NATION

PASSWORD

To burkini or not burkini, that’s the question.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Would you ban a burkini on your beaches?

Yes
78
12%
Yes and Hillary too
135
22%
No.
392
63%
Certainly not. A burkini should be mandatory on the beaches for all women.
22
4%
 
Total votes : 627

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159117
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Fri Aug 26, 2016 8:05 am

Wallenburg wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Apparently the State Council has overturned these bans.

Telegraph
Graun

The mayor of Sisco, in Corsica, vowed to defy the State Council's ruling and maintain the ban in his town.

For fuck's sake, he thinks he's a little Andrew Jackson or something.

French Revolution 2016

User avatar
Seperates
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14622
Founded: Sep 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Seperates » Fri Aug 26, 2016 8:07 am

I wonder if they'll ban wet-suits next...
This Debate is simply an exercise in Rhetoric. Truth is a fickle being with no intentions of showing itself today.

Non fui, fui, non sum, non curo

"The most important fact about us: that we are greater than the institutions and cultures we build."--Roberto Mangabeira Unger

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Fri Aug 26, 2016 8:09 am

Seperates wrote:I wonder if they'll ban wet-suits next...


Only for Muslims.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Skyviolia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 939
Founded: Sep 04, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Skyviolia » Fri Aug 26, 2016 8:19 am

Hasn't the French court lifted the ban?
Qui est-ce ?

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159117
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Fri Aug 26, 2016 8:20 am

Skyviolia wrote:Hasn't the French court lifted the ban?

Yes.

User avatar
Wallenburg
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 22347
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wallenburg » Fri Aug 26, 2016 8:25 am

Skyviolia wrote:Hasn't the French court lifted the ban?

Technically, they've simply suspended it. At least one local government is throwing a temper tantrum now, but I imagine most will comply with the court.
I want to improve.
grestin went through the MKULTRA program and he has more of a free will than wallenburg does - Imperial Idaho
King of Snark, General Assembly Secretary, Arbiter for The East Pacific


User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Fri Aug 26, 2016 8:44 am

Ifreann wrote:Apparently the State Council has overturned these bans.

Telegraph
Graun

What is the "State Council"?

The Independent describes it as "France's highest court", and ruling that the bans are "seriously, and clearly illegal".
In light of this, I wonder if the officers involved in forcing a woman to remove her burkini will face disciplinary measures.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 11396.html
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Fri Aug 26, 2016 8:45 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Apparently the State Council has overturned these bans.

Telegraph
Graun

What is the "State Council"?

The Independent describes it as "France's highest court", and ruling that the bans are "seriously, and clearly illegal".
In light of this, I wonder if the officers involved in forcing a woman to remove her burkini will face disciplinary measures.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 11396.html


In before someone salty about the lifting says it should be renamed to the Supreme Council.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Alvecia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19955
Founded: Aug 17, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alvecia » Fri Aug 26, 2016 8:47 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Apparently the State Council has overturned these bans.

Telegraph
Graun

What is the "State Council"?

The Independent describes it as "France's highest court", and ruling that the bans are "seriously, and clearly illegal".
In light of this, I wonder if the officers involved in forcing a woman to remove her burkini will face disciplinary measures.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 11396.html

Wiki wrote:In France, the Council of State (French: Conseil d'État; French pronunciation: ​[kɔ̃.sɛj.deˈta]) is a body of the French national government that acts both as legal adviser of the executive branch and as the supreme court for administrative justice.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54749
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Fri Aug 26, 2016 8:51 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Apparently the State Council has overturned these bans.

Telegraph
Graun

What is the "State Council"?

It's the topmost court for administrative justice. Basically, if you think a governmental instance (ranging from town councils to the President of the Republic) has violated your rights or passed an illegal act, you file a case at the administrative courts.
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. "Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee.
I'm back.
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54749
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Fri Aug 26, 2016 8:53 am

Ifreann wrote:
Wallenburg wrote:
For fuck's sake, he thinks he's a little Andrew Jackson or something.

French Revolution 2016

The Charles De Gaulle is already enroute to Corsica. ;)
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. "Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee.
I'm back.
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72260
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Fri Aug 26, 2016 8:53 am

Risottia wrote:
Ifreann wrote:French Revolution 2016

The Charles De Gaulle is already enroute to Corsica. ;)

Aww, Charles De Gaulle is such a cute little boat.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Wallenburg
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 22347
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wallenburg » Fri Aug 26, 2016 8:54 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Apparently the State Council has overturned these bans.

Telegraph
Graun

What is the "State Council"?

The Independent describes it as "France's highest court", and ruling that the bans are "seriously, and clearly illegal".
In light of this, I wonder if the officers involved in forcing a woman to remove her burkini will face disciplinary measures.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 11396.html

I don't imagine they would. The local government would be in support of the ban, and so it would not be interested in punishing its officers for enforcing its law.
I want to improve.
grestin went through the MKULTRA program and he has more of a free will than wallenburg does - Imperial Idaho
King of Snark, General Assembly Secretary, Arbiter for The East Pacific


User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Fri Aug 26, 2016 8:56 am

Wallenburg wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:What is the "State Council"?

The Independent describes it as "France's highest court", and ruling that the bans are "seriously, and clearly illegal".
In light of this, I wonder if the officers involved in forcing a woman to remove her burkini will face disciplinary measures.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world ... 11396.html

I don't imagine they would. The local government would be in support of the ban, and so it would not be interested in punishing its officers for enforcing its law.

But the law was "seriously and clearly illegal". The officers should have had no business enforcing it.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54749
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Fri Aug 26, 2016 8:57 am

Wallenburg wrote:I don't imagine they would. The local government would be in support of the ban, and so it would not be interested in punishing its officers for enforcing its law.

