NATION

PASSWORD

White Supremacist Demonstration Outside Houston NAACP HQ

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Jumalariik
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5733
Founded: Sep 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Jumalariik » Mon Aug 22, 2016 3:55 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Jumalariik wrote:I could recognize reality.


That didn't answer the question. Then again, you tend not to answer ones that might prove difficult.

I didn't think about it, though if asked I would recognize that I'm male.

#doublepost
Varemeist tõuseb kättemaks! Eesti on Hiiumaast Petserini!
Pray for a new spiritual crusade against the left!-Sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in proelio, contra nequitiam et insidias diaboli esto praesidium
For: A Christian West, Tradition, Pepe, Catholicism, St. Thomas Aquinas, the rosary, warm cider, ramen noodles, kbac, Latin, Gavin McInnes, Pro-Life, kebabs, stability, Opus Dei
Against: the left wing, the Englightenment, Black Lives Matter, Islam, homosexual/transgender agenda, cultural marxism

Boycott Coke, drink Fanta

User avatar
Thermodolia
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76265
Founded: Oct 07, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Thermodolia » Mon Aug 22, 2016 3:57 pm

Jumalariik wrote:
Thermodolia wrote:Let me ask you a question. At the age of 4 did you or did you not know if you where a girl or a boy?

I could recognize reality.

So what you are saying is that you knew whether you where a girl or a boy. Which means that if you knew that at the age of 4 that are a boy then it stands to reason that members of the Trans* community would also know what gender they are at that same age.
Male, State Socialist, Cultural Nationalist, Welfare Chauvinist lives somewhere in AZ I'm GAY! Disabled US Military Veteran
I'm agent #69 in the Gaystapo!
>The Sons of Adam: I'd crown myself monarch... cuz why not?
>>Dumb Ideologies: Why not turn yourself into a penguin and build an igloo at the centre of the Earth?
>Xovland: I keep getting ads for printer ink. Sometimes, when you get that feeling down there, you have to look at some steamy printer pictures.
Click for Da Funies

RIP Dya

User avatar
The Confederacy of Nationalism
Minister
 
Posts: 2334
Founded: Sep 05, 2013
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby The Confederacy of Nationalism » Mon Aug 22, 2016 3:57 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
The Confederacy of Nationalism wrote:If it's not attempt to disagree with biology and one's own physical existence, what is it?


It's not an attempt to disagree. It's an actual sense of identity. Nobody is disagreeing with what their biological sex is, but they aren't accepting that their gender identity has to match up with it.

I would disagree with the bolded statement, because there are people who identify as a different gender and expect others to respect that in speech and writing despite physical reality - it's a spook, in the Max Stirner sense.
Keep right -->
Don't give in to degeneracy,

My honor, my dignity, my pride above my life. No regrets.
American Ultranationalist
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it" - Voltaire / "If you want to shine like the sun, first you have to burn like it!" - Adolf Hitler
Resident Social Darwinist

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Mon Aug 22, 2016 3:57 pm

Jumalariik wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
That didn't answer the question. Then again, you tend not to answer ones that might prove difficult.

I didn't think about it, though if asked I would recognize that I'm male.

#doublepost


And if a child says "Wait, I have the sex organs of a boy, but I feel like a girl"?

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40510
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Mon Aug 22, 2016 3:57 pm

Jumalariik wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
That didn't answer the question. Then again, you tend not to answer ones that might prove difficult.

I didn't think about it, though if asked I would recognize that I'm male.

#doublepost


That still doesn't answer the question.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Italios
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17520
Founded: Dec 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Italios » Mon Aug 22, 2016 3:58 pm

Kamchastkia wrote:
Italios wrote:can you just say "BLM is totally racist and the WLM group has an actual justification for this demonstration" and be over with it?

White Lives Don't Matter, they've been systemically suppressing indigeneous peoples like African-Americans for centuries! Why does their life matter when they are going around putting the indigenous peoples down for their own benefit???

pussyfooting is only funny in the first post. Seriously, say what you mean or else what's the point of "participating" in these threads.
Issue Author #1461: No Shirt, No Shoes, No ID, No Service.

