NATION

PASSWORD

Is There Really a Rape Culture?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Is there really a rape culture?

Yes and it's a very serious issue that is rooted in misogyny
102
19%
Yes but it's found in prisons not in mainstream society
41
8%
Maybe but it's not the best way to combat rape issues
29
5%
Maybe but it needs better analysis than is currently offered
68
13%
No, it's nonsense
297
55%
 
Total votes : 537

User avatar
Soadino
Envoy
 
Posts: 324
Founded: Aug 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soadino » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:21 am

Felrik wrote:
Soadino wrote:And then you have Sweden....


That's what happens when you try to bring in people from a third world country and intergrate them into a extremely liberal country like Sweden.

Yeah...It's a sad place the Swedes live in.
Rights don't end where feelings begin
This is me
The United Farms wrote:Hispanic girl, 16 yo, living in the southern US. Likes juice and wears black hoodie.

King Louis IX supreme
Le Français toujours vaincra!

User avatar
Mattopilos
Senator
 
Posts: 4229
Founded: Apr 22, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Mattopilos » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:21 am

Arkolon wrote:Out of interest, have you ever seen a woman, or women, being catcalled?


Yeah... As a fucking joke. You are WAY to serious about something that really cannot cause any kind of serious harm - you need to focus on real issues in the world and not nit-pick what you consider wrong.
"From each according to their ability, to each according to their needs"
Dialectic egoist/Communist Egoist, Post-left anarchist, moral nihilist, Intersectional Anarcha-feminist.
my political compass:Economic Left/Right: -8.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.23

Pros:Anarchy, Communism (not that of Stalin or Mao), abortion rights, LGBTI rights, secularism i.e. SOCAS, Agnostic atheism, free speech (within reason), science, most dark humor, dialectic egoism, anarcha-feminism.
Cons: Capitalism, Free market, Gnostic atheism and theism, the far right, intolerance of any kind, dictatorships, pseudoscience and snake-oil peddling, imperialism and overuse of military, liberalism, radical and liberal feminism

User avatar
Minzerland
Minister
 
Posts: 2367
Founded: Apr 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Minzerland » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:22 am

Arkolon wrote:
Costa Fierro wrote:
No it isn't. Violence implies inherent physicality and catcalling does not involve any physical contact.

Violence isn't inherently physical action; violence is also the intimidation by the exhibition of overpowering physical force.

Catcalling and losing ones virginity, as you've said in previous posts, doesn't fit this definition. A man of certain stature can fit your definition because they may be intimidating by overpowering physical force to woman.
'Common sense isn't so common.'
-Voltaire

'I Disapprove of What You Say, But I Will Defend to the Death Your Right to Say It.'
-Evelyn Beatrice Hall

I'm a Tribune of the Plebs, so watch out, or I might just veto you. You may call me Minzerland or Sam.
Classical Libertarianism|Constitutional Monarchy|Secularism|Westphalian Sovereignty|
_[' ]_
(-_Q)

Hello, people persistently believe I'm American, I'm here to remedy this; I'm an Australian of English, Swiss-Italian (on my mothers side), Scottish and Irish (on my fathers side) dissent.

User avatar
Arkolon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9498
Founded: May 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Arkolon » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:22 am

Costa Fierro wrote:We're here to discuss whether or not rape culture exists in the West and it is evidently clear that it does not.

But you're a man. The very fundamentals of critical theory tell us that that would shape your opinion, especially on a topic like this. So, what I'm asking is, would a woman say the same?
"Revisionism is nothing else than a theoretic generalisation made from the angle of the isolated capitalist. Where does this viewpoint belong theoretically if not in vulgar bourgeois economics?"
Rosa Luxemburg

User avatar
Felrik
Diplomat
 
Posts: 966
Founded: May 07, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Felrik » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:22 am

Arkolon wrote:
Felrik wrote:
I suggest you go out and ask a male or your male friends ( best are the younger people ) how they feel about being demonised for something that mainly affects men, because I didnt realise that this didn't effect women much when compared to men and it eventually hit me when I began meeting victims of this demonisation, who are probably your otherwise average person, and we don't realise we reinforce this demonisation of young males everyday.

I am a male with many male friends. This would have been a witty comment if it made sense.

Minzerland wrote:Catcalling and walking home alone at night isn't sexual violence, they aren't innately violent; they cause no physical damage. Why the fuck a it listed as violent.

Arkolon wrote:Violence isn't inherently physical action; violence is also the intimidation by the exhibition of overpowering physical force.


Catochristoferson wrote:Catcalling?

Are you f***ing kidding me?

How is that violent?

Out of interest, have you ever seen a woman, or women, being catcalled?


It wasn't supposed to make sense it was mocking your post, and yes I have seen a women cat called they generally ignore it and move on with their lives like mature women, unlike the girls who take offence off of words.
"They're all like Parrots, parroting each other, saying they're right and the other person is wrong."
- Felrik, 3:34 Am, 14 August 2016.

I believe I should have the Freedom to say whatever I like no matter how offensive without negative consequences ( free to criticise me though ).
And do as I like with in the confines of the law.

Pros: Meritocracy, Monarchy, Egalitarianism, free speech and free expression (Most of these are a given)

Cons: Feminism, people who put feelings before fact, and Islam also people who think the "Guilty until proven innocent" mentality is acceptable.

User avatar
Mattopilos
Senator
 
Posts: 4229
Founded: Apr 22, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Mattopilos » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:22 am

Arkolon wrote:
Costa Fierro wrote:We're here to discuss whether or not rape culture exists in the West and it is evidently clear that it does not.

But you're a man. The very fundamentals of critical theory tell us that that would shape your opinion, especially on a topic like this. So, what I'm asking is, would a woman say the same?


Yes, they would, unless that are the overly-fanatic third-wavers.
"From each according to their ability, to each according to their needs"
Dialectic egoist/Communist Egoist, Post-left anarchist, moral nihilist, Intersectional Anarcha-feminist.
my political compass:Economic Left/Right: -8.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.23

Pros:Anarchy, Communism (not that of Stalin or Mao), abortion rights, LGBTI rights, secularism i.e. SOCAS, Agnostic atheism, free speech (within reason), science, most dark humor, dialectic egoism, anarcha-feminism.
Cons: Capitalism, Free market, Gnostic atheism and theism, the far right, intolerance of any kind, dictatorships, pseudoscience and snake-oil peddling, imperialism and overuse of military, liberalism, radical and liberal feminism

User avatar
Costa Fierro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19884
Founded: Dec 09, 2013
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Costa Fierro » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:23 am

Arkolon wrote:Violence isn't inherently physical action; violence is also the intimidation by the exhibition of overpowering physical force.


Jesus wept. Violence, first and foremost, is physical. There is nothing anywhere in any dictionary that says that calling someone beautiful is inherently violent or that the "exhibition of overpowering physical force" is violence.

How about you acknowledge that redefining words to suit your argument doesn't work?
"Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist." - George Carlin

User avatar
Soadino
Envoy
 
Posts: 324
Founded: Aug 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soadino » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:23 am

Arkolon wrote:
Felrik wrote:
I suggest you go out and ask a male or your male friends ( best are the younger people ) how they feel about being demonised for something that mainly affects men, because I didnt realise that this didn't effect women much when compared to men and it eventually hit me when I began meeting victims of this demonisation, who are probably your otherwise average person, and we don't realise we reinforce this demonisation of young males everyday.

I am a male with many male friends. This would have been a witty comment if it made sense.

Minzerland wrote:Catcalling and walking home alone at night isn't sexual violence, they aren't innately violent; they cause no physical damage. Why the fuck a it listed as violent.

Arkolon wrote:Violence isn't inherently physical action; violence is also the intimidation by the exhibition of overpowering physical force.


Catochristoferson wrote:Catcalling?

Are you f***ing kidding me?

How is that violent?

Out of interest, have you ever seen a woman, or women, being catcalled?


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_e706l9FD2g
Rights don't end where feelings begin
This is me
The United Farms wrote:Hispanic girl, 16 yo, living in the southern US. Likes juice and wears black hoodie.

King Louis IX supreme
Le Français toujours vaincra!

User avatar
Soadino
Envoy
 
Posts: 324
Founded: Aug 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soadino » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:24 am

Arkolon wrote:
Costa Fierro wrote:We're here to discuss whether or not rape culture exists in the West and it is evidently clear that it does not.

But you're a man. The very fundamentals of critical theory tell us that that would shape your opinion, especially on a topic like this. So, what I'm asking is, would a woman say the same?

A woman probably would.
Rights don't end where feelings begin
This is me
The United Farms wrote:Hispanic girl, 16 yo, living in the southern US. Likes juice and wears black hoodie.

