Advertisement

by Gauthier » Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:15 am

by Thermodolia » Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:16 am

by Imperializt Russia » Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:16 am
Patridam wrote:The only thing CNN confirmed was that he had gun licenses and purchased at least one firearm legally. I'm betting it was the handgun. They aren't outright banned like assault rifles are, but AR-15's are still pretty tough to get.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Unified Governments » Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:16 am
Gauthier wrote:Muhammad Ali is already turbining right now I bet, and I would not be surprised if we have edgelords and right wingers heading to Louisville with full bladders.

by Church of the Earth Mother » Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:16 am
The Serbian Empire wrote:Thermodolia wrote:Thankfully FBI says there is no connection to Orlando.
How can they link that up so quickly? I think they deserve a pay raise if this info is correct.Conserative Morality wrote:Fuck no.
Do what the Finns have been doing.
Fucking educate new immigrants and accept them as part of society rather than isolating them into self-contained enclaves which encourage an echo chamber of thought from The Old Country.
The problem is how do you let them integrate when many of them have no desire to do so?
Cwilliams94 wrote:The Neorevolutionary cause is devoted to bringing down the Capitalist Order. All who object to us naturally side, even subconsciously, with the Capitalists. Therefore, no opposition can EVER be allowed. All opposition must be ANNIHILATED.

by Conserative Morality » Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:16 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:I'm in favor, sure. But that doesn't deal with the enclaves, does it. They need to be broken up, forcibly.
They won't dissolve on their own.
And i'm not in favor of any new muslim arrivals until the current ones are dealt with and integrated so we at least have a proof of concept.
The problem is that any action taken to assimilate the current Islamic community will inevitably be perceived as hostile to them.
Because it is. It would be us rocking up and saying "You are no longer allowed to do things your way, and we're here to force you to stop."

by The Serbian Empire » Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:16 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:The Serbian Empire wrote:How can they link that up so quickly? I think they deserve a pay raise if this info is correct.
The problem is how do you let them integrate when many of them have no desire to do so?
Break up the enclaves with a few laws. If necessary, by force. Move muslims around the country and regulate where they can stay.
Try and isolate them so there's no Islamic community and deal with them as atomized individuals.
They can either be a basement dweller, or join the majority culture. Don't leave them the option of forming their own groups.
It's authoritarian, but its the only way I can see it working.

by Galiantus VII » Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:17 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:Fuck no.
Do what the Finns have been doing.
Fucking educate new immigrants and accept them as part of society rather than isolating them into self-contained enclaves which encourage an echo chamber of thought from The Old Country.
I'm in favor, sure. But that doesn't deal with the enclaves, does it. They need to be broken up, forcibly. They won't dissolve on their own.
And i'm not in favor of any new muslim arrivals until the current ones are dealt with and integrated so we at least have a proof of concept.
The problem is that any action taken to assimilate the current Islamic community will inevitably be perceived as hostile to them.
Because it is. It would be us rocking up and saying "You are no longer allowed to do things your way, and we're here to force you to stop."
The side effects of hearing a view you disagree with can include confusion, nausea, and vomiting. Just try and listen to someone say anything politically incorrect without doing any of those things. Obviously, then, we have to consider the precious feelings of everyone we talk to. Some people don't want to be triggered, guys. It's their right as Americans.

by Jumalariik » Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:17 am
Gauthier wrote:Jumalariik wrote:Maybe, just maybe, not everybody only thinks of people as objects like you do....
I mean I think most Christians are sad that this happened, or at least not happy. I think you have a deep seated problem with Christians, and for that reason, you have a secret love for Islam, or just shitposting. Take your pick.
It was Muslims who pushed for the passing of Amendment 8 in California, I forgot.

by Imperializt Russia » Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:17 am
Nirvash Type TheEND wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:So because a Muslim did it, it therefore has no points of commonality to any mass shooting committed by a non-Muslim, ever.
Uh-huh.
Oh right, I'm sorry. It was the righteous fervor of the fact that he had a weapon that made him go out and shoot 50 homosexuals
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by Armed Citizens » Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:17 am

by Thermodolia » Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:18 am
Elepis wrote:Unified Governments wrote:Source
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/live/world-us-canada-36510172

by Valaran » Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:18 am
Dread Lady Nathicana wrote:Was all of this just crap, or is it more fun to insult one another and wildly point fingers?
Just curious if it was something I said, or didn't say.Hard to tell sometimes, especially when it appears points get ignored.
Archeuland and Baughistan wrote:"I don't always nice, but when I do, I build it up." Valaran
Valaran wrote:To be fair though.... I was judging on coolness factor, the most important criteria in any war.
Zoboyizakoplayoklot wrote:Val: NS's resident mindless zombie
Planita wrote:you just set the OP on fire

by Ostroeuropa » Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:18 am
The Serbian Empire wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
Break up the enclaves with a few laws. If necessary, by force. Move muslims around the country and regulate where they can stay.
Try and isolate them so there's no Islamic community and deal with them as atomized individuals.
They can either be a basement dweller, or join the majority culture. Don't leave them the option of forming their own groups.
It's authoritarian, but its the only way I can see it working.
And then they get violent. We've seen this with Native Americans and reservations such as the incident at Wounded Knee.
Conserative Morality wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:I'm in favor, sure. But that doesn't deal with the enclaves, does it. They need to be broken up, forcibly.
Goddamn those Muslims for embracing violence, amirite?They won't dissolve on their own.
No. They won't. In order to break up ethnic enclaves, you have to engage the ethnic minority economically, civically, and culturally. America learned that long ago.And i'm not in favor of any new muslim arrivals until the current ones are dealt with and integrated so we at least have a proof of concept.
... or you could examine places in which Muslim arrivals have integrated so you proof of concept.The problem is that any action taken to assimilate the current Islamic community will inevitably be perceived as hostile to them.
Because it is. It would be us rocking up and saying "You are no longer allowed to do things your way, and we're here to force you to stop."
I'm going to take that as seriously as your ranting on how liberals hate the West.

