NATION

PASSWORD

Two Police Shot in Dallas

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Seangoli
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5920
Founded: Sep 24, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Seangoli » Fri Jul 08, 2016 12:13 am

Chinese Peoples wrote:
Shonburg wrote:If you disarm police, how would they be able to protect the populace effectively in a situation like this?

None of the populace has been endangered in this particular situation.


That is wildly untrue. A woman was wounded after being shot by one of the snipers while trying to protect her son. Considering that the officers were very near the protestors, a missed shot could very easily have killed one of the protestors.

Also, you know, the officers on the scene weren't actually doing much of anything other than standing around. They were as much an innocent as any of the bystanders.

User avatar
Syadei
Diplomat
 
Posts: 805
Founded: Nov 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Syadei » Fri Jul 08, 2016 12:13 am

Shonburg wrote:UPDATE: All employees and students at El Centro are evacuated.


That's great news.

User avatar
Kubra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16360
Founded: Apr 15, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Kubra » Fri Jul 08, 2016 12:14 am

Syadei wrote:
Kubra wrote: The fox stream had the reporter saying they'd already done so.
I'm less apt to trust what I heard now, since obviously if it were known that the guy was down it would have been bigger news.


All the Fox stream is doing right now is staring at the DART Officer that was killed, and they'll probably go back to (yes, they have) go back to focusing on the building that the standoff is occurring. I'm not from the US, but Fox look awful, they couldn't even synchronise audio with video when that female reporter was on.
Have mercy, it's available for canadians
“Atomic war is inevitable. It will destroy half of humanity: it is going to destroy immense human riches. It is very possible. The atomic war is going to provoke a true inferno on Earth. But it will not impede Communism.”
Comrade J. Posadas

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Fri Jul 08, 2016 12:14 am

Shonburg wrote:UPDATE: All employees and students at El Centro are evacuated.


Actually, two still remain at the BoA building at the garage.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Seangoli
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5920
Founded: Sep 24, 2006
Ex-Nation

Postby Seangoli » Fri Jul 08, 2016 12:14 am

Chinese Peoples wrote:
Collatis wrote:So your solution to terror attacks on police officers is to... disarm them? While this could be a valid opinion, it seems much less valid in the light of recent events.

The problem here is that the people do not trust the police, and since police are a local service, it should be up the community to arm or disarm them to the extent that they desire. If they don't want the police to have guns, then they should have their way; it's their community and it's safety, after all.


And then we have the Purge.

User avatar
Syadei
Diplomat
 
Posts: 805
Founded: Nov 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Syadei » Fri Jul 08, 2016 12:14 am

Kubra wrote:
Syadei wrote:
All the Fox stream is doing right now is staring at the DART Officer that was killed, and they'll probably go back to (yes, they have) go back to focusing on the building that the standoff is occurring. I'm not from the US, but Fox look awful, they couldn't even synchronise audio with video when that female reporter was on.
Have mercy, it's available for canadians


It's available for me in England too. The Fox news reporter is so damn mundane though.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Fri Jul 08, 2016 12:15 am

Chinese Peoples wrote:
Shonburg wrote:If you disarm police, how would they be able to protect the populace effectively in a situation like this?

None of the populace has been endangered in this particular situation.


They were snipers, shooting at a crowd, specifically to kill cops.

How is this not just a stupid idea, but also not a dangerous one for the crowd?
Last edited by Soldati Senza Confini on Fri Jul 08, 2016 12:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Kubra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16360
Founded: Apr 15, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Kubra » Fri Jul 08, 2016 12:16 am

Syadei wrote:
Kubra wrote: Have mercy, it's available for canadians


It's available for me in England too. The Fox news reporter is so damn mundane though.
today our queen is a curse
god save the queen tho, bloody yanks think 16 ounces is a pint

Back on topic, the desync might be because we're getting the stream off livestream.com, and not necessarily the Fox stream itself.
“Atomic war is inevitable. It will destroy half of humanity: it is going to destroy immense human riches. It is very possible. The atomic war is going to provoke a true inferno on Earth. But it will not impede Communism.”
Comrade J. Posadas

User avatar
Chinese Peoples
Minister
 
Posts: 2666
Founded: Dec 28, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Chinese Peoples » Fri Jul 08, 2016 12:17 am

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Chinese Peoples wrote:My condolences to all families involved.

