NATION

PASSWORD

implicationofissue274

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Quokkastan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1913
Founded: Dec 21, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Quokkastan » Mon Aug 08, 2016 8:28 pm

Communal Ecotopia wrote:Under certain circumstances, I can see this working. If they are indeed adults, have no power relation over another (so, probably same generation), and undergo the genetic testing most non-incestuous couples do (the genetic pool is skewed by siblings, but is still large), and everything is consensual, as the OP suggests, I see few problems emerging.

Where do you live?
Give us this day our daily thread.
And forgive us our flames, as we forgive those who flame against us.
And lead us not into trolling, but deliver us from spambots.
For thine is the website, and the novels, and the glory. Forever and ever.
In Violent's name we pray. Submit.

User avatar
The East Marches
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13843
Founded: May 14, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby The East Marches » Mon Aug 08, 2016 8:28 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
Eisarn-Ara wrote:

Octavia & Octavian are not to moral exemplars, absolutely fucking degenerate. Dis-fuckin'-gusting.

Consequently, this is why pakistan is a horrifying country.

*** 7 day ban for trolling. ***

The ice grows thin beneath your feet. Post civlly or don't post at all.


What has he done against the rules? Can we be held accountable such comments now? I'd like to know for my own posts in the future too if this is the case.
Conserative Morality wrote:Move to a real state bud instead of a third-world country that inexplicably votes in American elections.


Novus America wrote:But yes, I would say the mere existence of Illinois proves this is hell. Chicago the 9th circle.

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Mon Aug 08, 2016 8:29 pm

excution them and be done with it. Next case.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Communal Ecotopia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1730
Founded: Feb 27, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Communal Ecotopia » Mon Aug 08, 2016 8:33 pm

Quokkastan wrote:
Communal Ecotopia wrote:Under certain circumstances, I can see this working. If they are indeed adults, have no power relation over another (so, probably same generation), and undergo the genetic testing most non-incestuous couples do (the genetic pool is skewed by siblings, but is still large), and everything is consensual, as the OP suggests, I see few problems emerging.

Where do you live?


The US. But I have ties to the disability community and my half sister-in-law is a geneticist, so perhaps I assumed it was more common than it is.
Political Compass -10, -9.28

User avatar
Felrik
Diplomat
 
Posts: 966
Founded: May 07, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Felrik » Mon Aug 08, 2016 8:37 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
Eisarn-Ara wrote:

Octavia & Octavian are not to moral exemplars, absolutely fucking degenerate. Dis-fuckin'-gusting.

Consequently, this is why pakistan is a horrifying country.

*** 7 day ban for trolling. ***

The ice grows thin beneath your feet. Post civlly or don't post at all.


Can I ask how that's trolling.
"They're all like Parrots, parroting each other, saying they're right and the other person is wrong."
- Felrik, 3:34 Am, 14 August 2016.

I believe I should have the Freedom to say whatever I like no matter how offensive without negative consequences ( free to criticise me though ).
And do as I like with in the confines of the law.

Pros: Meritocracy, Monarchy, Egalitarianism, free speech and free expression (Most of these are a given)

Cons: Feminism, people who put feelings before fact, and Islam also people who think the "Guilty until proven innocent" mentality is acceptable.

User avatar
Amuaplye
Minister
 
Posts: 2978
Founded: Dec 07, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Amuaplye » Mon Aug 08, 2016 8:38 pm

Jochizyd Republic wrote:
Quokkastan wrote:Yeah, next thing you know, people will be having four wives, or something.

Nowhere near as destructive as doing it with your own family.

How is it "destructive"? I see incest, as nothing wrong. Not to mention, the government shouldn't have their noses in the bedroom. What goes on in there is something the government shouldn't care about.
I'm a dude.
Also, call me Amuaplye, not Amuapyle, or Amu.

Electrum on Discord wrote:Please do not ping me a list of body parts.

