to think that the elite we're primarily neoliberal or conservative, but as I dig deeper, I find that to be not true.

are you even an anarchist anymore

[The New Sea Territory]

I don't think it is ironic at all. The right has a pathological need to focus on individuals who embody things they don't like. Whether it's Soros, Barack al-Kenyan al-Marxist ibn Hussein Obama, Ayers, Saul Alinsky or any of the other conspiratorial right-wing figures.

The left (at least, the far-left) on the other hand cares more about classes as a whole. I don't particularly care about all the individual actions of one man. I want to overthrow the ruling class altogether.

And that's my point. I think Soros might just be interested in funding your revolution.

Lolnope. He's interested in buying it, like most of the bourgeois.

[Napkiraly]

Are you trying to give us alcohol poisoning?

It's all part of The Eternal Hungarian's plan!

Magyar go home, pls.

[Conserative Morality]

Well when you import a large amount of people into area with no mechanisms for assimilating them, what do you expect to happen? You'd think the Europeans would learn from their experiences with the Algerians and Turks.

Tbf the problems of assimilation are different from the problem of social unrest under a magnifying glass a la the Cologne incidents.

[Nusaresa]

The reason I bring Soros up is because I used to think that the elite we're primarily neoliberal or conservative, but as I dig deeper, I find that to be not true.

are you even an anarchist anymore

seconding this

[PaNTuXIa]

The reason I bring Soros up is because I used to think that the elite we're primarily neoliberal or conservative, but as I dig deeper, I find that to be not true.

are you even an anarchist anymore

Yes.

Acknowledging that George Soros exists isn't unanarchist.

[Nusaresa]

It's all part of The Eternal Hungarian's plan!

Magyar go home, pls.

LET. THE. HUNGARIAN. STAY.

[Jochizyd Republic]

Fuck it.

I've been a revisionist zionist since I signed up. You knew that right?

Oh yeah.

But you were never that bad.

[Grinstead]

are you even an anarchist anymore

Yes.

Acknowledging that George Soros exists isn't unanarchist.

I'm just used to hearing left-anarchists say "NOT A REAL ANARCHIST" whenever someone brings up something contradictory to their narrative.

[The New Sea Territory]

are you even an anarchist anymore

Yes.

Acknowledging that George Soros exists isn't unanarchist.

No, but focusing on individuals as opposed to classes is exactly what an anarchist or Marxist class analysis seeks to avoid, because it ends up in conspiratorial thinking like "one man caused the refugee crisis".

[The East Marches]

>A crony capitalist can be really left wing

The guy purposely crashes markets and loves immigration as a means of undercutting labor. I find it ironic that the right is opposing him and not the left.

I don't think it is ironic at all. The right has a pathological need to focus on individuals who embody things they don't like. Whether it's Soros, Barack al-Kenyan al-Marxist ibn Hussein Obama, Ayers, Saul Alinsky or any of the other conspiratorial right-wing figures.

The left (at least, the far-left) on the other hand cares more about classes as a whole. I don't particularly care about all the individual actions of one man. I want to overthrow the ruling class altogether.

I always thought the right wing was all about groups. "THE J00S" (apologies Grin) or the "other". For instance the current situation regarding people they called "cuckservatives" and things of this nature. The Right doesn't have a Porky esque character or some nameless corporate structure to hate, therefore they have to resort to some form of naming in their conspiracies of groups. Then again, I've spent too much time on 4chin and my opinion is colored by this.

[Dagashi Shojo]

Yes.

Acknowledging that George Soros exists isn't unanarchist.

I'm just used to hearing left-anarchists say "NOT A REAL ANARCHIST" whenever someone brings up something contradictory to their narrative.

That's only for actual non-anarchists, such as you.

[Grinstead]

I don't think it is ironic at all. The right has a pathological need to focus on individuals who embody things they don't like. Whether it's Soros, Barack al-Kenyan al-Marxist ibn Hussein Obama, Ayers, Saul Alinsky or any of the other conspiratorial right-wing figures.

