NATION

PASSWORD

Free Speech or Social Justice

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Atlanticatia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5970
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Atlanticatia » Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:20 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Gauthier wrote:
But a drawing of crass if not misogynistic stereotyping is "contributing". Cute.


Atlanticatia wrote:
Hey, using the term 'misogynist' is misandrist to all the oppressed men.


Heidisteinian Fempire wrote:Yeah, my fedora is shaking ;-;


It's great when you can capture these moments. Italicized by me.


It's because it's fun to mock MRAs and their talking points.
Economic Left/Right: -5.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.95

Pros: social democracy, LGBT+ rights, pro-choice, free education and health care, environmentalism, Nordic model, secularism, welfare state, multiculturalism
Cons: social conservatism, neoliberalism, hate speech, racism, sexism, 'right-to-work' laws, religious fundamentalism
i'm a dual american-new zealander previously lived in the northeast US, now living in new zealand. university student.
Social Democrat and Progressive.
Hanna Nilsen, Leader of the SDP. Equality, Prosperity, and Opportunity: The Social Democratic Party

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:20 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Gauthier wrote:
But a drawing of crass if not misogynistic stereotyping is "contributing". Cute.


Atlanticatia wrote:
Hey, using the term 'misogynist' is misandrist to all the oppressed men.


Heidisteinian Fempire wrote:Yeah, my fedora is shaking ;-;


It's great when you can capture these moments. Italicized by me.


Oh right, I forgot Fat Angry Bull Dyke is not a misogynistic stereotype but an accepted fact. Silly me.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Frenline Delpha
Senator
 
Posts: 4346
Founded: Sep 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Frenline Delpha » Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:21 pm

Heidisteinian Fempire wrote:
New Edom wrote:
Well Heidi, you know me a bit. I'm not really right wing though annoyingly I keep geting lumped with them because I at least somewhat care about families and moral issues though I have all my life been pro women's rights, pro minority rights, pro LGBT rights. I am just not knee jerk in favour of whatever the cause of the day is and try to weigh it historically and pragmatically. It gets tiresome at times.

So I listen to these people raging and getting their facts wrong, unscientific, ahistorical, and they are exasperating. It is not the overal CAUSEs that are a probelm, it is how they are carried out, the analysis, the ideas that are criticized and should be criticized. Being objective is sometiems vitally necessary on both sides, and soemtiems the right is right and the left is wrong and vice versa.

If you strip gamergate down to bare bones, journalism ethics is a decent cause. Once you add on that these websites are mostly clickbait sites, it becomes a bit petty. Once you add harassment, it becomes a bit fucked up.

Cause no one else used harassment. 'Cause only GGers harassed dissidents. Ever heard of Big Red.
I don't know how long I'll be back, but I just thought I'd stop in and say hi, at least.

User avatar
Hirota
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7320
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Hirota » Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:24 pm

Gauthier wrote:
Hirota wrote:Oh look, Gauthier sticking his nose in with a post that contributes nothing whatsoever. How original.


But a drawing of crass if not misogynistic stereotyping is "contributing". Cute.
We all have our moments when we don't have the time or opportunity to write a full post that maybe doesn't do justice. I'm looking forward to the time when you do have the time. I mean, when was the last time you posted anything that contributed? 2013?
When a wise man points at the moon the imbecile examines the finger - Confucius
Known to trigger Grammar Nazis, Spelling Nazis, Actual Nazis, the emotionally stunted and pedants.
Those affected by the views, opinions or general demeanour of this poster should review this puppy picture. Those affected by puppy pictures should consider investing in an isolation tank.

Economic Left/Right: -3.25, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.03
Isn't it curious how people will claim they are against tribalism, then pigeonhole themselves into tribes?

It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
I use obviously in italics to emphasise the conveying of sarcasm. If I've put excessive obviously's into a post that means I'm being sarcastic

User avatar
Atlanticatia
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5970
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Atlanticatia » Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:24 pm

Hirota wrote:
Gauthier wrote:
But a drawing of crass if not misogynistic stereotyping is "contributing". Cute.
We all have our moments when we don't have the time or opportunity to write a full post that maybe doesn't do justice. I'm looking forward to the time when you do have the time. I mean, when was the last time you posted anything that contributed? 2013?


