Or maybe you're the one lacking in any logic since you seem to think liking someone and denying them basic civil liberties aren't at all at odds with each other.
You mean like to right to bear arms? and the right to self defense?
Advertisement
by Patrick OConner » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:49 pm
Or maybe you're the one lacking in any logic since you seem to think liking someone and denying them basic civil liberties aren't at all at odds with each other.
by Conserative Morality » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:50 pm
Rhodevus wrote:I didn't say I was apathetic, I said I tolerate it. I don't support it but I am not anti it. If someone is reading an e-book, I am nto going to go to them and tell them what they're doing it wrong. I am just going to let it be.
And tolerating something, even with some disdain is also different from being anti it. Millions of people in the USA tolerate the president (with disdain), but they are not anti-Obama or whoever will be the president. They are just for the other side. You can be pro something without being anti the opposite
by Gauthier » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:50 pm
by Esternial » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:51 pm
by Geilinor » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:51 pm
by Ganos Lao » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:53 pm
Esternial wrote:Camicon wrote:Is the statement "our country has basic voting rights" true if women cannot vote? No?
Then why would the statement "our country has basic civil liberties" be true when the LGBT community doesn't have them?
It'd definitely make "The United States of America, land of the free" a sad joke.
For people so proud of their freedom, some would grant the people whose lifestyle they disapprove of very little.
by Liriena » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:53 pm
The New Sea Territory wrote:Jumalariik wrote:You again, know nothing about what you speak. The most prominent clergy of every major denomination of Christianity support the kind treatment of homosexuals. Muslims are the only ones who commonly advocate treating "LGBT" as "subhuman shits."
Grade-A Bullshit.
I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |
by Gauthier » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:53 pm
by Patrick OConner » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:53 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:And tolerating something, even with some disdain is also different from being anti it. Millions of people in the USA tolerate the president (with disdain), but they are not anti-Obama or whoever will be the president. They are just for the other side. You can be pro something without being anti the opposite
No, you really can't. You can't be pro-egalitarianism and not anti-racist. You can't be pro-socialism* and not anti-capitalism. If it has an opposite; not merely companions and bystanders, but an actual opposite, you can't be neutral on one side and prejudiced on the other.
by Zeinbrad » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:54 pm
Unified Governments wrote:Zeinbrad wrote:And when another group rises up since we did nothing to fix the problem?
Leave US troops. It's the mistake that Obama made, withdrawing troops so that ISIS could rise. Had US troops been left there ISIS could have been destroyed before they took any territory.
by Patrick OConner » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:55 pm
Liriena wrote:The New Sea Territory wrote:
Grade-A Bullshit.
There's something so... repulsive... about posters who have a long history of opposing LGBT+ rights, often with Christian doctrine as their excuse, going on to claim that Christianity totally loves us LGBT+ folk and would never ever treat us like this Muslim shooter has.
by Conserative Morality » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:55 pm
Patrick OConner wrote:Key word there is tolerant. I do not like socailist but i do not go around shooting them. I do not like librals but i do not go around shooting them. I tolerate there existence. I think you need to make use of a dictionary.
by Dakini » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:55 pm
by Rhodevus » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:55 pm
Patrick OConner wrote:Conserative Morality wrote:
No, you really can't. You can't be pro-egalitarianism and not anti-racist. You can't be pro-socialism* and not anti-capitalism. If it has an opposite; not merely companions and bystanders, but an actual opposite, you can't be neutral on one side and prejudiced on the other.
Key word there is tolerant. I do not like socailist but i do not go around shooting them. I do not like librals but i do not go around shooting them. I tolerate there existence. I think you need to make use of a dictionary.
Rodrania wrote:Rhod, I f*cking love you, man. <3
Divergia wrote:The Canadian Polar-Potato-Moose-Cat has spoken!
Beiluxia wrote:Is it just me, or does your name keep getting better the more I see it?
by Godular » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:55 pm
by Gauthier » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:55 pm
Conserative Morality wrote:Patrick OConner wrote:Key word there is tolerant. I do not like socailist but i do not go around shooting them. I do not like librals but i do not go around shooting them. I tolerate there existence. I think you need to make use of a dictionary.
You don't have to goddamn shoot someone to be against what they are or what they do.
Gauthier wrote:Just goes to show how people who think LGBTs are subhumans who should not be allowed to have the same marriage benefits and rights as straight people consider themselves enlightened just because they don't give in to their id and kill them like some unhinged Daesh fanboy did.
by Scarlet Tides » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:57 pm
by Ratateague » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:57 pm
Liriena wrote:The New Sea Territory wrote:
Grade-A Bullshit.
There's something so... repulsive... about posters who have a long history of opposing LGBT+ rights, often with Christian doctrine as their excuse, going on to claim that Christianity totally loves us LGBT+ folk and would never ever treat us like this Muslim shooter has.
by United Territories and States » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:57 pm
by Gauthier » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:57 pm
Scarlet Tides wrote:Got posters in here treating gay people as less than and at the same time lamenting that they were targeted for execution.
The fuck, get a fucking clue.
by Rhodevus » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:58 pm
United Territories and States wrote:I think people forgot the fact that he was mentally unstable.
Rodrania wrote:Rhod, I f*cking love you, man. <3
Divergia wrote:The Canadian Polar-Potato-Moose-Cat has spoken!
Beiluxia wrote:Is it just me, or does your name keep getting better the more I see it?
by Camicon » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:58 pm
Geilinor wrote:Camicon wrote:Is the statement "our country has basic voting rights" true if women cannot vote? No?
Then why would the statement "our country has basic civil liberties" be true when the LGBT community doesn't have them?
So Australia and Germany lack basic civil liberties? There's, you know, a scale of civil liberties and some countries have liberties in some areas and don't in others.
Country of glowing hearts, and patrons of the artsThe Trews, Under The Sun
Help me out
Star spangled madness, united sadness
Count me out
No human is more human than any other. - Lieutenant-General Roméo Antonius Dallaire
Don't shine for swine. - Metric, Soft Rock Star
Love is hell. Hell is love. Hell is asking to be loved. - Emily Haines and the Soft Skeleton, Detective Daughter
by Gauthier » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:58 pm
United Territories and States wrote:I think people forgot the fact that he was mentally unstable.
by Geilinor » Sun Jun 12, 2016 1:58 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ancientania, Ethel mermania, Gun Manufacturers, Ifreann, Kannap, Kreushia, Maximum Imperium Rex, Repreteop, Shidei, Turenia
Advertisement