by The Serbian Empire » Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:18 am

by Unified Governments » Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:18 am
Conserative Morality wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:I'm in favor, sure. But that doesn't deal with the enclaves, does it. They need to be broken up, forcibly.
Goddamn those Muslims for embracing violence, amirite?They won't dissolve on their own.
No. They won't. In order to break up ethnic enclaves, you have to engage the ethnic minority economically, civically, and culturally. America learned that long ago.And i'm not in favor of any new muslim arrivals until the current ones are dealt with and integrated so we at least have a proof of concept.
... or you could examine places in which Muslim arrivals have integrated so you proof of concept.The problem is that any action taken to assimilate the current Islamic community will inevitably be perceived as hostile to them.
Because it is. It would be us rocking up and saying "You are no longer allowed to do things your way, and we're here to force you to stop."
I'm going to take that as seriously as your ranting on how liberals hate the West.

by Patridam » Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:19 am
The Serbian Empire wrote:Patridam wrote:The only thing CNN confirmed was that he had gun licenses and purchased at least one firearm legally. I'm betting it was the handgun. They aren't outright banned like assault rifles are, but AR-15's are still pretty tough to get.
You'd be surprised. If it's not full automatic, it's easy to get one of that model. The thing is they won't be cheap.
Imperializt Russia wrote:Patridam wrote:The only thing CNN confirmed was that he had gun licenses and purchased at least one firearm legally. I'm betting it was the handgun. They aren't outright banned like assault rifles are, but AR-15's are still pretty tough to get.
I'm quite certain that the AR-15 itself, not counting derivatives and clones, is the most popular single semi-automatic rifle in the US. The US market for AK and derived rifles is enough to keep Izhmash afloat.

by Imperializt Russia » Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:19 am
Unified Governments wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:You're damn right it's not, because until the moment he rocked up with his guns, he wasn't a terrorist. There were no grounds of political extremism to discount him from owning guns until then.
The Boston Bombers didn't have guns. Guns aren't the only way to commit terrorist acts, and if this fellow couldn't get his hands on guns then he would have likely resorted to other means.
Also,Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

by IsraelHoldsTheDoor » Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:19 am

by Thermodolia » Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:19 am
Jumalariik wrote:Gauthier wrote:
It was Muslims who pushed for the passing of Amendment 8 in California, I forgot.
Yeah. Killing 50 people = supporting a law.
Why do you hate Christians and love Islam? I'm serious. You seem to think that Islam is great and that Christians are awful. I think you wish a Christian had done this so you could blame it on Christianity, so instead you need to say how bad Christianity is for whatever other reason you can think of.
Gauth logic:
50 people killed for being gay by a Muslim
Christianity is evil too because
Because
Because
Some Christians supported a bill to ban gay marriage
Banning gay marriage=killing gays

by Mega City 5 » Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:19 am

by Gauthier » Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:19 am
Jumalariik wrote:Gauthier wrote:
It was Muslims who pushed for the passing of Amendment 8 in California, I forgot.
Yeah. Killing 50 people = supporting a law.
Why do you hate Christians and love Islam? I'm serious. You seem to think that Islam is great and that Christians are awful. I think you wish a Christian had done this so you could blame it on Christianity, so instead you need to say how bad Christianity is for whatever other reason you can think of.
Gauth logic:
50 people killed for being gay by a Muslim
Christianity is evil too because
Because
Because
Some Christians supported a bill to ban gay marriage
Banning gay marriage=killing gays

by The Black Forrest » Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:20 am
Patridam wrote:Imperializt Russia wrote:It's been repeatedly stated that at least one of his firearms were legally acquired. He had a securities firearms licence.
Do you disagree that if it were harder to acquire a rifle and a handgun, it would be less likely he would have shot one hundred people in a nightclub because he thought gays were icky?
I'm going to bet the handgun was the one purchased legally.
This all wouldn't have been a damn problem if at least one of the club patrons had a carry firearm though.

by Thermodolia » Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:20 am
Mega City 5 wrote:I wish to note the following:
The killer was a brown person.
The killer was a Muslim.
Liberals will continually complain about guns, but the problem's not guns. A gun didn't murder people at a night club. A brown muslim did.
The solution to me seems obvious. I'm with Trump:
1. Build the wall.
2. End birthright citizenship.
3. Put a stop to Muslim immigration.
4. Deport the illegals.
If we were to made Americawhiteagain already, this would not have happened.
Just remember:
"We ought to send 'em all back to Africa. We ought to send 'em all back to Africa."

by Jumalariik » Sun Jun 12, 2016 11:20 am
Unified Governments wrote:Gauthier wrote:Muhammad Ali is already turbining right now I bet, and I would not be surprised if we have edgelords and right wingers heading to Louisville with full bladders.
I'm going to start taking a shot every time you mention right-wingers in this thread. It's like you have a sexual fetish for us or something.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bayerischer Faschistenstaat, Bovad, Dimetrodon Empire, Duvniask, Elejamie, Emotional Support Crocodile, Fahran, First Nightmare, Galloism, Heavenly Assault, Imperatorskiy Rossiya, Kunderland, Major-Tom, Phage, Reich of the New World Order, The Huskar Social Union, The Ruvia, The Union of Galaxies, West Barack and East Obama
Advertisement