Necessitating Violence

[The balkens]

Just because I vigorously do things in front of a gilded statue of Milo Yiannopoulos, laugh alongside Steven Crowder and agree with Gavin Mcinnes on Trannys, will Vote Libertarian, and am a White Male in what used to be the Original 13 Colonies (Also a Presbyterian btw) doesn't make my remark of any less worth.

Fair enough. (I was Southern Baptist lol)

And having seen your horribly edgy, contrarion "lol, look at me guys, I fap to Hunter S. Thompson, and am an anarchistic pseudo-socialist new-age beatnick, hurkydurr" posts.....well, are you still that 13 year old that saw "Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas" and thought "This is who want to be!"? If so, God help us all, and I pity the people who have to deal with you day-to-day.

I take offense at only a few things here.

1. "pseudo-socialist" bruh. no. legit socialist.
2. "new-age" no. just, no. fucking christ. not at all.
3. "saw Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas" Absolutely fucking not. I read the book first. And that was much after I'd started doing drugs anyway. Think I was about 17 at the time.

"Humble thyself & hold thy tongue" sounds appropriate, as does "Pride goeth before the fall"

My favorite is "he who does not work, neither shall he eat." And the one where Jesus whips a bunch of capitalists lol good times

You were acting hostile and all of a sudden this crap?

what the hell?

[Prussia-Steinbach]

You were acting hostile and all of a sudden this crap?

what the hell?

I get along really well with pretty much anyone who has a good sense of humor.

[The balkens]

You were acting hostile and all of a sudden this crap?

what the hell?

I get along really well with pretty much anyone who has a good sense of humor.

considering his posts, most of that was not humorous.

at all.

[Greater United American Republics]

You were acting hostile and all of a sudden this crap?

what the hell?

I get along really well with pretty much anyone who has a good sense of humor.

Just came back with some Benchmark and I hate to tell you this, but it sucks-to-be-you. I don't have one, a sense of humor that is; lost it in the Rockies doing some 'work'.

[Prussia-Steinbach]

I get along really well with pretty much anyone who has a good sense of humor.

considering his posts, most of that was not humorous.

at all.

...do you really think he does "things in front of a gilded statue of Milo Yiannopoulos"...? Really, Balk? This is what I mean by a sense of humor.

In terms of being true, nothing I said was "humorous" either. I just said it in a tone I don't use with everyone.

[Prussia-Steinbach]

I get along really well with pretty much anyone who has a good sense of humor.

Just came back with some Benchmark and I hate to tell you this, but it sucks-to-be-you. I don't have one, a sense of humor that is; lost it in the Rockies doing some 'work'.

I thought Calvin took mine along with the feelings, but it turns out drug psychosis does a lot of... stuff, for one's mental state.

[The balkens]

Just came back with some Benchmark and I hate to tell you this, but it sucks-to-be-you. I don't have one, a sense of humor that is; lost it in the Rockies doing some 'work'.

I thought Calvin took mine along with the feelings, but it turns out drug psychosis does a lot of... stuff, for one's mental state.

No shit.

[United Marxist Nations]

Just came back with some Benchmark and I hate to tell you this, but it sucks-to-be-you. I don't have one, a sense of humor that is; lost it in the Rockies doing some 'work'.

I thought Calvin took mine along with the feelings, but it turns out drug psychosis does a lot of... stuff, for one's mental state.

Is that how you call yourself an anarchist while being more of a tankie than me?

[Greater United American Republics]

Just came back with some Benchmark and I hate to tell you this, but it sucks-to-be-you. I don't have one, a sense of humor that is; lost it in the Rockies doing some 'work'.

I thought Calvin took mine along with the feelings, but it turns out drug psychosis does a lot of... stuff, for one's mental state.

We have nothing in common, don't make such an implied assumption. I know that wordplay, it's both playing the crowd to avoid a reaction to your blatant sociopathy and a need for supporters to confirm schizoid social philosophies of group behavior. I worked security for 15 years bucko, and not some shitty club-guard bullshit.

[Prussia-Steinbach]

I thought Calvin took mine along with the feelings, but it turns out drug psychosis does a lot of... stuff, for one's mental state.

