Ah if only hahahaha
Advertisement

by Bakery Hill » Tue Aug 16, 2016 11:01 am

by Renewed Imperial Germany » Tue Aug 16, 2016 11:01 am
United Marxist Nations wrote:Renewed Imperial Germany wrote:
People don't usually do things if its damaging.
Only if you have a puritanical obsession about when sex is ok and when its not.
There is literally nothing to demean.
Studies have shown that people who are more promiscuous have a higher divorce rate, and generally are less happy in marriages.

by United Marxist Nations » Tue Aug 16, 2016 11:03 am
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.

by Renewed Imperial Germany » Tue Aug 16, 2016 11:05 am

by United Marxist Nations » Tue Aug 16, 2016 11:07 am
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.

by Aelex » Tue Aug 16, 2016 11:10 am
Bakery Hill wrote:Cultural critique is not bullying. Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from criticism.
Of course. But we're not talking about individuals here, but rather characters that have been created. And an industry that looks through a male gaze (and an unenlightened one at that), with a habit for making a woman's primary value and function sexual above all else.

by Dagashi » Tue Aug 16, 2016 11:13 am

by Aelex » Tue Aug 16, 2016 11:16 am
Dagashi wrote:Here in the US, I remember when it was fundamentalist conservatives who wanted to censor everything under the pretense of "think of the children." It was stupid then, and no one batted an eye when I criticized them.
Now it's the politically correct left wing which tries to censor everything under the pretense of "equality." It's still stupid now, but the difference is there are people who actually expect you to make the double standard of supporting them.

by Ashkera » Tue Aug 16, 2016 11:32 am
Baltican Union wrote:What's the big deal with Warhammer ?

by Ashkera » Tue Aug 16, 2016 11:46 am
Renewed Imperial Germany wrote:United Marxist Nations wrote:Regardless, there are plenty of other times where people have to repress their sexuality, for good reason, whether it is within a friendship, a work-relationship, etc.
If I want to fuck, and the other guy/girl wants to fuck, why the hell shouldn't we?

by Alvecia » Tue Aug 16, 2016 11:50 am
Ashkera wrote:Renewed Imperial Germany wrote:
If I want to fuck, and the other guy/girl wants to fuck, why the hell shouldn't we?
1. There's some stuff to indicate it could be involved in pair bonding, which could be undermined by promiscuity wearing out the mechanism.
2. For the fertile, there is risk of baby. Baby is best raised in stable 2-parent home.
3. It's quite possible that lack of desire for promiscuous women among some men is natural, much like how some women naturally prefer tall men.
4. Disease risk.

by Ashkera » Tue Aug 16, 2016 11:50 am
Bakery Hill wrote:Aelex wrote:It's wrong for them than to try to bully their ideology into other people. Plus, as Gamergate proved, they're far from holding no power nor influence over the video-game industry.
Cultural critique is not bullying. Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from criticism.Women making risquées poses =/= de-humanising women. I can very much enjoy the look of a woman and yet still acknowledge her as an human being. If you're incapable of doing so, you're the one having a problem.
Of course. But we're not talking about individuals here, but rather characters that have been created. And an industry that looks through a male gaze (and an unenlightened one at that), with a habit for making a woman's primary value and function sexual above all else.

by Bakery Hill » Tue Aug 16, 2016 11:54 am
Aelex wrote:Bakery Hill wrote:Cultural critique is not bullying. Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from criticism.
Sending legions of feminists to spam to force a company to change the design and posing of a character because it was deemed as "too frivolous", however, is very much bullying.Of course. But we're not talking about individuals here, but rather characters that have been created. And an industry that looks through a male gaze (and an unenlightened one at that), with a habit for making a woman's primary value and function sexual above all else.
Once more, if you're unable to look past the appearance of a character and take interest in her personality, you're the one having a problem here.To take as an exemple one of my favorite game, Bravely Default, the character of Agnès is very cute and "moe". Does I like her just because of that?
No.
I like her because of her story, her struggle, the relationships she build with other characters through the game, the emotions that she feel and that I, as a player, share with her character. The fact that she is pretty only add to that but is and remain secondary because, once more, much like most of the male population, if i just wanted to look at boobs I would just go watch some porn and not play a fucking video game!

by Bakery Hill » Tue Aug 16, 2016 11:55 am
Ashkera wrote:Bakery Hill wrote:Cultural critique is not bullying. Freedom of speech does not mean freedom from criticism.
Of course. But we're not talking about individuals here, but rather characters that have been created. And an industry that looks through a male gaze (and an unenlightened one at that), with a habit for making a woman's primary value and function sexual above all else.
Bottom line: women are allowed to have fan service that caters to them, men aren't.

by Ashkera » Tue Aug 16, 2016 11:57 am
Alvecia wrote:Ashkera wrote:1. There's some stuff to indicate it could be involved in pair bonding, which could be undermined by promiscuity wearing out the mechanism.
2. For the fertile, there is risk of baby. Baby is best raised in stable 2-parent home.
3. It's quite possible that lack of desire for promiscuous women among some men is natural, much like how some women naturally prefer tall men.
4. Disease risk.
To be fair you could probably write up an equally long list for why you shouldn't drink alcohol.

by Ashkera » Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:01 pm
Bakery Hill wrote:Not at all. The concepts of masculinity you find in a lot of these games are just as stupid.

by Alvecia » Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:03 pm
Ashkera wrote:Alvecia wrote:To be fair you could probably write up an equally long list for why you shouldn't drink alcohol.
I drink maybe once a month. If you go binge drinking, indeed, you are being stupid and shouldn't do that.
If you're having sex only in the context of romantic relationships, it's not nearly so risky.

by Aelex » Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:05 pm
Bakery Hill wrote:I think you're being willfully ignorant here.

by Renewed Imperial Germany » Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:14 pm
Ashkera wrote:Renewed Imperial Germany wrote:
If I want to fuck, and the other guy/girl wants to fuck, why the hell shouldn't we?
1. There's some stuff to indicate it could be involved in pair bonding, which could be undermined by promiscuity wearing out the mechanism.
2. For the fertile, there is risk of baby. Baby is best raised in stable 2-parent home.
3. It's quite possible that lack of desire for promiscuous women among some men is natural, much like how some women naturally prefer tall men.
4. Disease risk.

by The V O I D » Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:19 pm

by United Marxist Nations » Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:23 pm
The V O I D wrote:I wish there was a way to inject experiences unto other people's minds. That way, we could inject the experiences - negative and positive - of the LGBT Community as a whole into social conservatives. Then, suddenly, social conservatism would go extinct.
If only...
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.

by The V O I D » Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:27 pm
United Marxist Nations wrote:The V O I D wrote:I wish there was a way to inject experiences unto other people's minds. That way, we could inject the experiences - negative and positive - of the LGBT Community as a whole into social conservatives. Then, suddenly, social conservatism would go extinct.
If only...
Utter rubbish. Fuck, I could be considered bisexual to some degree, and Dio is more conservative than I am and is definitely bisexual.

by Aelex » Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:28 pm
The V O I D wrote:I wish there was a way to inject experiences unto other people's minds. That way, we could inject the experiences - negative and positive - of the LGBT Community as a whole into social conservatives. Then, suddenly, social conservatism would go extinct.
If only...

by United Marxist Nations » Tue Aug 16, 2016 12:30 pm
The V O I D wrote:United Marxist Nations wrote:Utter rubbish. Fuck, I could be considered bisexual to some degree, and Dio is more conservative than I am and is definitely bisexual.
You and Dio do not represent the entire LGBT Community or their experiences. And I'm pretty sure you're both committing self-harm, psychologically speaking, in an unintentional manner. Not everyone is willing to do that to themselves just to conform to what you believe is normal.
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dimetrodon Empire, Hispida, James_xenoland, La Xinga, Tarsonis, The Jamesian Republic, Torisakia, Yasuragi
Advertisement