NATION

PASSWORD

Actress Leslie Jones Hacked, Private Info Leaked

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Thu Aug 25, 2016 9:29 pm

Greater Orensta wrote:
Uiiop wrote:Then can you at least give a reason why you don't care about this?

it happens all the time, doesn't affect me, or you, so why do you care?
The Shady Looking Vukmiri Delegates wrote:Fair retribution for what her and her colleagues did to the Ghostbusters franchise and movie. :lol2:

this


Explain your reasoning. How is remaking a movie that you liked in a way that you don't like cause for anything but you not spending your money on the movie, and maybe putting some criticism of the film online? Why is it grounds to go after someone who was in the film, and didn't even have as big a role as the three other main characters? Why is it grounds to hassle her on Twitter, then subject her to national embarrassment with private pictures, and possible identity theft? How is this at all a reasonable approach to take?

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Thu Aug 25, 2016 9:30 pm

The Shady Looking Vukmiri Delegates wrote:
Gauthier wrote:
So if someone capitalizes on the doxx and injures or kills her you'd call that fair retribution as well?

If someone (Hacked Victim) commits a crime (Association in the making of the terrible movie) then that would possibly leave them open to "Vigilante justice" as I would call it, it's fair game now. :ugeek:


What was the crime, here? If acting in a non-lead role in a shitty movie was a crime, then you'd have to turn your efforts to everyone in Hollywood from the most critically and commercially successful actors to most day players.

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Thu Aug 25, 2016 9:31 pm

The Shady Looking Vukmiri Delegates wrote:
Greater Orensta wrote:That's not how that works, making a terrible movie is not a crime, as much as you hate said movie

There are a lot of nutjobs out there and people who worship these cult classics like gods, and tainting them like seeing did was bound to get some people angry, if I were her I would've seen it coming a mile away. :rofl:


Plenty of movies have been given shitty remakes without this being the result. This isn't even good victim-blaming.

User avatar
Greater Orensta
Minister
 
Posts: 2671
Founded: Jul 28, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Orensta » Thu Aug 25, 2016 9:31 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Greater Orensta wrote:it happens all the time, doesn't affect me, or you, so why do you care?

this


Explain your reasoning. How is remaking a movie that you liked in a way that you don't like cause for anything but you not spending your money on the movie, and maybe putting some criticism of the film online? Why is it grounds to go after someone who was in the film, and didn't even have as big a role as the three other main characters? Why is it grounds to hassle her on Twitter, then subject her to national embarrassment with private pictures, and possible identity theft? How is this at all a reasonable approach to take?

sarcasm
i didn't like the new ghostbusters, but i wouldn't condone doxxing, but i don't feel bad for her
Last edited by Greater Orensta on Thu Aug 25, 2016 9:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
R.I.P
~Kurt, Layne, Scott, Chris~

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Thu Aug 25, 2016 9:32 pm

Greater Orensta wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Explain your reasoning. How is remaking a movie that you liked in a way that you don't like cause for anything but you not spending your money on the movie, and maybe putting some criticism of the film online? Why is it grounds to go after someone who was in the film, and didn't even have as big a role as the three other main characters? Why is it grounds to hassle her on Twitter, then subject her to national embarrassment with private pictures, and possible identity theft? How is this at all a reasonable approach to take?

sarcasm
i didn't like the new ghostbusters, but i wouldn't condone it, but i don't feel bad for her


Why not? Why not feel bad for someone whose privacy was invaded, whose private and intimate photos were placed online, and whose identifying information was leaked, putting her at risk of identity theft?

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Thu Aug 25, 2016 9:33 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Greater Orensta wrote:sarcasm
i didn't like the new ghostbusters, but i wouldn't condone it, but i don't feel bad for her


Why not? Why not feel bad for someone whose privacy was invaded, whose private and intimate photos were placed online, and whose identifying information was leaked, putting her at risk of identity theft?


