After the Nazi Party took power in 1933 with Hitler as its leader, Hess was granted the office of 'Deputy Führer of the NSDAP', and was granted official recognition as a Cabinet Member, making him the third highest-ranking official (Behind only Goring and Hitler himself).
Hess was also the spearhead of the Nazi Party's anti-semitic movement, including the Nuremberg Laws.
Here comes the Debatey stuff.
Hess was sent to attempt to commence peace talks with the British government hoping to work through the Duke of Hamilton in Scotland. Hess was arrested upon arrival in Britain and was sentenced to life in The Spandau Prison- an extremely secure internationally-controlled prison meant for German War Criminals, having been charged with 'Crimes against Peace', and 'Conspiracy with other German Leaders to Commit Crimes'.
The topic of debate that I seek to look into regards the Spandau Prison itself, and whether the severity of its associated punishments are ever right, even for men as evil as Rudolf Hess.
In total there were seven prisoners in Spandau before it was torn down after Hess's death (With his suicide marking the death of the last of the seven inmates), however I will be focusing on Rudolf Hess
Spandau was a Maximum Security Prison in Germany designated for use with prominent war criminals, such as Hess, among others. The Prison was owned and operated by a joint effort between France, Britain, the Soviet Union, and the United States, and every step taken by a prisoner in Spandau was heavily regulated and closely monitored. Each of the Four Powers provided guards to the prison who were rotated every month, with there being gaps between any two guards serving at the same time. (Following details as to the severity of the Prison's punishments detailed below, the following Paragraph is taken entirely from Wikipedia and is in no way my own work:)
Every facet of life in the prison was strictly set out by an intricate prison regulation scheme designed before the prisoners' arrival by the Four Powers — France, Britain, the Soviet Union and the United States. Compared with other established prison regulations at the time, Spandau's rules were quite strict. The prisoners' outgoing letters to families were at first limited to one page every month, talking with fellow prisoners was prohibited, newspapers were banned, diaries and memoirs were forbidden, visits by families were limited to one of fifteen minutes every two months, and lights were flashed into the prisoners' cells every fifteen minutes during the night as a form of suicide watch. A considerable portion of the stricter regulations was either later revised toward the more lenient, or deliberately ignored by prison staff.
It is noteworthy that the inmates feared the months when the prison was wardened by a Soviet Officer the most however, as the Russian Guard Captain maintained barely-legal meals for his prisoners, while Prison Employees (Both Western and Russian) were said to both hate and fear the Soviet Warden for his sheer brutality towards the inhabitants of the prison.
I personally believe that the prison was essentially a well thought-out method of torturing the war criminals held there, as the isolation of Solitary Confinement and poor living conditions have been attributed to the deteriorated mental health of its prisoners. I believe that the morally correct thing to do would be to simply execute the Nazi Officials held there, however I do not believe I would have gone out of my way to campaign too hard against the punishments laid down upon these men.
What do you think NSG? Did Rudolf Hess deserved his punishment for his role in the Nazi Government, or do you believe that the Allies should have done more to maintain the Moral High Ground, rather than torturing seven men?




