NATION

PASSWORD

Mr. President, do NOT ban assault weapons!

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:35 pm

Vassenor wrote:Am I the only one who thinks the Second Amendment is basically just a massive case of Appeal To Tradition now?

After all every other nation on the planet manages just fine without an equivalent.

We can't have a reasonable discussion when any regulation mentioned is equated to ripping the 2nd amendment out completely.
It's more of a hindrance at this point.

User avatar
Kathmandue
Envoy
 
Posts: 296
Founded: Dec 20, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Kathmandue » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:35 pm

I'm not posting this for debate, but, what is your reasoning for owning assault weapons in the first place?

User avatar
The balkens
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18751
Founded: Sep 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The balkens » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:35 pm

Vassenor wrote:Am I the only one who thinks the Second Amendment is basically just a massive case of Appeal To Tradition now?

After all every other nation on the planet manages just fine without an equivalent.


Again.

Gun Culture.

User avatar
Paddy O Fernature
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13801
Founded: Sep 30, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Paddy O Fernature » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:35 pm

Vassenor wrote:Am I the only one who thinks the Second Amendment is basically just a massive case of Appeal To Tradition now?

After all every other nation on the planet manages just fine without an equivalent.


As a lawful firearm owner, collector, sport shooter, and all around enthusiast, I couldn't give a flying fuck less about what the rest of the world does in this regard.

Proud Co-Founder of The Axis Commonwealth - Would you like to know more?
SJW! Why? Some nobody on the internet who has never met me accused me of being one, so it absolutely MUST be true! *Nod Nod*

User avatar
Xadufell
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1179
Founded: Mar 10, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Xadufell » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:35 pm

The Black Forrest wrote:


I assumed it was obvious. Port Arthur saw 35 dead due to a semi-auto. Australia outlawed them and they haven't seen something like that since.

The Americans think Big Brother will appear if Assault Rifles are pulled......



Semi-automatic firearms aren't assault rifles.

Isn't it ironic that all these gun control advocates know next to nothing about guns?
28 Year old autistic twat.
!!!WE MADE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!
Pro: Right Wing, Israel, The Donald, Guns, Free Speech, Capitalism, Switzerland, Germany, Britain leaving the EU, TEMPORARY ban on Muslims until everything gets sorted out, Republicans, Russia.
Anti: Hillary, Sanders, Democrats, Radical Islam, ISIS, Illegal Immigration, BLM (Because they obviously do.), Obama, MSNBC, Left Wing, Radical Anything (Virtually), Turkey, Trump Protesters who have no valid points.

Grinning Dragon wrote:Why would anyone waste a good bullet on the likes of CNN anyway? I don't understand why anyone would get that worked up over a bunch of dipshits, christ if their shit show is getting you that worked up, just turn the damn thing off and go for a walk/run/ride.

User avatar
Paddy O Fernature
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13801
Founded: Sep 30, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Paddy O Fernature » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:35 pm

Kathmandue wrote:I'm not posting this for debate, but, what is your reasoning for owning assault weapons in the first place?


You mean semiautomatic sporting rifles?

Proud Co-Founder of The Axis Commonwealth - Would you like to know more?
SJW! Why? Some nobody on the internet who has never met me accused me of being one, so it absolutely MUST be true! *Nod Nod*

User avatar
The balkens
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18751
Founded: Sep 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The balkens » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:36 pm

Kathmandue wrote:I'm not posting this for debate, but, what is your reasoning for owning assault weapons in the first place?

Collecting and shooting.

and in the event of defense.

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:36 pm

Xadufell wrote:First off, my Sig P226 has been a virtue in stopping would-be muggers. And I'm not saying that because a firearm has saved my life means it can save everyone's, don't be a stereotypical liberal.

Also, because it's rare that people use firearms to defend themselves against crime means that we should entirely pass over the argument?

It's statistically irrelevant. Most defensive uses of guns are with long arms, and most defensive uses of handguns are at home, not when carried in public. Furthermore, gun owners are more likely to be shot in a home assault than non-gun owners, and there's little evidence to suggest that defensive gun use statistically reduces the probability of loss of property or personal injury.
Kernen wrote:I believe Big Jim P has a statistic floating around that estimates Defensive Gun Uses to be much higher than statistics currently show, because not all uses require a police report, and are therefore available for analysis.

Nonetheless, I'd much rather have the opportunity to defend myself then not and just hope I don't need to.

Other than Big Jim P being ridiculous on his best days, I want to know who exactly shoots someone else and doesn't bother to report it?
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:36 pm

Xadufell wrote:
The Black Forrest wrote:
I assumed it was obvious. Port Arthur saw 35 dead due to a semi-auto. Australia outlawed them and they haven't seen something like that since.

The Americans think Big Brother will appear if Assault Rifles are pulled......



Semi-automatic firearms aren't assault rifles.

Isn't it ironic that all these gun control advocates know next to nothing about guns?

I don't believe he claimed they were, nice try though.

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:36 pm

The balkens wrote:
Kathmandue wrote:I'm not posting this for debate, but, what is your reasoning for owning assault weapons in the first place?

