Right Wing Discussion Thread the Third

[Conserative Morality]

Dogs are weak. You rule the dog. The worship you automatically, do as you say, need you for pretty much everything. They are the "sheeple" in animal form. If they were people most on the right would view them with disdain. Though I guess you can enslave the dog and not the people.

Cats instead know how to use you to get whatever they want. They do not need you, they can survive in essentially any environment.
The dog is your slave. You are the cats servant.

Dogs are strong. They know when to lead, and when to follow. They can provide for themselves if left alone, they have a basic, animal kind of empathy, they look up to you if you are worth looking up to in their eyes. Dogs are dogs.

Cats instead rely upon people to cater to their every whim, and like small dogs owned by elderly folk, are completely unable of contributing anything of meaning to the world. Cats are parasites.

[United Marxist Nations]

He doesn't hate you, though, which is why he wants you to overcome your sinful nature along with others. If He hated you, he would leave you be and relish in your suffering after death.

If it fucking loved me it wouldn't have senselessly put me in this fucking situation in the first place just to arbitrarily make a stupid fucking law against me actually being fucking happy. No, "god" is a sadistic fucking asshole. So, considering that the Bible claims that this mysterious fantasy sky man is loving, he can't exist, because he contradicts the books he supposedly inspired. Therefore, I can say, from personal experience, god's fake.

He didn't put you in this situation, humanity's sinful nature did.

[Jumalariik]

He doesn't hate you, though, which is why he wants you to overcome your sinful nature along with others. If He hated you, he would leave you be and relish in your suffering after death.

If it fucking loved me it wouldn't have senselessly put me in this fucking situation in the first place just to arbitrarily make a stupid fucking law against me actually being fucking happy. No, "god" is a sadistic fucking asshole. So, considering that the Bible claims that this mysterious fantasy sky man is loving, he can't exist, because he contradicts the books he supposedly inspired. Therefore, I can say, from personal experience, god's fake.

You were given proof that God loves you. A sadist who loves His victim and tries to do what is best for them is not really a very effective sadist. xD

[Germanic Templars]

Dogs are weak. You rule the dog. The worship you automatically, do as you say, need you for pretty much everything. They are the "sheeple" in animal form. If they were people most on the right would view them with disdain. Though I guess you can enslave the dog and not the people.

Cats instead know how to use you to get whatever they want. They do not need you, they can survive in essentially any environment.
The dog is your slave. You are the cats servant.

Dogs are strong. They know when to lead, and when to follow. They can provide for themselves if left alone, they have a basic, animal kind of empathy, they look up to you if you are worth looking up to in their eyes. Dogs are dogs.

Cats instead rely upon people to cater to their every whim, and like small dogs owned by elderly folk, are completely unable of contributing anything of meaning to the world. Cats are parasites.

Not all cats are like this. Few maybe, but I had a few that wanted to "provide" for my family, e.g. leaving dead birds and rodents on our front porch. XD

[Nusaresa]

Natch. A lot of things go into my acceptance of certain things as 'real' or 'fake', though I freely admit that my judgment isn't perfect. To go down all the things that make me accept or not accept the existence of even a simple thing would be... very time consuming.

By whose judgment? Your's? How very... subjective.

If we're being serious right now, fuck spooks. It's a pointless buzzword.

Radical Skepticism is basically flipping the table on Aristotle. It is basically saying "you proved this, but I'll deny it despite its clear truth." Your senses are kind of all that you really have to know reality. That's why they exist.

Buddy. Reality exists outside our senses. Objective reality doesn't give a shit how you or I perceive it. Reality is perceived in multiple ways by different people. Our senses (and brain) can only do so much and has the tendency to churn out bullshit. We like patterns where there are non, we hear things when there is nothing to hear, and we feel things that are no longer there.

They are all you have. But shitty and unreliable.

[Conserative Morality]

Radical Skepticism is basically flipping the table on Aristotle. It is basically saying "you proved this, but I'll deny it despite its clear truth." Your senses are kind of all that you really have to know reality. That's why they exist.

Oh, okay. I guess then you're willing to accept that my house is lined with rats from top to bottom, that a man with claws once stood at the edge of my bed for years, that a dog I had never seen before peeked out of my curtain, never leaving, for a matter of days, not leaving to eat or drink or do anything but stare at me so far as I could see; that these things are 'proven' because my senses saw them? Heard them? Felt them?

[The United Colonies of Earth]

If it fucking loved me it wouldn't have senselessly put me in this fucking situation in the first place just to arbitrarily make a stupid fucking law against me actually being fucking happy. No, "god" is a sadistic fucking asshole. So, considering that the Bible claims that this mysterious fantasy sky man is loving, he can't exist, because he contradicts the books he supposedly inspired. Therefore, I can say, from personal experience, god's fake.

He didn't put you in this situation, humanity's sinful nature did.

"Adam and Eve guaranteed that one to two percent of human embryos that survived long enough to adolescence would end up having brains with features not present in people with karyotypes that contained matching examples of Pair 23 chromosomes."
Is this similar, at least, to what you're saying?

