That is why Donald Trump has said to Bernie supporters "we welcome you with you open arms". Granted, you may hate both, but he will probably be less useless than Hillary. Marginally.Oh, but we can still fight each other later, rest assured
Advertisement

by United Isles of the Commonwealth » Sun Jun 12, 2016 2:58 am

by Annorax » Sun Jun 12, 2016 3:01 am

by United Isles of the Commonwealth » Sun Jun 12, 2016 3:04 am
Annorax wrote:Labor Syndicates wrote:OK, yeah, but we can get behind this one issue, right? We can get back to fighting later, right?
Yes yes. If you are looking for me to support Hillary you will have to look elsewhere. She is as corrupt as the day is long, an enabler of her lothario husband, and has a multitude of scandals that follow her like flies to poop. She is a better Nixon than Nixon ever was.

by Labor Syndicates » Sun Jun 12, 2016 3:07 am
United Isles of the Commonwealth wrote:Labor Syndicates wrote:OK, yeah, but we can get behind this one issue, right? We can get back to fighting later, right?
That is why Donald Trump has said to Bernie supporters "we welcome you with you open arms". Granted, you may hate both, but he will probably be less useless than Hillary. Marginally.Oh, but we can still fight each other later, rest assured

by Annorax » Sun Jun 12, 2016 3:07 am
United Isles of the Commonwealth wrote:Annorax wrote:
Yes yes. If you are looking for me to support Hillary you will have to look elsewhere. She is as corrupt as the day is long, an enabler of her lothario husband, and has a multitude of scandals that follow her like flies to poop. She is a better Nixon than Nixon ever was.
Richard Nixon's associates cut about 6 minutes of tape and a few files. He resigned from his presidency. Hillary Clinton hid 30,000 emails, threatening National Security, and is under FBI investigation. She is the Democrats nominee

by Vassenor » Sun Jun 12, 2016 3:09 am
United Isles of the Commonwealth wrote:Annorax wrote:
Yes yes. If you are looking for me to support Hillary you will have to look elsewhere. She is as corrupt as the day is long, an enabler of her lothario husband, and has a multitude of scandals that follow her like flies to poop. She is a better Nixon than Nixon ever was.
Richard Nixon's associates cut about 6 minutes of tape and a few files. He resigned from his presidency. Hillary Clinton hid 30,000 emails, threatening National Security, and is under FBI investigation. She is the Democrats nominee

by Arana » Sun Jun 12, 2016 3:12 am
Vassenor wrote:United Isles of the Commonwealth wrote:
Richard Nixon's associates cut about 6 minutes of tape and a few files. He resigned from his presidency. Hillary Clinton hid 30,000 emails, threatening National Security, and is under FBI investigation. She is the Democrats nominee
Oh here we go with the emails thing again. Didn't the Republicans basically admit they were blowing that out of proportion purely to try and torpedo her?

by Washington Resistance Army » Sun Jun 12, 2016 3:13 am
Vassenor wrote:United Isles of the Commonwealth wrote:
Richard Nixon's associates cut about 6 minutes of tape and a few files. He resigned from his presidency. Hillary Clinton hid 30,000 emails, threatening National Security, and is under FBI investigation. She is the Democrats nominee
Oh here we go with the emails thing again. Didn't the Republicans basically admit they were blowing that out of proportion purely to try and torpedo her?

by United Isles of the Commonwealth » Sun Jun 12, 2016 3:13 am
Labor Syndicates wrote:United Isles of the Commonwealth wrote:
That is why Donald Trump has said to Bernie supporters "we welcome you with you open arms". Granted, you may hate both, but he will probably be less useless than Hillary. Marginally.Oh, but we can still fight each other later, rest assured
Haha, no. I hate Hillary, but I really hate Trump. And Sanders, I'm sort of "eeeeeeeh, could use a little work." Such is life as a socialist in America.

by Annorax » Sun Jun 12, 2016 3:15 am
Washington Resistance Army wrote:Vassenor wrote:
Oh here we go with the emails thing again. Didn't the Republicans basically admit they were blowing that out of proportion purely to try and torpedo her?
She's under a criminal investigation by the FBI and it has already been proven she did indeed send classified material from her server despite saying otherwise. Sadly for her it isn't a vast right wing conspiracy.

