NATION

PASSWORD

Stopping Edu. Funds for Disabled Students over Bathroom Laws

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Which is more important:

A. Getting education dollars to disadvantaged and disabled children.
121
71%
B. Getting rid of sexually segregated bathrooms in public schools.
36
21%
C. Not sure.
14
8%
 
Total votes : 171

User avatar
Noraika
Minister
 
Posts: 2589
Founded: Nov 29, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Noraika » Sat May 14, 2016 11:48 am

The funding came with conditions that the government and educational facilities of North Carolina would comply with the federal and regulations, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964. This was made plainly clear when North Carolina signed the agreement for the federal funds therein. By law, the funding is now required to be rescinded because North Carolina has ceased to comply, and acted directly in contradiction to, federal law and regulations. There is little choice in the matter. The terms of the contract were violated by North Carolina, and the cessation of their compliance ends the terms of agreement for the funding.
LOVEWHOYOUARE~
TRANSEQUALITY~
~ Economic Left -9.38 | Social Libertarian -2.77 ~
~ 93 Equality - 36 Liberty - 50 Stability ~

Democratic Socialism ● Egalitarianism ● Feminism ● LGBT+ rights ● Monarchism ● Social Justice ● Souverainism ● Statism


Pronouns: She/Her ♀️
Pagan and proud! ⛦
Gender and sex aren't the same thing!

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Sat May 14, 2016 11:49 am

Ifreann wrote:
Aelex wrote:Wait, do Obama seriously want to fuck over the education of people who're in the most dire need of one just for the sack of pandering progressives?
And there are 19 guys and gals (at least) who're backing him up?
Wow. I didn't thought one could loose his faith in humanity on the internet in any other site than tumblr or 4chan but I guess that I was rather naïf to think so...

Shouldn't you be asking if state governments seriously want to fuck over the education of who are in the most dire need of it just for the sake of pandering to conservatives?


They won't mind because low education turns out more future red voters.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
Aelex
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11398
Founded: Jun 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aelex » Sat May 14, 2016 11:58 am

Ifreann wrote:Shouldn't you be asking if state governments seriously want to fuck over the education of who are in the most dire need of it just for the sake of pandering to conservatives?

Ho, I'm not viewing them as any better than their liberals counter-parts but they, for once, didn't initiated the shit-storm.

Val Halla wrote:Cuz there's totes no risk involved with a transwoman going into the male bathroom is there?

Excuse my lack of knowledge but by transwoman you mean someone who used to be a woman or one who is one now?
In the first case, given that she/he/whatever pronoun look like a man there should be no problem with her/him/whatever pronoun going in the man's bathroom.
In the second, why should she/he/whatever pronoun would want to go in the man's bathroom anymore now that she/he/whatever look like a woman?
I mean, I'm no denying the fact that there might be problems. Just saying that destroying walls in every and each bathroom of the U.S despite the majority prefering it the way it is right now is neither a logical nor smart response to said problems.

Ashmoria wrote:the system that already existed allowed transgendered people to pick the bathroom the felt most comfortable in. the ones fucking up the system are anti-trans bigots ginning up fear in order to get political power.

And said system worked (almost) perfectly. But that was until liberals wanted to destroy normal bathroom to replace them by shared ones despite no one but a minority asking for it, unleashing a shit-storm in the process.
Last edited by Aelex on Sat May 14, 2016 11:59 am, edited 1 time in total.
Citoyen Français. Bonapartiste Républicain (aka De Gaule's Gaullisme) with Keynesian leanings on economics. Latin Christian.

User avatar
The Black Forrest
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55622
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Black Forrest » Sat May 14, 2016 11:59 am

Aelex wrote:Wait, do Obama seriously want to fuck over the education of people who're in the most dire need of one just for the sack of pandering progressives?
And there are 19 guys and gals (at least) who're backing him up?
Wow. I didn't thought one could loose his faith in humanity on the internet in any other site than tumblr or 4chan but I guess that I was rather naïf to think so...


It's simple really. If they didn't pass a needless law meant to punish people whom people with weak faith don't like; the children wouldn't be "suffering"
*I am a master proofreader after I click Submit.
* There is actually a War on Christmas. But Christmas started it, with it's unparalleled aggression against the Thanksgiving Holiday, and now Christmas has seized much Lebensraum in November, and are pushing into October. The rest of us seek to repel these invaders, and push them back to the status quo ante bellum Black Friday border. -Trotskylvania
* Silence Is Golden But Duct Tape Is Silver.
* I felt like Ayn Rand cornered me at a party, and three minutes in I found my first objection to what she was saying, but she kept talking without interruption for ten more days. - Max Barry talking about Atlas Shrugged

User avatar
USS Monitor
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 30409
Founded: Jul 01, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby USS Monitor » Sat May 14, 2016 12:02 pm

Washington Resistance Army wrote:
Pope Joan wrote:Obama, a scholar of Constitutional law, realized that he can do nothing which requires the approval of Congress. They won't even give an up or down vote for a SCOTUS candidate they already approved for the appellate system.

So he does what he can do within the limits of the Executive power alone.

If you want something better, change Congress.


I agree, we should kick the Dems out entirely and replace them with libertarians :p


And kick out the Republicans and replace them with Greens.
Don't take life so serious... it isn't permanent... RIP Dyakovo and Ashmoria
19th century steamships may be harmful or fatal if swallowed. In case of accidental ingestion, please seek immediate medical assistance.
༄༅། །འགྲོ་བ་མི་རིགས་ག་ར་དབང་ཆ་འདྲ་མཉམ་འབད་སྒྱེཝ་ལས་ག་ར་གིས་གཅིག་གིས་གཅིག་ལུ་སྤུན་ཆའི་དམ་ཚིག་བསྟན་དགོས།

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Sat May 14, 2016 12:03 pm

Aelex wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:the system that already existed allowed transgendered people to pick the bathroom the felt most comfortable in. the ones fucking up the system are anti-trans bigots ginning up fear in order to get political power.

And said system worked (almost) perfectly. But that was until liberals wanted to destroy normal bathroom to replace them by shared ones despite no one but a minority asking for it, unleashing a shit-storm in the process.

no. people just used the bathroom that they felt most comfortable with and no one cared or noticed that they had unexpected things in their pants. liberals didn't do anything.
whatever

User avatar
Gauthier
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 52887
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Gauthier » Sat May 14, 2016 12:03 pm

Aelex wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Shouldn't you be asking if state governments seriously want to fuck over the education of who are in the most dire need of it just for the sake of pandering to conservatives?

Ho, I'm not viewing them as any better than their liberals counter-parts but they, for once, didn't initiated the shit-storm.

Val Halla wrote:Cuz there's totes no risk involved with a transwoman going into the male bathroom is there?

Excuse my lack of knowledge but by transwoman you mean someone who used to be a woman or one who is one now?
In the first case, given that she/he/whatever pronoun look like a man there should be no problem with her/him/whatever pronoun going in the man's bathroom.
In the second, why should she/he/whatever pronoun would want to go in the man's bathroom anymore now that she/he/whatever look like a woman?
I mean, I'm no denying the fact that there might be problems. Just saying that destroying walls in every and each bathroom of the U.S despite the majority prefering it the way it is right now is neither a logical nor smart response to said problems.

Ashmoria wrote:the system that already existed allowed transgendered people to pick the bathroom the felt most comfortable in. the ones fucking up the system are anti-trans bigots ginning up fear in order to get political power.

And said system worked (almost) perfectly. But that was until liberals wanted to destroy normal bathroom to replace them by shared ones despite no one but a minority asking for it, unleashing a shit-storm in the process.


Um no, the shitstorm started when the North Carolina Legislature was butthurt that the city of Charlotte had the audacity to let Those Damn Shemales pick which restroom they wanted to use so they came up with HB 2 to nip that in the bud in case any other NC city wanted to do the same.
Crimes committed by Muslims will be a pan-Islamic plot and proof of Islam's inherent evil. On the other hand crimes committed by non-Muslims will merely be the acts of loners who do not represent their belief system at all.
The probability of one's participation in homosexual acts is directly proportional to one's public disdain and disgust for homosexuals.
If a political figure makes an accusation of wrongdoing without evidence, odds are probable that the accuser or an associate thereof has in fact committed the very same act, possibly to a worse degree.
Where is your God-Emperor now?

