NATION

PASSWORD

UK Politics IV: Disraeli Gears

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

So who do we want leading the Labour Party?

Jeremy Corbyn
142
48%
Owen Smith
66
22%
Lord Helix
89
30%
 
Total votes : 297

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:10 pm

Elepis wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
If you think all cultures are equal, you should have no objection to closing the borders then. It's just as valid as keeping them open. Your ideology is internally inconsistent.


No it isn't, by closing the borders we would be saying "'British' culture is better and we don't want nay others 'polluting' it"


But that is, in itself, a valid choice. Are you suggesting such a culture would be worse?
Gosh. Then it seems, as I said, your ideology is inherently completely incoherent and contradictory.

How about if tommorow, the UK up and decided that assaulting LGBT people and acquitting their attackers in court was part of our culture, would we be worse, or better?

I called multiculturalists Moral Nihilists for a reason you know.
The idea that cultures are equal is nihilistic. By being a multiculturalist who says cultures are equal, you are proclaiming yourself to be a complete vacuum of any morality or ethics. Or somebody who hasn't thought through the implication of your actions.

Is nazi germanies culture equal to ours?

1066 Englands?

Well.
Say what you will about the tenets of national socialism dude, at least it's an ethos.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:12 pm, edited 3 times in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66787
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:10 pm

Salandriagado wrote:
Lamadia III wrote:Because The Sun reflects some-many of my own personal views; and, far more importantly to me, because it is the best-selling newspaper in the UK, and reflects the views of tens-of-millions of those living in this country.


About 2 million, in fact. A number which, you will note, is utterly dwarfed by the top online news sources.


And only in print. When you include online circulation the Mail beats it. The "tens of millions" idea comes from a study last year where the results from the 36,000 adult sample were generalised to indicate a 13.5million readership.
Last edited by Vassenor on Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Elepis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8963
Founded: Jan 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Elepis » Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:12 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Elepis wrote:
No it isn't, by closing the borders we would be saying "'British' culture is better and we don't want nay others 'polluting' it"


But that is, in itself, a valid choice. Are you suggesting such a culture would be worse?
Gosh. Then it seems, as I said, your ideology is inherently completely incoherent and contradictory.

How about if tommorow, the UK up and decided that assaulting LGBT people and acquitting their attackers in court was part of our culture, would we be worse, or better?


That is not a culture though, no one has a culture of closing borders, That one be the decision of Mrs May and the Tory party, not 'British' Culture

That means the government are bigoted idiots, it has no bearing on all the people of the UK unless all the people (including all LGBTQ people) agreed to it. It has nothing to do with culture
Last edited by Elepis on Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
"Krugmar - Today at 10:00 PM
Not sure that'll work on Elepis considering he dislikes (from what I've observed):
A: Nationalism
B: Religion being taken seriously
C: The Irish"

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:14 pm

Elepis wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
But that is, in itself, a valid choice. Are you suggesting such a culture would be worse?
Gosh. Then it seems, as I said, your ideology is inherently completely incoherent and contradictory.

How about if tommorow, the UK up and decided that assaulting LGBT people and acquitting their attackers in court was part of our culture, would we be worse, or better?


That is not a culture though, no one has a culture of closing borders, That one be the decision of Mrs May and the Tory party, not 'British' Culture

That means the government are bigoted idiots, it has no bearing on all the people of the UK unless all the people (including all LGBTQ people) agreed to it. It has nothing to do with culture


A sizable majority is sufficient to claim its a part of the culture.
Juries would be the ones to acquit.
You're wriggling to avoid confronting how ridiculous your idea of cultural equality is.

I called multiculturalists Moral Nihilists for a reason you know.
The idea that cultures are equal is nihilistic. By being a multiculturalist who says cultures are equal, you are proclaiming yourself to be a complete vacuum of any morality or ethics. Or somebody who hasn't thought through the implication of your actions.

Is nazi germanies culture equal to ours?

1066 Englands?

Well.
Say what you will about the tenets of national socialism dude, at least it's an ethos.


By saying cultures are equal, you are abdicating any moral or ethical judgement. Multiculturalism is, at its core, Nihilism.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66787
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:15 pm

This is starting to sound a lot like mental gymnastics.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:18 pm

Vassenor wrote:This is starting to sound a lot like mental gymnastics.


It seems pretty evident to me.
By refusing to say there is a meaningful metric by which to judge cultures, you are being a nihilist. By necessity, that's what it involves. You are rejecting any notion of morality or ethics in order to make that claim.