User avatar
Ingskalla
Attaché
 
Posts: 66
Founded: Oct 10, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Ingskalla » Mon Aug 08, 2016 8:45 pm

Salvostella wrote:As a devout Catholic, all I can say is no, no, no, no.


With all candidness? According to the Book of Genesis, human life manifested from two Adam and Eve. Their kids procreated inbreds, who in turn proceeded to pork each other. How can you have such compunction when this occurred?
Last edited by Ingskalla on Mon Aug 08, 2016 8:48 pm, edited 2 times in total.
“Never apologize, mister, it’s a sign of weakness.”

- John Wayne in “She Wore a Yellow Ribbon”

"Whatever doesn't kill you simply makes you....stranger"
-Heath Ledger, "The Dark Knight

“…my conviction is that God never existed. I believe the Bible was written by the slickest bunch of peckerwood grifters that ever crapped between two sandles”

- Iceberg Slim from his novel “Trick Baby”

User avatar
Quokkastan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1913
Founded: Dec 21, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Quokkastan » Mon Aug 08, 2016 8:48 pm

Ingskalla wrote:
Salvostella wrote:As a devout Catholic, all I can say is no, no, no, no.


With all candidacy? According to the Book of Genesis, human life manifested from two Adam and Eve. Their kids procreated inbreds, who in turn proceeded to pork each other. How can you have such compunction when this occurred?

And then again with Noah. And then again with Lot's people.

I think God has a fetish.
Give us this day our daily thread.
And forgive us our flames, as we forgive those who flame against us.
And lead us not into trolling, but deliver us from spambots.
For thine is the website, and the novels, and the glory. Forever and ever.
In Violent's name we pray. Submit.

User avatar
Talo Imperium
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 23
Founded: Mar 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Talo Imperium » Mon Aug 08, 2016 8:48 pm

Ingskalla wrote:
Salvostella wrote:As a devout Catholic, all I can say is no, no, no, no.


With all candidness? According to the Book of Genesis, human life manifested from two Adam and Eve. Their kids procreated inbreds, who in turn proceeded to pork each other. How can you have such compunction when this occurred?

I have no idea but I bet there's a special exception involved.
Following new legislation in Talo Imperium, bleach is the nation's most common pesticide.

User avatar
Sack Jackpot Winners
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1124
Founded: May 20, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Sack Jackpot Winners » Mon Aug 08, 2016 8:56 pm

Dahon wrote:
Sack Jackpot Winners wrote:But it's consensual health risk.


We don't allow groups of people to commit suicide, even if they all consented to dying while holding hands together.

My thoughts exactly.
For the sake of confusion, you can call me SJW
NSG puppet


Your dose of Edgism #22
America just voted for a reality TV star.

What's sad is that was the better choice.

User avatar
Prosocial
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 171
Founded: May 09, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Prosocial » Mon Aug 08, 2016 8:56 pm

Completely disagree with it, completely don't want it to be illegal.

User avatar
The New Sea Territory
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16992
Founded: Dec 13, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The New Sea Territory » Mon Aug 08, 2016 8:57 pm

Eisarn-Ara wrote:
Islamic Republic e Jariri wrote:Hopefully we can all be civil and acknowledge the sensitivity of this issue. With all the passion poured into the LGBT debate it seemed the topic of incest remained taboo with few willing to address it. We live in the 21st century where attitudes towards sexuality have become more open-minded than it was in the past.

Is it hypocritical for progressive societies to legalize gay marriage but prohibit consensual sexual relationships between two adult aged blood relatives? If the law shouldn't exclude LGBT relationships within the realm of acceptability then should it give equal favor to adult consensual incest?

Personally I think incest in general should stay illegal and not given the same treatment as LGBT rights. Even in the case between two consenting adults it should remain prohibited as it would break down our current perception of familial relations (i.e. what it means to have parents, grandparents, aunts, uncles and siblings), not to mention its negative effect on the gene-pool by producing an inbred offspring.

