Advertisement

by Noraika » Sat May 14, 2016 11:48 am
LOVEWHOYOUARE~TRANS⚧EQUALITY~~ Economic Left -9.38 | Social Libertarian -2.77 ~
~ 93 Equality - 36 Liberty - 50 Stability ~Democratic Socialism ● Egalitarianism ● Feminism ● LGBT+ rights ● Monarchism ● Social Justice ● Souverainism ● StatismPronouns: She/Her ♀️⛦ Pagan and proud! ⛦⚧Gender and sex aren't the same thing!⚧

by Gauthier » Sat May 14, 2016 11:49 am
Ifreann wrote:Aelex wrote:Wait, do Obama seriously want to fuck over the education of people who're in the most dire need of one just for the sack of pandering progressives?
And there are 19 guys and gals (at least) who're backing him up?
Wow. I didn't thought one could loose his faith in humanity on the internet in any other site than tumblr or 4chan but I guess that I was rather naïf to think so...
Shouldn't you be asking if state governments seriously want to fuck over the education of who are in the most dire need of it just for the sake of pandering to conservatives?

by Aelex » Sat May 14, 2016 11:58 am
Ifreann wrote:Shouldn't you be asking if state governments seriously want to fuck over the education of who are in the most dire need of it just for the sake of pandering to conservatives?
Val Halla wrote:Cuz there's totes no risk involved with a transwoman going into the male bathroom is there?
Ashmoria wrote:the system that already existed allowed transgendered people to pick the bathroom the felt most comfortable in. the ones fucking up the system are anti-trans bigots ginning up fear in order to get political power.

by The Black Forrest » Sat May 14, 2016 11:59 am
Aelex wrote:Wait, do Obama seriously want to fuck over the education of people who're in the most dire need of one just for the sack of pandering progressives?
And there are 19 guys and gals (at least) who're backing him up?
Wow. I didn't thought one could loose his faith in humanity on the internet in any other site than tumblr or 4chan but I guess that I was rather naïf to think so...

by USS Monitor » Sat May 14, 2016 12:02 pm
Washington Resistance Army wrote:Pope Joan wrote:Obama, a scholar of Constitutional law, realized that he can do nothing which requires the approval of Congress. They won't even give an up or down vote for a SCOTUS candidate they already approved for the appellate system.
So he does what he can do within the limits of the Executive power alone.
If you want something better, change Congress.
I agree, we should kick the Dems out entirely and replace them with libertarians

by Ashmoria » Sat May 14, 2016 12:03 pm
Aelex wrote:Ashmoria wrote:the system that already existed allowed transgendered people to pick the bathroom the felt most comfortable in. the ones fucking up the system are anti-trans bigots ginning up fear in order to get political power.
And said system worked (almost) perfectly. But that was until liberals wanted to destroy normal bathroom to replace them by shared ones despite no one but a minority asking for it, unleashing a shit-storm in the process.

by Gauthier » Sat May 14, 2016 12:03 pm
Aelex wrote:Ifreann wrote:Shouldn't you be asking if state governments seriously want to fuck over the education of who are in the most dire need of it just for the sake of pandering to conservatives?
Ho, I'm not viewing them as any better than their liberals counter-parts but they, for once, didn't initiated the shit-storm.Val Halla wrote:Cuz there's totes no risk involved with a transwoman going into the male bathroom is there?
Excuse my lack of knowledge but by transwoman you mean someone who used to be a woman or one who is one now?
In the first case, given that she/he/whatever pronoun look like a man there should be no problem with her/him/whatever pronoun going in the man's bathroom.
In the second, why should she/he/whatever pronoun would want to go in the man's bathroom anymore now that she/he/whatever look like a woman?
I mean, I'm no denying the fact that there might be problems. Just saying that destroying walls in every and each bathroom of the U.S despite the majority prefering it the way it is right now is neither a logical nor smart response to said problems.Ashmoria wrote:the system that already existed allowed transgendered people to pick the bathroom the felt most comfortable in. the ones fucking up the system are anti-trans bigots ginning up fear in order to get political power.
And said system worked (almost) perfectly. But that was until liberals wanted to destroy normal bathroom to replace them by shared ones despite no one but a minority asking for it, unleashing a shit-storm in the process.

by USS Monitor » Sat May 14, 2016 12:05 pm
Aelex wrote:Wait, do Obama seriously want to fuck over the education of people who're in the most dire need of one just for the sack of pandering progressives?
And there are 19 guys and gals (at least) who're backing him up?
Wow. I didn't thought one could loose his faith in humanity on the internet in any other site than tumblr or 4chan but I guess that I was rather naïf to think so...

by The Black Forrest » Sat May 14, 2016 12:05 pm
Aelex wrote:And said system worked (almost) perfectly. But that was until liberals wanted to destroy normal bathroom to replace them by shared ones despite no one but a minority asking for it, unleashing a shit-storm in the process.

by Ethel mermania » Sat May 14, 2016 12:05 pm
Gauthier wrote:Aelex wrote:Wait, do Obama seriously want to fuck over the education of people who're in the most dire need of one just for the sack of pandering progressives?
And there are 19 guys and gals (at least) who're backing him up?
Wow. I didn't thought one could loose his faith in humanity on the internet in any other site than tumblr or 4chan but I guess that I was rather naïf to think so...
So Obama should reward a state for passively encouraging a pogrom on transgender people?

