NATION

PASSWORD

Milo Yiannopoulos banned from Twitter.

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Bluddhaven
Lobbyist
 
Posts: 17
Founded: Jul 16, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Bluddhaven » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:46 pm

Gauthier wrote:
Bluddhaven wrote:Didnt have that chinese kid though... Did it?


No, but Karen Allen came back.

True. Never liked her.
Anyway, none of the Indy moves has the exact same cast.

User avatar
Yugo-Austria
Diplomat
 
Posts: 565
Founded: Jun 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yugo-Austria » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:46 pm

The Grene Knyght wrote:we're on almost 500 posts in this shitty thread. Why did I even make this. I don't care about Milo at all.

Ask yourself that, buddy.
pleaes God don't judge me for my previous posts i know it was cringe

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36757
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Benuty » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:46 pm

Liriena wrote:
Conservative poster wrote:okay then think of it like this: A man has a rare mutation that gives him both reproductive organs(I forgot the acutal name for it)but yet the man is proud of it. But at the same time he views it as a curse.(He is proud of it because thats who he is and he is proud of himself) But he wouldnt want his kids to have the same mutation

Umm... yeah, maybe we should drop this topic entirely at this point.

We need to go deeper down the rabbit hole.
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity.
Please be aware my posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate.

User avatar
Italios
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17520
Founded: Dec 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Italios » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:47 pm

Conservative poster wrote:
Italios wrote:A mutation of sexual organs still isn't even close to homosexuality, try again.

I'm thinking you're proud of your stance on Milo Yiannopoulos' sexuality complex, but at the same time I think it's more of a curse.

No im not that proud of taking his side because i only listened to a few of his stuff, but I defend him because he is a Conservative.

So you'd defend him even if you opposed each other on an issue, but remained conservative?
Issue Author #1461: No Shirt, No Shoes, No ID, No Service.

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 35919
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:47 pm

The New Sea Territory wrote:
The balkens wrote:
i have the same reaction to the far left on the internet.

weird.


The only difference being that most alt-wrong wingers actually embody this mental image, and far-leftists have more of a problem of going too far in the other direction: becoming super intellectual and speaking in jargon terms from a century ago.


Sorry, just need clarification: was that in general, or directed at my post?

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36757
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Benuty » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:48 pm

Liriena wrote:
Gauthier wrote:
It was like someone hired Giogio Tsoukalas as scriptwriter.

George Lucas, yo.

Funny since the aliens practically ripped in half the major supernatural themes throughout the movies.
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity.
Please be aware my posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate.

User avatar
The Grene Knyght
Minister
 
Posts: 3263
Founded: May 07, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Grene Knyght » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:48 pm

The New Sea Territory wrote:
The balkens wrote:
i have the same reaction to the far left on the internet.

weird.


The only difference being that most alt-wrong wingers actually embody this mental image, and far-leftists have more of a problem of going too far in the other direction: becoming super intellectual and speaking in jargon terms from a century ago.

I second that. Fuck left-wing intellectual elitism. Nothing about the left annoys me more.
[_★_]
(◕‿◕)
Socialist Women wrote:Part of the reason you're an anarchist is because you ate too much expired food
Claorica wrote:Oh look, an antifa ancom being smartaleck
Old Tyrannia wrote:Bold words from the self-declared Leninist
Currently
Reading
2015: x=-8.75,y=-6.56
2016: x=-8.88,y=-9.54
2017: x=-9.63,y=-9.90
2018: x=-9.88,y=-9.23
2019: x=-10.0,y=-9.90
2020: x=-10.0,y=-10.0
2021: x=-10.0,y=-10.0
     
PRO: Socialism, Communism, Internationalism, Revolution, Leninism.
NEUTRAL: Anarchism, Marxism-Leninism.
ANTI: Capitalism, Liberalism, Nationalism, Fascists, Hyper-Sectarian Leftists.
Portal Nationalist | Proletarian Moralist

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:48 pm

Conservative poster wrote:
Nariterrr wrote:Yeah, not marrying gays is a violation of their civil rights.

And yet Christian churches are well with in their right to refuse marry gays,


This is indeed the case in America, and is as it should be. Now that we're in agreement on this point, let's move on.

the Christian religion often looks down apon Gays and usually dont agree with gay marriage.


I doubt that even churches that don't allow for gay marriage would necessarily classify themselves as "looking down upon gays", and those that allow for same-sex marrIage (United Church of Christ, Disciples of Christ, Baptists, Episcopalians, Lutherans, Presbyterians, and Methodists) are actually LGBT-affirming.

So if you force churches to marry gays it would be considered a violation of the constitution(Freedom of religion) which would be a good defense for the churches


Agreed, but here's the point: That isn't happening in America. That is happening in Denmark, where they have a state church, and said church has been instructed by the state to allow for same-sex marriages. In Denmark, there is no separation of church and state. What you're arguing seems to be that there should be a wall of separation between the two, and that's something that I agree with. However, in the United States, there is no serious movement to force specific denominations to solemnize same-sex marriages, nor should there be.