Is that how you call yourself an anarchist while being more of a tankie than me?

Tankies are supporters of states, dictatorial leaders, police forces, and so on.

I wouldn't have sent in the tanks.

[United Marxist Nations]

Is that how you call yourself an anarchist while being more of a tankie than me?

Tankies are supporters of states, dictatorial leaders, police forces, and so on.

I wouldn't have sent in the tanks.

>wants forced labor camps
>not a state

[Prussia-Steinbach]

I thought Calvin took mine along with the feelings, but it turns out drug psychosis does a lot of... stuff, for one's mental state.

We have nothing in common, don't make such an implied assumption. I know that wordplay, it's both playing the crowd to avoid a reaction to your blatant sociopathy and a need for supporters to confirm schizoid social philosophies of group behavior. I worked security for 15 years bucko, and not some shitty club-guard bullshit.

I never assumed you liked me, bud; don't presume shits are given when they're not. Might want to hold back on the blatant insults, though, or your time here will be short. Fair warning, from the all-too-sane object of such cute, fearful flattery.

[Greater United American Republics]

Tankies are supporters of states, dictatorial leaders, police forces, and so on.

I wouldn't have sent in the tanks.

>wants forced labor camps
>not a state

That would be about as bad as Uncle Sam telling people through a bullshit PR spin job that "It's okay, we're sending disloyal dissenters to Count Rocks in Nevada." Absolutely Totalitarian.

[Prussia-Steinbach]

>wants forced labor camps
>not a state

Communities could easily keep the former bourgies enclosed so long as they're still around. Not like it would be an actual prison system of any sort, or even widespread. They'd disappear soon enough, anyway.

[United Marxist Nations]

>wants forced labor camps
>not a state

Communities could easily keep the former bourgies enclosed so long as they're still around. Not like it would be an actual prison system of any sort, or even widespread. They'd disappear soon enough, anyway.

By the Marxian definition, that would also still be a state. Under no definition is that not a state.

[Greater United American Republics]

We have nothing in common, don't make such an implied assumption. I know that wordplay, it's both playing the crowd to avoid a reaction to your blatant sociopathy and a need for supporters to confirm schizoid social philosophies of group behavior. I worked security for 15 years bucko, and not some shitty club-guard bullshit.

I never assumed you liked me, bud; don't presume shits are given when they're not. Might want to hold back on the blatant insults, though, or your time here will be short. Fair warning, from the all-too-sane object of such cute, fearful flattery.

No petty insults here, just descriptors. Fair Warning, you need to try harder than that with attempted subtlety. Alot harder.

[United Marxist Nations]

We have nothing in common, don't make such an implied assumption. I know that wordplay, it's both playing the crowd to avoid a reaction to your blatant sociopathy and a need for supporters to confirm schizoid social philosophies of group behavior. I worked security for 15 years bucko, and not some shitty club-guard bullshit.

I never assumed you liked me, bud; don't presume shits are given when they're not. Might want to hold back on the blatant insults, though, or your time here will be short. Fair warning, from the all-too-sane object of such cute, fearful flattery.

Not really insults when you said yourself that you have harmed your mental state through excessive drug use. Also, I don't think many people here are exactly afraid of you, and such accusations that we are are why a lot of posters don't take you seriously.

[Prussia-Steinbach]

I never assumed you liked me, bud; don't presume shits are given when they're not. Might want to hold back on the blatant insults, though, or your time here will be short. Fair warning, from the all-too-sane object of such cute, fearful flattery.

No petty insults here, just descriptors. Fair Warning, you need to try harder than that with attempted subtlety. Alot harder.

Lol, and what "attempted subtlety" are you perceiving, hmm? You might want to read the main paragraph before you start inventing shit between the lines. And fine, fine. Do what you want, no need for the big mean italics. Just thought I'd let you know the mods might not look kindly on comments like the above.

[Prussia-Steinbach]

Not really insults when you said yourself that you have harmed your mental state through excessive drug use.

Damn, I finally have to say this.

That was a joke, UMN. I've never had any type of drug psychosis.

Also, I don't think many people here are exactly afraid of you, and such accusations that we are are why a lot of posters don't take you seriously.

