Yes, South Africa did as did Baathist Iraq
Advertisement

by -Suid-Afrika- » Sun Jul 17, 2016 9:10 pm

by Novus America » Sun Jul 17, 2016 9:11 pm
Soldati Senza Confini wrote:Novus America wrote:
Why not just US our military instead. 3 army divisions is about 60,000 men. It would be much easier to use our existing troops than doubling the border patrol.
US soldiers should be defending the US, not going off on ideological crusades in a distant desert.
If we can ensure that the military we send to the border is going to be trained as well as border patrol is trained to deal with illegal immigrants, I could get behind the idea of using our military men and women for the job.

by Thermodolia » Sun Jul 17, 2016 9:11 pm
Crockerland wrote:-Suid-Afrika- wrote:A wall needs to be built but what Trump doesn't realise in his delusional speeches is Mexico cannot afford it and this will lead to more illegals in America. Mexico is already a failed nation this is why illegals are rushing in a wall will further this, also I doubt they have the technology to build a good wall like the Korean DMZ or the Berlin wall. And I doubt Mexico could staff it properly. Also how can America force Mexico to pay? Threatning a war I doubt that'll go well.
America will stop sending Mexico $265,000,000 dollars a year until the wall is payed off.

by Thermodolia » Sun Jul 17, 2016 9:12 pm

by Thermodolia » Sun Jul 17, 2016 9:13 pm
Novus America wrote:Soldati Senza Confini wrote:
If we can ensure that the military we send to the border is going to be trained as well as border patrol is trained to deal with illegal immigrants, I could get behind the idea of using our military men and women for the job.
Well the way Israel does it is the military works with their border police. The military only does patrol and observation, not the actual arrests.

by West Angola » Sun Jul 17, 2016 9:14 pm
-Suid-Afrika- wrote:Yes, South Africa did as did Baathist Iraq

by Novus America » Sun Jul 17, 2016 9:14 pm
Thermodolia wrote:Novus America wrote:
Why not just US our military instead. 3 army divisions is about 60,000 men. It would be much easier to use our existing troops than doubling the border patrol.
US soldiers should be defending the US, not going off on ideological crusades in a distant desert.
While I agree with the sentiment that we shouldn't be blowing up shit in a far off desert. There is no way in hell that I'm going to stand guard duty on the damn border!

by Soldati Senza Confini » Sun Jul 17, 2016 9:14 pm
Novus America wrote:Soldati Senza Confini wrote:
If we can ensure that the military we send to the border is going to be trained as well as border patrol is trained to deal with illegal immigrants, I could get behind the idea of using our military men and women for the job.
Well the way Israel does it is the military works with their border police. The military only does patrol and observation, not the actual arrests.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by -Suid-Afrika- » Sun Jul 17, 2016 9:15 pm

by Usniya » Sun Jul 17, 2016 9:15 pm

by Novus America » Sun Jul 17, 2016 9:16 pm
Thermodolia wrote:Novus America wrote:
Well the way Israel does it is the military works with their border police. The military only does patrol and observation, not the actual arrests.
Well that's better than using the military for all of it. I could get behind that. Still don't want to stand guard on the border though.

by Novus America » Sun Jul 17, 2016 9:18 pm
Soldati Senza Confini wrote:Novus America wrote:
Well the way Israel does it is the military works with their border police. The military only does patrol and observation, not the actual arrests.
I mean, what you're saying is reasonable, and with the plans that we have explored, I see a border fence far more feasible, doing basic math.
Of course, that is not an endorsement of Trump's idea. I still think his idea is unrealistic. But if it was done the way we've managed to hammer out, I'd be on board with such a policy, to be honest. It's not an unrealistic wall, at least, and it is economically feasible, especially if it is a long-term plan (which most things of these nature are wont to be).

by Thermodolia » Sun Jul 17, 2016 9:18 pm
Novus America wrote:Thermodolia wrote:While I agree with the sentiment that we shouldn't be blowing up shit in a far off desert. There is no way in hell that I'm going to stand guard duty on the damn border!
Why not? It sure beats a patrol in Iraq. In the Navy we had to stand guard duty even in port in San Diego. I mean the 0300-0800 watch on a Sunday sucked serious ass, but hey, it is part of being in the military.

by Thermodolia » Sun Jul 17, 2016 9:19 pm


by Thermodolia » Sun Jul 17, 2016 9:20 pm
Novus America wrote:Thermodolia wrote:Well that's better than using the military for all of it. I could get behind that. Still don't want to stand guard on the border though.
Well you do not want to use just the military, as while the military is well trained in patrol and observation, they are not trained in border policing. It is good to have a dedicated border police as well (although again the US army was the border patrol before 1924). Israel does have a border police.