But I think it's time to address the issue at hand: disarm police. Let us hold the police to account, collectively. If one cannot handle the responsible use of a firearm, then none of them shall have it. If there's a lunatic in the house, none of its residents should have a gun; the lunatic can easily snatch the gun.


You are suggesting that police be disarmed in a thread regarding 11 police officers who were shot in the line of duty, 5 of whom died as a result of their wounds.

Let's think about that for a bit, shall we?

Yes. I am suggesting that they be disarmed. If the community does not trust them, they are as good as dismissed. Is it more logical that the community chooses the police that serves the community, or that the police chooses the community it serves?
IC Title: the Republic of China | MT | Factbooks | the only democratic China on NS
The duty of the state is to prevent danger, not to punish it after it has happened. Rescind the 2nd Amendment, today.

User avatar
Syadei
Diplomat
 
Posts: 805
Founded: Nov 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Syadei » Fri Jul 08, 2016 12:17 am

Kubra wrote:
Syadei wrote:
It's available for me in England too. The Fox news reporter is so damn mundane though.
today our queen is a curse
god save the queen tho, bloody yanks think 16 ounces is a pint

Back on topic, the desync might be because we're getting the stream off livestream.com, and not necessarily the Fox stream itself.


It's on Fox news itself.

http://video.foxnews.com/v/255356509400 ... watch-live

Apparently the suspect shot himself.

User avatar
Ganonsyoni
Diplomat
 
Posts: 540
Founded: May 01, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Ganonsyoni » Fri Jul 08, 2016 12:18 am

Seangoli wrote:
Chinese Peoples wrote:The problem here is that the people do not trust the police, and since police are a local service, it should be up the community to arm or disarm them to the extent that they desire. If they don't want the police to have guns, then they should have their way; it's their community and it's safety, after all.


And then we have the Purge.

Ah yes the movie based upon social darwinism is totes actually a reflection of a society with a disarmed police force.
New and Improved version of "The Carlisle"
MtF transperson, goes by she/her/hers
Call me Carly

“That rifle on the wall of the labourer's cottage or working class flat is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there.” - Orwell

"I'm a god damn Sage"

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Fri Jul 08, 2016 12:18 am

Chinese Peoples wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
You are suggesting that police be disarmed in a thread regarding 11 police officers who were shot in the line of duty, 5 of whom died as a result of their wounds.

Let's think about that for a bit, shall we?

Yes. I am suggesting that they be disarmed. If the community does not trust them, they are as good as dismissed. Is it more logical that the community chooses the police that serves the community, or that the police chooses the community it serves?


But we trust our cops at Dallas...
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Chinese Peoples
Minister
 
Posts: 2666
Founded: Dec 28, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Chinese Peoples » Fri Jul 08, 2016 12:18 am

Seangoli wrote:
Chinese Peoples wrote:None of the populace has been endangered in this particular situation.


That is wildly untrue. A woman was wounded after being shot by one of the snipers while trying to protect her son. Considering that the officers were very near the protestors, a missed shot could very easily have killed one of the protestors.

And what have the armed police done to protect her? Having a gun and not using it for the right purposes is pretty similar to not having one, or worse.
Also, you know, the officers on the scene weren't actually doing much of anything other than standing around. They were as much an innocent as any of the bystanders.

They may be innocent, but they are not bystanders.
IC Title: the Republic of China | MT | Factbooks | the only democratic China on NS
The duty of the state is to prevent danger, not to punish it after it has happened. Rescind the 2nd Amendment, today.