I'd say calling out misogynistic stereotyping is pretty good 'contributing'.
Economic Left/Right: -5.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.95

Pros: social democracy, LGBT+ rights, pro-choice, free education and health care, environmentalism, Nordic model, secularism, welfare state, multiculturalism
Cons: social conservatism, neoliberalism, hate speech, racism, sexism, 'right-to-work' laws, religious fundamentalism
i'm a dual american-new zealander previously lived in the northeast US, now living in new zealand. university student.
Social Democrat and Progressive.
Hanna Nilsen, Leader of the SDP. Equality, Prosperity, and Opportunity: The Social Democratic Party

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:25 pm

Hirota wrote:
Gauthier wrote:
But a drawing of crass if not misogynistic stereotyping is "contributing". Cute.
We all have our moments when we don't have the time or opportunity to write a full post that maybe doesn't do justice. I'm looking forward to the time when you do have the time. I mean, when was the last time you posted anything that contributed? 2013?


You can start your own MRA forum if you want minimum posting requirements. Otherwise this is a public forum as long as one obeys its rules. Cheers!
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57888
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:27 pm

Atlanticatia wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:




It's great when you can capture these moments. Italicized by me.


It's because it's fun to mock MRAs and their talking points.


Yeh... right.

And it's fun to mock feminists. I'm glad we both agree.

Atlanticatia wrote:
Hirota wrote:We all have our moments when we don't have the time or opportunity to write a full post that maybe doesn't do justice. I'm looking forward to the time when you do have the time. I mean, when was the last time you posted anything that contributed? 2013?


I'd say calling out misogynistic stereotyping is pretty good 'contributing'.


Oh. Apparently you don't get it after all.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:27 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Heidisteinian Fempire
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1094
Founded: May 25, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Heidisteinian Fempire » Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:28 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Atlanticatia wrote:
It's because it's fun to mock MRAs and their talking points.


Yeh... right.

And it's fun to mock feminists. I'm glad we both agree.

Atlanticatia wrote:
I'd say calling out misogynistic stereotyping is pretty good 'contributing'.


Oh. Apparently you don't get it after all.

Don't white males already have their rights? They certainly need way less!
Leftist Agrarian-Anarchist, also Muslim too
Pro: Dudeism, LGBT+ rights, Feminism, Far-left thought, Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton, individual freedom
Anti: people who don't want other people to be themselves, /pol/

User avatar
Frenline Delpha
Senator
 
Posts: 4346
Founded: Sep 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Frenline Delpha » Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:29 pm

Heidisteinian Fempire wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Yeh... right.

And it's fun to mock feminists. I'm glad we both agree.



Oh. Apparently you don't get it after all.

Don't white males already have their rights? They certainly need way less!

Because removing people's rights isn't Orwell's nightmare. And you wonder why people make fun of feminism.

How about this radical idea? Recognize that everyone in the First World has the same rights under laws.
Last edited by Frenline Delpha on Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:29 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I don't know how long I'll be back, but I just thought I'd stop in and say hi, at least.

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:30 pm

Frenline Delpha wrote:
Heidisteinian Fempire wrote:Don't white males already have their rights? They certainly need way less!

Because removing people's rights isn't Orwell's nightmare. And you wonder why people make fun of feminism.


With stereotypes that involve bodyshaming.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Hirota
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7320
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Hirota » Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:30 pm

Atlanticatia wrote:I'd say calling out misogynistic stereotyping is pretty good 'contributing'.
Can you point out where anyone was misogynistic? I was mocking "Social Justice Warriors" not women in general. Most women are far too rational and sensible to be part of that ideological cancer.
When a wise man points at the moon the imbecile examines the finger - Confucius
Known to trigger Grammar Nazis, Spelling Nazis, Actual Nazis, the emotionally stunted and pedants.
Those affected by the views, opinions or general demeanour of this poster should review this puppy picture. Those affected by puppy pictures should consider investing in an isolation tank.

Economic Left/Right: -3.25, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.03
Isn't it curious how people will claim they are against tribalism, then pigeonhole themselves into tribes?

It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
I use obviously in italics to emphasise the conveying of sarcasm. If I've put excessive obviously's into a post that means I'm being sarcastic

User avatar
Heidisteinian Fempire
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1094
Founded: May 25, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Heidisteinian Fempire » Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:30 pm

Frenline Delpha wrote:
Heidisteinian Fempire wrote:Don't white males already have their rights? They certainly need way less!

Because removing people's rights isn't Orwell's nightmare. And you wonder why people make fun of feminism.

Shh, cis white male. You don't have a opinion, because certainly every cis white male is a fedora'd gentleman.