User avatar
USS Monitor
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 30409
Founded: Jul 01, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby USS Monitor » Sat May 14, 2016 12:05 pm

Aelex wrote:Wait, do Obama seriously want to fuck over the education of people who're in the most dire need of one just for the sack of pandering progressives?
And there are 19 guys and gals (at least) who're backing him up?
Wow. I didn't thought one could loose his faith in humanity on the internet in any other site than tumblr or 4chan but I guess that I was rather naïf to think so...


Obama doesn't want to fuck over the disabled. He wants the states to comply with federal antidiscrimination laws.
Don't take life so serious... it isn't permanent... RIP Dyakovo and Ashmoria
19th century steamships may be harmful or fatal if swallowed. In case of accidental ingestion, please seek immediate medical assistance.
༄༅། །འགྲོ་བ་མི་རིགས་ག་ར་དབང་ཆ་འདྲ་མཉམ་འབད་སྒྱེཝ་ལས་ག་ར་གིས་གཅིག་གིས་གཅིག་ལུ་སྤུན་ཆའི་དམ་ཚིག་བསྟན་དགོས།

User avatar
The Black Forrest
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55622
Founded: Antiquity
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby The Black Forrest » Sat May 14, 2016 12:05 pm

Aelex wrote:And said system worked (almost) perfectly. But that was until liberals wanted to destroy normal bathroom to replace them by shared ones despite no one but a minority asking for it, unleashing a shit-storm in the process.


Sorry. The librawls didn't start this one.
*I am a master proofreader after I click Submit.
* There is actually a War on Christmas. But Christmas started it, with it's unparalleled aggression against the Thanksgiving Holiday, and now Christmas has seized much Lebensraum in November, and are pushing into October. The rest of us seek to repel these invaders, and push them back to the status quo ante bellum Black Friday border. -Trotskylvania
* Silence Is Golden But Duct Tape Is Silver.
* I felt like Ayn Rand cornered me at a party, and three minutes in I found my first objection to what she was saying, but she kept talking without interruption for ten more days. - Max Barry talking about Atlas Shrugged

User avatar
Ethel mermania
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 126541
Founded: Aug 20, 2010
Father Knows Best State

Postby Ethel mermania » Sat May 14, 2016 12:05 pm

Gauthier wrote:
Aelex wrote:Wait, do Obama seriously want to fuck over the education of people who're in the most dire need of one just for the sack of pandering progressives?
And there are 19 guys and gals (at least) who're backing him up?
Wow. I didn't thought one could loose his faith in humanity on the internet in any other site than tumblr or 4chan but I guess that I was rather naïf to think so...


So Obama should reward a state for passively encouraging a pogrom on transgender people?


Cutting off funds is beyond his role, the courts decide punishments for non compliance with the law, not the executive.
The West won the world not by the superiority of its ideas or values or religion … but rather by its superiority in applying organized violence. Westerners often forget this fact; non-Westerners never do.

The most fundamental problem of politics is not the control of wickedness but the limitation of righteousness. 



http://www.salientpartners.com/epsilont ... ilizations

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159100
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Sat May 14, 2016 12:07 pm

Aelex wrote:
Ifreann wrote:Shouldn't you be asking if state governments seriously want to fuck over the education of who are in the most dire need of it just for the sake of pandering to conservatives?

Ho, I'm not viewing them as any better than their liberals counter-parts but they, for once, didn't initiated the shit-storm.

They very much did.

User avatar
Aelex
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11398
Founded: Jun 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aelex » Sat May 14, 2016 12:07 pm

Gauthier wrote:Um no, the shitstorm started when the North Carolina Legislature was butthurt that the city of Charlotte had the audacity to let Those Damn Shemales pick which restroom they wanted to use so they came up with HB 2 to nip that in the bud in case any other NC city wanted to do the same.

Hm. Seems like I was mis-informed on this one. I thought the whole thing started after Obama tried to impose shared bathroom in schools. Isn't it precisely what the article the O.P linked is about? I have to admit I merely glossed over it but it's what I understood of it, at least.
Citoyen Français. Bonapartiste Républicain (aka De Gaule's Gaullisme) with Keynesian leanings on economics. Latin Christian.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Sat May 14, 2016 12:09 pm

Ethel mermania wrote:
Gauthier wrote:
So Obama should reward a state for passively encouraging a pogrom on transgender people?