Dear oh dear, another joke. I'm not serious a good portion of the time I'm here, but when sniped at I'll snipe back. Calm yourself.

[Prussia-Steinbach]

Communities could easily keep the former bourgies enclosed so long as they're still around. Not like it would be an actual prison system of any sort, or even widespread. They'd disappear soon enough, anyway.

By the Marxian definition, that would also still be a state. Under no definition is that not a state.

Yes, under Marx's. The objective would be the abolition of classes within our lifetimes, ASAP, prompt and soon and damn close to immediate. Like, during the revolution. I will say the anarchist revolution is definitely idealized sometimes, but I'm still not on board with the transition state bullshit.

[United Marxist Nations]

By the Marxian definition, that would also still be a state. Under no definition is that not a state.

Yes, under Marx's. The objective would be the abolition of classes within our lifetimes, ASAP, prompt and soon and damn close to immediate. Like, during the revolution. I will say the anarchist revolution is definitely idealized sometimes, but I'm still not on board with the transition state bullshit.

Then how can you say that what you are advocating is in-line with your supposed ideology? And if you just explain it away with something like "continual revolution", then you realize that that is basically just Maoism, right?

[Prussia-Steinbach]

Yes, under Marx's. The objective would be the abolition of classes within our lifetimes, ASAP, prompt and soon and damn close to immediate. Like, during the revolution. I will say the anarchist revolution is definitely idealized sometimes, but I'm still not on board with the transition state bullshit.

Then how can you say that what you are advocating is in-line with your supposed ideology? And if you just explain it away with something like "continual revolution", then you realize that that is basically just Maoism, right?

Because within an anarchist revolution I can assume Weber's definition will be in use. Considering the bourgeoisie is an active enemy of the revolution - oppressors and a threat - they're not really covered under the achievement of freedom for the working class. The monopoly on force wouldn't exist because it would be the community at large volunteering to enclose dangerous elements so they could not attempt counter-revolution and re-institute the state.

Also, Maoism is pretty cool. MLM, though, not MZT and Third Wordlism and shit. Anarchists and Maoists actually get along really well, like, all the time.

[Greater United American Republics]

No petty insults here, just descriptors. Fair Warning, you need to try harder than that with attempted subtlety. Alot harder.

Lol, and what "attempted subtlety" are you perceiving, hmm? You might want to read the main paragraph before you start inventing shit between the lines. And fine, fine. Do what you want, no need for the big mean italics. Just thought I'd let you know the mods might not look kindly on comments like the above.

A fine example of "Attempted subtlety" in your case is almost immediate bout-face turn from the rather egregious capacities for aggressive behavior you displayed at the beginning of this discourse. Transitioning from a snarling, spiteful reaction to any/all differing opinions to a whimsically "friendly" attempt at appealing to observers through thinly veiled false platitudes is certainly an example of this. Besides, warning about Moderator intervention when someone gets too close to calling you on your Bull is exactly what happens before the person getting their shit called runs to a symbol of authority to maintain a facsimile of "Keeping their druthers".

[United Marxist Nations]

Then how can you say that what you are advocating is in-line with your supposed ideology? And if you just explain it away with something like "continual revolution", then you realize that that is basically just Maoism, right?

Because within an anarchist revolution I can assume Weber's definition will be in use. Considering the bourgeoisie is an active enemy of the revolution - oppressors and a threat - they're not really covered under the achievement of freedom for the working class. The monopoly on force wouldn't exist because it would be the community at large volunteering to enclose dangerous elements so they could not attempt counter-revolution and re-institute the state.

Also, Maoism is pretty cool. MLM, though, not MZT and Third Wordlism and shit. Anarchists and Maoists actually get along really well, like, all the time.

But under Weber's definition is still a state. The community at large would still have to have a monopoly on force to prevent the bourg from arming themselves and forming their own state to fight back. Which goes back to my original criticism of Anarchism, that every Anarchist movement in history has 1) created a state, and 2) claimed it was not a state.

No, no, Maoists hate everyone who isn't a Maoist, don't fool yourself. In India, they literally throw ML's off of buildings.

[Greater United American Republics]

Yeah, Anarchy is retarded in the same sense as deciding a sausage grinder is an excellent alternative to a glove.