There is undeniably a certain 'ick-factor' to this subject which makes it difficult to approach rationally and hence its rarely discussed in a thread of its own. I'd like to listen to other people's views on this issue with regards to their opinion on incest and whether adult consensual incest should be legalized?



Octavia & Octavian are not to moral exemplars, absolutely fucking degenerate. Dis-fuckin'-gusting.


You are able to call others "degenerate" from that high horse of yours. So moral, much wow.
| Ⓐ | Anarchist Communist | Heideggerian Marxist | Vegetarian | Bisexual | Stirnerite | Slavic/Germanic Pagan | ᛟ |
Solntsa Roshcha --- Postmodern Poyltheist
"Christianity had brutally planted the poisoned blade in the healthy, quivering flesh of all humanity; it had goaded a cold wave
of darkness with mystically brutal fury to dim the serene and festive exultation of the dionysian spirit of our pagan ancestors."
-Renzo Novatore, Verso il Nulla Creatore

User avatar
The New Sea Territory
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16992
Founded: Dec 13, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The New Sea Territory » Mon Aug 08, 2016 8:59 pm

Dahon wrote:
Sack Jackpot Winners wrote:But it's consensual health risk.


We don't allow groups of people to commit suicide, even if they all consented to dying while holding hands together.


Why not?

Morals? God? "It's the law"?
| Ⓐ | Anarchist Communist | Heideggerian Marxist | Vegetarian | Bisexual | Stirnerite | Slavic/Germanic Pagan | ᛟ |
Solntsa Roshcha --- Postmodern Poyltheist
"Christianity had brutally planted the poisoned blade in the healthy, quivering flesh of all humanity; it had goaded a cold wave
of darkness with mystically brutal fury to dim the serene and festive exultation of the dionysian spirit of our pagan ancestors."
-Renzo Novatore, Verso il Nulla Creatore

User avatar
Big Jim P
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55158
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Big Jim P » Mon Aug 08, 2016 9:07 pm

The New Sea Territory wrote:
Dahon wrote:
We don't allow groups of people to commit suicide, even if they all consented to dying while holding hands together.


Why not?

Morals? God? "It's the law"?


Whose morals, which god, and whose laws? Some people seem to think their distaste for the subject, their morals or their laws are some kind of universal objective standard.

personally I find the idea of incest to be disgusting, but I am not so arrogant as to assume that means I get to judge anothers choice or force them to live by my standard.
Hail Satan!
Happily married to Roan Cara, The first RL NS marriage, and Pope Joan is my Father-in-law.
I edit my posts to fix typos.

User avatar
Yorkers
Minister
 
Posts: 2488
Founded: Oct 27, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Yorkers » Mon Aug 08, 2016 9:14 pm

Literally wtf
"Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people, a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs."
-John Jay, 1787

Dancing in the moonlight.
I wish that every kiss was never-ending.


An alternate history epic.

sa-wish!

Yorkers is a wealthy WASP playground inspired by L.L. Bean and Vineyard Vines catalogs and 19th Century Anglo-American nativism.

User avatar
Yorkers
Minister
 
Posts: 2488
Founded: Oct 27, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Yorkers » Mon Aug 08, 2016 9:15 pm

Farnhamia wrote:
Eisarn-Ara wrote:

Octavia & Octavian are not to moral exemplars, absolutely fucking degenerate. Dis-fuckin'-gusting.

Consequently, this is why pakistan is a horrifying country.

*** 7 day ban for trolling. ***

The ice grows thin beneath your feet. Post civlly or don't post at all.


Does not seem like an impartial judgement.
"Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people, a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs."
-John Jay, 1787

Dancing in the moonlight.
I wish that every kiss was never-ending.


An alternate history epic.

sa-wish!

Yorkers is a wealthy WASP playground inspired by L.L. Bean and Vineyard Vines catalogs and 19th Century Anglo-American nativism.

