NATION

PASSWORD

Gay Nightclub Attacked in Orlando, FL

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Patrick OConner
Minister
 
Posts: 2278
Founded: Sep 26, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Patrick OConner » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:49 pm

Or maybe you're the one lacking in any logic since you seem to think liking someone and denying them basic civil liberties aren't at all at odds with each other.


You mean like to right to bear arms? and the right to self defense?
Member of Task Force Atlas
IATA Member

I choose the second definition of it. This meaning rule by virtue and not owning land to be allowed to vote or hold political office. Instead one is required to serve time in the military (currently 6 years)



Tech Level: Mix MT/PMT

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:50 pm

Rhodevus wrote:I didn't say I was apathetic, I said I tolerate it. I don't support it but I am not anti it. If someone is reading an e-book, I am nto going to go to them and tell them what they're doing it wrong. I am just going to let it be.

So because you don't take action you think that means having a negative opinion of something doesn't mean you oppose it.

...
And tolerating something, even with some disdain is also different from being anti it. Millions of people in the USA tolerate the president (with disdain), but they are not anti-Obama or whoever will be the president. They are just for the other side. You can be pro something without being anti the opposite

No, you really can't. You can't be pro-egalitarianism and not anti-racist. You can't be pro-socialism* and not anti-capitalism. If it has an opposite; not merely companions and bystanders, but an actual opposite, you can't be neutral on one side and prejudiced on the other.

*In the meaning of the term as worker ownership of the means of production
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:50 pm

Just goes to show how people who think LGBTs are subhumans who should not be allowed to have the same marriage benefits and rights as straight people consider themselves enlightened just because they don't give in to their id and kill them like some unhinged Daesh fanboy did.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Irona
Minister
 
Posts: 2399
Founded: Dec 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Irona » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:51 pm

Rhodevus wrote:
Irona wrote:So is this guy IS or not? Diffrent news feeds are giving conflicting reports


what I am kind of understanding is that he is not affiliated with ISIS, but is acting in their name


So lone wolf, this is going to play straight into IS's hands. All the anti-muslim retoric and the inevitable escilation against ISIS is just going to fuel their campaign.

User avatar
Esternial
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 54394
Founded: May 09, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Esternial » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:51 pm

Camicon wrote:
Jumalariik wrote:Right. That's stupid.

Is the statement "our country has basic voting rights" true if women cannot vote? No?

Then why would the statement "our country has basic civil liberties" be true when the LGBT community doesn't have them?

It'd definitely make "The United States of America, land of the free" a sad joke.

For people so proud of their freedom, some would grant the people whose lifestyle they disapprove of very little.
Last edited by Esternial on Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:51 pm

Camicon wrote:
Jumalariik wrote:Right. That's stupid.

Is the statement "our country has basic voting rights" true if women cannot vote? No?

Then why would the statement "our country has basic civil liberties" be true when the LGBT community doesn't have them?

So Australia and Germany lack basic civil liberties? There's, you know, a scale of civil liberties and some countries have liberties in some areas and don't in others.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Ganos Lao
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13904
Founded: Feb 26, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Ganos Lao » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:53 pm

Esternial wrote:
Camicon wrote:Is the statement "our country has basic voting rights" true if women cannot vote? No?

Then why would the statement "our country has basic civil liberties" be true when the LGBT community doesn't have them?

It'd definitely make "The United States of America, land of the free" a sad joke.

For people so proud of their freedom, some would grant the people whose lifestyle they disapprove of very little.


Hasn't that always been a sad joke? Samuel Johnson once mused, after all, "How is it that we hear the loudest yelps for liberty among the drivers of negroes?" and "Slavery is now no where more patiently endured, than in countries once inhabited by the zealots of liberty."
Last edited by Ganos Lao on Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:54 pm, edited 2 times in total.



This nation is controlled by the player who was once Neo-Ixania on the Jolt Forums! It is also undergoing reconstruction.

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:53 pm

The New Sea Territory wrote:
Jumalariik wrote:You again, know nothing about what you speak. The most prominent clergy of every major denomination of Christianity support the kind treatment of homosexuals. Muslims are the only ones who commonly advocate treating "LGBT" as "subhuman shits."


Grade-A Bullshit.

There's something so... repulsive... about posters who have a long history of opposing LGBT+ rights, often with Christian doctrine as their excuse, going on to claim that Christianity totally loves us LGBT+ folk and would never ever treat us like this Muslim shooter has.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:53 pm

Irona wrote:
Rhodevus wrote:
what I am kind of understanding is that he is not affiliated with ISIS, but is acting in their name


So lone wolf, this is going to play straight into IS's hands. All the anti-muslim retoric and the inevitable escilation against ISIS is just going to fuel their campaign.


Daesh encourages and praises fanboys acting out precisely because of reactionary attitudes that such things will generate like in this thread and others.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Patrick OConner
Minister
 
Posts: 2278
Founded: Sep 26, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Patrick OConner » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:53 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
And tolerating something, even with some disdain is also different from being anti it. Millions of people in the USA tolerate the president (with disdain), but they are not anti-Obama or whoever will be the president. They are just for the other side. You can be pro something without being anti the opposite

No, you really can't. You can't be pro-egalitarianism and not anti-racist. You can't be pro-socialism* and not anti-capitalism. If it has an opposite; not merely companions and bystanders, but an actual opposite, you can't be neutral on one side and prejudiced on the other.



Key word there is tolerant. I do not like socailist but i do not go around shooting them. I do not like librals but i do not go around shooting them. I tolerate there existence. I think you need to make use of a dictionary.
Member of Task Force Atlas
IATA Member

I choose the second definition of it. This meaning rule by virtue and not owning land to be allowed to vote or hold political office. Instead one is required to serve time in the military (currently 6 years)



Tech Level: Mix MT/PMT

User avatar
Zeinbrad
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29535
Founded: Jun 04, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Zeinbrad » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:54 pm

Unified Governments wrote:
Zeinbrad wrote:And when another group rises up since we did nothing to fix the problem?

Leave US troops. It's the mistake that Obama made, withdrawing troops so that ISIS could rise. Had US troops been left there ISIS could have been destroyed before they took any territory.

So, be locked in endless war? That's your answer?

Thank god your not a general.
Last edited by Zeinbrad on Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:58 pm, edited 2 times in total.
“There are three ways to ultimate success:
The first way is to be kind.
The second way is to be kind.
The third way is to be kind.”
― Fred Rogers
Currently looking for an artist for a Star Wars fan comic I want to make.

User avatar
Patrick OConner
Minister
 
Posts: 2278
Founded: Sep 26, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Patrick OConner » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:55 pm

Liriena wrote:
The New Sea Territory wrote:
Grade-A Bullshit.

There's something so... repulsive... about posters who have a long history of opposing LGBT+ rights, often with Christian doctrine as their excuse, going on to claim that Christianity totally loves us LGBT+ folk and would never ever treat us like this Muslim shooter has.


Yeah because a Christian is a lot less likely lot less lilely to shoot you than a Muslim. Christain will just preach at you.
Member of Task Force Atlas
IATA Member

I choose the second definition of it. This meaning rule by virtue and not owning land to be allowed to vote or hold political office. Instead one is required to serve time in the military (currently 6 years)



Tech Level: Mix MT/PMT

User avatar
Conserative Morality
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 76676
Founded: Aug 24, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Conserative Morality » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:55 pm

Patrick OConner wrote:Key word there is tolerant. I do not like socailist but i do not go around shooting them. I do not like librals but i do not go around shooting them. I tolerate there existence. I think you need to make use of a dictionary.

You don't have to goddamn shoot someone to be against what they are or what they do.
On the hate train. Choo choo, bitches. Bi-Polar. Proud Crypto-Fascist and Turbo Progressive. Dirty Étatist. Lowly Humanities Major. NSG's Best Liberal.
Caesar and Imperator of RWDT
Got a blog up again. || An NS Writing Discussion

User avatar
Dakini
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23085
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Dakini » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:55 pm

Jumalariik wrote:
East Catalina wrote:He's probably referring to the day they all stop opposing gay sex and marriage, which will be the day that Muslims are shooting up everyone who's LGBT through inspiration from Riyadh.

:rofl: :rofl:

So not supporting gay sex and gay marriage makes you anti-gay?

Of course it does. Have you been living under a rock in a cave on Pluto?

User avatar
Rhodevus
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7686
Founded: Apr 19, 2013
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Rhodevus » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:55 pm

Patrick OConner wrote:
Conserative Morality wrote:
No, you really can't. You can't be pro-egalitarianism and not anti-racist. You can't be pro-socialism* and not anti-capitalism. If it has an opposite; not merely companions and bystanders, but an actual opposite, you can't be neutral on one side and prejudiced on the other.



Key word there is tolerant. I do not like socailist but i do not go around shooting them. I do not like librals but i do not go around shooting them. I tolerate there existence. I think you need to make use of a dictionary.


Strong point, but why the need for the insult?
She/Her
IATA Member Embassy Character Creation 101
Do not argue against me, you will lose...or win, depending on the situation
The Official Madman with a Box
Rodrania wrote:Rhod, I f*cking love you, man. <3
Divergia wrote:The Canadian Polar-Potato-Moose-Cat has spoken!
Beiluxia wrote:Is it just me, or does your name keep getting better the more I see it?

Factbook
International Exchange Student Program Member
XENOS MEMBER OF THE MULTI-SPECIES UNION!

User avatar
Godular
Forum Moderator
 
Posts: 13083
Founded: Sep 09, 2004
New York Times Democracy

Postby Godular » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:55 pm

The way I figure, it's like how I treat broccoli.

