NATION

PASSWORD

Relationship and getting one thread

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Great Kauthar
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1742
Founded: May 01, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Kauthar » Sat Jul 09, 2016 2:51 pm

Cannot think of a name wrote:
Great Kauthar wrote:how to make her stop saying great friend

Be a shitty friend.

you're not wrong but not the direction I want to go.

Gauliscia wrote:Tbh, people asking how to get a girl on the Internet are probably only gonna hit some fat nerd bird

tbh I'm not going to ask people I know for advice
"Let the thief no longer steal, but rather let him labor, doing honest work with his own hands, so that he may have something to share with anyone in need." - Ephesians 4:28 (ESV)
Christian Social Democrat
I am: "A monument to [the RWDT's] collective sins."

User avatar
Valaran
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 21211
Founded: May 25, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Valaran » Sat Jul 09, 2016 2:54 pm

Benuty wrote:
Valaran wrote:

That's the spirit

With people like them it is amazing the things we can accomplish.


I had typed a reply in this same spirit, but it wasn't very kosher, so better not.

Instead, take a well earned kek.
I used to run an alliance, and a region. Not that it matters now.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire

User avatar
Great Feng
Senator
 
Posts: 4319
Founded: Dec 08, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Feng » Sat Jul 09, 2016 2:59 pm

Here's some advice: Most girls like guys who aren't too uptight. So don't act uptight, act calm, relaxed, accepting, etc.

User avatar
Gauliscia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1150
Founded: Mar 13, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauliscia » Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:00 pm

Great Kauthar wrote:
Cannot think of a name wrote:Be a shitty friend.

you're not wrong but not the direction I want to go.

Gauliscia wrote:Tbh, people asking how to get a girl on the Internet are probably only gonna hit some fat nerd bird

tbh I'm not going to ask people I know for advice

Why not?
ᛒᚰᚾᛞᚽᛊᚱᚼᛁᚴ ᛞᛜᚹᚪᛚᛁᚵᛁᛂ
Hail Wodin, Father of Men and Lord of Walhalla
Gauliscia is a Wodinist and germanic parliamentary democracy headed by a monarch. The Stalwart Boar Party in power backs a strong military, friendly foreign policy, a pious proud people and government support for the needy. It's a primeval landscape roamed by rich fauna. Gauliscia is lead by its aristocratic elite but fuelled by the working class.
Dutch and Hungarian, British educated. I have yet to find a political camp but my tendencies are to traditionalism, collectivism, nationalism and statism. I enjoy epic poetry and literature, hunting, drinking, wenching and rugby.

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41614
Founded: Antiquity
New York Times Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:02 pm

Great Kauthar wrote:
Cannot think of a name wrote:Be a shitty friend.

you're not wrong but not the direction I want to go.

Alright, this is a shit metaphor but bear with me...haha...that's funny, just wait...

If you've ever been fishing you know that there is this magic moment when the fish takes the bait when you pull and set the hook. From then on it's just reeling it in. If you yank too soon you pull the hook away from the fish, too late and the fish has nibbled the bait off the hook and left you with just a pointless string in the water.

If, and that's a biiiiiiiiiig if, if there was ever a chance between the two of you, you did one of those things. You waited too long or not long enough and now it's over. It's just a fish and a hook occupying the same water trying to make the best of it. It's over. Fish other fish, this one has seen your bait and made its decision. Maybe, just maybe they'll come around for another shot in the future, but that's not enough to count on.


However, the much more likely scenario and one you need to come to terms with in order to interact with humans is this: It was never going to happen. There was never a right time to pull that line because she was never that into your bait. But congratulations! She doesn't hate you, she just doesn't feel that intangible spark between the two of you. It's not a death sentence. It's a default setting. I don't fall deeply in love with every hot chick I see, nor do I start picking out wedding china to every girl who is nice to me in public. Think of all the chicks you've met and you've barely wanted anything to do with but like a fraction of them. It's our default setting. It's not an affront, it's just you didn't overcome this time. Accept your loss and move on. You're going to face more rejection than success. Try not to take it personally.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 126488
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Libertarian Police State

Postby Ethel mermania » Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:07 pm

Nanatsu no Tsuki wrote:
Valaran wrote:
That's genuinely one of the most hilarious things I've read in a while. Muchos kudos, and wow, this thread served a glorious purpose after all.


No problem. Bottle, a former poster, linked to this blog and we've been hooked on it at home. It's hilarious.

Ethel mermania wrote:
Where is your sense of adventure.... or humour.


Should I bring the pop corn?


And bourbon.
The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion … but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.

