DNC leak

[USS Monitor]

But Ron Paul is a good guy? "Muh freedums" and all that. Thats a big mark in my book even if I disagree with some of what he says.

Ron Paul is a good guy, even if I think his politics are whack. His son, on the other hand, not so much.

What's your beef with Rand Paul? I disagree with him politically, but aside from that, what's the problem?

[MERIZoC]

Ron Paul is a good guy, even if I think his politics are whack. His son, on the other hand, not so much.

What's your beef with Rand Paul? I disagree with him politically, but aside from that, what's the problem?

I mean when you're a politician there's not much else that's relevant to most people. I couldn't give a rats arse if my legislator looks people in the eye when he talks or likes to joke around with his buddies. It's ideology, and by extent policies, that matter.

[United Latin Lesbians]

Nothing contained in the leak is surprising. Bernie continuing to support Hillary in spite of the leak is unsurprising. Hillary immediately hiring DWS is unsurprising.

The DNC is our very own Tom Buchanan.

[Darjihad]

Why does Wikileaks want Trump to win?

Because hillary is such a bad candidate?

If I had to guess, they want the process to be fair and open. I'm no Bernie Sanders fan, but even I can see the DNC actively sabotaged him.

[Shofercia]

This is huge. I really appreciate the guys over on Reddit who trawled through the WikiLeaks release files themselves to compile an index of directly relevant and otherwise interesting/damning findings, which I'm going to share with you guys:

Credit to: /u/LongNiteDriving

DNC member killing horses for insurance money. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/578
DNC making fun of black womans name. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/17942
DNC requesting a pull an MSNBC commentary segment. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/6107
DNC controlling the narrative with time released stories. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/12450
DNC conspiring to create false Trump information and release with Reuters. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7102
DNC Hillary supporters infiltrated Sanders campaign. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/4776
DNC members going to complain to Morning Joe producers about his mentioning of a "rigged system." https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/8806
DNC discussing their relationship with NBC/MSNBC/CNN and how to get better treatment. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/13762
Super PAC paying young voters to push back online Sanders supporters. Paid shills. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/8351
DNC Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz having an off the record meeting in MSNBC President Phil Griffin's office. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/8867
DNC being messed with by the Washington Examiner. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/5304
DNC discussing Hillary's policies as unfeasible. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/519
$200k for a private dinner with Hillary. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/17287
Offering to send interns out to fake a protest against the RNC. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/13366
Faking outrage and pasting in a video later. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7102
A mole working inside of the Sanders campaign. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7793
Bringing up Sanders religion to scare the southern voters. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/11508
Possible money laundering by moving money back and forth to bypass legal limits. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/6230
Politico writer sending his stories to the DNC before he sends them to his editor. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/10808
DNC feeding CNN the questions they want to be asked in interviews. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/4077
Creating a fake job ad for a Trump business to paint him as a sexist. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/12803
Hillary funding 2 million dollars in a cooridanted campaign in battleground states to win back the Senate. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7784
DNC is upset that their "allies" didn't send in protestors so they sent out interns. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/13366
"Clinton Foundation quid-pro-quo worries are lingering, will be exploited in general." https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/8351
$50,000 - Lawrence Benenson. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/14700
Daily Fundraising Report for the DNC. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/2875
Content & Social Strategy Discussion. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7512
Re: BuzzFeed and DNC connection. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/10933
Draft linking news articles about trump to use as negative press. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7586
Fwd: State Dinner Countdown. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/1901
Some chick is angry she hasn't been given more stuff from the Obama administration...might be interesting to follow up. Re: State Dinner Countdown. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/2946
Tim O'Brien: Trump's Fixation on Inflating his Net Worth is a Cause for Concern. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/4496
RE: May Fundraising Numbers. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/5615 https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7720
Hillary for America Raised $26.4 Million in April, Began May with More than $30 Million Cash on Hand. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/13986
Re: For approval: Trump supporter graphics. https://www.wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/788
Press talking points, states Hillary is their candidate, dated May 5, 2016. More of a smoking gun than the ambiguous talk in the emails themselves. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/fileid/5254/2728
Consultant calling megyn kelly a bimbo. Has PDF attached that says the same. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/6087
DNC trying to get away with violating the Hatch Act. https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/20148
Democrats using interns to organize fake "protests." https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/13830
RE: Action on DNC tomorrow (Immigration Raids). https://www.wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/9736

This is some seriously hardcore stuff. The picture of this person as an avatar of everything wrong with the establishment, from the crony capitalism to the rigging of democracy, seems to be getting realised more and more; this definitely did her no favours, particularly in trying to escape the "Crooked Hillary" label.

Damn, the Bernie Bros must be loving it!

[Gauthier]

This is huge. I really appreciate the guys over on Reddit who trawled through the WikiLeaks release files themselves to compile an index of directly relevant and otherwise interesting/damning findings, which I'm going to share with you guys:



This is some seriously hardcore stuff. The picture of this person as an avatar of everything wrong with the establishment, from the crony capitalism to the rigging of democracy, seems to be getting realised more and more; this definitely did her no favours, particularly in trying to escape the "Crooked Hillary" label.

Damn, the Bernie Bros must be loving it!

And so is Putin, and probably most Russians too.

[Shofercia]

Damn, the Bernie Bros must be loving it!

And so is Putin, and probably most Russians too.

I will admit that quite a few Russians find the Clinton-Trump election to be highly entertaining, I'm saddened that I'll have to live with the result. It'd be hilarious if the election goes to Congress, and they cannot agree, so Paul Ryan becomes the president

[Gauthier]

And so is Putin, and probably most Russians too.

I will admit that quite a few Russians find the Clinton-Trump election to be highly entertaining, I'm saddened that I'll have to live with the result. It'd be hilarious if the election goes to Congress, and they cannot agree, so Paul Ryan becomes the president

Or they love that Trump has an erotic fixation with Putin to the point he's willing to have the U.S. abandon NATO and give Russia the green light to reclaim former satellites.

[Shofercia]

Your support of Hillary says otherwise.

I support Hillary because the other option is capitulation, and petty corruption doesn't really phase me.

Petty corruption? We're talking billions of dollars. What isn't petty corruption for you?

I support Hillary because the other option is capitulation, and petty corruption doesn't really phase me.

Support a third party, Trump and Hillary are going to be disastrous.

Feel the Johnson!

Hillary makes trump look like an angel. She has NO redeeming qualities, her record is abysmal, her honesty and ethics non-existent. There is literally no reason for any thinking being to want her as President.

My conundrum is this.

Clinton is a terrible candidate for various reasons.

Trump is a terrible candidate for various reasons.

They're both fucking awful, but because of our ass-backwards political system, I'm obligated to pick one turd over the other.

In this instance, I would pick a slightly soggy plate of pancakes over Donald Trump.

You can't file bankruptcy for an entire first world country.

You're not obligated to pick anyone, and Trump won't file for bankruptcy. He's not that stupid. He may pretend to, as part of his being unpredictable, but he won't actually do it.

Support a third party, Trump and Hillary are going to be disastrous.

Hillary will not be disastrous. People who say such things are kidding themselves.

I expect Clinton will be like Obama with more vigor and less bad foreign policy.

Then you'll be disappointed.

[Liriena]

In light of the fact that Debbie Wasserman Schultz only left the DNC so she could be a part of Clinton's campaign, this may affect Clinton more than I originally thought. Unless she starts to work miracles during the convention, this is rightfully going to hurt Clinton's relationship with Sanders supporters, and it's going to add fuel to the trashcan fire of the GOP's sudden love for anti-establishment politics.

Not being Donald Trump, for a start.

Hillary makes trump look like an angel. She has NO redeeming qualities, her record is abysmal, her honesty and ethics non-existent. There is literally no reason for any thinking being to want her as President.

For one, she has not pledged to overturn marriage equality, deprive people of access to health care, ban over a billion people from entering the country, commit war crimes, bring back new sadistic forms of torture, restrict abortions, default on the national debt, or build a useless wall on the border with a friendly neighbour. Nor has she chosen a notorious enemy of non-Christians, women, workers and the LGBT+ community as her running mate, nor encouraged violence at her own rallies, nor seen notoriously authoritarian regimes as examples to follow, nor dogwhistled her way into the hearts of white supremacists and fundamentalist Christians, nor gone on record as saying that American wages were too high, nor denied the science of global warming, nor been actively involved in the birther movement, nor been at the helm of a series of failed businesses and swindles. And she is not running under an anti-porn, pro-coal, dominionist, staunchly anti-LGBT+ platform.

