Imperializt Russia wrote:Aren't Walkers and Birds Eye British brands?
That's the joke.
Advertisement

by Freefall11111 » Sun Nov 06, 2016 3:48 pm
Imperializt Russia wrote:Aren't Walkers and Birds Eye British brands?

by Hurdergaryp » Sun Nov 06, 2016 5:54 pm

by Imperializt Russia » Sun Nov 06, 2016 5:58 pm
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Freefall11111 » Sun Nov 06, 2016 6:00 pm

by Imperializt Russia » Sun Nov 06, 2016 6:10 pm
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Hurdergaryp » Sun Nov 06, 2016 6:20 pm

by Imperializt Russia » Sun Nov 06, 2016 6:29 pm
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Souseiseki » Sun Nov 06, 2016 7:46 pm
Theresa May has dashed Indian hopes for a more liberal visa system for its nationals wanting to work in the UK by arguing that the current offer is generous enough.
Speaking on the way to her first bilateral meeting in Delhi, the prime minister argued that Britain was already able to attract the “brightest and best” from outside the EU. “The figures show that we issue more work visas to India than I think US, Australia and China put together. Nine out of 10 visa applications from India are already accepted. We have, I believe, a good system,” she said.
The comments will prove disappointing for some in the Indian government and business community who have argued for more of their highly skilled professional workers to be able to get six-month visas for the UK and other European countries. Will not raise visa quota for Indian nationals, says May
Prime minister says current system is ‘generous enough’ in a move which could hamper Delhi trade talks
The demand for more freedoms for Indian workers moving abroad was a part of trade negotiations with the EU, which stalled because of failure to agree on it and other issues.
Vince Cable, the former Lib Dem business secretary, said May’s refusal to agree to any such liberalisation in the past was a key stumbling block to trade talks between the EU and India. Although he admitted they were complex negotiations, he claimed that her unwillingness to budge was down to an obsession over getting the net migration numbers down as home secretary.

by Ifreann » Sun Nov 06, 2016 8:17 pm
Souseiseki wrote:https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/nov/06/uk-will-not-offer-more-work-visas-to-indian-nationals-says-mayTheresa May has dashed Indian hopes for a more liberal visa system for its nationals wanting to work in the UK by arguing that the current offer is generous enough.
Speaking on the way to her first bilateral meeting in Delhi, the prime minister argued that Britain was already able to attract the “brightest and best” from outside the EU. “The figures show that we issue more work visas to India than I think US, Australia and China put together. Nine out of 10 visa applications from India are already accepted. We have, I believe, a good system,” she said.
The comments will prove disappointing for some in the Indian government and business community who have argued for more of their highly skilled professional workers to be able to get six-month visas for the UK and other European countries. Will not raise visa quota for Indian nationals, says May
Prime minister says current system is ‘generous enough’ in a move which could hamper Delhi trade talks
The demand for more freedoms for Indian workers moving abroad was a part of trade negotiations with the EU, which stalled because of failure to agree on it and other issues.
Vince Cable, the former Lib Dem business secretary, said May’s refusal to agree to any such liberalisation in the past was a key stumbling block to trade talks between the EU and India. Although he admitted they were complex negotiations, he claimed that her unwillingness to budge was down to an obsession over getting the net migration numbers down as home secretary.
we're going to fucking tank UK-india and UK-EU talks over immigration and people are still going to complain about muh immigration endlessly

by Fartsniffage » Sun Nov 06, 2016 8:36 pm
Ifreann wrote:Souseiseki wrote:https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/nov/06/uk-will-not-offer-more-work-visas-to-indian-nationals-says-may
we're going to fucking tank UK-india and UK-EU talks over immigration and people are still going to complain about muh immigration endlessly
Yes.
Everything is ruined forever.

by Fartsniffage » Sun Nov 06, 2016 9:03 pm

by Greater Pareidolia » Mon Nov 07, 2016 3:15 am
Souseiseki wrote:https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/nov/06/uk-will-not-offer-more-work-visas-to-indian-nationals-says-mayTheresa May has dashed Indian hopes for a more liberal visa system for its nationals wanting to work in the UK by arguing that the current offer is generous enough.
Speaking on the way to her first bilateral meeting in Delhi, the prime minister argued that Britain was already able to attract the “brightest and best” from outside the EU. “The figures show that we issue more work visas to India than I think US, Australia and China put together. Nine out of 10 visa applications from India are already accepted. We have, I believe, a good system,” she said.
The comments will prove disappointing for some in the Indian government and business community who have argued for more of their highly skilled professional workers to be able to get six-month visas for the UK and other European countries. Will not raise visa quota for Indian nationals, says May
Prime minister says current system is ‘generous enough’ in a move which could hamper Delhi trade talks
The demand for more freedoms for Indian workers moving abroad was a part of trade negotiations with the EU, which stalled because of failure to agree on it and other issues.
Vince Cable, the former Lib Dem business secretary, said May’s refusal to agree to any such liberalisation in the past was a key stumbling block to trade talks between the EU and India. Although he admitted they were complex negotiations, he claimed that her unwillingness to budge was down to an obsession over getting the net migration numbers down as home secretary.
we're going to fucking tank UK-india and UK-EU talks over immigration and people are still going to complain about muh immigration endlessly