Or physical assault.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Uiiop
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7157
Founded: Jun 20, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Uiiop » Thu Aug 25, 2016 9:35 pm

The Shady Looking Vukmiri Delegates wrote:
Greater Orensta wrote:That's not how that works, making a terrible movie is not a crime, as much as you hate said movie

There are a lot of nutjobs out there and people who worship these cult classics like gods, and tainting them like seeing did was bound to get some people angry, if I were her I would've seen it coming a mile away. :rofl:

1. FFS it wasn't anything good but it didn't taint shit unless tokenism is enough for you guys.
2. Why aren't you doing after the original creators? Didn't the Sequel suck as well?
3.And why does sucking make this okay. Even if thy should they would be mad that doesn't make things ok.
And finally 4. Why her? She's one of the good parts of this movie IMO. Go after the writers.
#NSTransparency

User avatar
Felrik
Diplomat
 
Posts: 966
Founded: May 07, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Felrik » Thu Aug 25, 2016 9:35 pm

Unfortunate situation, fans blame her for ruining the ghostbusters series, really should blame the writers and whoever came up with characters.
"They're all like Parrots, parroting each other, saying they're right and the other person is wrong."
- Felrik, 3:34 Am, 14 August 2016.

I believe I should have the Freedom to say whatever I like no matter how offensive without negative consequences ( free to criticise me though ).
And do as I like with in the confines of the law.

Pros: Meritocracy, Monarchy, Egalitarianism, free speech and free expression (Most of these are a given)

Cons: Feminism, people who put feelings before fact, and Islam also people who think the "Guilty until proven innocent" mentality is acceptable.

User avatar
36 Camera Perspective
Minister
 
Posts: 2887
Founded: Jul 18, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby 36 Camera Perspective » Thu Aug 25, 2016 9:36 pm

The Shady Looking Vukmiri Delegates wrote:
Greater Orensta wrote:That's not how that works, making a terrible movie is not a crime, as much as you hate said movie

There are a lot of nutjobs out there and people who worship these cult classics like gods, and tainting them like seeing did was bound to get some people angry, if I were her I would've seen it coming a mile away. :rofl:


You really wouldn't have.
Power, power, the law of the land
Those living for death
Will die by their own hand

User avatar
Greater Orensta
Minister
 
Posts: 2671
Founded: Jul 28, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Orensta » Thu Aug 25, 2016 9:37 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Greater Orensta wrote:sarcasm
i didn't like the new ghostbusters, but i wouldn't condone it, but i don't feel bad for her


Why not? Why not feel bad for someone whose privacy was invaded, whose private and intimate photos were placed online, and whose identifying information was leaked, putting her at risk of identity theft?

does it affect me? no? i don't care for her
R.I.P
~Kurt, Layne, Scott, Chris~

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40510
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Thu Aug 25, 2016 9:38 pm

Greater Orensta wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Why not? Why not feel bad for someone whose privacy was invaded, whose private and intimate photos were placed online, and whose identifying information was leaked, putting her at risk of identity theft?

does it affect me? no? i don't care for her

then why are you posting in this thread? Posting to say I do not care is spam.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
36 Camera Perspective
Minister
 
Posts: 2887
Founded: Jul 18, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby 36 Camera Perspective » Thu Aug 25, 2016 9:38 pm

Greater Orensta wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Why not? Why not feel bad for someone whose privacy was invaded, whose private and intimate photos were placed online, and whose identifying information was leaked, putting her at risk of identity theft?

does it affect me? no? i don't care for her


It does affect you. Do you want to live in a society where this kind of behavior is acceptable?
Power, power, the law of the land
Those living for death
Will die by their own hand

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Thu Aug 25, 2016 9:38 pm

Greater Orensta wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Why not? Why not feel bad for someone whose privacy was invaded, whose private and intimate photos were placed online, and whose identifying information was leaked, putting her at risk of identity theft?

does it affect me? no? i don't care for her


Ah, so you're incapable of feeling empathy when it comes to situations that don't affect you directly, then? Got it. I'll keep that in mind.

User avatar
Uiiop
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7157
Founded: Jun 20, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Uiiop » Thu Aug 25, 2016 9:38 pm

36 Camera Perspective wrote:
Greater Orensta wrote:does it affect me? no? i don't care for her


It does affect you. Do you want to live in a society where this kind of behavior is acceptable?

