Are we talking about the systematic cultural genocide of African slaves by Europeans, the systematic cultural genocide of African slaves by Africans or the systematic cultural genocide of African slaves by Asians ? There have been so many...
Advertisement

by The Alma Mater » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:48 pm

by Stucco Houses » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:48 pm
Patridam wrote:Liriena wrote:Thousands of Muslims are fighting against Islamic fundamentalism as we speak. In Syria and Iraq, Muslim soldiers, paramilitaries and police officers are fighting ISIS. Thousands more march against terrorism while several members of the clergy cooperate with governments.
Oh, wow, thousands; out of 1.7 billion Muslims. That's like a whole 0.001 percent, wow. Really reform is inevitable at that rate.
Now, don't get me wrong, those few Muslims are brave.They are the Muslims we should celebrate, not the first world ones on social media. But they are also a ridiculously small portion
As for Christians and Jews doing "an infinitely better job"? A bit disingenuous.
Fair enough, because for it to really be infinity, Muslims would need to be infinitely religiously violent, which isn't possible; or Jews and Christians would need to be never ever religiously violent. Ah, math. Perhaps "Jews and Christians are doing a much, much, much better job of refuting the bad parts of their teachings than Muslims" would be more apt.

by The Romulan Republic » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:48 pm
Patridam wrote:Liriena wrote:Thousands of Muslims are fighting against Islamic fundamentalism as we speak. In Syria and Iraq, Muslim soldiers, paramilitaries and police officers are fighting ISIS. Thousands more march against terrorism while several members of the clergy cooperate with governments.
Oh, wow, thousands; out of 1.7 billion Muslims. That's like a whole 0.001 percent, wow. Really reform is inevitable at that rate.
Now, don't get me wrong, those few Muslims are brave.They are the Muslims we should celebrate, not the first world ones on social media. But they are also a ridiculously small portion

by Minzerland » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:49 pm

by The Alma Mater » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:49 pm
Salus Maior wrote:Liriena wrote:For instance? Those who cite Leviticus as a justification for opposing LGBT+ rights. They are, sadly, quite plentiful.
I am well aware that those laws in the Old Testament are not, in a strict sense, binding to Christians. Menassa, NSG's beloved scholar of everything Jewish, made that quite clear on several occasions. However, there are several Christians who are either unaware of this, or knowingly disregard it.
Mind you, I am not arguing that "two wrongs make a right" or anything of the sort. As I said, there is much about the Quran that I find intolerable, and I for one am not interested in converting to Islam, nor am I going to try and engage in apologism for the Islamic holy text.
Those people would be what we call "Biblical literalists", and nobody likes them and nor are they a very strong or numerous group.

by Liriena » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:50 pm
Patridam wrote:Liriena wrote:Thousands of Muslims are fighting against Islamic fundamentalism as we speak. In Syria and Iraq, Muslim soldiers, paramilitaries and police officers are fighting ISIS. Thousands more march against terrorism while several members of the clergy cooperate with governments.
Oh, wow, thousands; out of 1.7 billion Muslims. That's like a whole 0.001 percent, wow. Really reform is inevitable at that rate.
Now, don't get me wrong, those few Muslims are brave.They are the Muslims we should celebrate, not the first world ones on social media. But they are also a ridiculously small portion
Patridam wrote:
As for Christians and Jews doing "an infinitely better job"? A bit disingenuous.
Fair enough, because for it to really be infinity, Muslims would need to be infinitely religiously violent, which isn't possible; or Jews and Christians would need to be never ever religiously violent. Ah, math. Perhaps "Jews and Christians are doing a much, much, much better job of refuting the bad parts of their teachings than Muslims" would be more apt.
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by The Celtic British Isles » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:50 pm

by Minzerland » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:51 pm

by Salus Maior » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:52 pm
The Alma Mater wrote:
And yet Trump took great care to pick one of them as his VP.

by Stucco Houses » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:52 pm
Impireacht wrote:Stucco Houses wrote:-snip-
Waait so what I'm getting from this now is this:
Religious Extremism is not a result of religion o.o
"neither their religion nor their ethnicity makes them terrorize."
I agree that ethnicity doesn't play a role, but you can't really be an Islamic extremist without following Islam...
Again, so as you agreed there are Muslims of every ethnicity. Explain how a distate for the religion is in any way racist, people weren't putting down the ethnicity, they were putting down the religion.

