I wonder if the man realized what he had done afterwards and was trying to comprehend the consequences?
Advertisement
by Costa Fierro » Fri Jul 08, 2016 4:17 am
by Katganistan » Fri Jul 08, 2016 5:09 am
Krazakistan wrote:Gauthier wrote:It just confirms that the right to bear arms does not apply to black men. Rather, it becomes a capital crime for them to even legally carry.
Oh please fuck off with that race baiting bullshit. Black men that have CCW licenses have been pulled over in the past and were not killed. This incident is evidently the cause of wrongful procedure on the side of the officer, which I assume is due to lack of experience with the situation.
by Ethel mermania » Fri Jul 08, 2016 2:07 pm
by Tobiasia » Fri Jul 08, 2016 2:38 pm
Ava Ire wrote:That's horrible... And I wonder who's going to try and actually defend the cop in this case...
by Occupied Deutschland » Fri Jul 08, 2016 3:02 pm
by Washington Resistance Army » Fri Jul 08, 2016 3:03 pm
Occupied Deutschland wrote:So the NRA commented. A little...
I have to say I'm not exactly impressed with how vague and milquetoast it is, even as I can agree with the general sentiment of not jumping to conclusions (something which happens all too often in these kinds of cases), but I really wish there had been...More to this and that it was more specific and--perhaps not 'inflammatory' per se, but I wish there had been a little more fire in the response. Wish they'd specifically mentioned Castile...
In fact, I'm going to go ahead and say I expected better. Much happier with the Second Amendment Foundation's response from yesterday.
by Gauthier » Fri Jul 08, 2016 9:57 pm
Occupied Deutschland wrote:So the NRA commented. A little...
I have to say I'm not exactly impressed with how vague and milquetoast it is, even as I can agree with the general sentiment of not jumping to conclusions (something which happens all too often in these kinds of cases), but I really wish there had been...More to this and that it was more specific and--perhaps not 'inflammatory' per se, but I wish there had been a little more fire in the response. Wish they'd specifically mentioned Castile...
In fact, I'm going to go ahead and say I expected better. Much happier with the Second Amendment Foundation's response from yesterday.
by Aclion » Fri Jul 08, 2016 10:04 pm
Ava Ire wrote:That's horrible... And I wonder who's going to try and actually defend the cop in this case...
by Imperializt Russia » Sat Jul 09, 2016 12:41 pm
Aclion wrote:
NRA's always slower then other organizations to comment on stuff, usally limiting themselves to "can we please not all jump on this until the facts are out"
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.
by Big Jim P » Sat Jul 09, 2016 1:13 pm
Washington Resistance Army wrote:Occupied Deutschland wrote:So the NRA commented. A little...
I have to say I'm not exactly impressed with how vague and milquetoast it is, even as I can agree with the general sentiment of not jumping to conclusions (something which happens all too often in these kinds of cases), but I really wish there had been...More to this and that it was more specific and--perhaps not 'inflammatory' per se, but I wish there had been a little more fire in the response. Wish they'd specifically mentioned Castile...
In fact, I'm going to go ahead and say I expected better. Much happier with the Second Amendment Foundation's response from yesterday.
2AF and GOA always do it better.
by KittenEmpire » Sat Jul 09, 2016 3:42 pm
Socialist Nordia wrote:That needs to start with communities being able to trust police, which needs to start with police not killing innocent civilians.
by Arkinesia » Sat Jul 09, 2016 11:03 pm
Occupied Deutschland wrote:So the NRA commented. A little...
I have to say I'm not exactly impressed with how vague and milquetoast it is, even as I can agree with the general sentiment of not jumping to conclusions (something which happens all too often in these kinds of cases), but I really wish there had been...More to this and that it was more specific and--perhaps not 'inflammatory' per se, but I wish there had been a little more fire in the response. Wish they'd specifically mentioned Castile...
In fact, I'm going to go ahead and say I expected better. Much happier with the Second Amendment Foundation's response from yesterday.
Disappointment Panda wrote:Don't hope for a life without problems. There's no such thing. Instead, hope for a life full of good problems.
by Continuous Creative Cessation » Sat Jul 09, 2016 11:33 pm
Gauthier wrote:Aftermath of fatal Falcon Heights officer-involved shooting captured on video
Not even a week has passed since the fatal shooting of Alton Sterling in Louisiana and already another police killing of a black man has hit nationwide awareness.
32-year old Philando Castile was pulled over with his girlfriend and their daughter near Falcon Heights in Minnesota by police. Cops asked him for license registration, and according to his girlfriend Castile told police he was licensed to carry a gun and was reaching for his wallet
when police shot him in the arm 4 to 5 times.
She recorded the aftermath of the shooting and Castile later died.
The girlfriend said on the video that the officer “asked him for license and registration. He told him that it was in his wallet, but he had a pistol on him because he’s licensed to carry. The officer said don’t move. As he was putting his hands back up, the officer shot him in the arm four or five times.”
The video shows a uniformed police officer holding a pistol on the couple from outside the car. The officer can be heard to say, “I told him not to reach for it. I told him to get his hand out.”
What's going to be sad is you know there are going to be people who reflexively insist that the shooting was justified because Violent Nigger Had It Coming. Far as we know so far Castile did not have a criminal record like Alton Sterling and he was not in a struggle with police, rather sitting in the driver's seat and supposedly reaching for his license and registration as ordered to by police after warning them he was legally carrying. It just confirms that the right to bear arms does not apply to black men. Rather, it becomes a capital crime for them to even legally carry.
by Continuous Creative Cessation » Sat Jul 09, 2016 11:38 pm
KittenEmpire wrote:Socialist Nordia wrote:That needs to start with communities being able to trust police, which needs to start with police not killing innocent civilians.
