True. Never liked her.
Anyway, none of the Indy moves has the exact same cast.
Advertisement

by Bluddhaven » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:46 pm

by Yugo-Austria » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:46 pm
The Grene Knyght wrote:we're on almost 500 posts in this shitty thread. Why did I even make this. I don't care about Milo at all.

by Benuty » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:46 pm
Liriena wrote:Conservative poster wrote:okay then think of it like this: A man has a rare mutation that gives him both reproductive organs(I forgot the acutal name for it)but yet the man is proud of it. But at the same time he views it as a curse.(He is proud of it because thats who he is and he is proud of himself) But he wouldnt want his kids to have the same mutation
Umm... yeah, maybe we should drop this topic entirely at this point.

by Italios » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:47 pm
Conservative poster wrote:Italios wrote:A mutation of sexual organs still isn't even close to homosexuality, try again.
I'm thinking you're proud of your stance on Milo Yiannopoulos' sexuality complex, but at the same time I think it's more of a curse.
No im not that proud of taking his side because i only listened to a few of his stuff, but I defend him because he is a Conservative.

by Katganistan » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:47 pm
The New Sea Territory wrote:
The only difference being that most alt-wrong wingers actually embody this mental image, and far-leftists have more of a problem of going too far in the other direction: becoming super intellectual and speaking in jargon terms from a century ago.

by Benuty » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:48 pm

by The Grene Knyght » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:48 pm
The New Sea Territory wrote:
The only difference being that most alt-wrong wingers actually embody this mental image, and far-leftists have more of a problem of going too far in the other direction: becoming super intellectual and speaking in jargon terms from a century ago.
[_★_]
(◕‿◕)
Currently
Reading
2015: x=-8.75,y=-6.56
2016: x=-8.88,y=-9.54
2017: x=-9.63,y=-9.90
2018: x=-9.88,y=-9.23
2019: x=-10.0,y=-9.90
2020: x=-10.0,y=-10.0
2021: x=-10.0,y=-10.0
FULLY AUTOMATED LUXURY GAY SPACE COMMUNISM
Portal Nationalist | Proletarian MoralistPRO: Socialism, Communism, Internationalism, Revolution, Leninism.
NEUTRAL: Anarchism, Marxism-Leninism.
ANTI: Capitalism, Liberalism, Nationalism, Fascists, Hyper-Sectarian Leftists.

by Yumyumsuppertime » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:48 pm
the Christian religion often looks down apon Gays and usually dont agree with gay marriage.
So if you force churches to marry gays it would be considered a violation of the constitution(Freedom of religion) which would be a good defense for the churches

by Yugo-Austria » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:49 pm
The Grene Knyght wrote:The New Sea Territory wrote:
The only difference being that most alt-wrong wingers actually embody this mental image, and far-leftists have more of a problem of going too far in the other direction: becoming super intellectual and speaking in jargon terms from a century ago.
I second that. Fuck left-wing intellectual elitism. Nothing about the left annoys me more.

by Conservative poster » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:49 pm

by Benuty » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:50 pm
The Grene Knyght wrote:The New Sea Territory wrote:
The only difference being that most alt-wrong wingers actually embody this mental image, and far-leftists have more of a problem of going too far in the other direction: becoming super intellectual and speaking in jargon terms from a century ago.
I second that. Fuck left-wing intellectual elitism. Nothing about the left annoys me more.

by Katganistan » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:50 pm
Conservative poster wrote:Liriena wrote:Honestly, while I get the hate, I don't get the intensity of it, at least without taking potential misogyny into consideration.
It's Ghostbusters. Yeah, the original was a sweet blockbuster comedy classic, but it was bound to get a reboot someday.
I'm far more infuriated by the upcoming Ben-hur remake.
Well they took out the whole original cast, so the anger is justified

by Dameth » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:51 pm

by Yumyumsuppertime » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:51 pm
Conservative poster wrote:Italios wrote:A mutation of sexual organs still isn't even close to homosexuality, try again.
I'm thinking you're proud of your stance on Milo Yiannopoulos' sexuality complex, but at the same time I think it's more of a curse.
No im not that proud of taking his side because i only listened to a few of his stuff, but I defend him because he is a Conservative.

by The Grene Knyght » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:52 pm
[_★_]
(◕‿◕)
Currently
Reading
2015: x=-8.75,y=-6.56
2016: x=-8.88,y=-9.54
2017: x=-9.63,y=-9.90
2018: x=-9.88,y=-9.23
2019: x=-10.0,y=-9.90
2020: x=-10.0,y=-10.0
2021: x=-10.0,y=-10.0
FULLY AUTOMATED LUXURY GAY SPACE COMMUNISM
Portal Nationalist | Proletarian MoralistPRO: Socialism, Communism, Internationalism, Revolution, Leninism.
NEUTRAL: Anarchism, Marxism-Leninism.
ANTI: Capitalism, Liberalism, Nationalism, Fascists, Hyper-Sectarian Leftists.

by Aelex » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:52 pm
Socialist Nordia wrote:What? That doesn't make sense. Homosexuality isn't an injury.

by Benuty » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:52 pm

by Yumyumsuppertime » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:53 pm
The Grene Knyght wrote:The New Sea Territory wrote:
The only difference being that most alt-wrong wingers actually embody this mental image, and far-leftists have more of a problem of going too far in the other direction: becoming super intellectual and speaking in jargon terms from a century ago.
I second that. Fuck left-wing intellectual elitism. Nothing about the left annoys me more.

by Risottia » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:53 pm
The Grene Knyght wrote:http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/20/technology/twitter-bars-milo-yiannopoulos-in-crackdown-on-abusive-comments.html?_r=0
Milo Yiannopoulos, controversial conservative commentator,

by Arachno-Satinism » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:53 pm

by Yumyumsuppertime » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:54 pm

by Conservative poster » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:54 pm
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Conservative poster wrote: No im not that proud of taking his side because i only listened to a few of his stuff, but I defend him because he is a Conservative.
That's a bit silly. There's all sorts of people on the left I don't defend, especially when they say or do indefensible things. Maybe you should be a bit more focused on individual or group actions, and less on labels.

by Mefpan » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:55 pm
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Aelex wrote:No but it De Facto implicate sterility in most case, so it's not something most parents would be glad to see their children "suffer" from.
You do realize that gay couples all over the place have children, right? Some are from previous relationships, others adopted, still others through surrogacy or sperm donation.

by Yumyumsuppertime » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:56 pm
Conservative poster wrote:Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
That's a bit silly. There's all sorts of people on the left I don't defend, especially when they say or do indefensible things. Maybe you should be a bit more focused on individual or group actions, and less on labels.
Yeah but the GOP is divided so the best we can do is defend each other and stick together
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Commonwealth of Adirondack, Cosnionga, Floofybit, Galloism, Hispida, Ifreann, Kyoto Noku, La Cocina del Bodhi, Necroghastia, Neu California, Ors Might, Port Caverton, Senkaku, Shrillland, Sorcery, Spirit of Hope, Tarsonis, Terra dei Cittadini, The Acolyte Confederacy, The Black Forrest, The Crimson Isles, The Pirateariat, Thermodolia, Trump Almighty, Xenti
Advertisement