Psychopaths have a medical condition impairing their decision-making skills. So no, I would not let a psychopath make that choice.
Advertisement

by Geilinor » Tue Sep 13, 2016 6:26 pm

by The Kievan People » Tue Sep 13, 2016 6:26 pm

by United Marxist Nations » Tue Sep 13, 2016 6:26 pm
Renewed Imperial Germany- wrote:United Marxist Nations wrote:I think the most convincing miracle to me is the one in Spain where a man had his leg restored after it having been removed years earlier.
People spontaneously combust, ya know. Weird shit happens. Just because a guy uttered some words before said weird shit happens doesn't mean "ZOMG! GAWD!"
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.

by Conscentia » Tue Sep 13, 2016 6:26 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Conscentia wrote:How exactly would you define morality? Your earlier post suggests that you believe merely having biases (ie. values) of any sort that influence behaviour constitutes a morality. Is this so?
I would say that said biases (values) would have to come into play when making a decision, which would exclude anything regarded as insufficiently complex to make 'decisions', but otherwise, yes. Virtue ethicist here.
| Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |

by Conserative Morality » Tue Sep 13, 2016 6:26 pm
Jumalariik wrote:![]()
So now empirical fact is trumped by... by... by.... what? What can you replace your basic senses with?

by United Marxist Nations » Tue Sep 13, 2016 6:27 pm
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.

by Jumalariik » Tue Sep 13, 2016 6:27 pm
Renewed Imperial Germany- wrote:United Marxist Nations wrote:I think the most convincing miracle to me is the one in Spain where a man had his leg restored after it having been removed years earlier.
People spontaneously combust, ya know. Weird shit happens. Just because a guy uttered some words before said weird shit happens doesn't mean "ZOMG! GAWD!"

by Conserative Morality » Tue Sep 13, 2016 6:27 pm
Conscentia wrote:So a preference for the taste of chocolate and the colour red are moral values? They come into play when making particular decisions. Is the chocolate ice-cream morally superior to the strawberry ice-cream?

by Dagashi Shojo » Tue Sep 13, 2016 6:28 pm
Nusaresa wrote:I don't believe in miracles. As for the Dalai Lama's selection? You'd need to understand the Buddhist perspective on reincarnation or at least the Vajrayana perspective because they looooove that shit I tell ye.

by Jumalariik » Tue Sep 13, 2016 6:28 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Jumalariik wrote:![]()
So now empirical fact is trumped by... by... by.... what? What can you replace your basic senses with?
Skepticism. As someone who has seen things that aren't there, and seen things that were kind of there, and seen things that were there but not as I saw them, one's basic senses are incredibly unreliable.

by Renewed Imperial Germany- » Tue Sep 13, 2016 6:28 pm
Moreover, some people undoubtedly prefer chaos
or a form of order that clashes greatly with your worldview.

by Jumalariik » Tue Sep 13, 2016 6:29 pm

by Nusaresa » Tue Sep 13, 2016 6:29 pm
Jumalariik wrote:Nusaresa wrote:I'm a skeptic and I now that brains love to do crazy shit. It takes effort to say that crazy shit is in fact bullshit. But ok whatever kowtow to your brain and animal instincts why don't you.
![]()
So now empirical fact is trumped by... by... by.... what? What can you replace your basic senses with?
Conserative Morality wrote:Jumalariik wrote:![]()
So now empirical fact is trumped by... by... by.... what? What can you replace your basic senses with?
Skepticism. As someone who has seen things that aren't there, and seen things that were kind of there, and seen things that were there but not as I saw them, one's basic senses are incredibly unreliable.
Jochizyd Republic wrote:Death by honorable child soldier is less humiliating than death by Antifa activist.

by Minzerland II » Tue Sep 13, 2016 6:29 pm
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)

by Conserative Morality » Tue Sep 13, 2016 6:29 pm
United Marxist Nations wrote:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracle_of_Calanda
The Miracle of Calanda is an event that allegedly took place in Calanda, Spain in 1640, according to 17th century documents.

by United Marxist Nations » Tue Sep 13, 2016 6:29 pm
Renewed Imperial Germany- wrote:United Marxist Nations wrote:That doesn't make them right.
What does make people right then? A nonexistent diety that you can't possibly prove exists? Thats not objective.Moreover, some people undoubtedly prefer chaos
You don't need to convince me of that. But I'd say most people sadly don't enjoy chaos.or a form of order that clashes greatly with your worldview.
I mean, people can be wrong. I aint stoping them.
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.

by Minzerland II » Tue Sep 13, 2016 6:29 pm
St Anselm of Canterbury wrote:[…]who ever heard of anything having two mothers or two fathers? (Monologion, pg. 63)

by Jumalariik » Tue Sep 13, 2016 6:30 pm
Nusaresa wrote:Jumalariik wrote:![]()
So now empirical fact is trumped by... by... by.... what? What can you replace your basic senses with?
No. Just flip your sentence.
Empirical evidence is needed, if not, stay skeptical and if you understand your situation, dismiss it. Besides, why bother fapping over some blurry ass picture when you could be like mountain biking or canoeing or some shit.
Physical fitness is better than ruminating on 'what ifs' imho.Conserative Morality wrote:Skepticism. As someone who has seen things that aren't there, and seen things that were kind of there, and seen things that were there but not as I saw them, one's basic senses are incredibly unreliable.
Pretty much. Your senses (and you by extension) create bullshit like a cow shitting in a farm.

