YES!!! I KNEW IT!!! Score one for every single muslim without radical ideologies! But why do they have to hate on muslims? The western media? I mean,what have we ever done to them?
Advertisement
by Gauthier » Wed Jul 20, 2016 6:42 am
Troperia wrote:
YES!!! I KNEW IT!!! Score one for every single muslim without radical ideologies! But why do they have to hate on muslims? The western media? I mean,what have we ever done to them?
by Aelex » Wed Jul 20, 2016 6:46 am
by Vassenor » Wed Jul 20, 2016 6:48 am
Aelex wrote:
Did you actually read the article? Because it basically just says that Daesh refused to acknowledge him as a "true muslim" because he liked to take dick in his arse.
The man's religious motives for this act still remain unchanged even if he won't get his 72 virgins.
by Aelex » Wed Jul 20, 2016 6:55 am
Vassenor wrote:Or maybe religion had nothing to do with it at all no matter how much you reach.
by Minzerland » Wed Jul 20, 2016 6:56 am
Vassenor wrote:Aelex wrote:Did you actually read the article? Because it basically just says that Daesh refused to acknowledge him as a "true muslim" because he liked to take dick in his arse.
The man's religious motives for this act still remain unchanged even if he won't get his 72 virgins.
Or maybe religion had nothing to do with it at all no matter how much you reach.
by Asigna » Wed Jul 20, 2016 7:12 am
by Minzerland » Wed Jul 20, 2016 7:15 am
Asigna wrote:Minzerland wrote:Of course it doesn't, it's never religion.
I find it fascinating how the actions of a fanatic few could ultimately ruin the reputation of the majority, fueled by those who need the division in order for them to exploit fear in favor of their interests of power. This make an interesting case study.
by Risottia » Wed Jul 20, 2016 7:24 am
Xadufell wrote:Prime minister Valls: Get used to terrorism
...
Mmm... I think it's time we get new leadership. Preferably right wing leadership, as our current left wing leadership has failed us.
by Risottia » Wed Jul 20, 2016 7:25 am
Asigna wrote:Minzerland wrote:Of course it doesn't, it's never religion.
I find it fascinating how the actions of a fanatic few could ultimately ruin the reputation of the majority, fueled by those who need the division in order for them to exploit fear in favor of their interests of power. This make an interesting case study.
by Liriena » Wed Jul 20, 2016 8:38 am
Minzerland wrote:Asigna wrote:I find it fascinating how the actions of a fanatic few could ultimately ruin the reputation of the majority, fueled by those who need the division in order for them to exploit fear in favor of their interests of power. This make an interesting case study.
Sure? Why are you telling me this?
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Asigna » Wed Jul 20, 2016 8:53 am
Liriena wrote:Minzerland wrote:Sure? Why are you telling me this?
Because it seems that, when a Muslim commits mass murder, even if they are a "lone wolf", there is a tendency to overlook any other factors that could have motivated them beyond being Muslim. There is a tendency to blame, not even their personal interpretation of their faith, but the Islamic faith as a whole, and only (or primarily) the Islamic faith. Whereas, when it comes to non-Muslim "lone wolf" mass murderers, the general tendency is to blame it on mental illness, seldom their personal interpretation of an ideology, and almost never the ideology itself and as a whole.
by Gauthier » Wed Jul 20, 2016 8:57 am
Liriena wrote:Minzerland wrote:Sure? Why are you telling me this?
Because it seems that, when a Muslim commits mass murder, even if they are a "lone wolf", there is a tendency to overlook any other factors that could have motivated them beyond being Muslim. There is a tendency to blame, not even their personal interpretation of their faith, but the Islamic faith as a whole, and only (or primarily) the Islamic faith. Whereas, when it comes to non-Muslim "lone wolf" mass murderers, the general tendency is to blame it on mental illness, seldom their personal interpretation of an ideology, and almost never the ideology itself and as a whole.
by The Alma Mater » Wed Jul 20, 2016 9:50 am
Liriena wrote:Minzerland wrote:Sure? Why are you telling me this?
Because it seems that, when a Muslim commits mass murder, even if they are a "lone wolf", there is a tendency to overlook any other factors that could have motivated them beyond being Muslim. There is a tendency to blame, not even their personal interpretation of their faith, but the Islamic faith as a whole, and only (or primarily) the Islamic faith. Whereas, when it comes to non-Muslim "lone wolf" mass murderers, the general tendency is to blame it on mental illness, seldom their personal interpretation of an ideology, and almost never the ideology itself and as a whole.
by Vassenor » Wed Jul 20, 2016 9:53 am
The Alma Mater wrote:Liriena wrote:Because it seems that, when a Muslim commits mass murder, even if they are a "lone wolf", there is a tendency to overlook any other factors that could have motivated them beyond being Muslim. There is a tendency to blame, not even their personal interpretation of their faith, but the Islamic faith as a whole, and only (or primarily) the Islamic faith. Whereas, when it comes to non-Muslim "lone wolf" mass murderers, the general tendency is to blame it on mental illness, seldom their personal interpretation of an ideology, and almost never the ideology itself and as a whole.
Then again, the opposite tendency also exists. Every time a muslim commits mass murder, it is "a false flag by the zionists/Americans/whatever", "self defense" or one of millions of other reasons. It is NEVER the fault of Islam - or of, in fact, the killer himself. As long as he is muslim.
The truth is probably somewhere in between these extremes.
by Imperializt Russia » Thu Jul 21, 2016 4:36 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Olerand » Fri Jul 22, 2016 3:27 pm
Free Rhenish States wrote:You're French, without faith, probably godless, liberal without any traditional values or respect for any faith whatsoever
by The balkens » Fri Jul 22, 2016 3:27 pm
Olerand wrote:So, it appears that the terrorist has been plotting this for a few months now, at least, and that he had a ring of supporters/enablers, which makes the rapid radicalization/lone wolf theories out of question.
by Olerand » Fri Jul 22, 2016 3:47 pm
Free Rhenish States wrote:You're French, without faith, probably godless, liberal without any traditional values or respect for any faith whatsoever
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bermia, Cerula, Dreadton, Ethel mermania, HISPIDA, Lycom, Niolia, Siluvia, Thelottine, Uiiop
Advertisement