User avatar
Twilight Imperium
Minister
 
Posts: 2746
Founded: May 19, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Twilight Imperium » Mon Aug 08, 2016 9:16 pm

Talo Imperium wrote:
Ingskalla wrote:
With all candidness? According to the Book of Genesis, human life manifested from two Adam and Eve. Their kids procreated inbreds, who in turn proceeded to pork each other. How can you have such compunction when this occurred?

I have no idea but I bet there's a special exception involved.


We usually call it "special pleading", and it happens a lot when Christianity gets involved.

User avatar
Felrik
Diplomat
 
Posts: 966
Founded: May 07, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Felrik » Mon Aug 08, 2016 9:16 pm

Yorkers wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:*** 7 day ban for trolling. ***

The ice grows thin beneath your feet. Post civlly or don't post at all.


Does not seem like an impartial judgement.

No it doesn't does it.
"They're all like Parrots, parroting each other, saying they're right and the other person is wrong."
- Felrik, 3:34 Am, 14 August 2016.

I believe I should have the Freedom to say whatever I like no matter how offensive without negative consequences ( free to criticise me though ).
And do as I like with in the confines of the law.

Pros: Meritocracy, Monarchy, Egalitarianism, free speech and free expression (Most of these are a given)

Cons: Feminism, people who put feelings before fact, and Islam also people who think the "Guilty until proven innocent" mentality is acceptable.

User avatar
The New Sea Territory
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16992
Founded: Dec 13, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The New Sea Territory » Mon Aug 08, 2016 9:17 pm

Big Jim P wrote:
The New Sea Territory wrote:
Why not?

Morals? God? "It's the law"?


Whose morals, which god, and whose laws? Some people seem to think their distaste for the subject, their morals or their laws are some kind of universal objective standard.

personally I find the idea of incest to be disgusting, but I am not so arrogant as to assume that means I get to judge anothers choice or force them to live by my standard.


"But that hurts society/the nation/the family/morality/[insert spook here]! Thus we must take away your ability to choose!" /s
| Ⓐ | Anarchist Communist | Heideggerian Marxist | Vegetarian | Bisexual | Stirnerite | Slavic/Germanic Pagan | ᛟ |
Solntsa Roshcha --- Postmodern Poyltheist
"Christianity had brutally planted the poisoned blade in the healthy, quivering flesh of all humanity; it had goaded a cold wave
of darkness with mystically brutal fury to dim the serene and festive exultation of the dionysian spirit of our pagan ancestors."
-Renzo Novatore, Verso il Nulla Creatore

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Mon Aug 08, 2016 9:27 pm

Talo Imperium wrote:
Soldati Senza Confini wrote:
Yea, it mostly depends on the family/culture.

My family could not handle the whole thing.

Then again it was my half-brother with his step-mom (my mother).

what the fuck
that's literally a porno in real life right there
my condolences


Well, at least they didn't decide to record it and put it on YouPorn. That'd have been salt on the wound.

In any case, I ended up disowning him, and my siblings sided with him so I don't talk to them anymore.

I talk with my mom out of responsibility, and I have stayed at home with my dad now.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Mon Aug 08, 2016 9:29 pm

Torrocca wrote:
Soldati Senza Confini wrote:
That's the least of your problems, depending on who you talk to.


Right, of course. Sorry 'bout your situation by the way.

I specifically was talking about the genetic devastation of the family; though it is easy to see how it could just tear a family apart that way.


Booze, arguing online, videogames, your career, and YouTube makes you forget the situation right quick.

