Advertisement

by HMS Vanguard » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:16 am

by Imperializt Russia » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:17 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Freefall11111 » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:20 am
Rufford wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:When Sellafield decided to change the name of their reprocessing division to "waste management", they nearly tanked their foreign orders and changed it straight back.
It matters.
Can't remember what Leadsom is the minister of now, something to do with the environment, but its a stupidly long name.

by Freefall11111 » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:20 am
The Government has announced that it will abolish the Department of Energy and Climate Change and transfer its functions to other Government Departments, notably the new Department of Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. The exact details remain unclear. My Committee’s reports have recently identified serious concerns about reduced investor confidence in the UK energy sector. An historic agreement at COP21 in Paris last November still requires ratification, and the fifth carbon budget is still yet to be set in law. While Members of my Committee differed in their views on the European Union, the immediate impact of the vote to leave has been to amplify uncertainty at a time when major investment is needed to deliver affordable, clean and secure energy. In this context, I am astonished at the Prime Minister’s decision to abolish DECC. DECC’s disappearance raises urgent questions. To whom falls the central statutory obligation, contained in the Climate Change Act 2008, to reduce the UK’s carbon emissions by 80% from their 1990 baseline? Which Department will take responsibility for the energy and climate aspects of negotiations to leave the EU? Who will champion decarbonisation in Cabinet? Who will drive innovation in the energy sector? Turning to my Committee and the crucial role we play in scrutinising the Government’s energy and climate change policies, we are established under Standing Orders of the House of Commons. There will be no immediate change to our remit, operations or membership, which can only be done by order of the House. I am immensely proud of our work over the last year to hold the Government to account on achieving a balanced energy policy, setting the agenda on an innovative future energy system, and influencing the Government’s long-term approach to climate targets. Over the coming weeks I will speak to colleagues to explore how we can ensure that effective Parliamentary scrutiny on the crucial issues of energy and climate change continues.

by Imperializt Russia » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:22 am
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Rufford » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:23 am

by Questers » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:24 am

by Freefall11111 » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:24 am

by Rufford » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:26 am
Freefall11111 wrote:Also some statements from Johnson.

by Questers » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:28 am

by Rufford » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:32 am
Questers wrote:not as good for the "department of the regions" (whose responsibilities were merged into Defra iirc)
i still dont know what "the regions" fucking are

by Freefall11111 » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:32 am

by Freefall11111 » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:33 am

by The Nihilistic view » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:33 am

by HMS Vanguard » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:33 am

by HMS Vanguard » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:34 am
The Nihilistic view wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:When Sellafield decided to change the name of their reprocessing division to "waste management", they nearly tanked their foreign orders and changed it straight back.
It matters.
What does the foreign orders of a commercial arm of such a body have to do with the name of a government department? The government is not selling anything here.

by Imperializt Russia » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:40 am
HMS Vanguard wrote:The Nihilistic view wrote:
What does the foreign orders of a commercial arm of such a body have to do with the name of a government department? The government is not selling anything here.
It looks like Sellafield still sells waste management: http://www.sellafieldsites.com/solution ... anagement/
But in a wider sense, it does matter. The government has signalled that, in the future, energy policy will be about enabling the production of energy, rather than impeding the production of energy.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Freefall11111 » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:41 am

by HMS Vanguard » Thu Jul 14, 2016 9:42 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Achan, Albaaa, Australian rePublic, Cappedore, Dimetrodon Empire, Enormous Gentiles, Kostane, The marxist plains, THM, Utquiagvik, Valentian Elysium
Advertisement