by Ifreann » Sat May 14, 2016 12:07 pm
Aelex wrote:Ifreann wrote:Shouldn't you be asking if state governments seriously want to fuck over the education of who are in the most dire need of it just for the sake of pandering to conservatives?
Ho, I'm not viewing them as any better than their liberals counter-parts but they, for once, didn't initiated the shit-storm.

by Aelex » Sat May 14, 2016 12:07 pm
Gauthier wrote:Um no, the shitstorm started when the North Carolina Legislature was butthurt that the city of Charlotte had the audacity to let Those Damn Shemales pick which restroom they wanted to use so they came up with HB 2 to nip that in the bud in case any other NC city wanted to do the same.

by Ashmoria » Sat May 14, 2016 12:09 pm

by USS Monitor » Sat May 14, 2016 12:12 pm
Aelex wrote:Gauthier wrote:Um no, the shitstorm started when the North Carolina Legislature was butthurt that the city of Charlotte had the audacity to let Those Damn Shemales pick which restroom they wanted to use so they came up with HB 2 to nip that in the bud in case any other NC city wanted to do the same.
Hm. Seems like I was mis-informed on this one. I thought the whole thing started after Obama tried to impose shared bathroom in schools. Isn't it precisely what the article the O.P linked is about? I have to admit I merely glossed over it but it's what I understood of it, at least.

by Ifreann » Sat May 14, 2016 12:16 pm
Aelex wrote:Gauthier wrote:Um no, the shitstorm started when the North Carolina Legislature was butthurt that the city of Charlotte had the audacity to let Those Damn Shemales pick which restroom they wanted to use so they came up with HB 2 to nip that in the bud in case any other NC city wanted to do the same.
Hm. Seems like I was mis-informed on this one. I thought the whole thing started after Obama tried to impose shared bathroom in schools. Isn't it precisely what the article the O.P linked is about? I have to admit I merely glossed over it but it's what I understood of it, at least.

by Aelex » Sat May 14, 2016 12:20 pm
Ifreann wrote:When efforts are made to end discrimination, it isn't the people making those efforts starting any resulting shitshow, it's the people discriminating in the first place.

by Galloism » Sat May 14, 2016 12:21 pm
Aelex wrote:Ifreann wrote:When efforts are made to end discrimination, it isn't the people making those efforts starting any resulting shitshow, it's the people discriminating in the first place.
If you're talking about forbidding trans from entering bathroom of the sex they're looking like, I can do nothing but to agree as it's just a dick move creating more problem for no reasons.
If you're talking about making all bathroom sex neutral, then sorry but this thing you're talking about isn't "discrimination" but mere common sense.

by Renewed Imperial Germany » Sat May 14, 2016 12:24 pm

by Aelex » Sat May 14, 2016 12:24 pm
Galloism wrote:Common sense that's only a little over a hundred and fifty years old, you mean?
Bathrooms were desegregated throughout the vast majority of mankind's history.

by Farnhamia » Sat May 14, 2016 12:24 pm
Galloism wrote:Aelex wrote:If you're talking about forbidding trans from entering bathroom of the sex they're looking like, I can do nothing but to agree as it's just a dick move creating more problem for no reasons.
If you're talking about making all bathroom sex neutral, then sorry but this thing you're talking about isn't "discrimination" but mere common sense.
Common sense that's only a little over a hundred and fifty years old, you mean?
Bathrooms were desegregated throughout the vast majority of mankind's history.

by Galloism » Sat May 14, 2016 12:25 pm
Aelex wrote:Galloism wrote:Common sense that's only a little over a hundred and fifty years old, you mean?
Bathrooms were desegregated throughout the vast majority of mankind's history.
Not sure ancient Rome nor Middle Age Europe are time period you should quote as being exemple of "gender equality", man.
Farnhamia wrote:Galloism wrote:Common sense that's only a little over a hundred and fifty years old, you mean?
Bathrooms were desegregated throughout the vast majority of mankind's history.
Indeed and in fact, indoor plumbing is a fairly modern innovation. If shared facilities were good enough for our ancestors, they're good enough for us!

by Aelex » Sat May 14, 2016 12:31 pm
Farnhamia wrote:Indeed and in fact, indoor plumbing is a fairly modern innovation. If shared facilities were good enough for our ancestors, they're good enough for us!



by Aelex » Sat May 14, 2016 12:36 pm
Galloism wrote:Not at all, but the mere point is that there's no proof that segregated facilities are in any way beneficial or necessary.

by Sanctissima » Sat May 14, 2016 12:37 pm
Aelex wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Indeed and in fact, indoor plumbing is a fairly modern innovation. If shared facilities were good enough for our ancestors, they're good enough for us!
Well, I guess that following this logic, so is slavery, marital-rape, inbreeding or this very funny custom of beheading the last young man to arrive on the common place the day of his military service.
Leaving the argument itself aside, I however have say that I'm rather surprised as I would never had expected hearing one of the most staunch and jusqu'au-boutiste progressive on this site argue out of tradition.
Guess this thread was worth existing just for this fact alone.

by Ifreann » Sat May 14, 2016 12:43 pm
Aelex wrote:Ifreann wrote:When efforts are made to end discrimination, it isn't the people making those efforts starting any resulting shitshow, it's the people discriminating in the first place.
If you're talking about forbidding trans from entering bathroom of the sex they're looking like, I can do nothing but to agree as it's just a dick move creating more problem for no reasons.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Abaro, Ecalpa, El Lazaro, Ethel mermania, Ifreann, La Xinga, Neu California, New Gonch, Port Caverton, Solaryia, Tarsonis, The Black Forrest, The Lund, Uiiop, Valrifall, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement