Yeah...It's a sad place the Swedes live in.
Advertisement

by Soadino » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:21 am
The United Farms wrote:Hispanic girl, 16 yo, living in the southern US. Likes juice and wears black hoodie.

by Mattopilos » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:21 am
Arkolon wrote:Out of interest, have you ever seen a woman, or women, being catcalled?

by Minzerland » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:22 am

by Arkolon » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:22 am
Costa Fierro wrote:We're here to discuss whether or not rape culture exists in the West and it is evidently clear that it does not.

by Felrik » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:22 am
Arkolon wrote:Felrik wrote:
I suggest you go out and ask a male or your male friends ( best are the younger people ) how they feel about being demonised for something that mainly affects men, because I didnt realise that this didn't effect women much when compared to men and it eventually hit me when I began meeting victims of this demonisation, who are probably your otherwise average person, and we don't realise we reinforce this demonisation of young males everyday.
I am a male with many male friends. This would have been a witty comment if it made sense.Minzerland wrote:Catcalling and walking home alone at night isn't sexual violence, they aren't innately violent; they cause no physical damage. Why the fuck a it listed as violent.Arkolon wrote:Violence isn't inherently physical action; violence is also the intimidation by the exhibition of overpowering physical force.
Out of interest, have you ever seen a woman, or women, being catcalled?

by Mattopilos » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:22 am
Arkolon wrote:Costa Fierro wrote:We're here to discuss whether or not rape culture exists in the West and it is evidently clear that it does not.
But you're a man. The very fundamentals of critical theory tell us that that would shape your opinion, especially on a topic like this. So, what I'm asking is, would a woman say the same?

by Costa Fierro » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:23 am
Arkolon wrote:Violence isn't inherently physical action; violence is also the intimidation by the exhibition of overpowering physical force.

by Soadino » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:23 am
Arkolon wrote:Felrik wrote:
I suggest you go out and ask a male or your male friends ( best are the younger people ) how they feel about being demonised for something that mainly affects men, because I didnt realise that this didn't effect women much when compared to men and it eventually hit me when I began meeting victims of this demonisation, who are probably your otherwise average person, and we don't realise we reinforce this demonisation of young males everyday.
I am a male with many male friends. This would have been a witty comment if it made sense.Minzerland wrote:Catcalling and walking home alone at night isn't sexual violence, they aren't innately violent; they cause no physical damage. Why the fuck a it listed as violent.Arkolon wrote:Violence isn't inherently physical action; violence is also the intimidation by the exhibition of overpowering physical force.
Out of interest, have you ever seen a woman, or women, being catcalled?
The United Farms wrote:Hispanic girl, 16 yo, living in the southern US. Likes juice and wears black hoodie.

by Soadino » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:24 am
Arkolon wrote:Costa Fierro wrote:We're here to discuss whether or not rape culture exists in the West and it is evidently clear that it does not.
But you're a man. The very fundamentals of critical theory tell us that that would shape your opinion, especially on a topic like this. So, what I'm asking is, would a woman say the same?
The United Farms wrote:Hispanic girl, 16 yo, living in the southern US. Likes juice and wears black hoodie.

by Felrik » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:25 am
Arkolon wrote:Costa Fierro wrote:We're here to discuss whether or not rape culture exists in the West and it is evidently clear that it does not.
But you're a man. The very fundamentals of critical theory tell us that that would shape your opinion, especially on a topic like this. So, what I'm asking is, would a woman say the same?

by Arkolon » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:25 am

by Felrik » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:26 am

by Mattopilos » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:27 am

by Arkolon » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:28 am
Costa Fierro wrote:Arkolon wrote:Violence isn't inherently physical action; violence is also the intimidation by the exhibition of overpowering physical force.
Jesus wept. Violence, first and foremost, is physical. There is nothing anywhere in any dictionary that says that calling someone beautiful is inherently violent or that the "exhibition of overpowering physical force" is violence.
How about you acknowledge that redefining words to suit your argument doesn't work?

by Costa Fierro » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:28 am
Arkolon wrote:But you're a man.
The very fundamentals of critical theory tell us that that would shape your opinion, especially on a topic like this.
So, what I'm asking is, would a woman say the same?

by Felrik » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:29 am
Arkolon wrote:Costa Fierro wrote:
Jesus wept. Violence, first and foremost, is physical. There is nothing anywhere in any dictionary that says that calling someone beautiful is inherently violent or that the "exhibition of overpowering physical force" is violence.
How about you acknowledge that redefining words to suit your argument doesn't work?
I used your exact source.
1.1
Law
The unlawful exercise of physical force or intimidation by the exhibition of such force.

by Costa Fierro » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:30 am
Arkolon wrote:I used your exact source.
1.1
Law
The unlawful exercise of physical force or intimidation by the exhibition of such force.

by Costa Fierro » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:31 am
Arkolon wrote:Then you need to get out more.

by Minzerland » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:32 am
Arkolon wrote:Costa Fierro wrote:
Jesus wept. Violence, first and foremost, is physical. There is nothing anywhere in any dictionary that says that calling someone beautiful is inherently violent or that the "exhibition of overpowering physical force" is violence.
How about you acknowledge that redefining words to suit your argument doesn't work?
I used your exact source.
1.1
Law
The unlawful exercise of physical force or intimidation by the exhibition of such force.

by Arkolon » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:32 am
Who cares what a woman thinks?

by Soadino » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:33 am
The United Farms wrote:Hispanic girl, 16 yo, living in the southern US. Likes juice and wears black hoodie.

by Arkolon » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:34 am

by Arkolon » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:35 am

by Soadino » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:35 am
Arkolon wrote:Costa Fierro wrote:
And?
You do realise paragraph structure usually begins with a point, so divorcing the topical point from the explanatory body of the paragraph is ... retarded, since the "And?" is answered in the rest of the paragraph.Who cares what a woman thinks?
Maybe this is your problem.
I also brought up critical theory for a reason. Anyway, would you contend that a woman would probably disagree with you?
The United Farms wrote:Hispanic girl, 16 yo, living in the southern US. Likes juice and wears black hoodie.

by Felrik » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:35 am
Arkolon wrote:Costa Fierro wrote:
And?
You do realise paragraph structure usually begins with a point, so divorcing the topical point from the explanatory body of the paragraph is ... retarded, since the "And?" is answered in the rest of the paragraph.Who cares what a woman thinks?
Maybe this is your problem.
I also brought up critical theory for a reason. Anyway, would you contend that a woman would probably disagree with you?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cannot think of a name, Corporate Collective Salvation, Eltorian, Fartsniffage, Likhinia, Port Caverton, Rary, San Lumen, Subi Bumeen, The Two Jerseys, Usaiana
Advertisement