Instead, she has proposed raising the minimum wage, reforming the criminal justice system, providing some much-needed debt relief to students, passing anti-discrimination protections for LGBT+ people, and reforming campaign finance. Among other things. Good stuff, if you are not feeling too ambitious.

Do I trust her to make good on her word, and actually make every proposed policy of hers a reality? No. She remains a neoliberal, not a social democrat. But at least she doesn't seem to be dangerously ignorant and erratic, and those policies she is more likely to implement would be a step in the right direction.

[Gauthier]

In light of the fact that Debbie Wasserman Schultz only left the DNC so she could be a part of Clinton's campaign, this may affect Clinton more than I originally thought. Unless she starts to work miracles during the convention, this is rightfully going to hurt Clinton's relationship with Sanders supporters, and it's going to add fuel to the trashcan fire of the GOP's sudden love for anti-establishment politics.

Hillary makes trump look like an angel. She has NO redeeming qualities, her record is abysmal, her honesty and ethics non-existent. There is literally no reason for any thinking being to want her as President.

For one, she has not pledged to overturn marriage equality, deprive people of access to health care, ban over a billion people from entering the country, commit war crimes, bring back new sadistic forms of torture, restrict abortions, default on the national debt, or build a useless wall on the border with a friendly neighbour. Nor has she chosen a notorious enemy of non-Christians, women, workers and the LGBT+ community as her running mate, nor encouraged violence at her own rallies, nor seen notoriously authoritarian regimes as examples to follow, nor dogwhistled her way into the hearts of white supremacists and fundamentalist Christians, nor gone on record as saying that American wages were too high, nor denied the science of global warming, nor been actively involved in the birther movement, nor been at the helm of a series of failed businesses and swindles. And she is not running under an anti-porn, pro-coal, dominionist, staunchly anti-LGBT+ platform.

Instead, she has proposed raising the minimum wage, reforming the criminal justice system, providing some much-needed debt relief to students, passing anti-discrimination protections for LGBT+ people, and reforming campaign finance. Among other things. Good stuff, if you are not feeling too ambitious.

Do I trust her to make good on her word, and actually make every proposed policy of hers a reality? No. She remains a neoliberal, not a social democrat. But at least she doesn't seem to be dangerously ignorant and erratic.

She also doesn't have a fetish for Vladimir Putin to the point of openly flirting with abandoning NATO and letting Russia overrun former satellite states and she is definitely not fixated on starting trade wars with China and Mexico just because. But hey, since Trump has vowed to protect the Second Amendment that's good enough for Jim. And those guns will come in handy when the United States and possibly the world economy collapses thanks to a welching con man and the country starts looking like the set of The Walking Dead where LGBTs are lynched on the spot.

[Liriena]

In light of the fact that Debbie Wasserman Schultz only left the DNC so she could be a part of Clinton's campaign, this may affect Clinton more than I originally thought. Unless she starts to work miracles during the convention, this is rightfully going to hurt Clinton's relationship with Sanders supporters, and it's going to add fuel to the trashcan fire of the GOP's sudden love for anti-establishment politics.


For one, she has not pledged to overturn marriage equality, deprive people of access to health care, ban over a billion people from entering the country, commit war crimes, bring back new sadistic forms of torture, restrict abortions, default on the national debt, or build a useless wall on the border with a friendly neighbour. Nor has she chosen a notorious enemy of non-Christians, women, workers and the LGBT+ community as her running mate, nor encouraged violence at her own rallies, nor seen notoriously authoritarian regimes as examples to follow, nor dogwhistled her way into the hearts of white supremacists and fundamentalist Christians, nor gone on record as saying that American wages were too high, nor denied the science of global warming, nor been actively involved in the birther movement, nor been at the helm of a series of failed businesses and swindles. And she is not running under an anti-porn, pro-coal, dominionist, staunchly anti-LGBT+ platform.

Instead, she has proposed raising the minimum wage, reforming the criminal justice system, providing some much-needed debt relief to students, passing anti-discrimination protections for LGBT+ people, and reforming campaign finance. Among other things. Good stuff, if you are not feeling too ambitious.