by The United Colonies of Earth » Tue Sep 13, 2016 6:30 pm
Jumalariik wrote:The United Colonies of Earth wrote:you read about chaos
http://www.reformation.org/en-sack-of-constantinople.jpg
you think about fire and getting your ass eviscerated and hacked to pieces
does that feel good to you?
https://cdn.meme.am/instances/500x/49244429.jpg
get that shit away from me
i don't want to experience chaos
chaos is literally destruction and death
and hence you have successfully concluded that by your own logic it is negative
if p, then q
p is chaos, aka "fire and burning and getting eviscerated and hacked to pieces"
q is "i don't want to experience this shit keep it away from me"
if p, then q, then x because q
where x is "chaos is bad, where bad is something i wish to avoid"
p->q->x because q
So you proved that chaos is unpleasant. How does that prove that it's negative?
not positive or neutral
(physics) of electrical charge of an electron and related particles [from the 18th c.]
(mathematics) of number, less than zero
(linguistics, logic) denying a proposition
damaging; undesirable; unfavourable [quotations ▼]
pessimistic; not tending to see the bright side of things. (Often used pejoratively.) [quotations ▼]
Of or relating to a photographic image in which the colours of the original, and the relations of right and left, are reversed.
(chemistry) metalloidal; nonmetallic; contrasted with positive or basic.
The nitro group is negative.
(New Age jargon) (pejorative) bad, unwanted, disagreeable, potentially damaging, to be avoided, unpleasant, difficult, painful; (often precedes 'energy', 'feeling', 'emotion' or 'thought'). [quotations ▲]
2009, Christopher Johns, Becoming a Reflective Practitioner, John Wiley & Sons, page 15
Negative feelings can be worked through and their energy converted into positive energy... In crisis, normal patterns of self-organization fail, resulting in anxiety (negative energy).
2011, Joe Vitale, The Key: the missing secret for attracting anything you want, Body, Mind & Spirit, [1]
The threat of negative feelings may seem very real, but they are nothing more than mirages... Allow the unwanted feelings to evaporate and dissolve as the mirages that they are.
2011, Anne Jones, Healing Negative Energies, Hachette, page 118
If you have been badly affected by negative energy a salt bath is wonderful for clearing and cleansing yourself... Salt attracts negative energy and will draw it away from you.
Characterized by the presence of features which do not support a hypothesis.
The East Marches wrote:Dagashi Shojo wrote:
My cat is more enjoyable and friendly than my dogs.
He doesn't start yapping at the top of his lungs because I walk past the bedroom door where he's sleeping.
Thanks because you haven't trained your kampfhunds correctly. I would argue that dog training is more difficult than training other humans. At least with humans, somebody else did all the ground work.

by The Kievan People » Tue Sep 13, 2016 6:30 pm

by Renewed Imperial Germany- » Tue Sep 13, 2016 6:30 pm
Jumalariik wrote:Renewed Imperial Germany- wrote:
People spontaneously combust, ya know. Weird shit happens. Just because a guy uttered some words before said weird shit happens doesn't mean "ZOMG! GAWD!"
Logic 10/10.
Something you think is weird happens. It is clearly real and there is a clear explanation. Why would you not give some thought to that explanation if you cannot find a real one?

by Reverend Norv » Tue Sep 13, 2016 6:30 pm
For really, I think that the poorest he that is in England hath a life to live as the greatest he. And therefore truly, Sir, I think it's clear that every man that is to live under a Government ought first by his own consent to put himself under that Government. And I do think that the poorest man in England is not at all bound in a strict sense to that Government that he hath not had a voice to put himself under.
Col. Thomas Rainsborough, Putney Debates, 1647
A God who let us prove His existence would be an idol.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer

by United Marxist Nations » Tue Sep 13, 2016 6:31 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:United Marxist Nations wrote:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miracle_of_CalandaThe Miracle of Calanda is an event that allegedly took place in Calanda, Spain in 1640, according to 17th century documents.
You'll remember that's about the time that a Frenchman jacked off into a pile of leaves and claimed a semiperson grew from it.
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.

by Dushan » Tue Sep 13, 2016 6:31 pm
Nusaresa wrote:Jumalariik wrote:![]()
So now empirical fact is trumped by... by... by.... what? What can you replace your basic senses with?
No. Just flip your sentence.
Empirical evidence is needed, if not, stay skeptical and if you understand your situation, dismiss it. Besides, why bother fapping over some blurry ass picture when you could be like mountain biking or canoeing or some shit.
Physical fitness is better than ruminating on 'what ifs' imho.Conserative Morality wrote:Skepticism. As someone who has seen things that aren't there, and seen things that were kind of there, and seen things that were there but not as I saw them, one's basic senses are incredibly unreliable.
Pretty much. Your senses (and you by extension) create bullshit like a cow shitting in a farm.

by FelrikTheDeleted » Tue Sep 13, 2016 6:31 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Celritannia, Forsher, Google [Bot], Jewish Underground State, Lativs, Neo-American States, New Saharia, Skiearpia, The Jamesian Republic, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement