Right-Wing Discussion Thread Part Two

[The Grey Wolf]

I'm 14 and a half

I thought you were doing the "and a half" thing as a joke.

If you aren't, I feel obligated to let you know that it is doing the opposite of helping your case.

Listen to Pruss, he knows what he's talking about, no sarcasm.

[The Empire of Pretantia]

I'm 14 and a half

I thought you were doing the "and a half" thing as a joke.

If you aren't, I feel obligated to let you know that it is doing the opposite of helping your case.

To be fair, you have so few years at fourteen that you can still kinda pick things out at the semiannual level instead of going,"That was... Three centuries ago?"

He also has yet to discover dividing polynomials. Probably hasn't even done the foil method, the poor thing.

[United Marxist Nations]

I thought you were doing the "and a half" thing as a joke.

If you aren't, I feel obligated to let you know that it is doing the opposite of helping your case.

To be fair, you have so few years at fourteen that you can still kinda pick things out at the semiannual level instead of going,"That was... Three centuries ago?"

He also has yet to discover dividing polynomials. Probably hasn't even done the foil method, the poor thing.

>tfw still don't understand the foil method
>tfw still can't solve polynomials

[The Empire of Pretantia]

To be fair, you have so few years at fourteen that you can still kinda pick things out at the semiannual level instead of going,"That was... Three centuries ago?"

He also has yet to discover dividing polynomials. Probably hasn't even done the foil method, the poor thing.

>tfw still don't understand the foil method
>tfw still can't solve polynomials

It's okay, just the exposure will turn boys into men.

[Kelinfort]

are you like 12

I'm 14 and a half

I'd get out more, if I were you.

[The New Sea Territory]

"Libertarian or related (includes anarchism)"

I'm 14 and a half

I'd get out more, if I were you.

Agreed.

[Northern Davincia]

"Libertarian or related (includes anarchism)"

I hope you're not claiming ownership of anarchism.

[The Liberated Territories]

"Libertarian or related (includes anarchism)"

I hope you're not claiming ownership of anarchism.

But muh intellectual property rights

muh etymological fallacy

muh circular arguments

[The New Sea Territory]

"Libertarian or related (includes anarchism)"

I hope you're not claiming ownership of anarchism.

The problem doesn't arise from ownership of the word, but Rothbard's' inability to read about words he liked using.

In the same way that anyone who defends class society can't claim to be a communist, anyone who defends capitalism cannot be an anarchist. It's either cognitive dissonance or ahistorical use of the term.

[Northern Davincia]

I hope you're not claiming ownership of anarchism.

The problem doesn't arise from ownership of the word, but Rothbard's' inability to read about words he liked using.

In the same way that anyone who defends class society can claim to be a communist, anyone who defends capitalism cannot be an anarchist. It's either cognitive dissonance or ahistorical use of the term.

Well, the only requirement for anarchism is abolition of state.
And then we must decide upon which definition of 'state' is correct.

[The Liberated Territories]

The problem doesn't arise from ownership of the word, but Rothbard's' inability to read about words he liked using.

In the same way that anyone who defends class society can claim to be a communist, anyone who defends capitalism cannot be an anarchist. It's either cognitive dissonance or ahistorical use of the term.

Well, the only requirement for anarchism is abolition of state.
And then we must decide upon which definition of 'state' is correct.

Nuh uh you fascist, anarchy means no rulers, therefore due to my extremely picky definition of anarchism I declare that all measurement must be abolished or else you ain't a true anarchist.

^Ancom logic

[The Grey Wolf]

I hope you're not claiming ownership of anarchism.

The problem doesn't arise from ownership of the word, but Rothbard's' inability to read about words he liked using.

In the same way that anyone who defends class society can claim to be a communist, anyone who defends capitalism cannot be an anarchist. It's either cognitive dissonance or ahistorical use of the term.

Frankly there's nothing more comical than Rothbard's Manichean individual vs collectivist worldview.

[Northern Davincia]

Well, the only requirement for anarchism is abolition of state.
And then we must decide upon which definition of 'state' is correct.