User avatar
Yugo-Austria
Diplomat
 
Posts: 565
Founded: Jun 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yugo-Austria » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:49 pm

The Grene Knyght wrote:
The New Sea Territory wrote:
The only difference being that most alt-wrong wingers actually embody this mental image, and far-leftists have more of a problem of going too far in the other direction: becoming super intellectual and speaking in jargon terms from a century ago.

I second that. Fuck left-wing intellectual elitism. Nothing about the left annoys me more.

Fuck elitism in general. There's nothing good about it.
pleaes God don't judge me for my previous posts i know it was cringe

User avatar
Conservative poster
Secretary
 
Posts: 38
Founded: Jul 20, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Conservative poster » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:49 pm

Italios wrote:
Conservative poster wrote: No im not that proud of taking his side because i only listened to a few of his stuff, but I defend him because he is a Conservative.

So you'd defend him even if you opposed each other on an issue, but remained conservative?

OH, no! i disagree with him on some things! oh no! call the press all Conservatives dont think alike!
Sarcasm aside I amy not see eye to eye with milo but most of the stuff he said makes sense. Jusk like i disagree with trump on some things like making mexico pay for the wall when the US should, but guess what I still want trump to get into office
New to NS

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36757
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Benuty » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:50 pm

The Grene Knyght wrote:
The New Sea Territory wrote:
The only difference being that most alt-wrong wingers actually embody this mental image, and far-leftists have more of a problem of going too far in the other direction: becoming super intellectual and speaking in jargon terms from a century ago.

I second that. Fuck left-wing intellectual elitism. Nothing about the left annoys me more.

I am pro left wing intellectual elitism to merely spite anyone else out of contrarianism.
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity.
Please be aware my posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate.

User avatar
Katganistan
Senior Game Moderator
 
Posts: 35919
Founded: Antiquity
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Katganistan » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:50 pm

Conservative poster wrote:
Liriena wrote:Honestly, while I get the hate, I don't get the intensity of it, at least without taking potential misogyny into consideration.
It's Ghostbusters. Yeah, the original was a sweet blockbuster comedy classic, but it was bound to get a reboot someday.

I'm far more infuriated by the upcoming Ben-hur remake.

Well they took out the whole original cast, so the anger is justified

http://movieweb.com/ghostbusters-casts- ... mmel-live/

Must be why they were in the film and also promoted it along the new cast.

User avatar
Italios
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17520
Founded: Dec 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Italios » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:51 pm

Benuty wrote:
The Grene Knyght wrote:I second that. Fuck left-wing intellectual elitism. Nothing about the left annoys me more.

I am pro left wing intellectual elitism to merely spite anyone else out of contrarianism.

Okay drop all the "ism"s in that post and maybe we can talk.
Issue Author #1461: No Shirt, No Shoes, No ID, No Service.

User avatar
Dameth
Diplomat
 
Posts: 771
Founded: Feb 05, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Dameth » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:51 pm

One gay man get banned from twitter, SJW rejoince. Ah, milo, Milo, Milo. She was a woman, black and fat. You're just gay. Your oppression card may very well work against the mass of cishet white male feminists but here you dealt with someone far beyond your reach. Have you learn nothing ?

That said, look. I understand you guys are upset your movie is really bad and got trashed into oblivion by the whole internet, but homophobia is not the answer. Let it be. Learn from your mistakes.
Trashing an old and loved brand to push a rotten agenda piss people off. Those people find in Milo the expression of their anger. Silencing someone who speaks for a vast and growing community of people fed up with identity politics does not make the people go away. It make them angry.

The left won't channel their rightful anger, so they vote for Boris Johnson and Donald Trump. Your country get trashed, and after thay you can cry over cis white males all you want.
Roses are red
Wololo
Violets are blue
(Far) FT nation.

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:51 pm

Conservative poster wrote:
Italios wrote:A mutation of sexual organs still isn't even close to homosexuality, try again.

I'm thinking you're proud of your stance on Milo Yiannopoulos' sexuality complex, but at the same time I think it's more of a curse.

No im not that proud of taking his side because i only listened to a few of his stuff, but I defend him because he is a Conservative.


That's a bit silly. There's all sorts of people on the left I don't defend, especially when they say or do indefensible things. Maybe you should be a bit more focused on individual or group actions, and less on labels.

User avatar
The Grene Knyght
Minister
 
Posts: 3263
Founded: May 07, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Grene Knyght » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:52 pm

Benuty wrote:
The Grene Knyght wrote:I second that. Fuck left-wing intellectual elitism. Nothing about the left annoys me more.

I am pro left wing intellectual elitism to merely spite anyone else out of contrarianism.