Apparently yes unless it happens to him
#NSTransparency

User avatar
Felrik
Diplomat
 
Posts: 966
Founded: May 07, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Felrik » Thu Aug 25, 2016 9:39 pm

Uiiop wrote:
The Shady Looking Vukmiri Delegates wrote:There are a lot of nutjobs out there and people who worship these cult classics like gods, and tainting them like seeing did was bound to get some people angry, if I were her I would've seen it coming a mile away. :rofl:

1. FFS it wasn't anything good but it didn't taint shit unless tokenism is enough for you guys.
2. Why aren't you doing after the original creators? Didn't the Sequel suck as well?
3.And why does sucking make this okay. Even if thy should they would be mad that doesn't make things ok.
And finally 4. Why her? She's one of the good parts of this movie IMO. Go after the writers.

Personally I didn't think it was great at all, but it's one of those movies that you watch when drunk, I think the fans expected better from a cult classic remake, and when it didn't meet expectations they blamed the cast, mostly her.
"They're all like Parrots, parroting each other, saying they're right and the other person is wrong."
- Felrik, 3:34 Am, 14 August 2016.

I believe I should have the Freedom to say whatever I like no matter how offensive without negative consequences ( free to criticise me though ).
And do as I like with in the confines of the law.

Pros: Meritocracy, Monarchy, Egalitarianism, free speech and free expression (Most of these are a given)

Cons: Feminism, people who put feelings before fact, and Islam also people who think the "Guilty until proven innocent" mentality is acceptable.

User avatar
The balkens
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18751
Founded: Sep 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The balkens » Thu Aug 25, 2016 9:39 pm

[LAUGHS INTERNALLY]
Last edited by The balkens on Thu Aug 25, 2016 9:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Thu Aug 25, 2016 9:41 pm

The balkens wrote:[LAUGHS INTERNALLY]


Thank you for letting the board know you take glee in her troubles.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Felrik
Diplomat
 
Posts: 966
Founded: May 07, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Felrik » Thu Aug 25, 2016 9:41 pm

The balkens wrote:[LAUGHS INTERNALLY]


Image
"They're all like Parrots, parroting each other, saying they're right and the other person is wrong."
- Felrik, 3:34 Am, 14 August 2016.

I believe I should have the Freedom to say whatever I like no matter how offensive without negative consequences ( free to criticise me though ).
And do as I like with in the confines of the law.

Pros: Meritocracy, Monarchy, Egalitarianism, free speech and free expression (Most of these are a given)

Cons: Feminism, people who put feelings before fact, and Islam also people who think the "Guilty until proven innocent" mentality is acceptable.

User avatar
The Shady Looking Vukmiri Delegates
Envoy
 
Posts: 333
Founded: Jul 15, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby The Shady Looking Vukmiri Delegates » Thu Aug 25, 2016 9:42 pm

Uiiop wrote:
The Shady Looking Vukmiri Delegates wrote:There are a lot of nutjobs out there and people who worship these cult classics like gods, and tainting them like seeing did was bound to get some people angry, if I were her I would've seen it coming a mile away. :rofl:

1. FFS it wasn't anything good but it didn't taint shit unless tokenism is enough for you guys.
2. Why aren't you doing after the original creators? Didn't the Sequel suck as well?
3.And why does sucking make this okay. Even if thy should they would be mad that doesn't make things ok.
And finally 4. Why her? She's one of the good parts of this movie IMO. Go after the writers.

RE:
1. I wouldn't place any money on what you just said, it eat anything like the originals, it's humor was forced and bland, the build up sudden and anticlimactic, the writing and acting mediocre and cringe worthy, and finally giving slimer a girlfriend, wtf.
2. Yeah but the sequel was bearable and had the original cast members. :p
3. I can't speak for the people that attempted this attack but it must have obviously made them considerably angry.
4. She in my opinion, is the face of everything that is wrong with movie. She's a feminism loving misogyny hating ghost buster bat at the same time she is filled with black stereotypes and horrible dialogue and humor. Sure it would make sense to go after the writers and brain of the movie but some people won't look past the wall.