User avatar
Shonburg
Diplomat
 
Posts: 822
Founded: Jan 11, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Shonburg » Fri Jul 08, 2016 12:18 am

Chinese Peoples wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
You are suggesting that police be disarmed in a thread regarding 11 police officers who were shot in the line of duty, 5 of whom died as a result of their wounds.

Let's think about that for a bit, shall we?

Yes. I am suggesting that they be disarmed. If the community does not trust them, they are as good as dismissed. Is it more logical that the community chooses the police that serves the community, or that the police chooses the community it serves?

That is illogical, disarming the police is not a solution to public mistrust.
Queendom of Shonburg

User avatar
Minzerland
Minister
 
Posts: 2367
Founded: Apr 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Minzerland » Fri Jul 08, 2016 12:19 am

Chinese Peoples wrote:
Shonburg wrote:If you disarm police, how would they be able to protect the populace effectively in a situation like this?

None of the populace has been endangered in this particular situation.


One civilian has been injured.
'Common sense isn't so common.'
-Voltaire

'I Disapprove of What You Say, But I Will Defend to the Death Your Right to Say It.'
-Evelyn Beatrice Hall

I'm a Tribune of the Plebs, so watch out, or I might just veto you. You may call me Minzerland or Sam.
Classical Libertarianism|Constitutional Monarchy|Secularism|Westphalian Sovereignty|
_[' ]_
(-_Q)

Hello, people persistently believe I'm American, I'm here to remedy this; I'm an Australian of English, Swiss-Italian (on my mothers side), Scottish and Irish (on my fathers side) dissent.

User avatar
Chinese Peoples
Minister
 
Posts: 2666
Founded: Dec 28, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Chinese Peoples » Fri Jul 08, 2016 12:19 am

Shonburg wrote:
Chinese Peoples wrote:Yes. I am suggesting that they be disarmed. If the community does not trust them, they are as good as dismissed. Is it more logical that the community chooses the police that serves the community, or that the police chooses the community it serves?

That is illogical, disarming the police is not a solution to public mistrust.

Yes, it is. We put police in uniforms so they can't be mistaken, and that is to engage public trust and confidence. If we can regulate what they wear, why not what they carry?
IC Title: the Republic of China | MT | Factbooks | the only democratic China on NS
The duty of the state is to prevent danger, not to punish it after it has happened. Rescind the 2nd Amendment, today.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Fri Jul 08, 2016 12:19 am

Chinese Peoples wrote:
Seangoli wrote:
That is wildly untrue. A woman was wounded after being shot by one of the snipers while trying to protect her son. Considering that the officers were very near the protestors, a missed shot could very easily have killed one of the protestors.

And what have the armed police done to protect her? Having a gun and not using it for the right purposes is pretty similar to not having one, or worse.
Also, you know, the officers on the scene weren't actually doing much of anything other than standing around. They were as much an innocent as any of the bystanders.

They may be innocent, but they are not bystanders.


:eyebrow:
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Syadei
Diplomat
 
Posts: 805
Founded: Nov 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Syadei » Fri Jul 08, 2016 12:20 am

Shonburg wrote:
Chinese Peoples wrote:Yes. I am suggesting that they be disarmed. If the community does not trust them, they are as good as dismissed. Is it more logical that the community chooses the police that serves the community, or that the police chooses the community it serves?

That is illogical, disarming the police is not a solution to public mistrust.


Don't disarm the police, there are too many guns in the US for that now. But prosecute the police that do wrong. Also, aren't there some states that require officers to wear head cams? That's probably the way to go to re-gain trust.

User avatar
Kubra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16360
Founded: Apr 15, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Kubra » Fri Jul 08, 2016 12:20 am

Syadei wrote:
Kubra wrote: today our queen is a curse
god save the queen tho, bloody yanks think 16 ounces is a pint

Back on topic, the desync might be because we're getting the stream off livestream.com, and not necessarily the Fox stream itself.