Do I trust her to make good on her word, and actually make every proposed policy of hers a reality? No. She remains a neoliberal, not a social democrat. But at least she doesn't seem to be dangerously ignorant and erratic.

She also doesn't have a fetish for Vladimir Putin to the point of openly flirting with abandoning NATO and letting Russia overrun former satellite states and she is definitely not fixated on starting trade wars with China and Mexico just because. But hey, since Trump has vowed to protect the Second Amendment that's good enough for Jim. And those guns will come in handy when the United States and possibly the world economy collapses thanks to a welching con man and the country starts looking like the set of The Walking Dead where LGBTs are lynched on the spot.

To be fair an American president that doesn't go out of his way to demonize Putin and Russia might be a nice change of pace... but Trump is doing it in the worst way, and for the wrong reasons.

[Gauthier]

She also doesn't have a fetish for Vladimir Putin to the point of openly flirting with abandoning NATO and letting Russia overrun former satellite states and she is definitely not fixated on starting trade wars with China and Mexico just because. But hey, since Trump has vowed to protect the Second Amendment that's good enough for Jim. And those guns will come in handy when the United States and possibly the world economy collapses thanks to a welching con man and the country starts looking like the set of The Walking Dead where LGBTs are lynched on the spot.

To be fair an American president that doesn't go out of his way to demonize Putin and Russia might be a nice change of pace... but Trump is doing it in the worst way, and for the wrong reasons.

There's not demonizing Putin, and then there's having a crush on him and being openly willing to give him his wet dream of a crippled or destroyed NATO.

[Shofercia]

Just like an onion. The more you peel away its layers, the more it stinks. XD

I thought House of Cards was just a decent, if overrated television show, not a documentary.

You thought wrong, dude!

She wants to destabilize the region to make it a repeat of Libya. Wikileaks already released the email where she said the government needs to come down because Israel doesn't like it.

https://wikileaks.org/clinton-emails/emailid/18328

The rebels in Syria are backed by Turkey and Saudi Arabia, and number Al-Qaeda (whom both states support in Syria) among their ranks; if they gain control, the state will change from a secular one, into a Islamist nightmare.

http://www.ncregister.com/daily-news/sy ... ead-world/

First of all I doubt the plan she's proposing there is still possible with Turkey being as it is right now (kowtowing to Putin and pulling out of Syria).

Second, getting rid of Assad is a noble goal. He's a tyrant, and I see no convincing argument for Iran wielding influence over Israel.

Considering that Israel de facto annexed the Golan Heights, I'd say that Israel's holding its own rather well.

Why does Wikileaks want Trump to win?

Wikileaks publishes anything they get, they don't give a fuck if it would literally start World War 3.

Russian hackers implicate Russia, who obviously want Trump to win because he wants to be bottom for Putin sempai and has ranted about pulling the U.S. out of NATO so that Russia can go Tartar over the former Soviet Satellites.

Russia can go Tartar over all former Soviet Satellites, except Kazakhstan and Belarus. Thus far Russia hasn't done very much, aside from supporting two Oblasts in Ukraine, and annexing Crimea, which pretty much wants to be Russian. Hurr Durr Rusha Scary Elect Clinton is no longer working. Interestingly enough, that's the line that Republicans used to tow.

He's still pissed about Trump talking shit about his wife and father. Of course, it's nice that he had enough integrity to do something about it.

And then Trump's fanboys almost lynching his wife and father because he said "Fuck You" to Trump.

Didn't the wife lynching start after a pro-Cruz super-pac ran a piece attacking Melania?

I will admit that quite a few Russians find the Clinton-Trump election to be highly entertaining, I'm saddened that I'll have to live with the result. It'd be hilarious if the election goes to Congress, and they cannot agree, so Paul Ryan becomes the president

Or they love that Trump has an erotic fixation with Putin to the point he's willing to have the U.S. abandon NATO and give Russia the green light to reclaim former satellites.

Why exactly would Russia take the Baltics and jeopardize trade with Europe?

[Liriena]

And then Trump's fanboys almost lynching his wife and father because he said "Fuck You" to Trump.

Didn't the wife lynching start after a pro-Cruz super-pac ran a piece attacking Melania?

Yes, but as far as we know Cruz himself was not involved.

And it wasn't so much a piece as it was circulating a semi-nude picture of Melania from her modelling days.

Hardly warranted Trump personally mocking Heidi Cruz's appearance, and then pretending that he didn't.

[Shofercia]

Didn't the wife lynching start after a pro-Cruz super-pac ran a piece attacking Melania?

Yes, but as far as we know Cruz himself was not involved.

And it wasn't so much a piece as it was circulating a semi-nude picture of Melania from her modelling days.

Hardly warranted Trump personally mocking Heidi Cruz's appearance, and then pretending that he didn't.

It was a photo, with a text that engaged in shaming Melania Trump. Did it warrant Trump's mocking of Heidi Cruz's appearance? Obviously not. But it wasn't just an innocent semi-nude picture.

[Liriena]

Yes, but as far as we know Cruz himself was not involved.

And it wasn't so much a piece as it was circulating a semi-nude picture of Melania from her modelling days.

Hardly warranted Trump personally mocking Heidi Cruz's appearance, and then pretending that he didn't.

It was a photo, with a text that engaged in shaming Melania Trump. Did it warrant Trump's mocking of Heidi Cruz's appearance? Obviously not. But it wasn't just an innocent semi-nude picture.

True.

Still, good on Cruz for not being a total cuck for Trump. *conspicuously glares at Chris Christie*

[Imperium Americanum]

>bernie still supporting clinton after leak

>c word that ends in k

[Gauthier]

It was a photo, with a text that engaged in shaming Melania Trump. Did it warrant Trump's mocking of Heidi Cruz's appearance? Obviously not. But it wasn't just an innocent semi-nude picture.

True.

Still, good on Cruz for not being a total cuck for Trump. *conspicuously glares at Chris Christie*

It's a Cuck Train. Christie is a cuck for Trump, and Trump in turn is a cuck for Putin.

[New Werpland]

I support Hillary because the other option is capitulation, and petty corruption doesn't really phase me.

Petty corruption? We're talking billions of dollars. What isn't petty corruption for you?

What? Have you gotten this mixed up with something else?

Hillary will not be disastrous. People who say such things are kidding themselves.

I expect Clinton will be like Obama with more vigor and less bad foreign policy.

Then you'll be disappointed.

I will not.

[Shofercia]

Petty corruption? We're talking billions of dollars. What isn't petty corruption for you?

What? Have you gotten this mixed up with something else?

Then you'll be disappointed.

I will not.

With the failures of Clinton's foreign policy? I'm fairly sure you will be.

True.

Still, good on Cruz for not being a total cuck for Trump. *conspicuously glares at Chris Christie*

It's a Cuck Train. Christie is a cuck for Trump, and Trump in turn is a cuck for Putin.

Speaking of being a cuck for Putin, hmm, I wonder, did making all those state e-mails available to Putin by putting them on an easily hackable private server, make his day? And wasn't that done by Clinton, not Trump? So if we're going to, for some odd reason, argue who'd benefit Putin the most, Clinton's in the running too.

It was a photo, with a text that engaged in shaming Melania Trump. Did it warrant Trump's mocking of Heidi Cruz's appearance? Obviously not. But it wasn't just an innocent semi-nude picture.

True.

Still, good on Cruz for not being a total cuck for Trump. *conspicuously glares at Chris Christie*

Chris Christie's been a cuck for everyone though, so maybe he was hoping to infect Trump.

[Licana]

Hillary will not be disastrous. People who say such things are kidding themselves.

I expect Clinton will be like Obama with more vigor and less bad foreign policy.

I support Hillary because the other option is capitulation, and petty corruption doesn't really phase me.

"5 Shillbux have been added to your account."

[Vedilia]

Who cares?

>bernie still supporting clinton after leak

>c word that ends in k

Giant cocks everywhere.

[Vassenor]

Who cares?

>bernie still supporting clinton after leak

>c word that ends in k

Giant cocks everywhere.

But clearly this proves the entire Democratic Party is pure evil and needs to be destroyed for the good of America.

[Vedilia]

Who cares?

Giant cocks everywhere.

But clearly this proves the entire Democratic Party is pure evil and needs to be destroyed for the good of America.

It doesn't prove such.
That's a conclusion drawn from emotional bias. It proves nothing more than that documentation exists alleging such things happened.