Ameriganastan wrote:20K fine for a basic sack. Not just a penalty. A fine for what is a pretty light sack. Welcome to the modern NFL folks.
Yeah. That's a big pile of money to pay for a big pile of nothing.
Advertisement
by Idzequitch » Sun Aug 26, 2018 5:11 pm
Ameriganastan wrote:20K fine for a basic sack. Not just a penalty. A fine for what is a pretty light sack. Welcome to the modern NFL folks.
by Ranoria » Sun Aug 26, 2018 6:17 pm
Ameriganastan wrote:20K fine for a basic sack. Not just a penalty. A fine for what is a pretty light sack. Welcome to the modern NFL folks.
by Ameriganastan » Sun Aug 26, 2018 9:57 pm
Edward Richtofen wrote:Ameri's so tough that he criticized an Insane Asylum and was promptly let out
Sinovet wrote:Ameri's like Honey badger. He don't give a fuck.
Krazakistan wrote: He is a force of negativity for the sake of negativity
Onocarcass wrote:Trying to change Ameri, is like trying to drag a 2 ton block of lead with your d**k.
Immoren wrote:When Ameri says something is shit it's good and when Ameri says some thing is good it's great. *nods*
by Greater vakolicci haven » Mon Aug 27, 2018 1:44 am
Ranoria wrote:Ameriganastan wrote:20K fine for a basic sack. Not just a penalty. A fine for what is a pretty light sack. Welcome to the modern NFL folks.
It's honestly ridiculous. At this rate, the league's going to lose the violence and grit that make football what it is. Really sad, honestly.
by Idzequitch » Mon Aug 27, 2018 9:41 pm
by United Kingdom of Poland » Mon Aug 27, 2018 9:56 pm
Idzequitch wrote:The Giants have locked up Odell Beckham for the foreseeable future. Beckham and the Giants have agreed to a 5-year, $95,000,000 contract extension. $65 million of that contract is guaranteed.
by Idzequitch » Mon Aug 27, 2018 10:36 pm
United Kingdom of Poland wrote:Idzequitch wrote:The Giants have locked up Odell Beckham for the foreseeable future. Beckham and the Giants have agreed to a 5-year, $95,000,000 contract extension. $65 million of that contract is guaranteed.
Why do I imagine the steelers front office just shit bricks after seeing that headline.
by United Kingdom of Poland » Mon Aug 27, 2018 11:00 pm
Idzequitch wrote:United Kingdom of Poland wrote:Why do I imagine the steelers front office just shit bricks after seeing that headline.
Odell is making an average of $19 million/yr on this new contract. Brown is under contract for four more years, and already making an average of $17 million/yr.
So yes, the price tag goes up (as it always seems to do) but not too hugely (by NFL standards, that is. $2 million might as well be infinity as far as I would be concerned )
by Idzequitch » Mon Aug 27, 2018 11:50 pm
United Kingdom of Poland wrote:Idzequitch wrote:Odell is making an average of $19 million/yr on this new contract. Brown is under contract for four more years, and already making an average of $17 million/yr.
So yes, the price tag goes up (as it always seems to do) but not too hugely (by NFL standards, that is. $2 million might as well be infinity as far as I would be concerned )
I was thinking more Bell and Primadonna squad that is the rest of thier recieving corp
by Datlofff » Tue Aug 28, 2018 8:02 am
Idzequitch wrote:The Giants have locked up Odell Beckham for the foreseeable future. Beckham and the Giants have agreed to a 5-year, $95,000,000 contract extension. $65 million of that contract is guaranteed.
by Luminesa » Tue Aug 28, 2018 9:13 am
United Kingdom of Poland wrote:Idzequitch wrote:The Giants have locked up Odell Beckham for the foreseeable future. Beckham and the Giants have agreed to a 5-year, $95,000,000 contract extension. $65 million of that contract is guaranteed.
Why do I imagine the steelers front office just shit bricks after seeing that headline.
by Baltimore-Ravens » Tue Aug 28, 2018 9:53 am
by Greater vakolicci haven » Tue Aug 28, 2018 10:59 am
Baltimore-Ravens wrote:Luminesa wrote:I mean, those are some huge numbers.
Wow. That's a bunch of cabbage for Beckham. I wonder if there are any interesting clauses in his contract about conduct.
Ravens trade Kam Correa to Titans for draft pick
The guy was great against 2nd & 3rd tier talent in the first preseason game vs the Bears. He still seems outmatched by first team players. Luckily the Ravens are stacked at LB and made a good decision.
Kam might be able to latch on with the Ravens' former DC Dean Pees in Tennessee for awhile. He can provide depth.
by Baltimore-Ravens » Tue Aug 28, 2018 11:34 am
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:Baltimore-Ravens wrote:
Wow. That's a bunch of cabbage for Beckham. I wonder if there are any interesting clauses in his contract about conduct.
Ravens trade Kam Correa to Titans for draft pick
The guy was great against 2nd & 3rd tier talent in the first preseason game vs the Bears. He still seems outmatched by first team players. Luckily the Ravens are stacked at LB and made a good decision.
Kam might be able to latch on with the Ravens' former DC Dean Pees in Tennessee for awhile. He can provide depth.