[Jumalariik]

If it fucking loved me it wouldn't have senselessly put me in this fucking situation in the first place just to arbitrarily make a stupid fucking law against me actually being fucking happy. No, "god" is a sadistic fucking asshole. So, considering that the Bible claims that this mysterious fantasy sky man is loving, he can't exist, because he contradicts the books he supposedly inspired. Therefore, I can say, from personal experience, god's fake.

He didn't put you in this situation, humanity's sinful nature did.

Sin is by nature looking at God's loving helping hand and biting it.

[The United Colonies of Earth]

Dogs are weak. You rule the dog. The worship you automatically, do as you say, need you for pretty much everything. They are the "sheeple" in animal form. If they were people most on the right would view them with disdain. Though I guess you can enslave the dog and not the people.

Cats instead know how to use you to get whatever they want. They do not need you, they can survive in essentially any environment.
The dog is your slave. You are the cats servant.

Dogs are strong. They know when to lead, and when to follow. They can provide for themselves if left alone, they have a basic, animal kind of empathy, they look up to you if you are worth looking up to in their eyes. Dogs are dogs.

Cats instead rely upon people to cater to their every whim, and like small dogs owned by elderly folk, are completely unable of contributing anything of meaning to the world. Cats are parasites.

I thought cats were naturally solitary in their ancestry and would only seek out resources as far as they needed, hence their "lazy" behavior.

[Novus America]

Dogs are weak. You rule the dog. The worship you automatically, do as you say, need you for pretty much everything. They are the "sheeple" in animal form. If they were people most on the right would view them with disdain. Though I guess you can enslave the dog and not the people.

Cats instead know how to use you to get whatever they want. They do not need you, they can survive in essentially any environment.
The dog is your slave. You are the cats servant.

Dogs possess a trait I've noticed lacking in cats. Loyalty. Dogs understand loyalty to their master more so than any animal I've seen bar parrots. That is why the dog is more Right Wing than the Cat.

Because a) it sounds funny and b) buzzwords and RWDT is like the holiest marriage ever.

^This shit right here.

Cats feel supreme loyalty to their master, themselves. Thing is you will never be their master. They are your master. They answer to themselves alone.

Dogs are plebs. Cats are patricians.
Dogs are simply the perfect slaves.

[Minzerland II]

Dogs are the best.

Dogs are weak. You rule the dog. The worship you automatically, do as you say, need you for pretty much everything. They are the "sheeple" in animal form. If they were people most on the right would view them with disdain. Though I guess you can enslave the dog and not the people.

Cats instead know how to use you to get whatever they want. They do not need you, they can survive in essentially any environment.
The dog is your slave. You are the cats servant.

Dogs are just friendly.

[Renewed Imperial Germany-]

If it fucking loved me it wouldn't have senselessly put me in this fucking situation in the first place just to arbitrarily make a stupid fucking law against me actually being fucking happy. No, "god" is a sadistic fucking asshole. So, considering that the Bible claims that this mysterious fantasy sky man is loving, he can't exist, because he contradicts the books he supposedly inspired. Therefore, I can say, from personal experience, god's fake.

He didn't put you in this situation, humanity's sinful nature did.

Which a supposedly all-knowing god would have been able to predict as a consequence of creating humanity, and wouldnt have made humanity knowing it would spell nothing but suffering. Your whole religion is a contradiction.

If it fucking loved me it wouldn't have senselessly put me in this fucking situation in the first place just to arbitrarily make a stupid fucking law against me actually being fucking happy. No, "god" is a sadistic fucking asshole. So, considering that the Bible claims that this mysterious fantasy sky man is loving, he can't exist, because he contradicts the books he supposedly inspired. Therefore, I can say, from personal experience, god's fake.

You were given proof that God loves you. A sadist who loves His victim and tries to do what is best for them is not really a very effective sadist. xD

Hey! I only love one sadist, and his name starts with a J not a G!

[Jumalariik]

Radical Skepticism is basically flipping the table on Aristotle. It is basically saying "you proved this, but I'll deny it despite its clear truth." Your senses are kind of all that you really have to know reality. That's why they exist.

Buddy. Reality exists outside our senses. Objective reality doesn't give a shit how you or I perceive it. Reality is perceived in multiple ways by different people. Our senses (and brain) can only do so much and has the tendency to churn out bullshit. We like patterns where there are non, we hear things when there is nothing to hear, and we feel things that are no longer there.

They are all you have. But shitty and unreliable.

K. How do you know what is reality then?

Radical Skepticism is basically flipping the table on Aristotle. It is basically saying "you proved this, but I'll deny it despite its clear truth." Your senses are kind of all that you really have to know reality. That's why they exist.

Oh, okay. I guess then you're willing to accept that my house is lined with rats from top to bottom, that a man with claws once stood at the edge of my bed for years, that a dog I had never seen before peeked out of my curtain, never leaving, for a matter of days, not leaving to eat or drink or do anything but stare at me so far as I could see; that these things are 'proven' because my senses saw them? Heard them? Felt them?

If 50 thousand people saw this stuff and this included people who could examine it critically and everybody acknowledged it, I'd believe it, yes. Otherwise, that is not a problem with functioning senses if you see what I mean...