User avatar
Yorkers
Minister
 
Posts: 2488
Founded: Oct 27, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Yorkers » Mon Aug 22, 2016 3:58 pm

Yorkers wrote:
Dakini wrote:This sounds less like a source and more like "Oh shit, I expected them to just believe me. Now I gotta pull something out of my ass or make them wait in the hopes that they'll forget about it. But first, I'm going to be condescending and act like everyone else is stupid." to me.


Or I just have a life and don't really care about your convenience, but that would imply the world doesn't revolve around you and your smugness.


On this note, draft saved. I'm a bit stuck on how to count the white gun crime rate, because Latinos are inconsistently lumped in with whites. For example, in murder rates, they are counted as separate group, but when it comes to gun-homicide, it seems the statisticians count them as whites, which causes headaches.

However, one thing to particularly noteworthy so far, and this will be revealed when I finish my draft, is that even if you assume that all races use firearms in murder across at the same rate, there are still staggering differences between the races, and that's assuming all things are equal.
"Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people, a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs."
-John Jay, 1787

Dancing in the moonlight.
I wish that every kiss was never-ending.


An alternate history epic.

sa-wish!

Yorkers is a wealthy WASP playground inspired by L.L. Bean and Vineyard Vines catalogs and 19th Century Anglo-American nativism.

User avatar
Minzerland
Minister
 
Posts: 2367
Founded: Apr 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Minzerland » Mon Aug 22, 2016 3:58 pm

Kamchastkia wrote:
Italios wrote:can you just say "BLM is totally racist and the WLM group has an actual justification for this demonstration" and be over with it?

White Lives Don't Matter, they've been systemically suppressing indigeneous peoples like African-Americans for centuries! Why does their life matter when they are going around putting the indigenous peoples down for their own benefit???

That's a bundle of joy. I'll save you the trouble by shooting myself, perhaps?
'Common sense isn't so common.'
-Voltaire

'I Disapprove of What You Say, But I Will Defend to the Death Your Right to Say It.'
-Evelyn Beatrice Hall

I'm a Tribune of the Plebs, so watch out, or I might just veto you. You may call me Minzerland or Sam.
Classical Libertarianism|Constitutional Monarchy|Secularism|Westphalian Sovereignty|
_[' ]_
(-_Q)

Hello, people persistently believe I'm American, I'm here to remedy this; I'm an Australian of English, Swiss-Italian (on my mothers side), Scottish and Irish (on my fathers side) dissent.

User avatar
Italios
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17520
Founded: Dec 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Italios » Mon Aug 22, 2016 3:59 pm

The Confederacy of Nationalism wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
It's not an attempt to disagree. It's an actual sense of identity. Nobody is disagreeing with what their biological sex is, but they aren't accepting that their gender identity has to match up with it.

I would disagree with the bolded statement, because there are people who identify as a different gender and expect others to respect that in speech and writing despite physical reality - it's a spook, in the Max Stirner sense.

I think they expect others not to disregard their biology, but to it out of respect for their self identification.
Issue Author #1461: No Shirt, No Shoes, No ID, No Service.

User avatar
Jumalariik
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5733
Founded: Sep 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Jumalariik » Mon Aug 22, 2016 4:00 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Jumalariik wrote:I didn't think about it, though if asked I would recognize that I'm male.

#doublepost


And if a child says "Wait, I have the sex organs of a boy, but I feel like a girl"?

Hard to say. If they are below the age of consent, then I don't think they can consent to changing how they really are biologically or by dress.
Varemeist tõuseb kättemaks! Eesti on Hiiumaast Petserini!
Pray for a new spiritual crusade against the left!-Sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in proelio, contra nequitiam et insidias diaboli esto praesidium
For: A Christian West, Tradition, Pepe, Catholicism, St. Thomas Aquinas, the rosary, warm cider, ramen noodles, kbac, Latin, Gavin McInnes, Pro-Life, kebabs, stability, Opus Dei
Against: the left wing, the Englightenment, Black Lives Matter, Islam, homosexual/transgender agenda, cultural marxism

Boycott Coke, drink Fanta

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Mon Aug 22, 2016 4:00 pm

The Confederacy of Nationalism wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
It's not an attempt to disagree. It's an actual sense of identity. Nobody is disagreeing with what their biological sex is, but they aren't accepting that their gender identity has to match up with it.