King Louis IX supreme
Le Français toujours vaincra!

User avatar
Felrik
Diplomat
 
Posts: 966
Founded: May 07, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Felrik » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:25 am

Arkolon wrote:
Costa Fierro wrote:We're here to discuss whether or not rape culture exists in the West and it is evidently clear that it does not.

But you're a man. The very fundamentals of critical theory tell us that that would shape your opinion, especially on a topic like this. So, what I'm asking is, would a woman say the same?


Really your pulling the "we aren't them so we don't know what it's like" argument, I can throw that logic back at you in fact, maybe their molded to believe they live in a rape culture and men know that we don't.
"They're all like Parrots, parroting each other, saying they're right and the other person is wrong."
- Felrik, 3:34 Am, 14 August 2016.

I believe I should have the Freedom to say whatever I like no matter how offensive without negative consequences ( free to criticise me though ).
And do as I like with in the confines of the law.

Pros: Meritocracy, Monarchy, Egalitarianism, free speech and free expression (Most of these are a given)

Cons: Feminism, people who put feelings before fact, and Islam also people who think the "Guilty until proven innocent" mentality is acceptable.

User avatar
Arkolon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9498
Founded: May 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Arkolon » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:25 am

Mattopilos wrote:
Arkolon wrote:Out of interest, have you ever seen a woman, or women, being catcalled?


Yeah... As a fucking joke.

Then you need to get out more. They aren't jokes. Ask your female friends what builders, teenagers, the two-three people driving in a van or other male groupings said to them last time they were walking a street alone.
"Revisionism is nothing else than a theoretic generalisation made from the angle of the isolated capitalist. Where does this viewpoint belong theoretically if not in vulgar bourgeois economics?"
Rosa Luxemburg

User avatar
Felrik
Diplomat
 
Posts: 966
Founded: May 07, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Felrik » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:26 am

Arkolon wrote:
Mattopilos wrote:
Yeah... As a fucking joke.

Then you need to get out more. They aren't jokes. Ask your female friends what builders, teenagers, the two-three people driving in a van or other male groupings said to them last time they were walking a street alone.


Maybe you've been talking to the wrong girls, notice I didn't use the word women, after all if a comment can make them mad are you sure they're ready for the outside world.
"They're all like Parrots, parroting each other, saying they're right and the other person is wrong."
- Felrik, 3:34 Am, 14 August 2016.

I believe I should have the Freedom to say whatever I like no matter how offensive without negative consequences ( free to criticise me though ).
And do as I like with in the confines of the law.

Pros: Meritocracy, Monarchy, Egalitarianism, free speech and free expression (Most of these are a given)

Cons: Feminism, people who put feelings before fact, and Islam also people who think the "Guilty until proven innocent" mentality is acceptable.

User avatar
Mattopilos
Senator
 
Posts: 4229
Founded: Apr 22, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Mattopilos » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:27 am

Arkolon wrote:
Mattopilos wrote:
Yeah... As a fucking joke.

Then you need to get out more. They aren't jokes. Ask your female friends what builders, teenagers, the two-three people driving in a van or other male groupings said to them last time they were walking a street alone.


Again, you are taking a minor problem and exaggerating to the point of hyperbole. WORDS. ARE. NOT. INHERENTLY. VIOLENT. IF you find it hard to know what the word 'violent' means, YOU need to get out more. You clearly aren't here for a proper discussion in the way you have been using purely emotional points to 'prove' a rape culture exists. Not stats, not evidence, just anecdotes and 'what ifs'.
"From each according to their ability, to each according to their needs"
Dialectic egoist/Communist Egoist, Post-left anarchist, moral nihilist, Intersectional Anarcha-feminist.
my political compass:Economic Left/Right: -8.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.23

Pros:Anarchy, Communism (not that of Stalin or Mao), abortion rights, LGBTI rights, secularism i.e. SOCAS, Agnostic atheism, free speech (within reason), science, most dark humor, dialectic egoism, anarcha-feminism.
Cons: Capitalism, Free market, Gnostic atheism and theism, the far right, intolerance of any kind, dictatorships, pseudoscience and snake-oil peddling, imperialism and overuse of military, liberalism, radical and liberal feminism

User avatar
Arkolon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9498
Founded: May 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Arkolon » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:28 am

Costa Fierro wrote:
Arkolon wrote:Violence isn't inherently physical action; violence is also the intimidation by the exhibition of overpowering physical force.