by Crockerland » Sun Jul 17, 2016 9:21 pm

by The Greater Ohio Valley » Sun Jul 17, 2016 9:23 pm
-Suid-Afrika- wrote:if America adopts a strict isolationist foreign policy dissolves NATO and pulls out of NAFTA and ends borrowing from China and allows immigrants from countries east Asia and India to fill jobs as engineers and other necessary roles a border like the one I propose can be achieved.

by Novus America » Sun Jul 17, 2016 9:23 pm
Thermodolia wrote:Novus America wrote:
Why not? It sure beats a patrol in Iraq. In the Navy we had to stand guard duty even in port in San Diego. I mean the 0300-0800 watch on a Sunday sucked serious ass, but hey, it is part of being in the military.
Ya I know all about that. I just really hate have to stand guard duty. Hated it during basic, still hate it now. But I'd be for an Israeli type situation where the military stands guard but doesn't arrest anyone.

by Thermodolia » Sun Jul 17, 2016 9:23 pm
Crockerland wrote:-Suid-Afrika- wrote:Yes, South Africa did as did Baathist Iraq
Excellent countries that set a great example.-Suid-Afrika- wrote:Not currently but Baathist Iraq was a model nation for Arab nations
The Arab nations are consistently some of the worst on the planet.Thermodolia wrote:So you want to get into a trade war with Mexico? Oh that will go well.
Yes, clearly, not wanting to give a country 265,000,000 dollars a year for free while they do next to nothing to enforce the border = wanting to be in a trade war.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Sun Jul 17, 2016 9:24 pm
Crockerland wrote:-Suid-Afrika- wrote:Yes, South Africa did as did Baathist Iraq
Excellent countries that set a great example.-Suid-Afrika- wrote:Not currently but Baathist Iraq was a model nation for Arab nations
The Arab nations are consistently some of the worst on the planet.Thermodolia wrote:So you want to get into a trade war with Mexico? Oh that will go well.
Yes, clearly, not wanting to give a country 265,000,000 dollars a year for free while they do next to nothing to enforce the border = wanting to be in a trade war.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Runeria » Sun Jul 17, 2016 9:24 pm

by Thermodolia » Sun Jul 17, 2016 9:25 pm
Novus America wrote:Thermodolia wrote:Ya I know all about that. I just really hate have to stand guard duty. Hated it during basic, still hate it now. But I'd be for an Israeli type situation where the military stands guard but doesn't arrest anyone.
Fair enough, I assume you are not an MP and thus not trained nor equipped to make arrests. Thus I think the Israel situation is best, where the military and border police work together so the military does not have to do work it is not properly trained to do.
I mean yeah, guard duty sucks sometimes. The early morning watch on Sunday always seriously sucks. But patrolling up and down the border sure beats patrolling in Iraq.

by Thermodolia » Sun Jul 17, 2016 9:26 pm
Runeria wrote:I think it's pretty clear that what Trump means by making Mexico pay for it is that revenue from tarriffs he would impose on imports from Mexico would contribute to building the wall. The reason he doesn't explain this properly is because, A. he's an idiot, and B. that doesn't have nearly as much pazazz.
It's all about pazazz, folks

by Crockerland » Sun Jul 17, 2016 9:27 pm
Soldati Senza Confini wrote:Crockerland wrote:Excellent countries that set a great example.
The Arab nations are consistently some of the worst on the planet.
Yes, clearly, not wanting to give a country 265,000,000 dollars a year for free while they do next to nothing to enforce the border = wanting to be in a trade war.
We don't necessarily need to cut off trading with Mexico for the wall, either.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Sun Jul 17, 2016 9:27 pm
Novus America wrote:Thermodolia wrote:Ya I know all about that. I just really hate have to stand guard duty. Hated it during basic, still hate it now. But I'd be for an Israeli type situation where the military stands guard but doesn't arrest anyone.
Fair enough, I assume you are not an MP and thus not trained nor equipped to make arrests. Thus I think the Israel situation is best, where the military and border police work together so the military does not have to do work it is not properly trained to do.
I mean yeah, guard duty sucks sometimes. The early morning watch on Sunday always seriously sucks. But patrolling up and down the border sure beats patrolling in Iraq.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dimetrodon Empire, Giovanniland, Kitsuva, The Grand Duchy of Muscovy, Ubecc, Washington Resistance Army, Yets New
Advertisement