I would disagree with the bolded statement, because there are people who identify as a different gender and expect others to respect that in speech and writing despite physical reality - it's a spook, in the Max Stirner sense.


My point is that they're not saying that they don't have the chromosomes of someone of their sex at birth, only that they've chosen to go with what they identify as rather than what they were biologically assigned at conception. Yes, they expect others to respect that choice, and it's almost unbelievably petty that people would have an issue with that.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40510
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Mon Aug 22, 2016 4:00 pm

Italios wrote:
The Confederacy of Nationalism wrote:I would disagree with the bolded statement, because there are people who identify as a different gender and expect others to respect that in speech and writing despite physical reality - it's a spook, in the Max Stirner sense.

I think they expect others not to disregard their biology, but to it out of respect for their self identification.


Sorta like if someone asks you to call them Katy instead of Catherine.
Last edited by Neutraligon on Mon Aug 22, 2016 4:02 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Felrik
Diplomat
 
Posts: 966
Founded: May 07, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Felrik » Mon Aug 22, 2016 4:01 pm

Kamchastkia wrote:
Italios wrote:can you just say "BLM is totally racist and the WLM group has an actual justification for this demonstration" and be over with it?

White Lives Don't Matter, they've been systemically suppressing indigeneous peoples like African-Americans for centuries! Why does their life matter when they are going around putting the indigenous peoples down for their own benefit???


Are you serious or are you actually being sarcastic, if you're being sarcastic you might want to admit it, if not.......


Image
"They're all like Parrots, parroting each other, saying they're right and the other person is wrong."
- Felrik, 3:34 Am, 14 August 2016.

I believe I should have the Freedom to say whatever I like no matter how offensive without negative consequences ( free to criticise me though ).
And do as I like with in the confines of the law.

Pros: Meritocracy, Monarchy, Egalitarianism, free speech and free expression (Most of these are a given)

Cons: Feminism, people who put feelings before fact, and Islam also people who think the "Guilty until proven innocent" mentality is acceptable.

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Mon Aug 22, 2016 4:01 pm

Jumalariik wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
And if a child says "Wait, I have the sex organs of a boy, but I feel like a girl"?

Hard to say. If they are below the age of consent, then I don't think they can consent to changing how they really are biologically or by dress.


Not biologically, no, but they can dress as the gender they identify with if the parents are amenable.

User avatar
Italios
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17520
Founded: Dec 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Italios » Mon Aug 22, 2016 4:01 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Italios wrote:I think they expect others not to disregard their biology, but to it out of respect for their self identification.


Sorta like if someone asks you to call them Catherine instead of Katy.

"but it says catherine on your birth certificate! so why should I use a FAKE name instead of your real name!"
Issue Author #1461: No Shirt, No Shoes, No ID, No Service.

User avatar
Freefall11111
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5763
Founded: May 31, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Freefall11111 » Mon Aug 22, 2016 4:01 pm

White supremacists are hilarious. Hilariously depressing, but hilarious.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40510
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Mon Aug 22, 2016 4:01 pm

Jumalariik wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
And if a child says "Wait, I have the sex organs of a boy, but I feel like a girl"?

Hard to say. If they are below the age of consent, then I don't think they can consent to changing how they really are biologically or by dress.

Well they can certainly ask parents to dress them how the child wants rather then how the parent wants. Oh and, children can get hormone blockers, with of course the parents consent.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Mon Aug 22, 2016 4:03 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Jumalariik wrote:Hard to say. If they are below the age of consent, then I don't think they can consent to changing how they really are biologically or by dress.

Well they can certainly ask parents to dress them how the child wants rather then how the parent wants. Oh and, children can get hormone blockers, with of course the parents consent.


Yes, but we were talking about a four year old. Hormone blockers wouldn't come into play until pubescence.

User avatar
Felrik
Diplomat
 
Posts: 966
Founded: May 07, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Felrik » Mon Aug 22, 2016 4:03 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
What're you talking about? Doctors totally perform full scale SRS on toddlers all the time! :roll:


"And when you wake up, Bobby, you'll be Roberta just like you wanted! Now close your eyes and count backwards from ten like a good girl..."