The most fundamental problem of politics is not the control of wickedness but the limitation of righteousness. 



http://www.salientpartners.com/epsilont ... ilizations

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 126488
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Libertarian Police State

Postby Ethel mermania » Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:09 pm

Cannot think of a name wrote:
Gauliscia wrote:Tbh, people asking how to get a girl on the Internet are probably only gonna hit some fat nerd bird

You're a sweet talker, Betty Crocker.

Hey, Betty could cook.

And you know what they say, the way to a man's heart is straight through the rib cage.
Last edited by Ethel mermania on Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion … but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.

The most fundamental problem of politics is not the control of wickedness but the limitation of righteousness. 



http://www.salientpartners.com/epsilont ... ilizations

User avatar
The Joseon Dynasty
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6015
Founded: Jan 16, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Joseon Dynasty » Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:13 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:
The Joseon Dynasty wrote:Well, I'm going to be a graduate student living at poverty line for the next 5 years or so, then a post-doc living below the poverty line. I should have tenure and a standard middle class salary by the time I'm 40, though.

How are you struggling for pussy as a student?

Don't remind me... I was taking the piss earlier about being a repulsive human being (at least by my own assessment), but it's still true that I haven't had much luck as a student. I'm an alright-looking guy, so I've been approached by girls in the past, but I routinely cock it up by being awkward and panicky. Plus, I'm in econometrics and statistics, so the gender ratio doesn't work in my favour.
Last edited by The Joseon Dynasty on Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
  • No, I'm not Korean. I'm British and as white as the Queen's buttocks.
  • Bio: I'm a PhD student in Statistics. Interested in all sorts of things. Currently getting into statistical signal processing for brain imaging. Currently co-authoring a paper on labour market dynamics, hopefully branching off into a test of the Markov property for labour market transition rates.

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 126488
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Libertarian Police State

Postby Ethel mermania » Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:15 pm

The Joseon Dynasty wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:How are you struggling for pussy as a student?

Don't remind me... I was taking the piss earlier about being a repulsive human being (at least by my own assessment), but it's still true that I haven't had much luck as a student. I'm an alright-looking guy, so I've been approached by girls in the past, but I routinely cock it up by being awkward and panicky. Plus, I'm in econometrics and statistics, so the gender ratio doesn't work in my favour.

Hang out with the theater majors, more than half the guys are gay.
The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion … but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.

The most fundamental problem of politics is not the control of wickedness but the limitation of righteousness. 



http://www.salientpartners.com/epsilont ... ilizations

User avatar
Gauliscia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1150
Founded: Mar 13, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauliscia » Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:18 pm

The Joseon Dynasty wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:How are you struggling for pussy as a student?

Don't remind me... I was taking the piss earlier about being a repulsive human being (at least by my own assessment), but it's still true that I haven't had much luck as a student. I'm an alright-looking guy, so I've been approached by girls in the past, but I routinely cock it up by being awkward and panicky. Plus, I'm in econometrics and statistics, so the gender ratio doesn't work in my favour.

What's the rush. Bros before hos
ᛒᚰᚾᛞᚽᛊᚱᚼᛁᚴ ᛞᛜᚹᚪᛚᛁᚵᛁᛂ
Hail Wodin, Father of Men and Lord of Walhalla
Gauliscia is a Wodinist and germanic parliamentary democracy headed by a monarch. The Stalwart Boar Party in power backs a strong military, friendly foreign policy, a pious proud people and government support for the needy. It's a primeval landscape roamed by rich fauna. Gauliscia is lead by its aristocratic elite but fuelled by the working class.
Dutch and Hungarian, British educated. I have yet to find a political camp but my tendencies are to traditionalism, collectivism, nationalism and statism. I enjoy epic poetry and literature, hunting, drinking, wenching and rugby.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:23 pm

Just talk to them and don't be a prick, I guess?

If she likes you she likes you, if she doesn't she doesn't.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159039
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:25 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Saiwania wrote:So far as diamond rings go, I can't see myself ever getting one. Every buying instinct I have just screams that it is a bad investment. These are not rare gemstones. It stands to reason that carbon is almost everywhere and for that reason, so too will diamonds. The DeBeers company just wants people to believe that "a diamond is forever" when it loses its value like any other item.

To me, a diamond is just a shiny rock. A cubic zirconium looks just as good in my view but if you want a real diamond, you can technically have it made in a laboratory for cheaper with fewer imperfections than the natural equivalent; and not relying on inhumane labor practices overseas to mine it.

This is like saying scaremongering over the supply of uranium for nuclear power is dumb because uranium is in seawater. And topsoil.

yeah
but in absurdly tiny quantities.

If you want to make a diamond ring feel special, have a family member's ashes turned into a diamond. It's a thing.

"This ring is beautiful"
"It's my dead mother"
Image



The Joseon Dynasty wrote:How do I get a woman if I'm socially inept, emotionally stunted, sexually depraved and physically repulsive? Thanks in advance for the input.

