NATION

PASSWORD

UK Politics IV: Disraeli Gears

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

So who do we want leading the Labour Party?

Jeremy Corbyn
142
48%
Owen Smith
66
22%
Lord Helix
89
30%
 
Total votes : 297

User avatar
Olivaero
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8012
Founded: Jun 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Olivaero » Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:16 pm

Sanctissima wrote:
Olivaero wrote:I would say "None!" but I'm certain I'm in a massive minority. I'd go one step further and say it's actually a fairly ridiculous goal to try and limit immigration to a simple numerical figure when the population of the whole world keeps on growing and the environmental situation is deteriorating.


Eh, it depends on the economy in question, and the current population demographic. You can't just have total open borders, especially if you're a rich and highly developed country, since that would be unrealistic. People would continually flock in, and eventually it would become unsustainable.

In the case of the UK, quite a lot of its economy, like most of Western Europe, relies on cheap labour from migrant workers (not exactly the same situation as with actual immigrants, I know, but hear me out). As such, it inevitably needs to maintain or otherwise keep a steady influx of these workers, since its economy would otherwise need to be restructured, lest it implode on itself. With the possibility of the UK officially leaving the EU, this is going to increasingly become a necessity, since many European expats working in the UK under the terms of Schengen will likely be sent home packing. That being said, even with the increasing need, you can't have too much cheap labour, or domestic unemployment becomes untenable and instability ensues. There needs to be a bit of give and take.

The population of the entire world is unsustainable we have to make it work some way, there may be a time when we're "Full up" but it's not yet, our construction industry has just been sitting around with it's thumb in it's areshole for a long period of time. There needs to be innovations in suporting large populations of humans on small parcels of land and the best place for that innovation to occur is in a first world country and it will only happen if that country is feeling the pressure of lots of immigrants. Immigrants are by and large productive workers, most people are really as long as they are welcomed with open arms and given a fair chance. Yes too much cheap labour will also be a problem just like climate change will be in a few years time but that's true throughout the world and we'll also need a solution to that and the earlier we get that the better. So basically what I'm saying is that there is no way to avoid the problems that large numbers of immigrants bring over the long term.
British, Anglo Celtic, English, Northerner.

Transhumanist, Left Hegelian, Marxist, Communist.

Agnostic Theist, Culturally Christian.

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Moralistic Democracy

Postby The Nihilistic view » Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:16 pm

Nearly half (49%) of leave voters said the biggest single reason for wanting to leave the EU was “the principle that decisions about the UK should be taken in the UK”. One third (33%) said the main reason was that leaving “offered the best chance for the UK to regain control over immigration and its own borders.” Just over one in eight (13%) said remaining would mean having no choice “about how the EU expanded its membership or its powers in the years ahead.” Only just over one in twenty (6%) said their main reason was that “when it comes to trade and the economy, the UK would benefit more from being outside the EU than from being part of it.”
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:19 pm

The Nihilistic view wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm sorry, were you away at the end of June?
Image

http://lordashcroftpolls.com/2016/06/ho ... d-and-why/

http://lordashcroftpolls.com/wp-content ... 68x989.jpg

Only offers three specific questions.
http://www.britishelectionstudy.com/bes ... 8S0oSgrLIV
Fifteen thousand "unique answers". I assume that means 15,000 respondents.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:21 pm

Wolfmanne2 wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm sorry, were you away at the end of June?
Image

You're assuming that the anti-immigration sentiment is stemming from xenophobia and racism, which is true in many instances. You need to remember as well that such attitudes stem from economic deprivation within communities, whether as a result of a lack of public investment or as a result of economic exploitation by unscrupulous bosses of both native and migrant labour.

Most people don't oppose highly skilled immigration; they do not want to halt immigration as a whole. To a white working class person they understand that a skilled engineer has a lot to contribute to the country. The issue is more low-skilled immigrants.

What?

I'm now going to ask the same question, were you away at the end of June?
I accepted "such attitudes stem from economic deprivation within communities, whether as a result of a lack of public investment or as a result of economic exploitation by unscrupulous bosses of both native and migrant labour." in the immediate days after the result.