It's on Fox news itself.

http://video.foxnews.com/v/255356509400 ... watch-live

Apparently the suspect shot himself.
"I believe that he shot himself"
"probably an hour ago"
k nvm fuck this stream
“Atomic war is inevitable. It will destroy half of humanity: it is going to destroy immense human riches. It is very possible. The atomic war is going to provoke a true inferno on Earth. But it will not impede Communism.”
Comrade J. Posadas

User avatar
Shonburg
Diplomat
 
Posts: 822
Founded: Jan 11, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Shonburg » Fri Jul 08, 2016 12:20 am

Chinese Peoples wrote:
Shonburg wrote:That is illogical, disarming the police is not a solution to public mistrust.

Yes, it is. We put police in uniforms so they can't be mistaken, and that is to engage public trust and confidence. If we can regulate what they wear, why not what they carry?

Because their weapon is used as a tool to protect the populace and keep the peace.
Queendom of Shonburg

User avatar
Chinese Peoples
Minister
 
Posts: 2666
Founded: Dec 28, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Chinese Peoples » Fri Jul 08, 2016 12:20 am

Soldati Senza Confini wrote:
Chinese Peoples wrote:Yes. I am suggesting that they be disarmed. If the community does not trust them, they are as good as dismissed. Is it more logical that the community chooses the police that serves the community, or that the police chooses the community it serves?


But we trust our cops at Dallas...

Let's hold a plebiscite, shall we? Only the people of Dallas can decide that.
IC Title: the Republic of China | MT | Factbooks | the only democratic China on NS
The duty of the state is to prevent danger, not to punish it after it has happened. Rescind the 2nd Amendment, today.

User avatar
Kubra
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16360
Founded: Apr 15, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Kubra » Fri Jul 08, 2016 12:21 am

"the building will probably be closed tomorrow"
oh man who woulda thunk
“Atomic war is inevitable. It will destroy half of humanity: it is going to destroy immense human riches. It is very possible. The atomic war is going to provoke a true inferno on Earth. But it will not impede Communism.”
Comrade J. Posadas

User avatar
Chinese Peoples
Minister
 
Posts: 2666
Founded: Dec 28, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Chinese Peoples » Fri Jul 08, 2016 12:21 am

Shonburg wrote:
Chinese Peoples wrote:Yes, it is. We put police in uniforms so they can't be mistaken, and that is to engage public trust and confidence. If we can regulate what they wear, why not what they carry?

Because their weapon is used as a tool to protect the populace and keep the peace.

Not in this case.
IC Title: the Republic of China | MT | Factbooks | the only democratic China on NS
The duty of the state is to prevent danger, not to punish it after it has happened. Rescind the 2nd Amendment, today.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Fri Jul 08, 2016 12:21 am

Chinese Peoples wrote:
Soldati Senza Confini wrote:
But we trust our cops at Dallas...

Let's hold a plebiscite, shall we? Only the people of Dallas can decide that.


Dude, I live here in Dallas.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Shonburg
Diplomat
 
Posts: 822
Founded: Jan 11, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Shonburg » Fri Jul 08, 2016 12:22 am

Syadei wrote:
Shonburg wrote:That is illogical, disarming the police is not a solution to public mistrust.


Don't disarm the police, there are too many guns in the US for that now. But prosecute the police that do wrong. Also, aren't there some states that require officers to wear head cams? That's probably the way to go to re-gain trust.

More and more states, counties and cities are requiring body cams after Obama offered federal funds.
Queendom of Shonburg

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aguila de Oro, Alcala-Cordel, American Legionaries, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Bombadil, Cannot think of a name, Celritannia, Dimetrodon Empire, Dreria, EuroStralia, Feyrisshire, Necroghastia, Northern Socialist Council Republics, Riviere Renard, Saiwana, Shrillland, Southland, Tarsonis

Advertisement

Remove ads