Nuh uh you fascist, anarchy means no rulers, therefore due to my extremely picky definition of anarchism I declare that all measurement must be abolished or else you ain't a true anarchist.

^Ancom logic

#PropertyIsTheft2016

[The Liberated Territories]

Nuh uh you fascist, anarchy means no rulers, therefore due to my extremely picky definition of anarchism I declare that all measurement must be abolished or else you ain't a true anarchist.

^Ancom logic

#PropertyIsTheft2016

Property is defined by society. Society is theft!

[The New Sea Territory]

Well, the only requirement for anarchism is abolition of state.
And then we must decide upon which definition of 'state' is correct.

This has never been the defining characteristic of anarchism. The state is one social structure that ought to be abolished, in an anarchist analysis. Limiting that analysis solely to the state is not logically consistent.

The debate of the definition of "state" is more of a Marxist-anarchist debate thing.

[Geilinor]

Well, the only requirement for anarchism is abolition of state.
And then we must decide upon which definition of 'state' is correct.

This has never been the defining characteristic of anarchism. The state is one social structure that ought to be abolished, in an anarchist analysis. Limiting that analysis solely to the state is not logically consistent.

The debate of the definition of "state" is more of a Marxist-anarchist debate thing.

Anarchism is the abolition of the state.

That is it.

[The New Sea Territory]

This has never been the defining characteristic of anarchism. The state is one social structure that ought to be abolished, in an anarchist analysis. Limiting that analysis solely to the state is not logically consistent.

The debate of the definition of "state" is more of a Marxist-anarchist debate thing.

Anarchism is the abolition of the state.

That is it.

According to what? Your opinion?

It's like saying "NationStates is forum roleplay. That's it". Yes, P2TM is one aspect of nationstates. It is not the only defining characteristic of the game.

[Spiloebistan]

I thought you were doing the "and a half" thing as a joke.

If you aren't, I feel obligated to let you know that it is doing the opposite of helping your case.

To be fair, you have so few years at fourteen that you can still kinda pick things out at the semiannual level instead of going,"That was... Three centuries ago?"

He also has yet to discover dividing polynomials. Probably hasn't even done the foil method, the poor thing.

Well there's the possibility he's skipped a grade on mathematics.

I learnt about all that stuff at age 14.

[Northern Davincia]

Anarchism is the abolition of the state.

That is it.

According to what? Your opinion?

It's like saying "NationStates is forum roleplay. That's it". Yes, P2TM is one aspect of nationstates. It is not the only defining characteristic of the game.

So only your definition is correct in this instance?

[The Empire of Pretantia]

Anarchism is the abolition of the state.

That is it.

According to what? Your opinion?

It's like saying "NationStates is forum roleplay. That's it". Yes, P2TM is one aspect of nationstates. It is not the only defining characteristic of the game.

So, Anarchism also entails... What, exactly, if not just abolition of the state?

[The Grey Wolf]

According to what? Your opinion?

It's like saying "NationStates is forum roleplay. That's it". Yes, P2TM is one aspect of nationstates. It is not the only defining characteristic of the game.

So only your definition is correct in this instance?

Even Rothbard admitted they weren't anarchists.

[Grenartia]

Have you ever read Starship Troopers?

Read? You think I read! /sarcasm

I've seen the movies.

My heart bleeds for you.

[The Liberated Territories]

According to what? Your opinion?

It's like saying "NationStates is forum roleplay. That's it". Yes, P2TM is one aspect of nationstates. It is not the only defining characteristic of the game.

So only your definition is correct in this instance?

Never changes.

Tribe AnCom is always correct, since Tribe AnCom forces itself to be the standard of what is and isn't anarchist. It's the perfect no-true scotsman fallacy prepped up by the etymological fallacy.

[Grenartia]

State = government. You cannot have a government without a state.

Incorrect.

What an astounding refutation of my assertion! Brilliantly sourced, and with unbeatable logic!

[Dremovia]

Can't fly without 2 wings, but what the original post says I agree with. CLOSE THE BORDERS! Arrrg enough with globalist nonsense from elitist aholes hell bent to destroy all that was fought and suffered in 2 major wars.... As to the exact reasoning I'll avoid for now