If that's not the case, then what meaningful metric do you offer?

It's my belief that certain cultures are morally superior to others.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Moralistic Democracy

Postby The Nihilistic view » Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:18 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Elepis wrote:
No it isn't, by closing the borders we would be saying "'British' culture is better and we don't want nay others 'polluting' it"


But that is, in itself, a valid choice. Are you suggesting such a culture would be worse?
Gosh. Then it seems, as I said, your ideology is inherently completely incoherent and contradictory.

How about if tommorow, the UK up and decided that assaulting LGBT people and acquitting their attackers in court was part of our culture, would we be worse, or better?

I called multiculturalists Moral Nihilists for a reason you know.
The idea that cultures are equal is nihilistic. By being a multiculturalist who says cultures are equal, you are proclaiming yourself to be a complete vacuum of any morality or ethics. Or somebody who hasn't thought through the implication of your actions.

Is nazi germanies culture equal to ours?

1066 Englands?

Well.
Say what you will about the tenets of national socialism dude, at least it's an ethos.


Hey, when have I ever expressed a love of multiculturalism. :(
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Elepis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8963
Founded: Jan 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Elepis » Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:19 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Elepis wrote:
That is not a culture though, no one has a culture of closing borders, That one be the decision of Mrs May and the Tory party, not 'British' Culture

That means the government are bigoted idiots, it has no bearing on all the people of the UK unless all the people (including all LGBTQ people) agreed to it. It has nothing to do with culture


A sizable majority is sufficient to claim its a part of the culture.
Juries would be the ones to acquit.
You're wriggling to avoid confronting how ridiculous your idea of cultural equality is.


Not in my book, that would be an ideology not a culture, a culture has to be developed over hundreds of years. Not in a day. And even then I would not say all British people are evil or bad, just a few. Just because the Russian government has a bad record on gay rights does not mean A) all Russians are homophobes B) russia has a homophobic culture. There is just as good a chance your ideal Irishman is homophobic.

I called multiculturalists Moral Nihilists for a reason you know.
The idea that cultures are equal is nihilistic. By being a multiculturalist who says cultures are equal, you are proclaiming yourself to be a complete vacuum of any morality or ethics. Or somebody who hasn't thought through the implication of your actions.

Is nazi germanies culture equal to ours?

1066 Englands?

Well.
Say what you will about the tenets of national socialism dude, at least it's an ethos.


By saying cultures are equal, you are abdicating any moral or ethical judgement. Multiculturalism is, at its core, Nihilism.[/quote]

Nazism is not a culture, it is an ideology, there is a definable difference.
"Krugmar - Today at 10:00 PM
Not sure that'll work on Elepis considering he dislikes (from what I've observed):
A: Nationalism
B: Religion being taken seriously
C: The Irish"

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:19 pm

The Nihilistic view wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
But that is, in itself, a valid choice. Are you suggesting such a culture would be worse?
Gosh. Then it seems, as I said, your ideology is inherently completely incoherent and contradictory.

How about if tommorow, the UK up and decided that assaulting LGBT people and acquitting their attackers in court was part of our culture, would we be worse, or better?

I called multiculturalists Moral Nihilists for a reason you know.
The idea that cultures are equal is nihilistic. By being a multiculturalist who says cultures are equal, you are proclaiming yourself to be a complete vacuum of any morality or ethics. Or somebody who hasn't thought through the implication of your actions.

Is nazi germanies culture equal to ours?

1066 Englands?

Well.
Say what you will about the tenets of national socialism dude, at least it's an ethos.


Hey, when have I ever expressed a love of multiculturalism. :(


I'm pretty sure you aren't actually a nihilist except in a vague "I guess nihilism is philosophically true but society shouldn't be organized around its principles" way.

You may be a philosophical nihilist, but you aren't a political nihilist.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:20 pm

Elepis wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
A sizable majority is sufficient to claim its a part of the culture.
Juries would be the ones to acquit.
You're wriggling to avoid confronting how ridiculous your idea of cultural equality is.


Not in my book, that would be an ideology not a culture, a culture has to be developed over hundreds of years. Not in a day. And even then I would not say all British people are evil or bad, just a few. Just because the Russian government has a bad record on gay rights does not mean A) all Russians are homophobes B) russia has a homophobic culture. There is just as good a chance your ideal Irishman is homophobic.