For some reason that sounded astonishing wrong....
"They're all like Parrots, parroting each other, saying they're right and the other person is wrong."
- Felrik, 3:34 Am, 14 August 2016.

I believe I should have the Freedom to say whatever I like no matter how offensive without negative consequences ( free to criticise me though ).
And do as I like with in the confines of the law.

Pros: Meritocracy, Monarchy, Egalitarianism, free speech and free expression (Most of these are a given)

Cons: Feminism, people who put feelings before fact, and Islam also people who think the "Guilty until proven innocent" mentality is acceptable.

User avatar
The first Galactic Republic
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7422
Founded: Apr 27, 2014
Anarchy

Postby The first Galactic Republic » Mon Aug 22, 2016 4:03 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Big Jim P wrote:
Indeed. It is 2016, not 1860. Time marches on. :roll:

Time marches on but we haven't solved racial issues yet.

More like time marches on but symbols don't change meaning if they're still used for the same reasons.
TG me about my avatars for useless trivia.

A very good link right here.

User avatar
Jumalariik
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5733
Founded: Sep 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Jumalariik » Mon Aug 22, 2016 4:05 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Jumalariik wrote:Hard to say. If they are below the age of consent, then I don't think they can consent to changing how they really are biologically or by dress.

Well they can certainly ask parents to dress them how the child wants rather then how the parent wants. Oh and, children can get hormone blockers, with of course the parents consent.

They should not get hormone blockers, NO.
Varemeist tõuseb kättemaks! Eesti on Hiiumaast Petserini!
Pray for a new spiritual crusade against the left!-Sancte Michael Archangele, defende nos in proelio, contra nequitiam et insidias diaboli esto praesidium
For: A Christian West, Tradition, Pepe, Catholicism, St. Thomas Aquinas, the rosary, warm cider, ramen noodles, kbac, Latin, Gavin McInnes, Pro-Life, kebabs, stability, Opus Dei
Against: the left wing, the Englightenment, Black Lives Matter, Islam, homosexual/transgender agenda, cultural marxism

Boycott Coke, drink Fanta

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40510
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Mon Aug 22, 2016 4:05 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:Well they can certainly ask parents to dress them how the child wants rather then how the parent wants. Oh and, children can get hormone blockers, with of course the parents consent.


Yes, but we were talking about a four year old. Hormone blockers wouldn't come into play until pubescence.
I believe they are supposed to be started right before puberty starts, which is normally around 10 for females and 11 for males. You are right though that 4 hormone blockers would not come into play..
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40510
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Mon Aug 22, 2016 4:06 pm

Jumalariik wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:Well they can certainly ask parents to dress them how the child wants rather then how the parent wants. Oh and, children can get hormone blockers, with of course the parents consent.

They should not get hormone blockers, NO.


Why shouldn't kids get hormone blockers, afterall it gives them time to make the decision, and is reversible. You know what, nevermind, this is a threadjack.
Last edited by Neutraligon on Mon Aug 22, 2016 4:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
HMS Vanguard
Senator
 
Posts: 3964
Founded: Jan 16, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby HMS Vanguard » Mon Aug 22, 2016 4:06 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Yes, but we were talking about a four year old. Hormone blockers wouldn't come into play until pubescence.
I believe they are supposed to be started right before puberty starts, which is normally around 10 for females and 11 for males. You are right though that 4 hormone blockers would not come into play..

Did this knowledge come from the medical experiments of Josef Mengele?
Feelin' brexy

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40510
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Mon Aug 22, 2016 4:07 pm

HMS Vanguard wrote:
Neutraligon wrote: I believe they are supposed to be started right before puberty starts, which is normally around 10 for females and 11 for males. You are right though that 4 hormone blockers would not come into play..

Did this knowledge come from the medical experiments of Josef Mengele?

The relevance of this question is?
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: -Astoria-, Concejos Unidos, Dazchan, Elejamie, Floofybit, Hidrandia, Kubra, Necroghastia, Umeria

Advertisement

Remove ads