by Annorax » Sun Jun 12, 2016 3:17 am
United Isles of the Commonwealth wrote:Labor Syndicates wrote:
Haha, no. I hate Hillary, but I really hate Trump. And Sanders, I'm sort of "eeeeeeeh, could use a little work." Such is life as a socialist in America.
I completely get where you're coming from. I also am doubtful about Trump being able to get Mexico to pay for a wall as well has him trying to negotiate with North Korea. He is flawed.

by Korouse » Sun Jun 12, 2016 3:18 am

by Vassenor » Sun Jun 12, 2016 3:19 am
Annorax wrote:United Isles of the Commonwealth wrote:
I completely get where you're coming from. I also am doubtful about Trump being able to get Mexico to pay for a wall as well has him trying to negotiate with North Korea. He is flawed.
Trump already explained how he would get Mexico to pay for the wall. There are actually a number of ways it can be done.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... story.html

by United Isles of the Commonwealth » Sun Jun 12, 2016 3:22 am
Vassenor wrote:Annorax wrote:
Trump already explained how he would get Mexico to pay for the wall. There are actually a number of ways it can be done.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... story.html
So basically he's going to bully them into doing it.

by Vassenor » Sun Jun 12, 2016 3:24 am

by Herskerstad » Sun Jun 12, 2016 3:25 am

by Washington Resistance Army » Sun Jun 12, 2016 3:27 am
Herskerstad wrote:Oh Triggelypuff, the internet's new favourite meme.


by Petrolheadia » Sun Jun 12, 2016 3:37 am
Annorax wrote:Liriena wrote:You believe all liberals have to be subjected to right-wing political violence, regardless of whether they have engaged in political violence themselves?
Also, you do realize that not all leftists are liberals, and not all liberals are leftists?
Also, "freedom of speech is disappearing at an alarming rate" said the NS user as he openly called for suppressing the freedom of speech of liberals, with a history of being able to express his right-wing opinion online with few consequences, with access to a plethora of right-wing forums and news sites throughout the internet, with several right-wing institutions throughout the United States that he could attend, with right-wing TV networks and radio shows still having a commanding presence in American media, with a major party presidential candidate openly disparaging American leftists and even excusing violence against them with few repercussions... Need I go on?
Puh-leeeez American mainstream media is very liberal, it's a constant progressive love fest.
Leftist, liberal, progressive, whatever its all from the same cloth. I'll leave it to the left to figure out what sectarian branch an individual belongs to.
Anyone disparaging leftists is only fighting fire with fire, like I said, let's see how much they like it.

by Annorax » Sun Jun 12, 2016 3:40 am
Petrolheadia wrote:Annorax wrote:
Puh-leeeez American mainstream media is very liberal, it's a constant progressive love fest.
Leftist, liberal, progressive, whatever its all from the same cloth. I'll leave it to the left to figure out what sectarian branch an individual belongs to.
Anyone disparaging leftists is only fighting fire with fire, like I said, let's see how much they like it.
When you call liberals "leftists", you use the same tactic as those who call conservatives "fascists" or "racists" - name-calling that implies that your opponent has some very unpopular views that are regarded as bad for the society.

by Esternial » Sun Jun 12, 2016 3:41 am

by Herskerstad » Sun Jun 12, 2016 3:42 am


by Petrolheadia » Sun Jun 12, 2016 3:43 am
Annorax wrote:Petrolheadia wrote:
When you call liberals "leftists", you use the same tactic as those who call conservatives "fascists" or "racists" - name-calling that implies that your opponent has some very unpopular views that are regarded as bad for the society.
I do think liberals have some ideas that are bad for society. Mainly economic ones not social ones.

by Annorax » Sun Jun 12, 2016 3:45 am
Petrolheadia wrote:Annorax wrote:
I do think liberals have some ideas that are bad for society. Mainly economic ones not social ones.
You did not get the point - when you call your opponents "leftists", you imply that they support socialism/communism, a very unpopular and even ostracizing ideology, to make them less appealing, while not using any actual points against their ideas.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Corianna, Emotional Support Crocodile, Fartsniffage, Fractalnavel, Gun Manufacturers, Hanafuridake, Ifreann, New Kowloon Bay, Pizza Friday Forever91, Shrillland, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement