NATION

PASSWORD

UK Politics Thread V: Upon This Blasted Heath

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Which of the following do you want to keep post-Brexit

Freedom of Movement
31
13%
Single Market Access
62
25%
Both of the Above
102
41%
Neither of the Above
53
21%
 
Total votes : 248

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Thu Nov 24, 2016 3:02 pm

Philjia wrote:
Souseiseki wrote:https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CyBpBmyXcAEpyIi.jpg


The Daily Mail - "It's the immigrants"

That's...

So close to legitimising the killing. I think that just skirts outside of supporting it.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Hurdergaryp
Post Czar
 
Posts: 49267
Founded: Jul 10, 2016
Democratic Socialists

Postby Hurdergaryp » Thu Nov 24, 2016 3:07 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Philjia wrote:The Daily Mail - "It's the immigrants"

That's...

So close to legitimising the killing. I think that just skirts outside of supporting it.

When you're the newspaper that loudly proclaims that judges are the enemies of the people, it only is fair to do what you can in order to reinvent a vile neonazi murderer as a Brexit hero.


“Everything under heaven is in utter chaos; the situation is excellent.”
Mao Zedong

User avatar
MERIZoC
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23694
Founded: Dec 05, 2013
Left-wing Utopia

Postby MERIZoC » Thu Nov 24, 2016 3:09 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Philjia wrote:
The Daily Mail - "It's the immigrants"

That's...

So close to legitimising the killing. I think that just skirts outside of supporting it.

It's really worrying. Never mind legitimizing white supremacy, this is straight up providing excuses for it.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163891
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Thu Nov 24, 2016 3:29 pm

Union of Despotistan wrote:
Ifreann wrote:I thought the point was to get more British doctors working in the NHS.


Why not both ?

We form people who wants to work here, or we force them for a few years while we refuse formation to those who would simply leave the second they graduated.

I already pointed out how forcing people to work in the NHS if they study medicine in the UK would just lead to fewer people studying medicine in the UK.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42051
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Fartsniffage » Thu Nov 24, 2016 3:32 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Union of Despotistan wrote:
Why not both ?

We form people who wants to work here, or we force them for a few years while we refuse formation to those who would simply leave the second they graduated.

I already pointed out how forcing people to work in the NHS if they study medicine in the UK would just lead to fewer people studying medicine in the UK.


Not really. A British medical degree is one of the most highly respected in the world. There's a reason so many rich foreigners send their kids to study medicine here. Maybe getting a few years work out of them before they go home wouldn't be a terrible idea.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163891
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Thu Nov 24, 2016 3:42 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Ifreann wrote:I already pointed out how forcing people to work in the NHS if they study medicine in the UK would just lead to fewer people studying medicine in the UK.


Not really. A British medical degree is one of the most highly respected in the world. There's a reason so many rich foreigners send their kids to study medicine here. Maybe getting a few years work out of them before they go home wouldn't be a terrible idea.

I expect that at least some of the rich foreigners in question would send their kids somewhere else to study to be doctors if it meant they could start their careers immediately after qualifying rather than having to put up with however many years of being an NHS junior doctor.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Thu Nov 24, 2016 3:43 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
Ifreann wrote:I already pointed out how forcing people to work in the NHS if they study medicine in the UK would just lead to fewer people studying medicine in the UK.


Not really. A British medical degree is one of the most highly respected in the world. There's a reason so many rich foreigners send their kids to study medicine here. Maybe getting a few years work out of them before they go home wouldn't be a terrible idea.

Some would choose to send their children to the US instead. Some foreign parents may decide to try and fill this gap in foreign medicine students.

Many home students probably wouldn't bother, leaving us with a shortfall.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42051
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Fartsniffage » Thu Nov 24, 2016 3:48 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
Not really. A British medical degree is one of the most highly respected in the world. There's a reason so many rich foreigners send their kids to study medicine here. Maybe getting a few years work out of them before they go home wouldn't be a terrible idea.

I expect that at least some of the rich foreigners in question would send their kids somewhere else to study to be doctors if it meant they could start their careers immediately after qualifying rather than having to put up with however many years of being an NHS junior doctor.


So we fall back on the about 10 to 1 ratio of applicants to places for medicine. It costs the NHS around £600,000 to get a doctor through FO2 status, I don't think it's completely unfair that the taxpayer should see some returns on that investment.

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Thu Nov 24, 2016 3:55 pm

Union of Despotistan wrote:
Eastfield Lodge wrote:There's just not enough high-quality interest back in the UK, and coupled with the fact that we're also one of the biggest exporters of doctors as well, we have a massive shortfall.
And it's not just doctors, we're importing like 20% of our nurses as well.


I've often seen the idea of forcing newly graduated medical students to work at least X amount (Let's say 5 to 10 years) of time in the country that formed them before being allowed to leave the country. It seems harsh, but considering their formation and salary are being paid with taxpayer's money, I think it's an idea that should strongly be considered.


That will outright reduce the numbers of doctors available.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Hydesland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15120
Founded: Nov 28, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby Hydesland » Thu Nov 24, 2016 4:09 pm

Salandriagado wrote:
Union of Despotistan wrote:
I've often seen the idea of forcing newly graduated medical students to work at least X amount (Let's say 5 to 10 years) of time in the country that formed them before being allowed to leave the country. It seems harsh, but considering their formation and salary are being paid with taxpayer's money, I think it's an idea that should strongly be considered.


That will outright reduce the numbers of doctors available.


If what Fartsniffage says is true, we already have a huge excess demand for medical degrees compared to places offered - so this demand could be reduced without reducing the number of graduates.

User avatar
Eastfield Lodge
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10027
Founded: May 23, 2008
Democratic Socialists

Postby Eastfield Lodge » Thu Nov 24, 2016 4:13 pm

Hydesland wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
That will outright reduce the numbers of doctors available.


If what Fartsniffage says is true, we already have a huge excess demand for medical degrees compared to places offered - so this demand could be reduced without reducing the number of graduates.

However, you do run the real risk of reducing quality of the applicants.
Economic Left/Right: -5.01 (formerly -5.88)
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.31 (formerly 2.36)
ISideWith UK
My motto translates to: "All Eat Fish and Chips!"
First person to post the 10,000th reply to a thread on these forums.
International Geese Brigade - Celebrating 0 Radiation and 3rd Place!
info to be added
stuff to be added
This nation partially represents my political, social and economic views.

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42051
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Fartsniffage » Thu Nov 24, 2016 4:15 pm

Eastfield Lodge wrote:
Hydesland wrote:
If what Fartsniffage says is true, we already have a huge excess demand for medical degrees compared to places offered - so this demand could be reduced without reducing the number of graduates.

However, you do run the real risk of reducing quality of the applicants.


Not really. At that level the differences in quality of the applicants who make it through to interview depend on whether or not the interviewer likes them for the place.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Thu Nov 24, 2016 4:16 pm

Eastfield Lodge wrote:
Hydesland wrote:
If what Fartsniffage says is true, we already have a huge excess demand for medical degrees compared to places offered - so this demand could be reduced without reducing the number of graduates.

However, you do run the real risk of reducing quality of the applicants.

I'd go so far as to say that half of those applicants simply don't have the qualifications to meet the requirements of course admission.

I know that for vets, it's very, very common for unsuccessful applicants to do a Biomed (biovet?) degree and then use that as a springboard to a full vet degree. The success rate from that route is very high. About two thirds of vets and vet students I know went via that route.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42051
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Fartsniffage » Thu Nov 24, 2016 4:20 pm

Image

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Thu Nov 24, 2016 4:23 pm

The real question to ask should probably be, "why have places fallen significantly".
Also, "why did it fall after the Tories took power", "why did it fall after tuition fees went up despite applications going up" and "why were more spaces not created because that was probably the base problem all along"
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42051
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Fartsniffage » Thu Nov 24, 2016 4:28 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:The real question to ask should probably be, "why have places fallen significantly".
Also, "why did it fall after the Tories took power", "why did it fall after tuition fees went up despite applications going up" and "why were more spaces not created because that was probably the base problem all along"


Medical training cost the NHS a lot of money. £200,000ish for the 5 year degree and then another £600,000ish for FO1 and FO2 years.

The Tories just went on an austerity spree. Extrapolate from there.....
Last edited by Fartsniffage on Thu Nov 24, 2016 4:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 30594
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:23 pm

I'm currently in southern Chile without much in the way of internet access.

Which is essentially me saying 'feel free to start the next version of the thread without me'.

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42051
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Fartsniffage » Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:26 pm

The Archregimancy wrote:I'm currently in southern Chile without much in the way of internet access.

Which is essentially me saying 'feel free to start the next version of the thread without me'.


You can't be the only British mod?

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 30594
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:28 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
The Archregimancy wrote:I'm currently in southern Chile without much in the way of internet access.

Which is essentially me saying 'feel free to start the next version of the thread without me'.


You can't be the only British mod?


I'm not.

But I might be the only one who A) regularly posts in NSG and B) has any particular interest in this thread.

You don't need me, Fartsniffage. Fly, my little ones - be free!

User avatar
Fartsniffage
Post Czar
 
Posts: 42051
Founded: Dec 19, 2005
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Fartsniffage » Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:31 pm

The Archregimancy wrote:
Fartsniffage wrote:
You can't be the only British mod?


I'm not.

But I might be the only one who A) regularly posts in NSG and B) has any particular interest in this thread.

You don't need me, Fartsniffage. Fly, my little ones - be free!


You just said that in NSG. And I thought you were smart.....

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Thu Nov 24, 2016 6:41 pm

Fartsniffage wrote:
The Archregimancy wrote:I'm currently in southern Chile without much in the way of internet access.

Which is essentially me saying 'feel free to start the next version of the thread without me'.


You can't be the only British mod?

Well, if you're a good little boy, maybe Santa will bring you a banhammer :)
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Fri Nov 25, 2016 1:27 am

So am I going to have to think up a less than witty pun again?

In news news:

Things the Daily Mail considers more newsworthy than Jo Cox's murderer being jailed: News reports about 'laughing migrants', photos of a bikini-clad model taking a shower and the headline news that Santa is not real.

For reference, the only other paper that didn't put it on the front page was the Financial Times. The Mail, meanwhile, buried it on page 30.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Fri Nov 25, 2016 4:05 am

Under the universal laws of dibs and bants, I claim the next OP.

Unless I'm asleep then (I've become legit nocturnal, trying to kick it atm).

Git posting.
Vassenor wrote:So am I going to have to think up a less than witty pun again?

In news news:

Things the Daily Mail considers more newsworthy than Jo Cox's murderer being jailed: News reports about 'laughing migrants', photos of a bikini-clad model taking a shower and the headline news that Santa is not real.

For reference, the only other paper that didn't put it on the front page was the Financial Times. The Mail, meanwhile, buried it on page 30.

Legit, how can the Mail actually be so trash?
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Philjia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11833
Founded: Sep 15, 2014
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Philjia » Fri Nov 25, 2016 4:05 am

Reuters have found out that thousands of shell companies dealing in porn, dating sites, and diets, among other things, have been being routing their mail through Consett, County Durham to give foreign companies a UK address. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tyne-38097382

Consett was an ideal place to set this up. It's a dead end town where money is tight, so people would take any opportunity to make a bit of cash.

⚧ Trans rights. ⚧
Pragmatic ethical utopian socialist, IE I'm for whatever kind of socialism is the most moral and practical. Pro LGBT rights and gay marriage, pro gay adoption, generally internationalist, ambivalent on the EU, atheist, pro free speech and expression, pro legalisation of prostitution and soft drugs, and pro choice. Anti authoritarian, anti Marxist. White cishet male.

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19625
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Fri Nov 25, 2016 4:06 am

i still think the title should be "hope is a lie"
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Big Eyed Animation, Cyptopir, Moloto Japan, Neu California, Sarduri, Talibanada, Uiiop

Advertisement

Remove ads