As a giants fan, unless it results in him getting suspended, Beckham can do whatever the fuck he likes. Give the giants franchise a 'bad image?' I don't care: people want to go to teams based on how they perform, not based on whether their wr gets involved in a few fights at night clubs and the like. He's shown that if the giants defend him against all the accusations, he will perform for them: if they keep throwing him under the bus, of course he's going to get angry and dissatisfied with the organisation.
by Idzequitch » Tue Aug 28, 2018 12:34 pm
Baltimore-Ravens wrote:Greater vakolicci haven wrote:As a giants fan, unless it results in him getting suspended, Beckham can do whatever the fuck he likes. Give the giants franchise a 'bad image?' I don't care: people want to go to teams based on how they perform, not based on whether their wr gets involved in a few fights at night clubs and the like. He's shown that if the giants defend him against all the accusations, he will perform for them: if they keep throwing him under the bus, of course he's going to get angry and dissatisfied with the organisation.
Your caveat is Beckham getting an NFL suspension. Ok. Fact is a player can get suspended pretty easily.
What if he takes a knee? lol.
$95 million is also the most $$$ I've seen going to a non-QB on a fucking team that won only 3 measly games last season. And it's not like the giants have been to the promised land with Beckham.
I feel from past experiences with many players the extra money will not make him a better player, maybe worse. OTOH, if nobody on defense is allowed to tackle anymore, he could go wild and then he'll want more $$$.
by Greater vakolicci haven » Tue Aug 28, 2018 1:00 pm
Idzequitch wrote:Baltimore-Ravens wrote:
Your caveat is Beckham getting an NFL suspension. Ok. Fact is a player can get suspended pretty easily.
What if he takes a knee? lol.
$95 million is also the most $$$ I've seen going to a non-QB on a fucking team that won only 3 measly games last season. And it's not like the giants have been to the promised land with Beckham.
I feel from past experiences with many players the extra money will not make him a better player, maybe worse. OTOH, if nobody on defense is allowed to tackle anymore, he could go wild and then he'll want more $$$.
The thing I don't understand is that the bigger these star player contracts are, the less cap room the team has to put any decent talent around the star player. So depending on the team (and in Beckham's case, I wouldn't trust NYG to do this) might it not make sense for an elite guy to take a middling contract so the team can attract more talent?
Of course, I'm taking the old fashioned approach and assuming that winning is more important than the dollar signs. Silly me.
by Baltimore-Ravens » Tue Aug 28, 2018 1:01 pm
Idzequitch wrote:Baltimore-Ravens wrote:
Your caveat is Beckham getting an NFL suspension. Ok. Fact is a player can get suspended pretty easily.
What if he takes a knee? lol.
$95 million is also the most $$$ I've seen going to a non-QB on a fucking team that won only 3 measly games last season. And it's not like the giants have been to the promised land with Beckham.
I feel from past experiences with many players the extra money will not make him a better player, maybe worse. OTOH, if nobody on defense is allowed to tackle anymore, he could go wild and then he'll want more $$$.
The thing I don't understand is that the bigger these star player contracts are, the less cap room the team has to put any decent talent around the star player. So depending on the team (and in Beckham's case, I wouldn't trust NYG to do this) might it not make sense for an elite guy to take a middling contract so the team can attract more talent?
Of course, I'm taking the old fashioned approach and assuming that winning is more important than the dollar signs. Silly me.
by Idzequitch » Tue Aug 28, 2018 1:03 pm
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:Idzequitch wrote:The thing I don't understand is that the bigger these star player contracts are, the less cap room the team has to put any decent talent around the star player. So depending on the team (and in Beckham's case, I wouldn't trust NYG to do this) might it not make sense for an elite guy to take a middling contract so the team can attract more talent?
Of course, I'm taking the old fashioned approach and assuming that winning is more important than the dollar signs. Silly me.
Beckham was very much in the situation of 'pay me like a whole small caribian country or I'll find someone else who will.'
by Baltimore-Ravens » Tue Aug 28, 2018 1:08 pm
Idzequitch wrote:Greater vakolicci haven wrote:Beckham was very much in the situation of 'pay me like a whole small caribian country or I'll find someone else who will.'
And he'd better enjoy that small Caribbean country, because in so doing, I believe he has handicapped his chances of playing in meaningful games in January, much less February.
by Greater vakolicci haven » Tue Aug 28, 2018 1:34 pm
Idzequitch wrote:Greater vakolicci haven wrote:Beckham was very much in the situation of 'pay me like a whole small caribian country or I'll find someone else who will.'
And he'd better enjoy that small Caribbean country, because in so doing, I believe he has handicapped his chances of playing in meaningful games in January, much less February.
by Baltimore-Ravens » Tue Aug 28, 2018 2:50 pm
Greater vakolicci haven wrote:Idzequitch wrote:And he'd better enjoy that small Caribbean country, because in so doing, I believe he has handicapped his chances of playing in meaningful games in January, much less February.
Until the giants sort their organisation out above the players, they could have a team about as good as a 4-person league winning fantasy team and they'd still play badly. When a franchise isn't on good terms with its players, they won't play to their best for it.
by Ranoria » Tue Aug 28, 2018 10:31 pm
Datlofff wrote:Idzequitch wrote:The Giants have locked up Odell Beckham for the foreseeable future. Beckham and the Giants have agreed to a 5-year, $95,000,000 contract extension. $65 million of that contract is guaranteed.
Whelp after these 5 years I'd imagine he could retire nicely XD
by Ranoria » Tue Aug 28, 2018 10:34 pm
Idzequitch wrote:Greater vakolicci haven wrote:Beckham was very much in the situation of 'pay me like a whole small caribian country or I'll find someone else who will.'
And he'd better enjoy that small Caribbean country, because in so doing, I believe he has handicapped his chances of playing in meaningful games in January, much less February.
by Jerzylvania » Wed Aug 29, 2018 8:50 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Emotional Support Crocodile, Juristonia, Loeje, Philjia, The Southern Dependencies
Advertisement