Sham citizenship marriage.

Oh, but you'll probably want a better citizenship than British. No one wants to be British any more.


Immoren wrote:
United Marxist Nations wrote:How does one "be confident"?


Down a bottle of potato vodka

Finnish courage. Like Dutch courage, but you end up fighting Russians.

User avatar
Great Feng
Senator
 
Posts: 4319
Founded: Dec 08, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Feng » Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:27 pm

This might be a stupid Question: So let's say that your ex is in a relationship. I always assume the deciding factor of who they choose is who they "love more". Is that necessarily the case most of the time(I know it's definitely not always, so I'm saying most of the time) or most of the time is it more than that and a person can love the person they rejected more but chose the other person for some other reason?

User avatar
Salus Maior
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27813
Founded: Jun 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Salus Maior » Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:28 pm

Great Feng wrote:Here's some advice: Most girls like guys who aren't too uptight. So don't act uptight, act calm, relaxed, accepting, etc.


That's a bit hard to do for me. Because I get waaay stressed when it comes to girls and I find it hard to stay totally calm and I then become conflicted about what I should be doing. Which of course I realize I shouldn't do, and then get stressed from that. Vicious cycle and all that.

I'm actually going through a bit of that at the moment, actually.
Last edited by Salus Maior on Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Traditionalist Catholic, Constitutional Monarchist, Habsburg Nostalgic, Distributist, Disillusioned Millennial.

"In any case we clearly see....That some opportune remedy must be found quickly for the misery and wretchedness pressing so unjustly on the majority of the working class...it has come to pass that working men have been surrendered, isolated and helpless, to the hardheartedness of employers and the greed of unchecked competition." -Pope Leo XIII, Rerum Novarum

User avatar
Freefall11111
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5763
Founded: May 31, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Freefall11111 » Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:29 pm

Great Feng wrote:This might be a stupid Question: So let's say that your ex is in a relationship. I always assume the deciding factor of who they choose is who they "love more". Is that necessarily the case most of the time(I know it's definitely not always, so I'm saying most of the time) or most of the time is it more than that and a person can love the person they rejected more but chose the other person for some other reason?

There's more to relationships than love. You may be in a relationship with someone you love less because of an endless list of possible circumstances.

User avatar
Salus Maior
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27813
Founded: Jun 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Salus Maior » Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:29 pm

Great Feng wrote:This might be a stupid Question: So let's say that your ex is in a relationship. I always assume the deciding factor of who they choose is who they "love more". Is that necessarily the case most of the time(I know it's definitely not always, so I'm saying most of the time) or most of the time is it more than that and a person can love the person they rejected more but chose the other person for some other reason?


Probably. Women and relationships are weird.

No offense intended to any ladies in this thread.
Traditionalist Catholic, Constitutional Monarchist, Habsburg Nostalgic, Distributist, Disillusioned Millennial.

"In any case we clearly see....That some opportune remedy must be found quickly for the misery and wretchedness pressing so unjustly on the majority of the working class...it has come to pass that working men have been surrendered, isolated and helpless, to the hardheartedness of employers and the greed of unchecked competition." -Pope Leo XIII, Rerum Novarum

User avatar
Great Feng
Senator
 
Posts: 4319
Founded: Dec 08, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Feng » Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:29 pm

Salus Maior wrote:
Great Feng wrote:Here's some advice: Most girls like guys who aren't too uptight. So don't act uptight, act calm, relaxed, accepting, etc.


That's a bit hard to do for me. Because I get waaay stressed when it comes to girls and I find it hard to stay totally calm and I become conflicted about what I should be doing. Which of course I realize I shouldn't do, and then get stressed from that. Vicious cycle and all that.

I'm actually going through a bit of that at the moment, actually.

Same. I know I have trouble with it too. Doesn't mean I can't give advice not to do it. :p

User avatar
Salus Maior
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27813
Founded: Jun 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Salus Maior » Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:30 pm

Great Feng wrote:
Salus Maior wrote:
That's a bit hard to do for me. Because I get waaay stressed when it comes to girls and I find it hard to stay totally calm and I become conflicted about what I should be doing. Which of course I realize I shouldn't do, and then get stressed from that. Vicious cycle and all that.

I'm actually going through a bit of that at the moment, actually.

Same. I know I have trouble with it too. Doesn't mean I can't give advice not to do it. :p


*stress intensifies*

:P
Traditionalist Catholic, Constitutional Monarchist, Habsburg Nostalgic, Distributist, Disillusioned Millennial.