I called multiculturalists Moral Nihilists for a reason you know.
The idea that cultures are equal is nihilistic. By being a multiculturalist who says cultures are equal, you are proclaiming yourself to be a complete vacuum of any morality or ethics. Or somebody who hasn't thought through the implication of your actions.

Is nazi germanies culture equal to ours?

1066 Englands?

Well.
Say what you will about the tenets of national socialism dude, at least it's an ethos.


By saying cultures are equal, you are abdicating any moral or ethical judgement. Multiculturalism is, at its core, Nihilism.


Nazism is not a culture, it is an ideology, there is a definable difference.[/quote]

I said the culture of nazi germany.
Ideologies are part of cultures.
Again, you're dancing around the issue rather than confront it.

For one thing, a big part of culture is:

the ideas, customs, and social behaviour of a particular people or society.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Elepis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8963
Founded: Jan 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Elepis » Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:24 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Elepis wrote:
Not in my book, that would be an ideology not a culture, a culture has to be developed over hundreds of years. Not in a day. And even then I would not say all British people are evil or bad, just a few. Just because the Russian government has a bad record on gay rights does not mean A) all Russians are homophobes B) russia has a homophobic culture. There is just as good a chance your ideal Irishman is homophobic.



By saying cultures are equal, you are abdicating any moral or ethical judgement. Multiculturalism is, at its core, Nihilism.


Nazism is not a culture, it is an ideology, there is a definable difference.


I said the culture of nazi germany.
Ideologies are part of cultures.
Again, you're dancing around the issue rather than confront it.

For one thing, a big part of culture is:

the ideas, customs, and social behaviour of a particular people or society.
[/quote]

Nazi Germnay did not have a culture, it had German culture and Nazi idoleogy, to different things.

You are just throwing words together in the hope they make sense

Besides, all this is different from what Lamadia was originally saying. She was saying i should have an unbreakable loyalty to Britain just for the very fact I was born here and nothing else, an idea I find parochial and petty. Which she has still not defended.
"Krugmar - Today at 10:00 PM
Not sure that'll work on Elepis considering he dislikes (from what I've observed):
A: Nationalism
B: Religion being taken seriously
C: The Irish"

User avatar
Elepis
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8963
Founded: Jan 05, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Elepis » Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:24 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Elepis wrote:
Not in my book, that would be an ideology not a culture, a culture has to be developed over hundreds of years. Not in a day. And even then I would not say all British people are evil or bad, just a few. Just because the Russian government has a bad record on gay rights does not mean A) all Russians are homophobes B) russia has a homophobic culture. There is just as good a chance your ideal Irishman is homophobic.



By saying cultures are equal, you are abdicating any moral or ethical judgement. Multiculturalism is, at its core, Nihilism.


Nazism is not a culture, it is an ideology, there is a definable difference.


I said the culture of nazi germany.
Ideologies are part of cultures.
Again, you're dancing around the issue rather than confront it.

For one thing, a big part of culture is:

the ideas, customs, and social behaviour of a particular people or society.
[/quote]

Nazi Germnay did not have a culture, it had German culture and Nazi idoleogy, to different things.

You are just throwing words together in the hope they make sense

Besides, all this is different from what Lamadia was originally saying. She was saying i should have an unbreakable loyalty to Britain just for the very fact I was born here and nothing else, an idea I find parochial and petty. Which she has still not defended.
"Krugmar - Today at 10:00 PM
Not sure that'll work on Elepis considering he dislikes (from what I've observed):
A: Nationalism
B: Religion being taken seriously
C: The Irish"

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Moralistic Democracy

Postby The Nihilistic view » Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:24 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
The Nihilistic view wrote:
Hey, when have I ever expressed a love of multiculturalism. :(


I'm pretty sure you aren't actually a nihilist except in a vague "I guess nihilism is philosophically true but society shouldn't be organized around its principles" way.

You may be a philosophical nihilist, but you aren't a political nihilist.


I am a moral and existential nihilist.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:25 pm

Elepis wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Being against gay marriage is on a significantly different level to believing homosexuality should be illegal.
As is typical for multiculturalists, you are determined to pretend these cultures are equal.
They aren't.

Even the most backward example you could think up from a first world nation is still better, and you just refuse to notice it.


how are cultures not equal?

Because some have better values and beliefs than others.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:27 pm

Napkiraly wrote:
Elepis wrote:
how are cultures not equal?

Because some have better values and beliefs than others.


Apparently that's nonsense.