It's not like the local government is allowed to act against a ruling of the Conseil d'Etat.

Imperializt Russia wrote:But the law was "seriously and clearly illegal". The officers should have had no business enforcing it.

Yes they had. It's not like an agent can choose whether to apply a local regulation (not laws: a French city council cannot make law).
Last edited by Risottia on Fri Aug 26, 2016 8:58 am, edited 1 time in total.
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. "Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee.
I'm back.
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
Jolthig
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16317
Founded: Aug 31, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Jolthig » Fri Aug 26, 2016 8:57 am

Ridiculous. All over fighting between cultures..smh..

The villages should instead prosecute whoever causes violence to begin with.
Devoted Ahmadi Muslim • theistic evolutionist • Star Wars fan • Discord ID: Jolthig#9602
Grenartia wrote:Then we Marshall Plan it.

Kowani wrote:
Jolthig wrote:Lol why

“Und Mirza”

:lol2:

Jean-Paul Sartre wrote:
LiberNovusAmericae wrote:Isn't that what NSG is for though to a degree?

YOU’RE WRONG.

Allow me to explain using several fallacies, veiled insults, and insinuations that you’re ugly and dumb.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54749
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Fri Aug 26, 2016 8:59 am

Jolthig wrote:Ridiculous. All over fighting between cultures..smh..

The villages should instead prosecute whoever causes violence to begin with.


"Villages" aren't prosecutor offices.
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. "Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee.
I'm back.
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54749
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Fri Aug 26, 2016 9:00 am

Galloism wrote:
Risottia wrote:The Charles De Gaulle is already enroute to Corsica. ;)

Aww, Charles De Gaulle is such a cute little boat.

Littlé? Mais non! Every ton of it counts as ten because of la grandeur de la France!
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. "Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee.
I'm back.
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
Wallenburg
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 22347
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wallenburg » Fri Aug 26, 2016 9:00 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Wallenburg wrote:I don't imagine they would. The local government would be in support of the ban, and so it would not be interested in punishing its officers for enforcing its law.

But the law was "seriously and clearly illegal". The officers should have had no business enforcing it.

Laws cannot be illegal, and officers are sworn to enforce the law.
I want to improve.
grestin went through the MKULTRA program and he has more of a free will than wallenburg does - Imperial Idaho
King of Snark, General Assembly Secretary, Arbiter for The East Pacific


User avatar
Jolthig
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16317
Founded: Aug 31, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Jolthig » Fri Aug 26, 2016 9:01 am

Risottia wrote:
Jolthig wrote:Ridiculous. All over fighting between cultures..smh..

The villages should instead prosecute whoever causes violence to begin with.


"Villages" aren't prosecutor offices.

Well, still.
Devoted Ahmadi Muslim • theistic evolutionist • Star Wars fan • Discord ID: Jolthig#9602
Grenartia wrote:Then we Marshall Plan it.

Kowani wrote:
Jolthig wrote:Lol why

“Und Mirza”

:lol2:

Jean-Paul Sartre wrote:
LiberNovusAmericae wrote:Isn't that what NSG is for though to a degree?

YOU’RE WRONG.

Allow me to explain using several fallacies, veiled insults, and insinuations that you’re ugly and dumb.

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72260
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Fri Aug 26, 2016 9:01 am

Wallenburg wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:But the law was "seriously and clearly illegal". The officers should have had no business enforcing it.

Laws cannot be illegal, and officers are sworn to enforce the law.

Well, I don't know about France, but in the United States, laws can be illegal.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54749
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Fri Aug 26, 2016 9:04 am

Wallenburg wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:But the law was "seriously and clearly illegal". The officers should have had no business enforcing it.

Laws cannot be illegal, and officers are sworn to enforce the law.

Not quite. Laws and regulations can be illegal - that's why there are a Conseil d'Etat and a Constitutional Court - not to mention international courts. If they're found to be illegal, they get stricken out and every legal consequence of the illegal bits is voided. Eventually the CdE can even grant a compensation to those who have been impacted adversely by an illegal act.
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. "Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee.
I'm back.
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Fri Aug 26, 2016 9:05 am

Wallenburg wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:But the law was "seriously and clearly illegal". The officers should have had no business enforcing it.

Laws cannot be illegal, and officers are sworn to enforce the law.

Your argument is with the French courts, not me.

Of course laws can be illegal. Say that Nice imposed a law saying that, in light of the Nice attack, anyone in traditional Middle Eastern or otherwise "Muslim" dress were to be shot on sight.
Would you disagree that this local law was "illegal"?
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54749
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Fri Aug 26, 2016 9:05 am

Jolthig wrote:
Risottia wrote:
"Villages" aren't prosecutor offices.

Well, still.

It's not like mayors and councils can determine laws or how the judiciary acts, you know.
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. "Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee.
I'm back.
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
Wallenburg
GA Secretariat
 
Posts: 22347
Founded: Jan 30, 2015
Democratic Socialists

Postby Wallenburg » Fri Aug 26, 2016 9:05 am

Galloism wrote:
Wallenburg wrote:Laws cannot be illegal, and officers are sworn to enforce the law.

Well, I don't know about France, but in the United States, laws can be illegal.

In the US, laws can be unconstitutional, but not illegal.
I want to improve.
grestin went through the MKULTRA program and he has more of a free will than wallenburg does - Imperial Idaho
King of Snark, General Assembly Secretary, Arbiter for The East Pacific


PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cannot think of a name, Dimetrodon Empire, El Lazaro, Elwher, Eternal Algerstonia, Hispida, Necroghastia, Tarsonis, Urkennalaid, Zolotaya Sobaka

Advertisement

Remove ads