by Great Nepal » Mon Nov 07, 2016 3:18 am
Greater Pareidolia wrote:Souseiseki wrote:https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/nov/06/uk-will-not-offer-more-work-visas-to-indian-nationals-says-may
we're going to fucking tank UK-india and UK-EU talks over immigration and people are still going to complain about muh immigration endlessly
I think yuh immigration is a pretty important factor to take into account, given how immigration is how, for instance, the attackers at Bataclan entered France. And no matter how many people I abhor live on your islands, I'd rather not see it turned into a wasteland because some people were too concerned with safe spaces than with safe ty.

by Vassenor » Mon Nov 07, 2016 3:42 am
Great Nepal wrote:Greater Pareidolia wrote:
I think yuh immigration is a pretty important factor to take into account, given how immigration is how, for instance, the attackers at Bataclan entered France. And no matter how many people I abhor live on your islands, I'd rather not see it turned into a wasteland because some people were too concerned with safe spaces than with safe ty.
Yes we should definitely make incredibly rare event occurrence with generally minimal impact otherwise a foundation for our public policy.

by Greater Pareidolia » Mon Nov 07, 2016 4:07 am

by Great Nepal » Mon Nov 07, 2016 4:39 am
Vassenor wrote:You're letting facts and logic cloud your judgement again. Remember that 7/7 was done by native Britons, after all.

by Imperializt Russia » Mon Nov 07, 2016 4:48 am
Greater Pareidolia wrote:Souseiseki wrote:https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/nov/06/uk-will-not-offer-more-work-visas-to-indian-nationals-says-may
we're going to fucking tank UK-india and UK-EU talks over immigration and people are still going to complain about muh immigration endlessly
I think yuh immigration is a pretty important factor to take into account, given how immigration is how, for instance, the attackers at Bataclan entered France. And no matter how many people I abhor live on your islands, I'd rather not see it turned into a wasteland because some people were too concerned with safe spaces than with safe ty.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Greater Pareidolia » Mon Nov 07, 2016 5:01 am
Imperializt Russia wrote:Greater Pareidolia wrote:
I think yuh immigration is a pretty important factor to take into account, given how immigration is how, for instance, the attackers at Bataclan entered France. And no matter how many people I abhor live on your islands, I'd rather not see it turned into a wasteland because some people were too concerned with safe spaces than with safe ty.
They were French nationals.

by Alvecia » Mon Nov 07, 2016 5:05 am
Greater Pareidolia wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:They were French nationals.
I see. I see.
Another bomber carried a passport belonging to a 25-year-old Syrian named "Ahmad al-Mohammad".[23][24] A passport-holder claiming to be a Syrian refugee with that name was registered on Leros in October upon his arrival from Turkey.[26] The dead attacker's fingerprints matched those taken at the registration on Leros.[23][27][28][29][30] French officials concluded that "Ahmad al-Mohammad" is probably a dead Syrian soldier whose passport was stolen after he was killed in Syria.[31][32] ISIS identified him as "Ukasah al-Iraqi", indicating that he was from Iraq.[33]
The third bomber has not been named by French police yet, but his image released by the authorities has been matched by the BBC with a photo on arrival papers at Leros belonging to a man travelling together with "Ahmad al-Mohammed" under the name of "M. al-Mahmod".[34] Like the other unidentified bomber, ISIS identified him as an Iraqi and called him "Ali al-Iraqi".[33]
All of the known Paris attackers were EU citizens, who crossed borders without difficulty, albeit registered as terrorism suspects.[23] According to the French prime minister, Manuel Valls, several of the perpetrators had exploited Europe's immigration crisis to enter the continent undetected.[25] At least some, including the alleged leader Abdelhamid Abaaoud, had visited Syria and returned radicalised. Jean-Charles Brisard, a French expert on terrorism, called this a change of paradigm, in that returning European citizens were themselves the attackers.[26] The Los Angeles Times reported that more than 3,000 Europeans have travelled to Syria and joined ISIL and other radical groups.[26]


by Anywhere Else But Here » Mon Nov 07, 2016 5:17 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Fractalnavel, Picairn, Pointy Shark
Advertisement