After the result I became incredibly hesitant to ascribe the motivations of racism or xenophobia to "the leave vote", except that subset of leave voters that was explicitly racist and/or xenophobic.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Wolfmanne2
Senator
 
Posts: 3762
Founded: Sep 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne2 » Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:22 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Wolfmanne2 wrote:You're assuming that the anti-immigration sentiment is stemming from xenophobia and racism, which is true in many instances. You need to remember as well that such attitudes stem from economic deprivation within communities, whether as a result of a lack of public investment or as a result of economic exploitation by unscrupulous bosses of both native and migrant labour.

Most people don't oppose highly skilled immigration; they do not want to halt immigration as a whole. To a white working class person they understand that a skilled engineer has a lot to contribute to the country. The issue is more low-skilled immigrants.

What?

I'm now going to ask the same question, were you away at the end of June?
I accepted "such attitudes stem from economic deprivation within communities, whether as a result of a lack of public investment or as a result of economic exploitation by unscrupulous bosses of both native and migrant labour." in the immediate days after the result.

After the result I became incredibly hesitant to ascribe the motivations of racism or xenophobia to "the leave vote", except that subset of leave voters that was explicitly racist and/or xenophobic.

Now you're patronising me. This attitude among the left is exactly why the Labour Party deserves what it gets. People aren't racist or xenophobic because they want lower immigration.
Last edited by Wolfmanne2 on Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:25 pm, edited 2 times in total.
ESFP
United in Labour! Jezbollah and Saint Tony together!


Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66775
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:23 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Wolfmanne2 wrote:You're assuming that the anti-immigration sentiment is stemming from xenophobia and racism, which is true in many instances. You need to remember as well that such attitudes stem from economic deprivation within communities, whether as a result of a lack of public investment or as a result of economic exploitation by unscrupulous bosses of both native and migrant labour.

Most people don't oppose highly skilled immigration; they do not want to halt immigration as a whole. To a white working class person they understand that a skilled engineer has a lot to contribute to the country. The issue is more low-skilled immigrants.

What?

I'm now going to ask the same question, were you away at the end of June?
I accepted "such attitudes stem from economic deprivation within communities, whether as a result of a lack of public investment or as a result of economic exploitation by unscrupulous bosses of both native and migrant labour." in the immediate days after the result.

After the result I became incredibly hesitant to ascribe the motivations of racism or xenophobia to "the leave vote", except that subset of leave voters that was explicitly racist and/or xenophobic.


Especially when you have people giving on-camera interviews saying that they voted Leave purely to get rid of migrants and that they don't care about any other factors like the effects on the economy.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:24 pm

?????

Not a clue what you're on about at this point.
You claimed my appraisal of leave voters was rooted in a presumption that they were racist or xenophobic - it is not, and conclusively has not been so since the vote. I corrected you on this, admittedly full of snark because I can't believe you managed to miss that transformation my worldview took.

Now you're claiming that I'm patronising you and this is why Labour is shit?
What?

Like seriously, have you got a word filter that makes my posts look like this?
After the result I became incredibly hesitant to ascribe the motivations of racism or xenophobia to "the leave vote", except especially that subset of leave voters that was explicitly racist and/or xenophobic.
Last edited by Imperializt Russia on Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Wolfmanne2
Senator
 
Posts: 3762
Founded: Sep 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne2 » Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:28 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:?????

Not a clue what you're on about at this point.
You claimed my appraisal of leave voters was rooted in a presumption that they were racist or xenophobic - it is not, and conclusively has not been so since the vote. I corrected you on this, admittedly full of snark because I can't believe you managed to miss that transformation my worldview took.

Now you're claiming that I'm patronising you and this is why Labour is shit?
What?

Like seriously, have you got a word filter that makes my posts look like this?
After the result I became incredibly hesitant to ascribe the motivations of racism or xenophobia to "the leave vote", except especially that subset of leave voters that was explicitly racist and/or xenophobic.

You missed everything I said. I've said that we've needed to address immigration, was talking about how to do it and then you post something about 'wow you didn't know about immigration'. Any need to be a prick?
ESFP
United in Labour! Jezbollah and Saint Tony together!


Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.

User avatar
Wolfmanne2
Senator
 
Posts: 3762
Founded: Sep 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne2 » Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:29 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:What?

I'm now going to ask the same question, were you away at the end of June?
I accepted "such attitudes stem from economic deprivation within communities, whether as a result of a lack of public investment or as a result of economic exploitation by unscrupulous bosses of both native and migrant labour." in the immediate days after the result.

After the result I became incredibly hesitant to ascribe the motivations of racism or xenophobia to "the leave vote", except that subset of leave voters that was explicitly racist and/or xenophobic.


Especially when you have people giving on-camera interviews saying that they voted Leave purely to get rid of migrants and that they don't care about any other factors like the effects on the economy.

Spending most of your life in a deprived community and having a sense that the people in Westminster don't care for you makes people think that. Should we not try to improve their wellbeing because they may be racist or xenophobic? In a way that doesn't involve us telling them what their problems are?
Last edited by Wolfmanne2 on Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
ESFP
United in Labour! Jezbollah and Saint Tony together!


Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66775
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:30 pm

Wolfmanne2 wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
Especially when you have people giving on-camera interviews saying that they voted Leave purely to get rid of migrants and that they don't care about any other factors like the effects on the economy.

Spending most of your life in a deprived community and having a sense that the people in Westminster don't care for you makes people think that. Should we not try to improve their wellbeing because they may be racist or xenophobic? In a way that doesn't involve us telling them what their problems are?


When they say "getting rid of the Muslims" in the same sentence I think it is a fair conclusion to draw.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:31 pm

Wolfmanne2 wrote:Spending most of your life in a deprived community and having a sense that the people in Westminster don't care for you makes people think that.


you're missing a key element here
Last edited by Souseiseki on Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:31 pm, edited 2 times in total.
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:33 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Wolfmanne2 wrote:Spending most of your life in a deprived community and having a sense that the people in Westminster don't care for you makes people think that. Should we not try to improve their wellbeing because they may be racist or xenophobic? In a way that doesn't involve us telling them what their problems are?


When they say "getting rid of the Muslims" in the same sentence I think it is a fair conclusion to draw.

I wonder how many people thought leaving the EU was at all related to Muslims.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Moralistic Democracy

Postby The Nihilistic view » Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:34 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:

Only offers three specific questions.
http://www.britishelectionstudy.com/bes ... 8S0oSgrLIV
Fifteen thousand "unique answers". I assume that means 15,000 respondents.


What you have there is asking people to talk about stuff, rather than asking them what is most important to them out of a range of options and to rank them. Thus it's not as valid when talking about the most important reason to people. Immigration was not the most important.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Wolfmanne2
Senator
 
Posts: 3762
Founded: Sep 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne2 » Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:35 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Wolfmanne2 wrote:Spending most of your life in a deprived community and having a sense that the people in Westminster don't care for you makes people think that. Should we not try to improve their wellbeing because they may be racist or xenophobic? In a way that doesn't involve us telling them what their problems are?


When they say "getting rid of the Muslims" in the same sentence I think it is a fair conclusion to draw.

Vassenor darling, you've never faced racism in your life. I have because of my skin colour, I don't appreciate sanctimonious left-wing white people lecturing me about racism and I don't appreciate them lecturing me on why people are racist when I have a great deal of interest on understanding such a thing, because I'd very much like to live in a less racist society.

Tell me, why are there seemingly more racist people from Stoke-upon-Trent, the Rhondda and Hull then in London? Three of those areas are areas with large white working class populations that have faced constant underinvestment, one is a city with a burgeoning economy.
Last edited by Wolfmanne2 on Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:35 pm, edited 2 times in total.
ESFP
United in Labour! Jezbollah and Saint Tony together!


Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66775
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:36 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
When they say "getting rid of the Muslims" in the same sentence I think it is a fair conclusion to draw.

I wonder how many people thought leaving the EU was at all related to Muslims.


Given that Google searches originating from British IP addresses for "what is the EU" spiked on June 24 I think we can logically assume a good chunk had no idea what they were voting for.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Olivaero
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8012
Founded: Jun 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Olivaero » Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:36 pm

Wolfmanne2 wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
Especially when you have people giving on-camera interviews saying that they voted Leave purely to get rid of migrants and that they don't care about any other factors like the effects on the economy.

Spending most of your life in a deprived community and having a sense that the people in Westminster don't care for you makes people think that. Should we not try to improve their wellbeing because they may be racist or xenophobic? In a way that doesn't involve us telling them what their problems are?

It never made me think that.
British, Anglo Celtic, English, Northerner.

Transhumanist, Left Hegelian, Marxist, Communist.

Agnostic Theist, Culturally Christian.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57898
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:37 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Geilinor wrote:I wonder how many people thought leaving the EU was at all related to Muslims.


Given that Google searches originating from British IP addresses for "what is the EU" spiked on June 24 I think we can logically assume a good chunk had no idea what they were voting for.


Did you bother to find out the extent of the spike or do you just not care because it fits with your preconceptions?
Hint:
It was the low thousands.

So a few thousand people googled "What is the EU" on a day, instead of like, twelve people doing it or whatever.

Didn't stop the pro-EU press in the midst of its temper tantrum and determination to cast anyone who disagreed with them as rubes from using it though. There's also zero indication these people were brexiters, involved in politics at all, etc.

Maybe people were just wondering why all the journalists and politicians were losing their shit and acting like the world had ended.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:39 pm

The Nihilistic view wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:Only offers three specific questions.
http://www.britishelectionstudy.com/bes ... 8S0oSgrLIV
Fifteen thousand "unique answers". I assume that means 15,000 respondents.


What you have there is asking people to talk about stuff, rather than asking them what is most important to them out of a range of options and to rank them. Thus it's not as valid when talking about the most important reason to people. Immigration was not the most important.

"Immigration" was followed at some distance by "borders" and "border", and also "security".
"Control" was way behind "immigration".

If you force people to vote for one specific thing of three, you are begging the question, for the sake of a more conclusive ranking. People's choice of options will be swayed.

if you voted to leave the EU because of immigration, and believed it was because of EU laws and rules that we couldn't change, then you would probably select "that decisions should be taken in the UK", as that would have solved your perceived immigration problem.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:40 pm

keeping in mind one of the big arguments over control was control over... immigration
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:41 pm

Wolfmanne2 wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:?????

Not a clue what you're on about at this point.
You claimed my appraisal of leave voters was rooted in a presumption that they were racist or xenophobic - it is not, and conclusively has not been so since the vote. I corrected you on this, admittedly full of snark because I can't believe you managed to miss that transformation my worldview took.

Now you're claiming that I'm patronising you and this is why Labour is shit?
What?

Like seriously, have you got a word filter that makes my posts look like this?

You missed everything I said. I've said that we've needed to address immigration, was talking about how to do it and then you post something about 'wow you didn't know about immigration'. Any need to be a prick?

Yeah, my world might be ending tomorrow.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57898
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:41 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Wolfmanne2 wrote:You missed everything I said. I've said that we've needed to address immigration, was talking about how to do it and then you post something about 'wow you didn't know about immigration'. Any need to be a prick?

Yeah, my world might be ending tomorrow.


Wassup?
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Olivaero
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8012
Founded: Jun 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Olivaero » Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:42 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Wolfmanne2 wrote:You missed everything I said. I've said that we've needed to address immigration, was talking about how to do it and then you post something about 'wow you didn't know about immigration'. Any need to be a prick?

Yeah, my world might be ending tomorrow.

Been through that,the world never truly ends, we just have to change what we want from it.
British, Anglo Celtic, English, Northerner.

Transhumanist, Left Hegelian, Marxist, Communist.

Agnostic Theist, Culturally Christian.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:43 pm

I might find that I become the first person ever to actually fail my master's course, by having only "completed" something in the region of 50 of the 180 credits.

Or I haven't and the people in the postgrad office have spent 4+ weeks not bothering to actually let me know how that's going.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Wolfmanne2
Senator
 
Posts: 3762
Founded: Sep 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne2 » Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:44 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:I might find that I become the first person ever to actually fail my master's course, by having only "completed" something in the region of 50 of the 180 credits.

Or I haven't and the people in the postgrad office have spent 4+ weeks not bothering to actually let me know how that's going.

Oh Lord, I'm sorry to hear.
ESFP
United in Labour! Jezbollah and Saint Tony together!


Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon Aug 29, 2016 3:46 pm

For the record my original answer was going to be "because I'm me", so I don't know why I actually chose to post that.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aerlanica, Cannot think of a name, Duvniask, Fractalnavel, Gun Manufacturers, Hispida, Juansonia, Necroghastia, Norse Inuit Union, Tarsonis, The Democratic peoples republic of hell, The Jamesian Republic, Thermodolia

Advertisement

Remove ads