No, just HRC.
And I say the people who think Trump will be the literal end of the United States are kidding themselves. He won't be able to do anything.
Advertisement

by Washington Resistance Army » Sun Jul 24, 2016 9:46 pm

by New Werpland » Sun Jul 24, 2016 9:46 pm
The Portland Territory wrote:Hillary used the Haitian Earthquake to make millions.

by Spiffier » Sun Jul 24, 2016 9:46 pm

by Spiffier » Sun Jul 24, 2016 9:47 pm

by New Werpland » Sun Jul 24, 2016 9:47 pm
Washington Resistance Army wrote:New Werpland wrote:Hillary will not be disastrous. People who say such things are kidding themselves.
I expect Clinton will be like Obama with more vigor and less bad foreign policy.
And I say the people who think Trump will be the literal end of the United States are kidding themselves. He won't be able to do anything.

by New Werpland » Sun Jul 24, 2016 9:48 pm

by Spiffier » Sun Jul 24, 2016 9:51 pm

by Luminesa » Sun Jul 24, 2016 9:51 pm
New Grestin wrote:You know, I'm going to be honest.
I'm not at all remotely fucking surprised that there was some bullshit going on with this election. I mean, I think everyone's just kind of acknowledged that this is how things are, and have pretty much always been. Politics is shady. Fine, I accept that.
What I am surprised about is the sheer depth that this goes.

by Senkaku » Sun Jul 24, 2016 9:51 pm

by New Werpland » Sun Jul 24, 2016 9:52 pm

by New Grestin » Sun Jul 24, 2016 9:53 pm
Luminesa wrote:Just like an onion. The more you peel away its layers, the more it stinks. XD
Let’s not dwell on our corpse strewn past. Let’s celebrate our corpse strewn future!
Head Bartender for The Pub | The Para-Verse | Writing Advice from a Pretentious Jerk | I write stuff | Arbitrary Political Numbers- Best Worldbuilding - 2016 (Community Choice)
- Best Horror/Thriller RP for THE ZONE - 2016 (Community Choice)

by The Serbian Empire » Sun Jul 24, 2016 9:57 pm
Luminesa wrote:New Grestin wrote:You know, I'm going to be honest.
I'm not at all remotely fucking surprised that there was some bullshit going on with this election. I mean, I think everyone's just kind of acknowledged that this is how things are, and have pretty much always been. Politics is shady. Fine, I accept that.
What I am surprised about is the sheer depth that this goes.
Just like an onion. The more you peel away its layers, the more it stinks. XD

by Maurepas » Sun Jul 24, 2016 9:57 pm
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
And I say the people who think Trump will be the literal end of the United States are kidding themselves. He won't be able to do anything.

by Washington Resistance Army » Sun Jul 24, 2016 9:59 pm
Maurepas wrote:Washington Resistance Army wrote:
And I say the people who think Trump will be the literal end of the United States are kidding themselves. He won't be able to do anything.
That the only defense of the guy is "Well, he probably can't do all the ludicrous things he says" says it all really. Not that it's remotely true, he'll have the pen and he'll have the phone as Obama likes to say.

by Lupolska » Sun Jul 24, 2016 10:00 pm
Maurepas wrote:Washington Resistance Army wrote:
And I say the people who think Trump will be the literal end of the United States are kidding themselves. He won't be able to do anything.
That the only defense of the guy is "Well, he probably can't do all the ludicrous things he says" says it all really. Not that it's remotely true, he'll have the pen and he'll have the phone as Obama likes to say.

by Washington Resistance Army » Sun Jul 24, 2016 10:00 pm
Lupolska wrote:Maurepas wrote:That the only defense of the guy is "Well, he probably can't do all the ludicrous things he says" says it all really. Not that it's remotely true, he'll have the pen and he'll have the phone as Obama likes to say.
A non-trump supporter (correct me if i'm wrong on this, WRA) making one point in defense of a trump presidency doesn't equate to 'the only argument'

by New Werpland » Sun Jul 24, 2016 10:02 pm
Spiffier wrote:New Werpland wrote:Why not?
Because she's strictly a partisan pandering to Saudi Arabia and Israel as opposed to trying to stabilize the region--in fact, if it's in their interests, she'd support making the region even worse. She'd also probably start supporting the House of Saud more against the Houthis.

by Pope Joan » Sun Jul 24, 2016 10:02 pm

by Pope Joan » Sun Jul 24, 2016 10:05 pm
Spiffier wrote:Maurepas wrote:I'm not sure how when they'll be exactly the same.
Clinton is far more supportive Israel, far more supportive of Saudi Arabia, and would make deposing Assad a much greater priority in Syria (whereas Obama prioritizes eliminating ISIS over there, even to the extent of cooperating with Russia, something Clinton would never do). I also imagine, though this is more of a guess, she'd be a lot more hostile toward Iran.

by Kyrusia » Sun Jul 24, 2016 10:07 pm
Novorneika wrote:We must lynch Hillary Clinton and Debbie Schultz in front of everyone on the Convention Stage!!!!!!
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Burna Republic, Cannot think of a name, Dimetrodon Empire, Eire Agus Albion, Ferrum Hills, Gun Manufacturers, Hidrandia, Hurdergaryp, La Xinga, Necroghastia, Ostroeuropa, Past beans, Rusozak, Senkaku, Shrillland, Valyxias
Advertisement