(I'm being sarcasting and turning the tables on your spicy memes, by the way.)
Leftist Agrarian-Anarchist, also Muslim too
Pro: Dudeism, LGBT+ rights, Feminism, Far-left thought, Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton, individual freedom
Anti: people who don't want other people to be themselves, /pol/

User avatar
Frenline Delpha
Senator
 
Posts: 4346
Founded: Sep 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Frenline Delpha » Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:30 pm

Gauthier wrote:
Frenline Delpha wrote:Because removing people's rights isn't Orwell's nightmare. And you wonder why people make fun of feminism.


With stereotypes that involve bodyshaming.

Fuck me. Any other buzzwords in your dictionary, such as mansplaining?
I don't know how long I'll be back, but I just thought I'd stop in and say hi, at least.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57888
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:30 pm

Gauthier wrote:
Frenline Delpha wrote:Because removing people's rights isn't Orwell's nightmare. And you wonder why people make fun of feminism.


With stereotypes that involve bodyshaming.


Neckbeard/Fedora and such.
They're just responding in kind. It's childish, but it is what it is. You can't claim the moral highground for your side.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57888
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:32 pm

Hirota wrote:
Atlanticatia wrote:I'd say calling out misogynistic stereotyping is pretty good 'contributing'.
Can you point out where anyone was misogynistic? I was mocking "Social Justice Warriors" not women in general. Most women are far too rational and sensible to be part of that ideological cancer.


You're forgetting that insulting A woman = Insulting Women, that's been the standard since Gamergate.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Heidisteinian Fempire
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1094
Founded: May 25, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Heidisteinian Fempire » Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:32 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Gauthier wrote:
With stereotypes that involve bodyshaming.


Neckbeard/Fedora and such.
They're just responding in kind. It's childish, but it is what it is. You can't claim the moral highground for your side.

It's called parody.
Leftist Agrarian-Anarchist, also Muslim too
Pro: Dudeism, LGBT+ rights, Feminism, Far-left thought, Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton, individual freedom
Anti: people who don't want other people to be themselves, /pol/

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:33 pm

Hirota wrote:
Atlanticatia wrote:I'd say calling out misogynistic stereotyping is pretty good 'contributing'.
Can you point out where anyone was misogynistic? I was mocking "Social Justice Warriors" not women in general. Most women are far too rational and sensible to be part of that ideological cancer.




Absolutely nothing wrong with gratuitously attributing obesity and unfemininity to something you don't like at all!
Last edited by Gauthier on Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57888
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:34 pm

Heidisteinian Fempire wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Neckbeard/Fedora and such.
They're just responding in kind. It's childish, but it is what it is. You can't claim the moral highground for your side.

It's called parody.


Yeh, it's parody when we do it too. And you apparently didn't take that first article to heart, nor bother reflecting on what it says that since your particular style of progressive politics became popular, the far-right has been revived politically as a major international force and KKK membership has doubled.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Hirota
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7320
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Hirota » Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:34 pm

Heidisteinian Fempire wrote:It's called parody.

Ahh, good one, I should have used that.

Yup, I was parodying social justice warriors. Nothing wrong with that right?
When a wise man points at the moon the imbecile examines the finger - Confucius
Known to trigger Grammar Nazis, Spelling Nazis, Actual Nazis, the emotionally stunted and pedants.
Those affected by the views, opinions or general demeanour of this poster should review this puppy picture. Those affected by puppy pictures should consider investing in an isolation tank.

Economic Left/Right: -3.25, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.03
Isn't it curious how people will claim they are against tribalism, then pigeonhole themselves into tribes?

It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
I use obviously in italics to emphasise the conveying of sarcasm. If I've put excessive obviously's into a post that means I'm being sarcastic

User avatar
Hirota
Negotiator
 
Posts: 7320
Founded: Jan 22, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Hirota » Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:35 pm

Gauthier wrote:
Hirota wrote:Can you point out where anyone was misogynistic? I was mocking "Social Justice Warriors" not women in general. Most women are far too rational and sensible to be part of that ideological cancer.




Absolutely nothing wrong with gratuitously attributing obesity and unfemininity to something you don't like at all!
You failed to point out an example. Demonstrate where I was mocking all women.
When a wise man points at the moon the imbecile examines the finger - Confucius
Known to trigger Grammar Nazis, Spelling Nazis, Actual Nazis, the emotionally stunted and pedants.
Those affected by the views, opinions or general demeanour of this poster should review this puppy picture. Those affected by puppy pictures should consider investing in an isolation tank.

Economic Left/Right: -3.25, Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.03
Isn't it curious how people will claim they are against tribalism, then pigeonhole themselves into tribes?