Elepis wrote:
Besides, all this is different from what Lamadia was originally saying. She was saying i should have an unbreakable loyalty to Britain just for the very fact I was born here and nothing else, an idea I find parochial and petty. Which she has still not defended.


You can up and decide to play for the other team in football and call people narrowminded too if you like.
You're British. You should be out to advocate for our interests.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:28 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:27 pm

The Nihilistic view wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
I'm pretty sure you aren't actually a nihilist except in a vague "I guess nihilism is philosophically true but society shouldn't be organized around its principles" way.

You may be a philosophical nihilist, but you aren't a political nihilist.


I am a moral and existential nihilist.


there's not fucking way you're a moral nihlist lol
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Wolfmanne2
Senator
 
Posts: 3762
Founded: Sep 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne2 » Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:28 pm

Elepis wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Being against gay marriage is on a significantly different level to believing homosexuality should be illegal.
As is typical for multiculturalists, you are determined to pretend these cultures are equal.
They aren't.

Even the most backward example you could think up from a first world nation is still better, and you just refuse to notice it.


how are cultures not equal? How is Irish culture superior to Mexican or Russian culture?

Moral relativism genuinely makes me depressed.
ESFP
United in Labour! Jezbollah and Saint Tony together!


Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:29 pm

Lamadia III wrote:
Elepis wrote:
Now its funny, I fee far more loyalty and affection for Prague, or Fetiye or St Petersburg than I do Grimsby or bradford, national pride is just an anathema to me

Sorry, did I read that incorrectly?
You feel no pride for this country? You see pride as a bad thing?


Yes, pride is a bad thing. It leads to shit decision making, like any other form of irrationality.

Sorry, am I wrong? Because I thought you had views about how this country should be run? If you don't have any pride for this country or its people, then why do you want to force your politics down our throats? In it for yourself, are you?


Pride has absolutely nothing to do with it. I care about people, pretty much to the exclusion of all else. What labels you feel like slapping on those people is irrelevant to me. Thus, I'll oppose measures that harm people, and support those that help people. This country is the one that I know the most about and have the most influence over, given that it's the one I live in and the only one I'm eligible to vote in, so my focus tends to lean here a little more than elsewhere.

Lamadia III wrote:
Elepis wrote:
also, I feel you may have misunderstood, I feel regard for the people of this country but because they are people not because they happened to be born in Walthamstow. I feel the same sense of regard and loyalty for all humans.

But why do you feel loyalty to all of humanity? Just because you are on the same piece of floating rock, air and water? Why not feel the same loyalty for dogs? Or cats? Or even trees?


I find it highly likely that people are conscious, sentient, sapient entities, capable of high level thoughts and emotion. I do feel much the same way towards dogs and cats (since they check the majority of those boxes, if not all of them). I see no reason to believe that trees tick those boxes, so I don't think of them the same. The planet is irrelevant: aliens that fill those categories would get exactly the same policy applied to them.

Lamadia III wrote:
Elepis wrote:
I would just like to point out my reply to your strange tree comment.


And I would like to reply to your strange, anti-British, sentiment, by saying that you show a disregard for a country which you live in. A country which you owe your freedom, your liberty, to.


No, the country that I have consented to giving a little of my liberty and on the understanding that it doesn't abuse the latter or unnecessarily curtail the former.

I could go on, but if your parents didn't bring you up proud of this country and what is has achieved, if you have neglected to have gratitude whilst demanding in your typical leftie attitude that everything be given to you, paid by the hardworkers & those who did not slack at school, then you have no basis for argument.


I'm entirely confident that I receive less benefit from the country, and contribute more to it, than you do. This is a transaction that I'm quite comfortable with, but not any reason for pride.

When you demand benefits, when you demand national healthcare, you neglect to respect the people who pay for it, and the country which gives it to you. I say, shame.


You are conflating a lot of completely different concepts, and abusing the fuck out of all of them:

1) Pride and respect are completely different things. I respect, to a limited degree, this country, and will continue to do so for so long as it continues to not completely screw up running itself, though the degree of that respect drops with every action that isn't to the benefit of people in general. That has absolutely nothing to do with pride.

2) The rich benefit vastly more from the government than the poor do. Even on a net basis once you factor in taxes. Stock market management, the provision of a stable trading currency, protection against theft, beneficial economic law, patent protection, and so on.

Lamadia III wrote:
Vassenor wrote:
You're the one who suggested insufficient national pride should be a bar to standing for office.