The genetic devastation doesn't show itself until generations of inbreeding. It doesn't show up from one generation.
Last edited by Soldati Senza Confini on Mon Aug 08, 2016 9:30 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Bakery Hill
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11973
Founded: Jul 03, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Bakery Hill » Mon Aug 08, 2016 9:30 pm

Fuck sake, we've got taboos in our society for a reason. Some of us need to get over this "freedom freedom freedom" bullshit. There's nothing progressive about this.
Founder of the Committee for Proletarian Morality - Winner of Best Communist Award 2018 - Godfather of NSG Syndicalism

User avatar
Darjihad
Diplomat
 
Posts: 604
Founded: Jul 13, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Darjihad » Mon Aug 08, 2016 9:31 pm

The New Sea Territory wrote:
Big Jim P wrote:
Whose morals, which god, and whose laws? Some people seem to think their distaste for the subject, their morals or their laws are some kind of universal objective standard.

personally I find the idea of incest to be disgusting, but I am not so arrogant as to assume that means I get to judge anothers choice or force them to live by my standard.


"But that hurts society/the nation/the family/morality/[insert spook here]! Thus we must take away your ability to choose!" /s


Incest does produce genetic defects in offspring that in turn increase the burden upon social welfare systems, which in turn brings those social welfare systems to the point of rationing who gets care and how much, which in turn leads to laws to discourage incest in the first place.

Remove the social welfare safety net entirely and incest becomes a bad idea that campaigns against itself by example.
Feel the Harding, Feel the Coolidge, Feel the Johnson
"If all men are created equal, that is final. If they are endowed with inalienable rights, that is final. If governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed, that is final. No advance, no progress can be made beyond these propositions. If anyone wishes to deny their truth or their soundness, the only direction in which he can proceed historically is not forward, but backward toward the time when there was no equality, no rights of the individual, no rule of the people. Those who wish to proceed in that direction can not lay claim to progress. They are reactionary. Their ideas are not more modern, but more ancient, than those of the Revolutionary fathers." - Calvin Coolidge, July 4,1926

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Mon Aug 08, 2016 9:34 pm

Darjihad wrote:
The New Sea Territory wrote:
"But that hurts society/the nation/the family/morality/[insert spook here]! Thus we must take away your ability to choose!" /s


Incest does produce genetic defects in offspring that in turn increase the burden upon social welfare systems, which in turn brings those social welfare systems to the point of rationing who gets care and how much, which in turn leads to laws to discourage incest in the first place.

Remove the social welfare safety net entirely and incest becomes a bad idea that campaigns against itself by example.


You do understand that incest doesn't just include genetic offspring, but political too, right?
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Quokkastan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1913
Founded: Dec 21, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Quokkastan » Mon Aug 08, 2016 9:36 pm

Bakery Hill wrote:Fuck sake, we've got taboos in our society for a reason. Some of us need to get over this "freedom freedom freedom" bullshit. There's nothing progressive about this.

You think if incest was legal it suddenly wouldn't be taboo?

Darjihad wrote:
The New Sea Territory wrote:
"But that hurts society/the nation/the family/morality/[insert spook here]! Thus we must take away your ability to choose!" /s


Incest does produce genetic defects in offspring that in turn increase the burden upon social welfare systems, which in turn brings those social welfare systems to the point of rationing who gets care and how much, which in turn leads to laws to discourage incest in the first place.

Remove the social welfare safety net entirely and incest becomes a bad idea that campaigns against itself by example.

You think that the mere fact of incest being legal would cause people to want to impregnate their relatives in such great numbers that it would make an appreciable impact on social welfare?

Is incest being illegal the only thing that keeps you from having unprotected sex with relatives?
Last edited by Quokkastan on Mon Aug 08, 2016 9:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Give us this day our daily thread.
And forgive us our flames, as we forgive those who flame against us.
And lead us not into trolling, but deliver us from spambots.
For thine is the website, and the novels, and the glory. Forever and ever.
In Violent's name we pray. Submit.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dimetrodon Empire, Giovanniland, Kitsuva, The Grand Duchy of Muscovy, Ubecc, Warvick, Washington Resistance Army, Yets New

Advertisement

Remove ads