by Liriena » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:52 pm
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Patridam » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:52 pm
Stucco Houses wrote:However, you seem not to understand that wacky conservative Christians and Jews exist too, that moderate Muslims make up the vast majority of Muslims, and that the poverty and imperialism experienced by the Middle East are the likely reason for the terrorism and intolerance in those countries. Ever wondered why Eastern Europe treats its gays so poorly? It's not Christianity, it's poverty. Ever wondered why Buddhists in Burma kill Muslims in Burma? It's not Buddhism, it's poverty.
If you don't understand that poverty underlies terrorism of every breed, you concede to bigotry, that you believe Muslims are worse at addressing the ideological problems which justify terrorism in so many non-Muslim instances.

by Stucco Houses » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:52 pm

by The Romulan Republic » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:52 pm
Liriena wrote:Patridam wrote:
Oh, wow, thousands; out of 1.7 billion Muslims. That's like a whole 0.001 percent, wow. Really reform is inevitable at that rate.
Now, don't get me wrong, those few Muslims are brave.They are the Muslims we should celebrate, not the first world ones on social media. But they are also a ridiculously small portion
And what exactly do you want the rest of Muslims to do? Do you want hundreds of millions of them to grab a rifle and march into Mosul?

by New Jerzylvania » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:53 pm

by Australian rePublic » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:54 pm

by Stucco Houses » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:54 pm
Patridam wrote:Stucco Houses wrote:However, you seem not to understand that wacky conservative Christians and Jews exist too, that moderate Muslims make up the vast majority of Muslims, and that the poverty and imperialism experienced by the Middle East are the likely reason for the terrorism and intolerance in those countries. Ever wondered why Eastern Europe treats its gays so poorly? It's not Christianity, it's poverty. Ever wondered why Buddhists in Burma kill Muslims in Burma? It's not Buddhism, it's poverty.
Ah, yes, because a Muslims actions can never ever be his fault or held accountable to him. Always a white person's fault. Always.If you don't understand that poverty underlies terrorism of every breed, you concede to bigotry, that you believe Muslims are worse at addressing the ideological problems which justify terrorism in so many non-Muslim instances.
Nope, I don't think its that the people that happen to be Muslim are somehow inherently worse at addressing ideological problems. No, Islam is just worse at having its ideological problems addressed, being a "perfect and complete" rambling complex mess of unclear and violent and mandatory orders stricter than other religion's orders, with a hell of a lot more problems than even Christianity ever had.

by Liriena » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:55 pm
Australian Republic wrote:Poor France
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Koninkrijk Zeeland » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:55 pm

by Stucco Houses » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:56 pm
Westoropa wrote:Just looked up /pol/. They are celebrating for the driver being a muslim. This shows who in fact have benefits from this incidents.

by The Celtic British Isles » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:58 pm
Westoropa wrote:Just looked up /pol/. They are celebrating for the driver being a muslim. This shows who in fact have benefits from this incidents.

by Minzerland » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:58 pm

by Impireacht » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:59 pm
Stucco Houses wrote:Minzerland wrote:
Let's save the hypocrisy.
I don't see how I'm a hypocrite. I don't hardly hate white people at all. I'm pretty white myself. I just try not to fool myself about how race relations work in a way that excuses imperial forces.Impireacht wrote:Waait so what I'm getting from this now is this:
Religious Extremism is not a result of religion o.o
"neither their religion nor their ethnicity makes them terrorize."
I agree that ethnicity doesn't play a role, but you can't really be an Islamic extremist without following Islam...
Again, so as you agreed there are Muslims of every ethnicity. Explain how a distate for the religion is in any way racist, people weren't putting down the ethnicity, they were putting down the religion.
Because there is a very clear message about what Muslim means in our modern discourse about Muslims. We aren't talking about Bosnians or Indian Muslims or Burmese Muslims, we are talking about Middle Eastern Muslims. It is a racist mind that says that terrorism stems from a religion of hate and evil followed by and large by nonwhite people affected by poverty and colonization, rather than the poverty and colonization themselves. It's pointlessly reactionary not to understand the root causes or to pretend like our discourse on terrorism isn't dictated by race.

by Koninkrijk Zeeland » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:59 pm

by Minzerland » Thu Jul 14, 2016 10:00 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Fractalnavel, Kenmoria, Lingang, Necroghastia, Nilokeras, Spode Humbled Minions, The Pirateariat, Uiiop, Umeria, Valrifall, World of Krieg, Yokashai Israel
Advertisement