I have a friend who was like that. He was upset because communism was gaining popularity among young people, and thus is made him seem less cool and unique. We had... words...
[_★_]
(◕‿◕)
Socialist Women wrote:Part of the reason you're an anarchist is because you ate too much expired food
Claorica wrote:Oh look, an antifa ancom being smartaleck
Old Tyrannia wrote:Bold words from the self-declared Leninist
Currently
Reading
2015: x=-8.75,y=-6.56
2016: x=-8.88,y=-9.54
2017: x=-9.63,y=-9.90
2018: x=-9.88,y=-9.23
2019: x=-10.0,y=-9.90
2020: x=-10.0,y=-10.0
2021: x=-10.0,y=-10.0
     
PRO: Socialism, Communism, Internationalism, Revolution, Leninism.
NEUTRAL: Anarchism, Marxism-Leninism.
ANTI: Capitalism, Liberalism, Nationalism, Fascists, Hyper-Sectarian Leftists.
Portal Nationalist | Proletarian Moralist

User avatar
Aelex
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11398
Founded: Jun 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aelex » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:52 pm

Socialist Nordia wrote:What? That doesn't make sense. Homosexuality isn't an injury.

No but it De Facto implicate sterility in most case, so it's not something most parents would be glad to see their children "suffer" from.
Citoyen Français. Bonapartiste Républicain (aka De Gaule's Gaullisme) with Keynesian leanings on economics. Latin Christian.

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36757
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Benuty » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:52 pm

Italios wrote:
Benuty wrote:I am pro left wing intellectual elitism to merely spite anyone else out of contrarianism.

Okay drop all the "ism"s in that post and maybe we can talk.

I am past my quota unfortunately.
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity.
Please be aware my posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate.

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:53 pm

The Grene Knyght wrote:
The New Sea Territory wrote:
The only difference being that most alt-wrong wingers actually embody this mental image, and far-leftists have more of a problem of going too far in the other direction: becoming super intellectual and speaking in jargon terms from a century ago.

I second that. Fuck left-wing intellectual elitism. Nothing about the left annoys me more.


As a left winger with aspirations towards intellectual excellence, I agree with this. However, there is a baby/bathwater issue at hand here.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54738
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:53 pm


Wait.
A controversial conservative commentator would, dunno, our Big Jim P.
This Mr.Yiannopoulos instead looks more like a troll who would get hammered asap by any mod... Which is exactly what happened.
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. "Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee.
I'm back.
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
Arachno-Satinism
Diplomat
 
Posts: 564
Founded: Jun 29, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Arachno-Satinism » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:53 pm

Good riddance.
The balkens wrote:
Socialist Nordia wrote:Well that's harsh.


Not harsh enough.

What would you consider qualify as "harsh enough"? Are you aware to the extent of her harassment?
Sieg Hamasho! also Homura still literally did nothing wrong.
Remove all populist demagogues shqip shqip
BRING BACK ROCKEFELLER REPUBLICANISM

"Talking nonsense is the sole privilege mankind possesses over the other organisms. It is by talking nonsense that one gets to the truth! I talk nonsense, therefore I am human." -Fyodor Dostoyevsky

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:54 pm

Aelex wrote:
Socialist Nordia wrote:What? That doesn't make sense. Homosexuality isn't an injury.

No but it De Facto implicate sterility in most case, so it's not something most parents would be glad to see their children "suffer" from.


You do realize that gay couples all over the place have children, right? Some are from previous relationships, others adopted, still others through surrogacy or sperm donation.

User avatar
Conservative poster
Secretary
 
Posts: 38
Founded: Jul 20, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Conservative poster » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:54 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Conservative poster wrote: No im not that proud of taking his side because i only listened to a few of his stuff, but I defend him because he is a Conservative.


That's a bit silly. There's all sorts of people on the left I don't defend, especially when they say or do indefensible things. Maybe you should be a bit more focused on individual or group actions, and less on labels.

Yeah but the GOP is divided so the best we can do is defend each other and stick together
New to NS

User avatar
Mefpan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5872
Founded: Oct 23, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mefpan » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:55 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Aelex wrote:No but it De Facto implicate sterility in most case, so it's not something most parents would be glad to see their children "suffer" from.


You do realize that gay couples all over the place have children, right? Some are from previous relationships, others adopted, still others through surrogacy or sperm donation.

Parents tend to not think around that many corners when the desire for grandbabies latches onto their brain, I fear.
I support thermonuclear warfare. Do you want to play a game of chess?
NationStates' umpteenth dirty ex-leftist class traitor.
I left the Left when it turned Right. Now I'm going back to the Right because it's all that's Left.
Yeah, Screw Realism!
Loyal Planet of Mankind

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Wed Jul 20, 2016 3:56 pm

Conservative poster wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
That's a bit silly. There's all sorts of people on the left I don't defend, especially when they say or do indefensible things. Maybe you should be a bit more focused on individual or group actions, and less on labels.

Yeah but the GOP is divided so the best we can do is defend each other and stick together


Okay.

Let's say that you have a cancerous growth in your body. Obviously you want to defend your body from harm. Do you do this by removing the growth, or by defending it as part of your body?

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Commonwealth of Adirondack, Cosnionga, Floofybit, Galloism, Hispida, Ifreann, Kyoto Noku, La Cocina del Bodhi, Necroghastia, Neu California, Ors Might, Port Caverton, Senkaku, Shrillland, Sorcery, Spirit of Hope, Tarsonis, Terra dei Cittadini, The Acolyte Confederacy, The Black Forrest, The Crimson Isles, The Pirateariat, Thermodolia, Trump Almighty, Xenti

Advertisement

Remove ads