NATION

PASSWORD

UK Politics IV: Disraeli Gears

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

So who do we want leading the Labour Party?

Jeremy Corbyn
142
48%
Owen Smith
66
22%
Lord Helix
89
30%
 
Total votes : 297

User avatar
Elepis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8963
Founded: Jan 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Elepis » Thu Jul 21, 2016 12:45 pm

Napkiraly wrote:
Elepis wrote:
which France, USA, Germany, Italy soooooo don't also have

Germany has no aircraft carriers and Italy's is not as technologically advanced as the Queen Elizabeth class is. Not to mention, neither have nuclear weapons, though they are participants in NATO's nuclear sharing program.


True, although no one i suggesting that we pull out of NATO because Mr Frenchy was a little mean to us. Russia would never attack France anyway as France has nuclear weapons of its own,
"Krugmar - Today at 10:00 PM
Not sure that'll work on Elepis considering he dislikes (from what I've observed):
A: Nationalism
B: Religion being taken seriously
C: The Irish"

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Thu Jul 21, 2016 12:46 pm

Arkolon wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:Germany has no aircraft carriers and Italy's is not as technologically advanced as the Queen Elizabeth class is. Not to mention, neither have nuclear weapons, though they are participants in NATO's nuclear sharing program.

The UK doesn't have any aircraft carriers either. ;)

For the time being. ;) :P

User avatar
Freefall11111
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5763
Founded: May 31, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Freefall11111 » Thu Jul 21, 2016 12:46 pm

Arkolon wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:Germany has no aircraft carriers and Italy's is not as technologically advanced as the Queen Elizabeth class is. Not to mention, neither have nuclear weapons, though they are participants in NATO's nuclear sharing program.

The UK doesn't have any aircraft carriers either. ;)

Technically there's the HMS Ocean, which is still an aircraft carrier, just not a fixed wing carrier.

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Thu Jul 21, 2016 12:48 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:How is he not respecting democracy?


Apparently Corbyn putting his fate in the hands of the party membership (ie a democratic vote) is undemocratic.

There is no hierarchy with the party membership at the top with the PLP below. The PLP was a democratic vote of the people that have to actually work with him.

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Thu Jul 21, 2016 12:48 pm

Freefall11111 wrote:
Arkolon wrote:The UK doesn't have any aircraft carriers either. ;)

Technically there's the HMS Ocean, which is still an aircraft carrier, just not a fixed wing carrier.

Amphibious assault ships are not the same as aircraft carriers.

User avatar
Freefall11111
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5763
Founded: May 31, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Freefall11111 » Thu Jul 21, 2016 12:49 pm

Napkiraly wrote:
Freefall11111 wrote:Technically there's the HMS Ocean, which is still an aircraft carrier, just not a fixed wing carrier.

Amphibious assault ships are not the same as aircraft carriers.

Amphibious assault ships are also known as commando carriers or amphibious assault carriers. They can be considered aircraft carriers, unless we're now defining helicopters as something other than aircraft.
Last edited by Freefall11111 on Thu Jul 21, 2016 12:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68115
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Thu Jul 21, 2016 12:51 pm

Napkiraly wrote:
Freefall11111 wrote:Technically there's the HMS Ocean, which is still an aircraft carrier, just not a fixed wing carrier.

Amphibious assault ships are not the same as aircraft carriers.


The US still manages to use them like one.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163947
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Thu Jul 21, 2016 12:51 pm

Freefall11111 wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:Amphibious assault ships are not the same as aircraft carriers.

Amphibious assault ships are also known as commando carriers or amphibious assault carriers. They can be considered aircraft carriers, unless we're now defining helicopters as something other than aircraft.

Industrial fans.
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Freefall11111
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5763
Founded: May 31, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Freefall11111 » Thu Jul 21, 2016 12:52 pm

Ifreann wrote:
Freefall11111 wrote:Amphibious assault ships are also known as commando carriers or amphibious assault carriers. They can be considered aircraft carriers, unless we're now defining helicopters as something other than aircraft.

Industrial fans.

I always wanted to own a helicopter just to use it as a giant fan.

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Thu Jul 21, 2016 12:58 pm

Freefall11111 wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:Amphibious assault ships are not the same as aircraft carriers.

Amphibious assault ships are also known as commando carriers or amphibious assault carriers. They can be considered aircraft carriers, unless we're now defining helicopters as something other than aircraft.

I'd argue that they're different because they serve different functions. Amphibious assault ships main purpose is to land ground forces and then assist them (which is why they also include amphibious landing craft support) while aircraft carriers are essentially mobile airbases for fixed wing aircraft.

User avatar
Freefall11111
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5763
Founded: May 31, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Freefall11111 » Thu Jul 21, 2016 1:01 pm

Napkiraly wrote:
Freefall11111 wrote:Amphibious assault ships are also known as commando carriers or amphibious assault carriers. They can be considered aircraft carriers, unless we're now defining helicopters as something other than aircraft.

I'd argue that they're different because they serve different functions. Amphibious assault ships main purpose is to land ground forces and then assist them (which is why they also include amphibious landing craft support) while aircraft carriers are essentially mobile airbases for fixed wing aircraft.

They function differently, sure, I was just making the point that you can technically classify the HMS Ocean as an aircraft carrier in the literal sense. Obviously we currently lack the capability that, say, Russia's aircraft carrier does, but that'll change over the next four years as the HMS QE is put in action.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163947
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Thu Jul 21, 2016 1:02 pm

British helicarriers when, Fallon?
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Freefall11111
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5763
Founded: May 31, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Freefall11111 » Thu Jul 21, 2016 1:03 pm

Ifreann wrote:British helicarriers when, Fallon?

As soon as Tim Fallon and the Dib Lems win the 2020 GE.

Wait, sorry, wrong timeline.

User avatar
Elepis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8963
Founded: Jan 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Elepis » Thu Jul 21, 2016 1:06 pm

Ifreann wrote:British helicarriers when, Fallon?


we could do what the japanese did and build totally not, really not aircraft carrier heli carriers
"Krugmar - Today at 10:00 PM
Not sure that'll work on Elepis considering he dislikes (from what I've observed):
A: Nationalism
B: Religion being taken seriously
C: The Irish"

User avatar
Freefall11111
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5763
Founded: May 31, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Freefall11111 » Thu Jul 21, 2016 1:08 pm

Elepis wrote:
Ifreann wrote:British helicarriers when, Fallon?


we could do what the japanese did and build totally not, really not aircraft carrier heli carriers

Ahem, it's a helicopter destroyer.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68115
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Thu Jul 21, 2016 1:17 pm

Elepis wrote:
Ifreann wrote:British helicarriers when, Fallon?


we could do what the japanese did and build totally not, really not aircraft carrier heli carriers


Which is what we did back in the day.

Technically the Illustrious-class are cruisers, not carriers.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Freefall11111
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5763
Founded: May 31, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Freefall11111 » Thu Jul 21, 2016 1:19 pm

Freefall11111 wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
Blame de Gaulle.

You're not serious, right?

In case you missed this, Vassenor.

User avatar
Narintia
Minister
 
Posts: 2777
Founded: Aug 10, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Narintia » Thu Jul 21, 2016 1:20 pm

why dont we build battleships, so when USSR and Ming Dynasty come and nuke our battleships they can wink at us and say
''I sunk your Battleship!!!''
aaaaaaa

weird socialist thing, estonian

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68115
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Thu Jul 21, 2016 1:21 pm

Freefall11111 wrote:
Freefall11111 wrote:
You're not serious, right?

In case you missed this, Vassenor.


Given that the matter has already been covered, I saw no need to respond.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Freefall11111
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5763
Founded: May 31, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Freefall11111 » Thu Jul 21, 2016 1:22 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Freefall11111 wrote:In case you missed this, Vassenor.


Given that the matter has already been covered, I saw no need to respond.

Let me rephrase the question: Is "France isn't in NATO" a joke?

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68115
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Thu Jul 21, 2016 1:25 pm

Freefall11111 wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
Given that the matter has already been covered, I saw no need to respond.

Let me rephrase the question: Is "France isn't in NATO" a joke?


Have you actually been reading the thread, where this matter was already explained?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Thu Jul 21, 2016 1:30 pm

Freefall11111 wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:Amphibious assault ships are not the same as aircraft carriers.

Amphibious assault ships are also known as commando carriers or amphibious assault carriers. They can be considered aircraft carriers, unless we're now defining helicopters as something other than aircraft.

Amphibious carriers absolutely do not fill the same role as fixed-wing carriers.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Thu Jul 21, 2016 1:38 pm

Freefall11111 wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
Given that the matter has already been covered, I saw no need to respond.

Let me rephrase the question: Is "France isn't in NATO" a joke?

Napkiraly wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
Especially since France hasn't been a member of NATO for decades.

France has been a member since 1949. It withdrew from the integrated command structure in 19671966 and rejoined under Sarkozy's presidency. Not to mention that there were secret accords to bring France back into the command structure should hostilities break out.

Edited, got the dates of SHAPE moving and France's withdrawal mixed.
Last edited by Napkiraly on Thu Jul 21, 2016 1:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Thu Jul 21, 2016 1:43 pm

Yeah, France was never exactly "unaligned" (or aligned against) with NATO between 1967 and Sarkozy.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Chestaan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6977
Founded: Sep 30, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Chestaan » Thu Jul 21, 2016 4:43 pm

Apologies if this has already been posted, but:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/po ... 49086.html

This is batshit crazy. They don't seem to care what the democratic will of their members is. But I think this nicely puts to bed any remaining notions that it is Corbyn, and not his opponenets, who are splitting the party.
Council Communist
TG me if you want to chat, especially about economics, you can never have enough discussions on economics.Especially game theory :)
Economic Left/Right: -9.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.62

Getting the Guillotine

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ickerija, Ifreann, Ineva, ML Library, Qahrania, Saiwana, TheKeyToJoy, Tungstan

Advertisement

Remove ads