[Conserative Morality]

(Image)

Tell me when the rite of initiation is needed to turn my computer on, and then we'll talk.

Not all cats are like this. Few maybe, but I had a few that wanted to "provide" for my family, e.g. leaving dead birds and rodents on our front porch. XD

I knew a cat like this once. He was a stray, though, a neighborhood cat. I saw him not too long ago. Ancient now. Wish I could've taken him in during the winter.

[The United Colonies of Earth]

Dogs possess a trait I've noticed lacking in cats. Loyalty. Dogs understand loyalty to their master more so than any animal I've seen bar parrots. That is why the dog is more Right Wing than the Cat.



^This shit right here.

Cats feel supreme loyalty to their master, themselves. Thing is you will never be their master. They are your master. They answer to themselves alone.

Dogs are plebs. Cats are patricians.
Dogs are simply the perfect slaves.

Dog girls will be genetically engineered by rightwingers to become the mothers of the new underclass by combining whatever's genetically relevant from dogs with a human form. Fuckin A, gents!

[United Marxist Nations]

He didn't put you in this situation, humanity's sinful nature did.

"Adam and Eve guaranteed that one to two percent of human embryos that survived long enough to adolescence would end up having brains with features not present in people with karyotypes that contained matching examples of Pair 23 chromosomes."
Is this similar, at least, to what you're saying?

Yes. All suffering comes from sin.

[The East Marches]

Dogs possess a trait I've noticed lacking in cats. Loyalty. Dogs understand loyalty to their master more so than any animal I've seen bar parrots. That is why the dog is more Right Wing than the Cat.



^This shit right here.

Cats feel supreme loyalty to their master, themselves. Thing is you will never be their master. They are your master. They answer to themselves alone.

Dogs are plebs. Cats are patricians.
Dogs are simply the perfect slaves.

Yes but if you are the master, why would you want a rebellious good for nothing like a cat? Shouldn't a good and proper person ideally want a dog? Dogs are the most patrician choice. Because only a real patrician can own slaves.

[Jumalariik]

He didn't put you in this situation, humanity's sinful nature did.

Which a supposedly all-knowing god would have been able to predict as a consequence of creating humanity, and wouldnt have made humanity knowing it would spell nothing but suffering. Your whole religion is a contradiction.

You were given proof that God loves you. A sadist who loves His victim and tries to do what is best for them is not really a very effective sadist. xD

Hey! I only love one sadist, and his name starts with a J not a G!

K. Will you acknowledge then that you are denying God not out of a concern for evidence, but a deep inner yearning for something different than what God wants?

[Jumalariik]

"Adam and Eve guaranteed that one to two percent of human embryos that survived long enough to adolescence would end up having brains with features not present in people with karyotypes that contained matching examples of Pair 23 chromosomes."
Is this similar, at least, to what you're saying?

Yes. All suffering comes from sin.

And not being able to offer it up to God.

[The United Colonies of Earth]

"Adam and Eve guaranteed that one to two percent of human embryos that survived long enough to adolescence would end up having brains with features not present in people with karyotypes that contained matching examples of Pair 23 chromosomes."
Is this similar, at least, to what you're saying?

Yes. All suffering comes from sin.

I'm going to put in the minimal effort needed to not act on that affirmation every bloody day for the rest of my life.
What am I saying? It's going to be easy anyways.

[United Marxist Nations]

He didn't put you in this situation, humanity's sinful nature did.

Which a supposedly all-knowing god would have been able to predict as a consequence of creating humanity, and wouldnt have made humanity knowing it would spell nothing but suffering. Your whole religion is a contradiction.

You were given proof that God loves you. A sadist who loves His victim and tries to do what is best for them is not really a very effective sadist. xD

Hey! I only love one sadist, and his name starts with a J not a G!

God most likely purposefully didn't allow Himself to know what would happen for the sake of giving us free will. Even if He didn't, it doesn't really change that it is humanity's fault, because we did still have the choice.

[Conserative Morality]

If 50 thousand people saw this stuff and this included people who could examine it critically and everybody acknowledged it, I'd believe it, yes. Otherwise, that is not a problem with functioning senses if you see what I mean...

So then, you accept Allah has performed miracles to his followers who listen to the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)?

[Dagashi Shojo]

It is times like these that I'm grateful for being a believer in an impersonal divinity.

Because he doesn't care whether I defend him or not.

[Renewed Imperial Germany-]

Which a supposedly all-knowing god would have been able to predict as a consequence of creating humanity, and wouldnt have made humanity knowing it would spell nothing but suffering. Your whole religion is a contradiction.



Hey! I only love one sadist, and his name starts with a J not a G!

K. Will you acknowledge then that you are denying God not out of a concern for evidence, but a deep inner yearning for something different than what God wants?

*rams head against a wall*

It. Was. A. Joke.

[The United Colonies of Earth]

If 50 thousand people saw this stuff and this included people who could examine it critically and everybody acknowledged it, I'd believe it, yes. Otherwise, that is not a problem with functioning senses if you see what I mean...

So then, you accept Allah has performed miracles to his followers who listen to the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH)?

Obviously Muhammad was just being led around by Shay- Satan.