Oh, it seems that you are arguing with thin air! :(
No, Vassenor, I didn't. Now, are we listening?
I said that voters would respond to this as it deserves, and that a moral barrier would exist in any compassionate or even sane person before running for high office in this country with no loyalty or respect for it or its people. I am fine with people being allowed to run regardless. I think, on the democracy front, my side holds more weight, don't you?


That is not even remotely what you said. This is what you said:

Lamadia III wrote:
Elepis wrote:
You got something right.
I feel no more pride in this country than I do Germany or Spain or India. I feel pride in human civilization, but not Britain per say. Why should I feel anymore pride for the lump of rock I was born on than any other country?
I don't see pride in this country as a bad thing, just parochial. Same with its people.

why do I want to force my politics down you throat? I my not have pride in this country but I still want to see it run well.

The fact that you have no pride in this country or its people disqualifies you from holding any political office. [snip]


If it's not what you meant, feel free to retract or amend your statement, but you very specifically claimed that lack of pride is a bar to holding political office, and the phrase "bar to holding office" is a very narrowly defined one, and absolutely refers to being prevented from holding office by law.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:29 pm

Wolfmanne2 wrote:
Elepis wrote:
how are cultures not equal? How is Irish culture superior to Mexican or Russian culture?

Moral relativism genuinely makes me depressed.


It's one of the bits of garbage the progressive left has generated that sent me screaming and running into the arms of the Tories.
Val has reached the point where she prefers theocrats to these people, as I said earlier.

Say what you will about the tenets of national socialism dude, at least it's an ethos.
Don't call it moral relativism. Give it it's proper name. It's nihilism. This is a moral vacuum. An absence of ethics. To say cultures are equal is a statement that you lack a moral compass. An extreme way of wording it, but ultimately true.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:31 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:30 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Napkiraly wrote:Because some have better values and beliefs than others.


Apparently that's nonsense.

Elepis wrote:
Besides, all this is different from what Lamadia was originally saying. She was saying i should have an unbreakable loyalty to Britain just for the very fact I was born here and nothing else, an idea I find parochial and petty. Which she has still not defended.


You can up and decide to play for the other team in football and call people narrowminded too if you like.
You're British. You should be out to advocate for our interests.

"Better" is always going to be subjective. How do you objectively define some cultures as better than others?
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:32 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Apparently that's nonsense.



You can up and decide to play for the other team in football and call people narrowminded too if you like.
You're British. You should be out to advocate for our interests.

"Better" is always going to be subjective. How do you objectively define some cultures as better than others?


Therein lies the rub. We can only do so according to our own values. I accept that is the case, but it's the best we've got.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Napkiraly
Post Czar
 
Posts: 37450
Founded: Aug 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Napkiraly » Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:32 pm

Wolfmanne2 wrote:
Elepis wrote:
how are cultures not equal? How is Irish culture superior to Mexican or Russian culture?

Moral relativism genuinely makes me depressed.

Same.

User avatar
Wolfmanne2
Senator
 
Posts: 3762
Founded: Sep 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne2 » Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:32 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Wolfmanne2 wrote:Moral relativism genuinely makes me depressed.


It's one of the bits of garbage the progressive left has generated that sent me screaming and running into the arms of the Tories.
Val has reached the point where she prefers theocrats to these people, as I said earlier.

Say what you will about the tenets of national socialism dude, at least it's an ethos.
Don't call it moral relativism. Give it it's proper name. It's nihilism. This is a moral vacuum. An absence of ethics. To say cultures are equal is a statement that you lack a moral compass. An extreme way of wording it, but ultimately true.

What I will say is that you are playing with dangerous, inflammatory rhetoric. It is hard to regard one as civilised when they must resort to excessive and hyperbolic demonisation.
ESFP
United in Labour! Jezbollah and Saint Tony together!


Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:32 pm

the valuation of which culture is better is, to extent itself, influenced by cultural background and there's no way you can avoid this

*drops mic*
Last edited by Souseiseki on Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:34 pm, edited 2 times in total.
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66787
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Mon Aug 29, 2016 2:34 pm

Cultural superiority is just such a phenomenally stupid concept. I don't think anyone can really quantify what makes a given culture objectively superior to another.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Elwher, Emotional Support Crocodile, Fartsniffage, Komarovo, Lord Dominator, Neu California, Rary, The Holy Therns, The Huskar Social Union, Valrifall

Advertisement

Remove ads