Jesus wept. Violence, first and foremost, is physical. There is nothing anywhere in any dictionary that says that calling someone beautiful is inherently violent or that the "exhibition of overpowering physical force" is violence.

How about you acknowledge that redefining words to suit your argument doesn't work?

I used your exact source.

1.1
Law
The unlawful exercise of physical force or intimidation by the exhibition of such force.
"Revisionism is nothing else than a theoretic generalisation made from the angle of the isolated capitalist. Where does this viewpoint belong theoretically if not in vulgar bourgeois economics?"
Rosa Luxemburg

User avatar
Costa Fierro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19884
Founded: Dec 09, 2013
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Costa Fierro » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:28 am

Arkolon wrote:But you're a man.


And?

The very fundamentals of critical theory tell us that that would shape your opinion, especially on a topic like this.


My genitalia does not influence how I think. I look at how Western society treats women who have been raped compared with other societies. I look at the laws, the societal views and other aspects and compare them with Western societies. And I have come to the conclusion that rape culture against women does not exist but rape culture against men does.

So, what I'm asking is, would a woman say the same?


Who cares what a woman thinks? She doesn't "suffer" from any kind of societal issues surrounding rape. If someone forced you to penetrate them against your will, or penetrated you against your will, would it not be considered rape? After all, the very people that invented the concept don't think so.
"Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist." - George Carlin

User avatar
Felrik
Diplomat
 
Posts: 966
Founded: May 07, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Felrik » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:29 am

Arkolon wrote:
Costa Fierro wrote:
Jesus wept. Violence, first and foremost, is physical. There is nothing anywhere in any dictionary that says that calling someone beautiful is inherently violent or that the "exhibition of overpowering physical force" is violence.

How about you acknowledge that redefining words to suit your argument doesn't work?

I used your exact source.

1.1
Law
The unlawful exercise of physical force or intimidation by the exhibition of such force.


Calling someone beautiful is not intimidating.
"They're all like Parrots, parroting each other, saying they're right and the other person is wrong."
- Felrik, 3:34 Am, 14 August 2016.

I believe I should have the Freedom to say whatever I like no matter how offensive without negative consequences ( free to criticise me though ).
And do as I like with in the confines of the law.

Pros: Meritocracy, Monarchy, Egalitarianism, free speech and free expression (Most of these are a given)

Cons: Feminism, people who put feelings before fact, and Islam also people who think the "Guilty until proven innocent" mentality is acceptable.

User avatar
Costa Fierro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19884
Founded: Dec 09, 2013
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Costa Fierro » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:30 am

Arkolon wrote:I used your exact source.

1.1
Law
The unlawful exercise of physical force or intimidation by the exhibition of such force.


It does not apply to catcalling. Because catcalling isn't violent. It does not involve any physical contact and it does not involve the display of any such force. It is also lawful.

So catcalling is not violent.
"Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist." - George Carlin

User avatar
Costa Fierro
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19884
Founded: Dec 09, 2013
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Costa Fierro » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:31 am

Arkolon wrote:Then you need to get out more.


You need to stop pretending that everything a woman says holds any truth to it.
"Inside every cynical person, there is a disappointed idealist." - George Carlin

User avatar
Minzerland
Minister
 
Posts: 2367
Founded: Apr 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Minzerland » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:32 am

Arkolon wrote:
Costa Fierro wrote:
Jesus wept. Violence, first and foremost, is physical. There is nothing anywhere in any dictionary that says that calling someone beautiful is inherently violent or that the "exhibition of overpowering physical force" is violence.

How about you acknowledge that redefining words to suit your argument doesn't work?

I used your exact source.

1.1
Law
The unlawful exercise of physical force or intimidation by the exhibition of such force.

How is catcalling 'intimidating'?
Last edited by Minzerland on Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:33 am, edited 2 times in total.
'Common sense isn't so common.'
-Voltaire

'I Disapprove of What You Say, But I Will Defend to the Death Your Right to Say It.'
-Evelyn Beatrice Hall

I'm a Tribune of the Plebs, so watch out, or I might just veto you. You may call me Minzerland or Sam.
Classical Libertarianism|Constitutional Monarchy|Secularism|Westphalian Sovereignty|
_[' ]_
(-_Q)

Hello, people persistently believe I'm American, I'm here to remedy this; I'm an Australian of English, Swiss-Italian (on my mothers side), Scottish and Irish (on my fathers side) dissent.