The left (at least, the far-left) on the other hand cares more about classes as a whole. I don't particularly care about all the individual actions of one man. I want to overthrow the ruling class altogether.

"THE J00S" (apologies Grin)

don't worry, I reported you to the JIDF ages ago

[PaNTuXIa]

Yes.

Acknowledging that George Soros exists isn't unanarchist.

No, but focusing on individuals as opposed to classes is exactly what an anarchist or Marxist class analysis seeks to avoid, because it ends up in conspiratorial thinking like "one man caused the refugee crisis".

Once again, I think pledging half a billion dollars towards immigration is at least worth mentioning.

As I look at the Podesta thread, I think I'm starting to realize that Soros might just be a centrist pragmatist, which America, being incredibly biased towards the right, isn't used to.

[Napkiraly]

Magyar go home, pls.

LET. THE. HUNGARIAN. STAY.

Battle of Lechfeld 2.0 nao.

[The East Marches]

Well when you import a large amount of people into area with no mechanisms for assimilating them, what do you expect to happen? You'd think the Europeans would learn from their experiences with the Algerians and Turks.

Tbf the problems of assimilation are different from the problem of social unrest under a magnifying glass a la the Cologne incidents.

I would consider the two tied together however, I can see from your perspective as well.

[The New Sea Territory]

I don't think it is ironic at all. The right has a pathological need to focus on individuals who embody things they don't like. Whether it's Soros, Barack al-Kenyan al-Marxist ibn Hussein Obama, Ayers, Saul Alinsky or any of the other conspiratorial right-wing figures.

The left (at least, the far-left) on the other hand cares more about classes as a whole. I don't particularly care about all the individual actions of one man. I want to overthrow the ruling class altogether.

I always thought the right wing was all about groups. "THE J00S" (apologies Grin) or the "other". For instance the current situation regarding people they called "cuckservatives" and things of this nature. The Right doesn't have a Porky esque character or some nameless corporate structure to hate, therefore they have to resort to some form of naming in their conspiracies of groups. Then again, I've spent too much time on 4chin and my opinion is colored by this.

I think this is a more classic right-wing way of painting enemies. Maybe 4chan is reviving this.

I'm talking more about mainstream, American conservatism. Bill O'Reilly could talk for days about how Saul Alinsky literally did everything from 9/11 to the 2008 crash to the Holocaust to the Crusades.

[Nusaresa]

LET. THE. HUNGARIAN. STAY.

Battle of Lechfeld 2.0 nao.

LET THE MAGYAR RULE

[Grinstead]

I'm just used to hearing left-anarchists say "NOT A REAL ANARCHIST" whenever someone brings up something contradictory to their narrative.

That's only for actual non-anarchists, such as you.

No
True
Scotsman

[The East Marches]

I always thought the right wing was all about groups. "THE J00S" (apologies Grin) or the "other". For instance the current situation regarding people they called "cuckservatives" and things of this nature. The Right doesn't have a Porky esque character or some nameless corporate structure to hate, therefore they have to resort to some form of naming in their conspiracies of groups. Then again, I've spent too much time on 4chin and my opinion is colored by this.

I think this is a more classic right-wing way of painting enemies. Maybe 4chan is reviving this.

I'm talking more about mainstream, American conservatism. Bill O'Reilly could talk for days about how Saul Alinsky literally did everything from 9/11 to the 2008 crash to the Holocaust to the Crusades.

Oh yes in the case of right wing mainstream, you are quite correct.

[PaNTuXIa]

I'm just used to hearing left-anarchists say "NOT A REAL ANARCHIST" whenever someone brings up something contradictory to their narrative.

That's only for actual non-anarchists, such as you.

Why is anarcho-capitalism not anarchism? It's a shit ideology, and many of it's subscribers aren't actually anarchists, but authoritarian rightists, but nothing in anarcho-capitalism is inherently against anarchism.

[Unnamed island state]

Time for a new topic.

What are your thoughts on quantitative easing?