Collecting and shooting.

and in the event of defense.

From.....?

User avatar
Xadufell
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1179
Founded: Mar 10, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Xadufell » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:37 pm

Kathmandue wrote:I'm not posting this for debate, but, what is your reasoning for owning assault weapons in the first place?


Semi-automatic rifles aren't "assault weapons", if anything my hammer should be considered an assault weapon because it's black, has a detachable head and a highly ergonomic and dangerous pistol grip.
28 Year old autistic twat.
!!!WE MADE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!
Pro: Right Wing, Israel, The Donald, Guns, Free Speech, Capitalism, Switzerland, Germany, Britain leaving the EU, TEMPORARY ban on Muslims until everything gets sorted out, Republicans, Russia.
Anti: Hillary, Sanders, Democrats, Radical Islam, ISIS, Illegal Immigration, BLM (Because they obviously do.), Obama, MSNBC, Left Wing, Radical Anything (Virtually), Turkey, Trump Protesters who have no valid points.

Grinning Dragon wrote:Why would anyone waste a good bullet on the likes of CNN anyway? I don't understand why anyone would get that worked up over a bunch of dipshits, christ if their shit show is getting you that worked up, just turn the damn thing off and go for a walk/run/ride.

User avatar
Paredonia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 625
Founded: Aug 28, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Paredonia » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:37 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Paredonia wrote:
Because individuality is really important when the death count keeps going up and up and up and up isn't it? :roll:


Gun crime has been declining for like two decades :lol2:

And is at the lowest point since the 1950's I think.


And yet the yearly American death toll from gun violence is pretty much higher than for the rest of the entire Western world combined. If this is the lowest, then you really have a serious problem.
THE FEDERAL STATES OF PAREDONIA
"Aliqui tantum temere verba"
"No one in the world needs a mink coat but a mink." - Murray Banks
"A Dog is for Life, not just for Christmas." - Clarissa Baldwin
"A dog is the only creature on Earth that loves you more than he loves himself." - Josh Billings
22, Male, British European, left-wing liberal, monarchist.
PRO: EU, left-wing, multiculturalism, choice, immigration, refugees, equality, British unionism, atheism, Hillary
ANTI: UKIP, SNP, Brexit, right-wing, racism, islamophobia, xenophobia, sexism, Scottish independence, Scottish nationalists, nationalism, religion, Trump, Farage, Sturgeon, Le Pen

User avatar
The balkens
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18751
Founded: Sep 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The balkens » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:37 pm

Genivaria wrote:
The balkens wrote:Collecting and shooting.

and in the event of defense.

From.....?


Looters, rioters Etc.

oh and giving Feintstein a reason to be in the senate i guess.

User avatar
Kathmandue
Envoy
 
Posts: 296
Founded: Dec 20, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Kathmandue » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:37 pm

The balkens wrote:
Kathmandue wrote:I'm not posting this for debate, but, what is your reasoning for owning assault weapons in the first place?

Collecting and shooting.

and in the event of defense.

But should high capacity magazines be allowed?

User avatar
Paddy O Fernature
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13801
Founded: Sep 30, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Paddy O Fernature » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:38 pm

Genivaria wrote:
The balkens wrote:Collecting and shooting.

and in the event of defense.

From.....?


Government reintroduced wolves are the biggie around me. Right next to bear, mountain lion, coyotes, and moose.

Proud Co-Founder of The Axis Commonwealth - Would you like to know more?
SJW! Why? Some nobody on the internet who has never met me accused me of being one, so it absolutely MUST be true! *Nod Nod*

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58536
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:38 pm

Paredonia wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Gun crime has been declining for like two decades :lol2:

And is at the lowest point since the 1950's I think.


And yet the yearly American death toll from gun violence is pretty much higher than for the rest of the entire Western world combined. If this is the lowest, then you really have a serious problem.


It's the gang wars and war on drugs causing it. It's much more pragmatic to end the war on drugs and then monitor the level of gun violence to see if it's still extremely abnormal.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 163903
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Iron Fist Socialists

Postby Ifreann » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:38 pm

Kathmandue wrote:I'm not posting this for debate, but, what is your reasoning for owning assault weapons in the first place?

Battling nature's super animals, like the electric eel and flying fox.


The balkens wrote:
Vassenor wrote:Am I the only one who thinks the Second Amendment is basically just a massive case of Appeal To Tradition now?

After all every other nation on the planet manages just fine without an equivalent.


Again.

Gun Culture.

Legislation protecting minority culture, you say?
He/Him

beating the devil
we never run from the devil
we never summon the devil
we never hide from from the devil
we never

User avatar
Annorax
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 492
Founded: Jul 27, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Annorax » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:38 pm

Kathmandue wrote:I'm not posting this for debate, but, what is your reasoning for owning assault weapons in the first place?


Don't need a reason because it is an inalienable right, it is like asking why do you need free speech.

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:38 pm

Xadufell wrote:
Kathmandue wrote:I'm not posting this for debate, but, what is your reasoning for owning assault weapons in the first place?


Semi-automatic rifles aren't "assault weapons", if anything my hammer should be considered an assault weapon because it's black, has a detachable head and a highly ergonomic and dangerous pistol grip.

I tried squinting and tilting my head and I still can't understand how that equation made sense.

User avatar
Xadufell
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1179
Founded: Mar 10, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Xadufell » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:38 pm

Genivaria wrote:
Xadufell wrote:

Semi-automatic firearms aren't assault rifles.

Isn't it ironic that all these gun control advocates know next to nothing about guns?

I don't believe he claimed they were, nice try though.


I could only assumed that because the Orlando shooter used an AR-15 that he would consider it an "assault weapon".
28 Year old autistic twat.
!!!WE MADE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!!!
Pro: Right Wing, Israel, The Donald, Guns, Free Speech, Capitalism, Switzerland, Germany, Britain leaving the EU, TEMPORARY ban on Muslims until everything gets sorted out, Republicans, Russia.
Anti: Hillary, Sanders, Democrats, Radical Islam, ISIS, Illegal Immigration, BLM (Because they obviously do.), Obama, MSNBC, Left Wing, Radical Anything (Virtually), Turkey, Trump Protesters who have no valid points.

Grinning Dragon wrote:Why would anyone waste a good bullet on the likes of CNN anyway? I don't understand why anyone would get that worked up over a bunch of dipshits, christ if their shit show is getting you that worked up, just turn the damn thing off and go for a walk/run/ride.

User avatar
Paddy O Fernature
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13801
Founded: Sep 30, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Paddy O Fernature » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:38 pm

Kathmandue wrote:
The balkens wrote:Collecting and shooting.

and in the event of defense.

But should high capacity magazines be allowed?


Absolutely.

Proud Co-Founder of The Axis Commonwealth - Would you like to know more?
SJW! Why? Some nobody on the internet who has never met me accused me of being one, so it absolutely MUST be true! *Nod Nod*

User avatar
Genivaria
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 69943
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Genivaria » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:39 pm

Xadufell wrote:
Genivaria wrote:I don't believe he claimed they were, nice try though.


I could only assumed that because the Orlando shooter used an AR-15 that he would consider it an "assault weapon".

That's your problem there.

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:39 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:There are no loopholes regarding online sales,

Not true at all, actually. That's a common myth.
and the gun show loophole everyone talks about is private sales which is an entirely other thing.

Yeah, pretty sure it being a 'private sale' shouldn't excuse a lack of background checks.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Washington Resistance Army
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54796
Founded: Aug 08, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Washington Resistance Army » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:39 pm

Kathmandue wrote:I'm not posting this for debate, but, what is your reasoning for owning assault weapons in the first place?


"Assault weapons" is a nonsense term made up by people who don't know what they're talking about and want to make things sound scary.

The term you're looking for is semi-automatic rifle, and it's the same reason I own every gun I have. Collecting, shooting and self defense if the need arises.

Conserative Morality wrote:Other than Big Jim P being ridiculous on his best days, I want to know who exactly shoots someone else and doesn't bother to report it?


Not all DGU's end in a shooting, I've drawn my Glock before in a situation that warranted it but no shots were fired. I'd consider that a DGU myself.

Paredonia wrote:
Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Gun crime has been declining for like two decades :lol2:

And is at the lowest point since the 1950's I think.


And yet the yearly American death toll from gun violence is pretty much higher than for the rest of the entire Western world combined. If this is the lowest, then you really have a serious problem.


Welcome to the drug war.
Hellenic Polytheist, Socialist

User avatar
The East Marches
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13843
Founded: May 14, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby The East Marches » Fri Jun 17, 2016 3:39 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
The East Marches wrote:Assault weapons won't change anything. Handguns are the real mass killer. Now, the real question is what to do about handguns? How do you fix that problem without either dearming legal citizens unnecessarily or infringing on people's right to due process?

Fix the loopholes regarding online sales and gun shows, properly fund the organizations doing background checks, change it so that background checks don't automatically go through within three days time if the Feds don't get around to it by then, registration of handguns nationwide, require a license for handgun possession.


Registration prohibited by law. Requirement for license might make it through. Those background checks thing is to prevent circumventing of the law by creating an artificial backlog as with the tax stamp debacles.

tbh I could get on board with the first two though. Online sales still have to have background check I thought. Gun shows need background checks in IL. I can't speak for other states though I'm sure there are a few that don't require them.

I've been shilling hard for high school classes for gun education like driver's ed. It'd be a cool elective and teach kids how to handle something that is generally apart of American life. I had one at mine and it did wonders. Arguably, the conceal carry class I had to take was even better. If it could meld the explanation of the laws, range time and the practical aspect I got when I was in high school, that would be best. I'm just dreaming I know. That idea has no potential to get done at all.
Conserative Morality wrote:Move to a real state bud instead of a third-world country that inexplicably votes in American elections.


Novus America wrote:But yes, I would say the mere existence of Illinois proves this is hell. Chicago the 9th circle.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Eahland, Shrillland, Soviet Haaregrad, Statesburg, Talibanada, Yasuragi

Advertisement

Remove ads