I think it's more complicated than that. It's a big circle where, not to generalize, but it's a hard time for anyone to trust anyone. Statistically speaking, if you are a police officer, there is more of a chance you'll get shot to death on the line of duty then being shot and killed by the police regardless of your race. Everyone is paranoid. The surge of anti-police on social media and the fear-mongers who insist the police are specifically after black people are not helping anyone on either side. Budget cuts in police departments are not helping either. People like Obama and Mark Dayton are certainly not helping anyone. I also find it odd social media only seem to care about police killing innocent people when the victims are black. Regardless, it's all just one giant shit show.
But regarding the video, I believe the officer should be charged with manslaughter. The way the officer was freaking the fuck out and still had his gun pointed at the guy was pretty damn odd. He seemed pretty unstable.
by Roski » Sat Jul 09, 2016 11:53 pm
Gauthier wrote:Occupied Deutschland wrote:So the NRA commented. A little...
I have to say I'm not exactly impressed with how vague and milquetoast it is, even as I can agree with the general sentiment of not jumping to conclusions (something which happens all too often in these kinds of cases), but I really wish there had been...More to this and that it was more specific and--perhaps not 'inflammatory' per se, but I wish there had been a little more fire in the response. Wish they'd specifically mentioned Castile...
In fact, I'm going to go ahead and say I expected better. Much happier with the Second Amendment Foundation's response from yesterday.
Why the NRA took so long to comment on the Philando Castile police shooting
by Costa Fierro » Sat Jul 09, 2016 11:53 pm
Arkinesia wrote:I am discovering, as the Washington Post, the New York Times, etc. publish a stream of articles—I am privileged by my place of residence. I don't mean the US. I mean South Carolina.
In this state, all law enforcement officers are required by law to fill out at least one form in every stop they make of any person, whether on foot or in a vehicle. That form is referred to as a “notice of contact.” The officer keeps a copy (which is submitted to superior officers) and gives a copy to the individual he stops.
The notice of contact is a simple form. On it, the officer checks one box in each category, one for sex, one for ethnicity, and one for the type of stop (vehicle or foot).
Apparently, this isn't normal? Like, other states don't do this? Why not?
by Roski » Sun Jul 10, 2016 12:00 am
Continuous Creative Cessation wrote:KittenEmpire wrote:
I think it's more complicated than that. It's a big circle where, not to generalize, but it's a hard time for anyone to trust anyone. Statistically speaking, if you are a police officer, there is more of a chance you'll get shot to death on the line of duty then being shot and killed by the police regardless of your race. Everyone is paranoid. The surge of anti-police on social media and the fear-mongers who insist the police are specifically after black people are not helping anyone on either side. Budget cuts in police departments are not helping either. People like Obama and Mark Dayton are certainly not helping anyone. I also find it odd social media only seem to care about police killing innocent people when the victims are black. Regardless, it's all just one giant shit show.
But regarding the video, I believe the officer should be charged with manslaughter. The way the officer was freaking the fuck out and still had his gun pointed at the guy was pretty damn odd. He seemed pretty unstable.
Does anyone know the chance of a police officer dying at work? Im sure its much higher than the chance of people they pull over being killed by police.
A gun can be fired by anyone. A cop does not have time to verify if the gun can be fired, nor have a conversation with someone reaching for a gun.
What about the officers life? Many police have died doing their job and protests dont occur.
The other video I saw lately was a person being shot on their back. Originally it seemed horrible. Then I heard a gun was in the guys pocket and he had his hand down there whilst on the ground. A cop is risking their life and that of their partners if they try and wrestle the gun free.
If you decide to carry a gun (whether licensed or not) and get confronted, here is a big suggestion. DONT REACH NEAR IT.
by Dragonia Re Xzua » Sun Jul 10, 2016 12:14 am
by Arkinesia » Sun Jul 10, 2016 12:20 am
Costa Fierro wrote:I guess perhaps other states wouldn't want to have additional paperwork filed every time a traffic stop was made.
Disappointment Panda wrote:Don't hope for a life without problems. There's no such thing. Instead, hope for a life full of good problems.
by Roski » Sun Jul 10, 2016 12:21 am
by Dragonia Re Xzua » Sun Jul 10, 2016 12:25 am
Roski wrote:the body cameras are more simple.
by Nazeroth » Sun Jul 10, 2016 12:28 am
by Arkinesia » Sun Jul 10, 2016 1:20 am
Roski wrote:the body cameras are more simple.
Disappointment Panda wrote:Don't hope for a life without problems. There's no such thing. Instead, hope for a life full of good problems.
by Big Jim P » Sun Jul 10, 2016 8:09 am
Nazeroth wrote:" I have a gun" shouldn't not be a legal means to kill somebody, based on the 2nd amendment. There should be nothing illegal or terrifying about someone saying that.
by Roski » Sun Jul 10, 2016 8:28 am
Arkinesia wrote:Roski wrote:the body cameras are more simple.
South Carolina was one of the first states to jump on the federal grant program for them. In my area, Greenville City, Greenville County, and Greer at least all use them. SCHP will be required to wear them with potential penalty for failure to record or failure to wear them by next year.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Anacharsia, Google [Bot], Lord Dominator, Post War America, Turenia, Zancostan
Advertisement