User avatar
Arkolon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9498
Founded: May 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Arkolon » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:32 am

Costa Fierro wrote:
Arkolon wrote:But you're a man.


And?

You do realise paragraph structure usually begins with a point, so divorcing the topical point from the explanatory body of the paragraph is ... retarded, since the "And?" is answered in the rest of the paragraph.

Who cares what a woman thinks?

Maybe this is your problem.

I also brought up critical theory for a reason. Anyway, would you contend that a woman would probably disagree with you?
"Revisionism is nothing else than a theoretic generalisation made from the angle of the isolated capitalist. Where does this viewpoint belong theoretically if not in vulgar bourgeois economics?"
Rosa Luxemburg

User avatar
Soadino
Envoy
 
Posts: 324
Founded: Aug 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soadino » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:33 am

Costa Fierro wrote:
Arkolon wrote:Then you need to get out more.


You need to stop pretending that everything a woman says holds any truth to it.

But what about your mom when she tells you that she loves you?
Rights don't end where feelings begin
This is me
The United Farms wrote:Hispanic girl, 16 yo, living in the southern US. Likes juice and wears black hoodie.

King Louis IX supreme
Le Français toujours vaincra!

User avatar
Arkolon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9498
Founded: May 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Arkolon » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:34 am

Felrik wrote:
Arkolon wrote:I used your exact source.

1.1
Law
The unlawful exercise of physical force or intimidation by the exhibition of such force.


Calling someone beautiful is not intimidating.

Catcalling isn't men bending over and throwing flowers and calling women the apples of their eyes. If it was, why would women think it is a problem?
"Revisionism is nothing else than a theoretic generalisation made from the angle of the isolated capitalist. Where does this viewpoint belong theoretically if not in vulgar bourgeois economics?"
Rosa Luxemburg

User avatar
Arkolon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9498
Founded: May 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Arkolon » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:35 am

Costa Fierro wrote:
Arkolon wrote:Then you need to get out more.


You need to stop pretending that everything a woman says holds any truth to it.

Better trust the word of these anonymous MRAs online then.
"Revisionism is nothing else than a theoretic generalisation made from the angle of the isolated capitalist. Where does this viewpoint belong theoretically if not in vulgar bourgeois economics?"
Rosa Luxemburg

User avatar
Soadino
Envoy
 
Posts: 324
Founded: Aug 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soadino » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:35 am

Arkolon wrote:
Costa Fierro wrote:
And?

You do realise paragraph structure usually begins with a point, so divorcing the topical point from the explanatory body of the paragraph is ... retarded, since the "And?" is answered in the rest of the paragraph.

Who cares what a woman thinks?

Maybe this is your problem.

I also brought up critical theory for a reason. Anyway, would you contend that a woman would probably disagree with you?

I mean, Angela Merkel and Germany...
Rights don't end where feelings begin
This is me
The United Farms wrote:Hispanic girl, 16 yo, living in the southern US. Likes juice and wears black hoodie.

King Louis IX supreme
Le Français toujours vaincra!

User avatar
Felrik
Diplomat
 
Posts: 966
Founded: May 07, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Felrik » Tue Aug 23, 2016 5:35 am

Arkolon wrote:
Costa Fierro wrote:
And?

You do realise paragraph structure usually begins with a point, so divorcing the topical point from the explanatory body of the paragraph is ... retarded, since the "And?" is answered in the rest of the paragraph.

Who cares what a woman thinks?

Maybe this is your problem.

I also brought up critical theory for a reason. Anyway, would you contend that a woman would probably disagree with you?


Now your nitpicking, you take little tidbits out of his paragraphs and ignore the rest.
"They're all like Parrots, parroting each other, saying they're right and the other person is wrong."
- Felrik, 3:34 Am, 14 August 2016.

I believe I should have the Freedom to say whatever I like no matter how offensive without negative consequences ( free to criticise me though ).
And do as I like with in the confines of the law.

Pros: Meritocracy, Monarchy, Egalitarianism, free speech and free expression (Most of these are a given)

Cons: Feminism, people who put feelings before fact, and Islam also people who think the "Guilty until proven innocent" mentality is acceptable.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cannot think of a name, Corporate Collective Salvation, Eltorian, Fartsniffage, Likhinia, Port Caverton, Rary, San Lumen, Subi Bumeen, The Two Jerseys, Usaiana

Advertisement

Remove ads