"In any case we clearly see....That some opportune remedy must be found quickly for the misery and wretchedness pressing so unjustly on the majority of the working class...it has come to pass that working men have been surrendered, isolated and helpless, to the hardheartedness of employers and the greed of unchecked competition." -Pope Leo XIII, Rerum Novarum

User avatar
Great Feng
Senator
 
Posts: 4319
Founded: Dec 08, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Feng » Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:30 pm

Salus Maior wrote:
Great Feng wrote:This might be a stupid Question: So let's say that your ex is in a relationship. I always assume the deciding factor of who they choose is who they "love more". Is that necessarily the case most of the time(I know it's definitely not always, so I'm saying most of the time) or most of the time is it more than that and a person can love the person they rejected more but chose the other person for some other reason?


Probably. Women and relationships are weird.

No offense intended to any ladies in this thread.

This person is sexually/physically female but identifies as a guy and wants to become a guy physically. The breakup I had with him/her was over that, but I'm finally going to bend my religious views and try to ignore that I am straight for this person that I love so much.
Then he/she has a relationship.
Oh well. I'll just wait. It's nothing new to me anyway. :p

User avatar
Cannot think of a name
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41614
Founded: Antiquity
New York Times Democracy

Postby Cannot think of a name » Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:34 pm

Great Feng wrote:This might be a stupid Question: So let's say that your ex is in a relationship. I always assume the deciding factor of who they choose is who they "love more". Is that necessarily the case most of the time(I know it's definitely not always, so I'm saying most of the time) or most of the time is it more than that and a person can love the person they rejected more but chose the other person for some other reason?

You love who you love in the time that you love them.
"...I have been gravely disappointed with the white moderate. I have almost reached the regrettable conclusion that the Negro's great stumbling block in the stride toward freedom is not the White Citizen's Council-er or the Ku Klux Klanner, but the white moderate who is more devoted to "order" than to justice; who prefers a negative peace which is the absence of tension to a positive peace which is the presence of justice; who constantly says "I agree with you in the goal you seek, but I can't agree with your methods of direct action;" who paternalistically feels he can set the timetable for another man's freedom; who lives by the myth of time and who constantly advises the Negro to wait until a "more convenient season." -MLK Jr.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:34 pm

Great Feng wrote:This might be a stupid Question: So let's say that your ex is in a relationship. I always assume the deciding factor of who they choose is who they "love more". Is that necessarily the case most of the time(I know it's definitely not always, so I'm saying most of the time) or most of the time is it more than that and a person can love the person they rejected more but chose the other person for some other reason?


Who cares? If they choose someone, that's who they chose for whatever reason.

Love can only get relationships so far.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
New haven america
Post Czar
 
Posts: 43454
Founded: Oct 08, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby New haven america » Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:37 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:how make woman talk

What's a "Woman"?
Human of the male variety
Will accept TGs
Char/Axis 2024

That's all folks~

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:38 pm

Great Feng wrote:
Salus Maior wrote:
Probably. Women and relationships are weird.

No offense intended to any ladies in this thread.

This person is sexually/physically female but identifies as a guy and wants to become a guy physically. The breakup I had with him/her was over that, but I'm finally going to bend my religious views and try to ignore that I am straight for this person that I love so much.
Then he/she has a relationship.
Oh well. I'll just wait. It's nothing new to me anyway. :p


If that's how you roll that's how you roll.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Great Feng
Senator
 
Posts: 4319
Founded: Dec 08, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Feng » Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:41 pm

Soldati Senza Confini wrote:
Great Feng wrote:This person is sexually/physically female but identifies as a guy and wants to become a guy physically. The breakup I had with him/her was over that, but I'm finally going to bend my religious views and try to ignore that I am straight for this person that I love so much.
Then he/she has a relationship.
Oh well. I'll just wait. It's nothing new to me anyway. :p


If that's how you roll that's how you roll.

You know this thread might actually help me.
I can just post info or ask for help here instead of TET, and thus be less annoying, imo.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:45 pm

Great Feng wrote:
Soldati Senza Confini wrote:
If that's how you roll that's how you roll.

You know this thread might actually help me.
I can just post info or ask for help here instead of TET, and thus be less annoying, imo.


I know, I'm just being like this to get a point across. :p

It's not that this thread is useless, no, but that being in a relationship doesn't require hyper-strategic analysis of every situation you are ever faced on. Sometimes you will fuck up, and you have to learn how to laugh at your failures. You also have to learn how to go with the flow and not think about things too much. A girl will like you if you talk to her. If she is your friend, nothing lost, you just made a good friend. If they like you, more power to you.

Having a relationship is not the be-all end-all of interactions with the opposite sex.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Greater Miami Shores 3, Kyoto Noku, Nantoraka, Necroghastia, Neu California, Pizza Friday Forever91, The Astral Mandate, The Crimson Isles, The Great Nevada Overlord, The Imperial State of Ateria, The Jamesian Republic

Advertisement

Remove ads