I can't STAND the stuff. Everything about it is positively disgusting. When I see people eating it, I can't even begin to fathom how they can stomach it. I ain't gonna swat a lump of broccoli out of someone's hands or shoot them if they eat it though. Their tastes are simply different than mine.

Why in the bloody hell does it even seem remotely right to anyone to murder other people because of a simple difference in tastes?

What kind of fucked up priorities are in place to justify that kind of depravity in their own minds, that the lives of those who don't behave like you are forfeit?
Now the moderation team really IS Godmoding.
Step 1: One-Stop Rules Shop. Step 2: ctrl+f. Step 3: Type in what you saw in modbox. Step 4: Don't do it again.
New to F7? Click here!


User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:55 pm

Conserative Morality wrote:
Patrick OConner wrote:Key word there is tolerant. I do not like socailist but i do not go around shooting them. I do not like librals but i do not go around shooting them. I tolerate there existence. I think you need to make use of a dictionary.

You don't have to goddamn shoot someone to be against what they are or what they do.


I repeat...

Gauthier wrote:Just goes to show how people who think LGBTs are subhumans who should not be allowed to have the same marriage benefits and rights as straight people consider themselves enlightened just because they don't give in to their id and kill them like some unhinged Daesh fanboy did.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Scarlet Tides
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 418
Founded: May 01, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Scarlet Tides » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:57 pm

Got posters in here treating gay people as less than and at the same time lamenting that they were targeted for execution.

The fuck, get a fucking clue.
Last edited by Scarlet Tides on Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ratateague
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1584
Founded: Dec 25, 2010
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Ratateague » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:57 pm

Liriena wrote:
The New Sea Territory wrote:
Grade-A Bullshit.

There's something so... repulsive... about posters who have a long history of opposing LGBT+ rights, often with Christian doctrine as their excuse, going on to claim that Christianity totally loves us LGBT+ folk and would never ever treat us like this Muslim shooter has.

Not only that, but claims to know their "way of living," which implies an inherent degeneracy. Oh, but he doesn't hate them. Just thinks the worst of them, that's all.
Society prepares the crime, the criminal commits it. -Henry Thomas Buckle
When money speaks, the truth is silent. -Russian Proverb
'|

User avatar
United Territories and States
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1367
Founded: Nov 14, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby United Territories and States » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:57 pm

I think people forgot the fact that he was mentally unstable.
Please be nice and refer this country as "America", or "United States" when in IC.

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:57 pm

Scarlet Tides wrote:Got posters in here treating gay people as less than and at the same time lamenting that they were targeted for execution.

The fuck, get a fucking clue.


Because the equation goes Sodomite Faggots > Ebil Moozlemz
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Rhodevus
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7686
Founded: Apr 19, 2013
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Rhodevus » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:58 pm

United Territories and States wrote:I think people forgot the fact that he was mentally unstable.


Is there a source for that?
She/Her
IATA Member Embassy Character Creation 101
Do not argue against me, you will lose...or win, depending on the situation
The Official Madman with a Box
Rodrania wrote:Rhod, I f*cking love you, man. <3
Divergia wrote:The Canadian Polar-Potato-Moose-Cat has spoken!
Beiluxia wrote:Is it just me, or does your name keep getting better the more I see it?

Factbook
International Exchange Student Program Member
XENOS MEMBER OF THE MULTI-SPECIES UNION!

User avatar
Camicon
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14377
Founded: Aug 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Camicon » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:58 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Camicon wrote:Is the statement "our country has basic voting rights" true if women cannot vote? No?

Then why would the statement "our country has basic civil liberties" be true when the LGBT community doesn't have them?

So Australia and Germany lack basic civil liberties? There's, you know, a scale of civil liberties and some countries have liberties in some areas and don't in others.

If Australia and Germany don't guarantee the same civil liberties for the LGBT community as they do for everyone else, then no.
Last edited by Camicon on Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Hey/They
Active since May, 2009
Country of glowing hearts, and patrons of the arts
Help me out
Star spangled madness, united sadness
Count me out
The Trews, Under The Sun
No human is more human than any other. - Lieutenant-General Roméo Antonius Dallaire
Don't shine for swine. - Metric, Soft Rock Star
Love is hell. Hell is love. Hell is asking to be loved. - Emily Haines and the Soft Skeleton, Detective Daughter

Why (Male) Rape Is Hilarious [because it has to be]

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:58 pm

United Territories and States wrote:I think people forgot the fact that he was mentally unstable.


Muslim shooters are ALWAYS of sound mind and body, silly.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:58 pm

http://www.politico.com/states/florida/story/2016/06/20-dead-after-shooting-at-orlando-nightclub-scott-headed-to-region-102758
The attacker was a known homophobe. According to his father, his son lost it after seeing a gay couple kissing. Such a depraved man.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Ethel mermania, Gun Manufacturers, Ifreann, Kannap, Kreushia, Maximum Imperium Rex, Repreteop, Shidei, Turenia

Advertisement

Remove ads