It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it.
I use obviously in italics to emphasise the conveying of sarcasm. If I've put excessive obviously's into a post that means I'm being sarcastic

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57888
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:36 pm

Hirota wrote:
Gauthier wrote:


Absolutely nothing wrong with gratuitously attributing obesity and unfemininity to something you don't like at all!
You failed to point out an example. Demonstrate where I was mocking all women.


How does he know the person portrayed is a woman? They appear to identify as gender fluid.
It's not shocking then that unfeminity is a part of that, nor is the unfeminine nature really central to the mockery of the parody.

The obesity is though.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
New Edom
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 23241
Founded: Mar 14, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby New Edom » Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:37 pm

Heidisteinian Fempire wrote:
New Edom wrote:
Well Heidi, you know me a bit. I'm not really right wing though annoyingly I keep geting lumped with them because I at least somewhat care about families and moral issues though I have all my life been pro women's rights, pro minority rights, pro LGBT rights. I am just not knee jerk in favour of whatever the cause of the day is and try to weigh it historically and pragmatically. It gets tiresome at times.

So I listen to these people raging and getting their facts wrong, unscientific, ahistorical, and they are exasperating. It is not the overal CAUSEs that are a probelm, it is how they are carried out, the analysis, the ideas that are criticized and should be criticized. Being objective is sometiems vitally necessary on both sides, and soemtiems the right is right and the left is wrong and vice versa.

If you strip gamergate down to bare bones, journalism ethics is a decent cause. Once you add on that these websites are mostly clickbait sites, it becomes a bit petty. Once you add harassment, it becomes a bit fucked up.


The other issue with it is feminists making anything women mildly dislike as an example of the horrors that await women at the hands of men. It's ridiculous. Like for instance the 'object' idea of women in video games. the truth is that historically men have had to demonstrate prowess in order to win women's approval--it's still true today. So this is a false explanation that insists that men hate women when it is not generally true but only specifically true.
"The three articles of Civil Service faith: it takes longer to do things quickly, it's far more expensive to do things cheaply, and it's more democratic to do things in secret." - Jim Hacker "Yes Minister"

User avatar
Frenline Delpha
Senator
 
Posts: 4346
Founded: Sep 19, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Frenline Delpha » Thu Jun 02, 2016 11:40 pm

Gauthier wrote:
Hirota wrote:Can you point out where anyone was misogynistic? I was mocking "Social Justice Warriors" not women in general. Most women are far too rational and sensible to be part of that ideological cancer.




Absolutely nothing wrong with gratuitously attributing obesity and unfemininity to something you don't like at all!

It was a meme. Not much room for nuance. Are you the kind of person who asks for someone to write twenty paragraphs in their cereal box?
I don't know how long I'll be back, but I just thought I'd stop in and say hi, at least.

User avatar
The Lone Alliance
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8855
Founded: May 25, 2005
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Lone Alliance » Fri Jun 03, 2016 12:35 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:You're forgetting that insulting A woman = Insulting Women, that's been the standard since Gamergate.

At least that's what Gauthier believes, yet it's not the same when Gauthier does it because Gauthier only does it to 'bad people'.
Last edited by The Lone Alliance on Fri Jun 03, 2016 12:45 am, edited 4 times in total.
"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger." -Herman Goering
--------------
War is cruelty, and you cannot refine it; -William Tecumseh Sherman
Free Kraven

User avatar
Odalfolk
Attaché
 
Posts: 81
Founded: Jun 03, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Odalfolk » Fri Jun 03, 2016 12:46 am

I agree with the concept of social justice, however it has been soiled by a rather sad minority. Because of this, I am going to have to give it to free speech.
ᚹ ᛖ ᚱ ᛟ ᛞ ᚨ ᛚ ᚠ ᛟ ᛚ ᚲ ᛗ ᚢ ᚾ ᚢ ᚱ ᛁ ᛋ ᚨ
VÖLKISCH ANARCHIST, INDO-EUROPEAN WORLDVIEW
RYM
Survivalist
Environmentalist
Misanthrope
Metalhead
23 years old
STRENGTH, PRIDE, TRADITION

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Achan, Aggicificicerous, Gorvonia, Grinning Dragon, Gun Manufacturers, Juansonia, Ostroeuropa, Stellar Colonies, Techocracy101010, The North Polish Union, The Orson Empire, The Two Jerseys, The United Penguin Commonwealth, Trotterdam

Advertisement

Remove ads