The Crimson Empire of Nanashi wrote:Laurasia wrote:
I am not taking a hypocritical definition. In my view, human life is valuable, and when one life, in any circumstance, is forfeit, then that chance should not be taken. A woman's life will not be forfeit simply because she gives birth to a child, gives it up for adoption, and moves on with her life. It would be folly to suggest otherwise. I would venture to say to you, and to others, that such selective abortions could maintain us better than abortions on demand. Our society would be better for it, morally and socially. It would also fit more in accord with the true objectives of our Constitution. As regards to organ donations, my definition would preserve the life of both the donor and the recipient. I am aware of the purpose for such donations, and that people can survive with just parts of their organs, or some of them. My definition is that it should not be taken to the extent that one person's life would be destroyed, without their lawful consent. Babies cannot legally consent; that is why theirs is such an important, unique case, besides the exceptions I provided. Living, breathing human beings consent; that is our right under God, and under our constitutional system. That right should be held for the unborn, for them to exercise when they become individual, viable human beings.
1. human life isnt valuable in the least. there are 7 billion of us, we dont need to add more. i assume you dont consume plants of animals since if you do then your a hypocrite. why is it that you value one species more then other species?
2. the mere fact that you allow exceptions to abortion being no good makes your stance weak and dismissable.
3.you say a woman's life wont be forfeit due to childbirth. the millions of women that die due to childbirth complications would disagree with you on that. it is a FACT that childbirth is very risky for women.
4. our constitution says that abortion is legal and women have rights to have one. now who's the one thats following the constitution eh? certainly not you or anyone else that refuses to allow women access to abortion
5. in regards to what your deity thinks, Nobody cares! your "god" gets absolutely no say in regards to our rights and laws. if you want to be in a country that follows your god's word move to rome.
6. fetuses aren't babies nor are they living beings. lets focus more help for the living instead of people that nonliving
7. the fetus has no rights since it's not a US citizen. our rights are provided to people born in the US and since fetuses haven't been born yet they have no rights as citizens
1. *Sigh*
2. Wrong.
3. Yeah, if you live in the Third World.
4. I don't recall the constitutional ammendment that said "Go ahead and terminate those fetuses." James Madison must've not made it clear enough.
5. *Louder Sigh*
6. "Not babies"..."People that Nonliving"... this was contradictory and incoherent.
7. This is deeply flawed.