User avatar
Capyton
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 22
Founded: Jun 04, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Capyton » Thu Aug 25, 2016 9:42 pm

Greater Orensta wrote:dicks out for harambe


bless

User avatar
Uiiop
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7157
Founded: Jun 20, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Uiiop » Thu Aug 25, 2016 9:42 pm

Felrik wrote:
Uiiop wrote:1. FFS it wasn't anything good but it didn't taint shit unless tokenism is enough for you guys.
2. Why aren't you doing after the original creators? Didn't the Sequel suck as well?
3.And why does sucking make this okay. Even if thy should they would be mad that doesn't make things ok.
And finally 4. Why her? She's one of the good parts of this movie IMO. Go after the writers.

Personally I didn't think it was great at all, but it's one of those movies that you watch when drunk, I think the fans expected better from a cult classic remake, and when it didn't meet expectations they blamed the cast, mostly her.

True except with the gender flick idea and the trailer going on there was a expectation of them failing that standard before release. I mean it wasn't great but it doesn't ruin shit...and anyone who says that should have been screwed the previous times this happened.
#NSTransparency

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Thu Aug 25, 2016 9:42 pm

Uiiop wrote:
36 Camera Perspective wrote:
It does affect you. Do you want to live in a society where this kind of behavior is acceptable?

Apparently yes unless it happens to him


That's most of humanity unfortunately. Anything goes unless it shits on you.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
The balkens
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18751
Founded: Sep 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The balkens » Thu Aug 25, 2016 9:43 pm

Gauthier wrote:
The balkens wrote:[LAUGHS INTERNALLY]


Thank you for letting the board know you take glee in her troubles.


Have you not heard the word of our lord and savoir, schadenfreude?

User avatar
New Grestin
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9500
Founded: Dec 21, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby New Grestin » Thu Aug 25, 2016 9:43 pm

You know, I'm really fucking trying to keep my personal opinions of this woman out of the picture, but goddamn do I just not give a shit.

I mean, seriously, I can understand getting bent out of shape when it's the little guys getting doxxed.

But Leslie Jones? A....*sigh* technically a comedian with more money than I could possibly dream of?

You'll forgive me if I'm running a bit low on empathy.
Let’s not dwell on our corpse strewn past. Let’s celebrate our corpse strewn future!
Head Bartender for The Pub | The Para-Verse | Writing Advice from a Pretentious Jerk | I write stuff | Arbitrary Political Numbers
Kentucky Fried Land wrote:I should have known Grestin was Christopher Walken the whole time.
ThePub wrote:New Grestin: "I will always choose the aborable lesbians over an entire town."
Imperial Idaho wrote:And with 1-2 sentences Grestin has declared war on the national pride of Canada.
- Best Worldbuilding - 2016 (Community Choice)
- Best Horror/Thriller RP for THE ZONE - 2016 (Community Choice)

User avatar
Greater Orensta
Minister
 
Posts: 2671
Founded: Jul 28, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater Orensta » Thu Aug 25, 2016 9:44 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Greater Orensta wrote:does it affect me? no? i don't care for her

then why are you posting in this thread? Posting to say I do not care is spam.

that's where you're wrong kiddo
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Greater Orensta wrote:does it affect me? no? i don't care for her


Ah, so you're incapable of feeling empathy when it comes to situations that don't affect you directly, then? Got it. I'll keep that in mind.

you do that
Uiiop wrote:
36 Camera Perspective wrote:
It does affect you. Do you want to live in a society where this kind of behavior is acceptable?

Apparently yes unless it happens to him

unless someone hates me specifically, and tries to murder me or kidnap me
R.I.P
~Kurt, Layne, Scott, Chris~

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Andsed, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Fartsniffage, Jar Wattinree, Lysset, New Temecula, Pizza Friday Forever91, Ryemarch, Shrillland, Stellar Colonies, The Jamesian Republic, The Orson Empire, Uiiop, Valyxias

Advertisement

Remove ads