Westoropa wrote:So, was the driver an islamists or white nationalists? I think he was the later as most muslims are peacefull people.
We already know he was an Islamist.
Advertisement

by Geilinor » Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:33 pm
Westoropa wrote:So, was the driver an islamists or white nationalists? I think he was the later as most muslims are peacefull people.

by IndependentGreenland » Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:33 pm

by The East Marches » Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:33 pm
Olerand wrote:The East Marches wrote:
I 100% disagree with you. They have proven willing to give arms to Sunni groups too if it gets their goals met. Though I may agree on the terror attacks in the West. There would not be as many as most those in the West are not Shia.
Without Sunni radicalism, there would be no Sunni groups to give weapons to. Iran would be effectively contained.

by Freefall11111 » Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:34 pm
Westoropa wrote:So, was the driver an islamists or white nationalists? I think he was the later as most muslims are peacefull people.

by Dameth » Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:34 pm
Olerand wrote:I don't think we should pull back, I think we should amplify our support for the Kurds. All that we can do other than that is urge the Arabs to fight the IS. I regret that we limited the IS' expansion however, since its borders reaching Saudi Arabia might have just jolted the Arabo-Islamic world into reality. At the cost of much bloodshed of course, but it could have perhaps sealed this coffin once and for all.

by Salus Maior » Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:34 pm

by Eol Sha » Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:34 pm
Olerand wrote:Dameth wrote:
If you propose we pull back from Syria, I'd give you a point for consistancy, but do you think this is reasonable ? If we can't attack, what can we do. Raising emergency level does not work, and it's not like the international weeping campaign will do any good.
I don't think we should pull back, I think we should amplify our support for the Kurds. All that we can do other than that is urge the Arabs to fight the IS. I regret that we limited the IS' expansion however, since its borders reaching Saudi Arabia might have just jolted the Arabo-Islamic world into reality. At the cost of much bloodshed of course, but it could have perhaps sealed this coffin once and for all.

by Othelos » Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:34 pm
Westoropa wrote:So, was the driver an islamists or white nationalists? I think he was the later as most muslims are peacefull people.

by Unified Governments » Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:35 pm

by Salus Maior » Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:35 pm

by Freefall11111 » Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:35 pm

by IndependentGreenland » Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:35 pm
Republic of Wijaya wrote:The East Marches wrote:
Iraq may not be the Muslim world at large but it is at the center of the Middle East. Two fanatical groups going all out for influence between the Saudis and the Iranians. Both are bad will destabilize things. You are right there are more Sunnis, I don't believe this precludes the Shia from being an equal threat in the future should we anger the puppet masters in Iran. They are merely laying low because we are co-belligerents at the moment.
The Problem is not about Islam Religion. This Problem just about Power and Who will lose.
And Fact The Largest Nation with Islam Population is Indonesia. Indonesia as the Largest Islam Population in the World they have peace with another

by Novus America » Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:35 pm

by Eol Sha » Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:36 pm
Republic of Wijaya wrote:The East Marches wrote:
Iraq may not be the Muslim world at large but it is at the center of the Middle East. Two fanatical groups going all out for influence between the Saudis and the Iranians. Both are bad will destabilize things. You are right there are more Sunnis, I don't believe this precludes the Shia from being an equal threat in the future should we anger the puppet masters in Iran. They are merely laying low because we are co-belligerents at the moment.
The Problem is not about Islam Religion. This Problem just about Power and Who will lose.
And Fact The Largest Nation with Islam Population is Indonesia. Indonesia as the Largest Islam Population in the World they have peace with another

by IndependentGreenland » Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:36 pm

by Olerand » Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:36 pm
The East Marches wrote:Olerand wrote:Without Sunni radicalism, there would be no Sunni groups to give weapons to. Iran would be effectively contained.
There will always be a rebel or separatist movement to throw arms at. Especially with the goatfuck of central Asia. We'd have to have a stable and not divided Afghanistan not to mention the Sunni problem. I believe Sunnis will solve their problems. before Afghans stop killing each other.
Your theory is based on the idea that the surrounding world will be stable around Iran. Iran doesn't want that because it means they could be contained. The state of the world will never reach that.
Free Rhenish States wrote:You're French, without faith, probably godless, liberal without any traditional values or respect for any faith whatsoever

by Patridam » Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:36 pm
Westoropa wrote:So, was the driver an islamists or white nationalists? I think he was the later as most muslims are peacefull people.

by Salus Maior » Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:36 pm
Unified Governments wrote:Salus Maior wrote:
Which is why he's not really an option for a better Syria post-war.
Especially considering he's the cause of the Civil War that allowed ISIS to get stronger in the first place.
It's been proven time and time again that bumping off dictators only makes these countries worse.

by Freefall11111 » Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:36 pm

by Olerand » Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:37 pm
Free Rhenish States wrote:You're French, without faith, probably godless, liberal without any traditional values or respect for any faith whatsoever

by The East Marches » Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:37 pm
Olerand wrote:The East Marches wrote:
There will always be a rebel or separatist movement to throw arms at. Especially with the goatfuck of central Asia. We'd have to have a stable and not divided Afghanistan not to mention the Sunni problem. I believe Sunnis will solve their problems. before Afghans stop killing each other.
Your theory is based on the idea that the surrounding world will be stable around Iran. Iran doesn't want that because it means they could be contained. The state of the world will never reach that.
Iran's ambitions are limited by reality. Its ultimate goal is regional hegemony with the Shiite Crescent. But with no Sunni radicalism from which to draw oppressed groups into its sphere, where would it go, what would it do?Without Shia-Sunni hostilities, why would the Lebanese, Iraqi, Bahraini, Yemeni, etc. Shia accept Iranian protection and supremacy?

by IndependentGreenland » Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:38 pm

by Novus America » Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:38 pm
Dameth wrote:Olerand wrote:I don't think we should pull back, I think we should amplify our support for the Kurds. All that we can do other than that is urge the Arabs to fight the IS. I regret that we limited the IS' expansion however, since its borders reaching Saudi Arabia might have just jolted the Arabo-Islamic world into reality. At the cost of much bloodshed of course, but it could have perhaps sealed this coffin once and for all.
I'm not a military strategist, so I definitely am out of place in discussing strategy. If supporting the Kurds proves itself effective, so be it, let's do that. But let's do something, I want to see our boots on the viper's head. Wether we do that on our own or we help the Kurds, it's a matter of technicity. The bottom line being, it's time to end them, one way or the other.

by Stucco Houses » Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:38 pm

by Freefall11111 » Thu Jul 14, 2016 8:38 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Buhers Mk II, Gravlen, Ifreann, Of The Ursalian Federation, Rary, Stellar Colonies, Sticky Ant 00, The Archregimancy, Valsora, Washington Resistance Army, Wizlandia
Advertisement