Milo Yiannopoulos banned from Twitter.

[Nariterrr]

http://www.breitbart.com/milo/2016/07/05/fat-shaming-is-good-science/

^ I think this pretty much sums up how much of a horrible piece of shit Milo is.

Also, I find it quite hypocritical that he says that fat people should hate themselves because they are unhealthy yet he smokes himself and doesn't see that as a problem.

I thought I hated Milo.. my mom is overweight. This is getting personal. What a fucking twat. He's such a wazzuk.

[Chestaan]

https://abload.de/img/nerointeractionslesli60u03.png

All interactions between the two.

Notice that she tweets at him vastly more than he at her, she also uses vulgarity and insults him more.

He only criticizes her work and her literacy, as well as calling her a caricature.

The decision to ban milo makes no sense when viewed in context.

http://www.vox.com/2016/7/20/12226070/m ... -explained

He also called her fat and implied that she was a man.

[Herador]

.

[Alvecia]

https://abload.de/img/nerointeractionslesli60u03.png

All interactions between the two.

Is it?

[Heidisteinian Fempire]

Skeleton roll call

who #deportMilo

[Ostroeuropa]

https://abload.de/img/nerointeractionslesli60u03.png

All interactions between the two.

Notice that she tweets at him vastly more than he at her, she also uses vulgarity and insults him more.

He only criticizes her work and her literacy, as well as calling her a caricature.

The decision to ban milo makes no sense when viewed in context.

http://www.vox.com/2016/7/20/12226070/m ... -explained

He also called her fat and implied that she was a man.

But that wasn't an interaction between them, now was it.
He was commenting on a media appearance of hers. That does not and cannot constitute harassment. She isn't tagged in it, and there's no reason to believe she saw it.

Also lolol Vox.

[Nariterrr]

Skeleton roll call

who #deportMilo

I second this.

[Ostroeuropa]

https://abload.de/img/nerointeractionslesli60u03.png

All interactions between the two.

Is it?

It would appear so yes.

[Herador]

Skeleton roll call

who #deportMilo

I second this.

Lets hash some tags friendio's

[Gauthier]

He was caught blatantly breaking rules on a notoriously lax Twitter repeatedly and then when he decided to ride the bomb one more time and got banned for it we've got alt-righters saying that he's a Special Snowflake who should be given a pass for all that.

[Heidisteinian Fempire]

I second this.

Lets hash some tags friendio's

amen bro let's #deportmilo

a man worth deporting :')

[Nariterrr]

WE NEED TO BUILT A WAR....around Milo.

[Alvecia]

Is it?

It would appear so yes.

We know this how?

[Gauthier]

WE NEED TO BUILT A WAR....around Milo.

And make him pay for it.

You meant "wall" right?

[Herador]

He was caught blatantly breaking rules on a notoriously lax Twitter repeatedly and then when he decided to ride the bomb one more time and got banned for it we've got alt-righters saying that he's a Special Snowflake who should be given a pass for all that.

And the status quo on the internet remained unbroken.

[Kelinfort]

He was caught blatantly breaking rules on a notoriously lax Twitter repeatedly and then when he decided to ride the bomb one more time and got banned for it we've got alt-righters saying that he's a Special Snowflake who should be given a pass for all that.

And the status quo on the internet remained unbroken.

It's been status quo since porn came online.

[Nariterrr]

WE NEED TO BUILT A WAR....around Milo.

And make him pay for it.

You meant "wall" right?

Yeah.

[Ostroeuropa]

It would appear so yes.

We know this how?

Are you seriously failing to understand the burden of proof here?
Go out and find a single additional interaction on twitter and you'll prove your argument.
I have provided 100% of them here. The evidence for there not being any more doesn't need to be provided, it's your job to go out and find them.

I cannot show you something that doesn't exist.

I would say that based on the interactions demonstrated, there is no justification for his ban. Do you agree?
If you do, could you find a tweet that does justify it? (No.)

I suspect it's become obvious to you after reading them that this wasn't anything to do with him breaking rules and you've been forced into either pushing nonsense or admitting you were wrong about political bias on twitter.

Here is a full list of the tweets not included there:

[Kelinfort]

WE NEED TO BUILT A WAR....around Milo.

Just send him a giant wooden horse.

[Heidisteinian Fempire]

Face it, alt-right. We won. We will take your childhoods and your video games and we will make them into something you will hate forever. Now the SJW cabal has taken over Twitter and Reddit and all those sites you love. Donald Trump is behind in the polls

cis males are done

[Alvecia]

We know this how?

Are you seriously failing to understand the burden of proof here?
Go out and find a single additional interaction on twitter and you'll prove your argument.
I have provided 100% of them here. The evidence for there not being any more doesn't need to be provided, it's your job to go out and find them.

I cannot show you something that doesn't exist.

I would say that based on the interactions demonstrated, there is no justification for his ban. Do you agree?
If you do, could you find a tweet that does justify it? (No.)

I suspect you're just in denial because it's become obvious to you after reading them that this wasn't anything to do with him breaking rules and you've been forced into either pushing nonsense or admitting you were wrong about political bias on twitter.

I'm sorry, what? You've failed to prove anything. You just posted an image of some screenshots and asserted that was all of them

[Gauthier]

Are you seriously failing to understand the burden of proof here?
Go out and find a single additional interaction on twitter and you'll prove your argument.
I have provided 100% of them here. The evidence for there not being any more doesn't need to be provided, it's your job to go out and find them.

I cannot show you something that doesn't exist.

I would say that based on the interactions demonstrated, there is no justification for his ban. Do you agree?
If you do, could you find a tweet that does justify it? (No.)

I suspect you're just in denial because it's become obvious to you after reading them that this wasn't anything to do with him breaking rules and you've been forced into either pushing nonsense or admitting you were wrong about political bias on twitter.

I'm sorry, what? You've failed to prove anything. You just posted an image of some screenshots and asserted that was all of them

And didn't Yiannopoulous have a documented habit of photoshopping screen shots for his own ends?

[Heidisteinian Fempire]

We know this how?

Are you seriously failing to understand the burden of proof here?
Go out and find a single additional interaction on twitter and you'll prove your argument.
I have provided 100% of them here. The evidence for there not being any more doesn't need to be provided, it's your job to go out and find them.

I cannot show you something that doesn't exist.

I would say that based on the interactions demonstrated, there is no justification for his ban. Do you agree?
If you do, could you find a tweet that does justify it? (No.)

I suspect you're just in denial because it's become obvious to you after reading them that this wasn't anything to do with him breaking rules and you've been forced into either pushing nonsense or admitting you were wrong about political bias on twitter.

Here is a full list of the tweets not included there:

i wanted milo banned regardless if he broke the rules

as he said he is in favor of the destruction of free speech

[Ostroeuropa]

Are you seriously failing to understand the burden of proof here?
Go out and find a single additional interaction on twitter and you'll prove your argument.
I have provided 100% of them here. The evidence for there not being any more doesn't need to be provided, it's your job to go out and find them.

I cannot show you something that doesn't exist.

I would say that based on the interactions demonstrated, there is no justification for his ban. Do you agree?
If you do, could you find a tweet that does justify it? (No.)

I suspect you're just in denial because it's become obvious to you after reading them that this wasn't anything to do with him breaking rules and you've been forced into either pushing nonsense or admitting you were wrong about political bias on twitter.

I'm sorry, what? You've failed to prove anything. You just posted an image of some screenshots and asserted that was all of them

It is all of them. It should be trivial to show otherwise if that were the case. I trust my sources.
I expect they simply performed a wayback search.
My point is you're asking me to show you things which I allege don't exist. That's a nonsense thing to ask.

[Kelinfort]

Are you seriously failing to understand the burden of proof here?
Go out and find a single additional interaction on twitter and you'll prove your argument.
I have provided 100% of them here. The evidence for there not being any more doesn't need to be provided, it's your job to go out and find them.

I cannot show you something that doesn't exist.

I would say that based on the interactions demonstrated, there is no justification for his ban. Do you agree?
If you do, could you find a tweet that does justify it? (No.)

I suspect you're just in denial because it's become obvious to you after reading them that this wasn't anything to do with him breaking rules and you've been forced into either pushing nonsense or admitting you were wrong about political bias on twitter.

Here is a full list of the tweets not included there:

i wanted milo banned regardless if he broke the rules

as he said he is in favor of the destruction of free speech

What.