Commerce Heights wrote:Trumpostan wrote:
Not to mention shifting money away from the poor, education and healthcare to fund what is essentially a party for the rich, for western athletes and tourists. Same thing happened with the latest two soccer world cups. I think it is morally reprehensible. And then there's the massive "security" measures aimed at keeping those poor out of sight. We wouldn't want to devalue sponsor brands by associating them with the poor dregs of society, would we?
“Western athletes”?
That's generally where the commercial interest lies, yes. A few exceptions don't make it less true.