Cutting off funds is beyond his role, the courts decide punishments for non compliance with the law, not the executive.

all he did was send out a clarifying letter informing schools about the administration's interpretation of the regulations under title IX. that way schools know where they stand. the enforcement will come from the justice department just like they are doing with north Carolina.
whatever

User avatar
USS Monitor
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 30409
Founded: Jul 01, 2015
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby USS Monitor » Sat May 14, 2016 12:12 pm

Aelex wrote:
Gauthier wrote:Um no, the shitstorm started when the North Carolina Legislature was butthurt that the city of Charlotte had the audacity to let Those Damn Shemales pick which restroom they wanted to use so they came up with HB 2 to nip that in the bud in case any other NC city wanted to do the same.

Hm. Seems like I was mis-informed on this one. I thought the whole thing started after Obama tried to impose shared bathroom in schools. Isn't it precisely what the article the O.P linked is about? I have to admit I merely glossed over it but it's what I understood of it, at least.


Obama was responding to the state coming out with the anti-trans bathroom law.
Don't take life so serious... it isn't permanent... RIP Dyakovo and Ashmoria
19th century steamships may be harmful or fatal if swallowed. In case of accidental ingestion, please seek immediate medical assistance.
༄༅། །འགྲོ་བ་མི་རིགས་ག་ར་དབང་ཆ་འདྲ་མཉམ་འབད་སྒྱེཝ་ལས་ག་ར་གིས་གཅིག་གིས་གཅིག་ལུ་སྤུན་ཆའི་དམ་ཚིག་བསྟན་དགོས།

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159100
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Sat May 14, 2016 12:16 pm

Aelex wrote:
Gauthier wrote:Um no, the shitstorm started when the North Carolina Legislature was butthurt that the city of Charlotte had the audacity to let Those Damn Shemales pick which restroom they wanted to use so they came up with HB 2 to nip that in the bud in case any other NC city wanted to do the same.

Hm. Seems like I was mis-informed on this one. I thought the whole thing started after Obama tried to impose shared bathroom in schools. Isn't it precisely what the article the O.P linked is about? I have to admit I merely glossed over it but it's what I understood of it, at least.

When efforts are made to end discrimination, it isn't the people making those efforts starting any resulting shitshow, it's the people discriminating in the first place.

User avatar
Aelex
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11398
Founded: Jun 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aelex » Sat May 14, 2016 12:20 pm

Ifreann wrote:When efforts are made to end discrimination, it isn't the people making those efforts starting any resulting shitshow, it's the people discriminating in the first place.

If you're talking about forbidding trans from entering bathroom of the sex they're looking like, I can do nothing but to agree as it's just a dick move creating more problem for no reasons.
If you're talking about making all bathroom sex neutral, then sorry but this thing you're talking about isn't "discrimination" but mere common sense.
Citoyen Français. Bonapartiste Républicain (aka De Gaule's Gaullisme) with Keynesian leanings on economics. Latin Christian.

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72260
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Sat May 14, 2016 12:21 pm

Aelex wrote:
Ifreann wrote:When efforts are made to end discrimination, it isn't the people making those efforts starting any resulting shitshow, it's the people discriminating in the first place.

If you're talking about forbidding trans from entering bathroom of the sex they're looking like, I can do nothing but to agree as it's just a dick move creating more problem for no reasons.
If you're talking about making all bathroom sex neutral, then sorry but this thing you're talking about isn't "discrimination" but mere common sense.

Common sense that's only a little over a hundred and fifty years old, you mean?

Bathrooms were desegregated throughout the vast majority of mankind's history.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Renewed Imperial Germany
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6928
Founded: Jun 18, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Renewed Imperial Germany » Sat May 14, 2016 12:24 pm

Ethel mermania wrote:
Gauthier wrote:
So Obama should reward a state for passively encouraging a pogrom on transgender people?


Cutting off funds is beyond his role, the courts decide punishments for non compliance with the law, not the executive.


Title IX states that no education program or activity that is funded by the Federal Government can discriminate on the basis of sex. Since enforcing the law falls upon the Executive Branch, it is not only his power to do so but also his duty.
Bailey Quinn, Nice ta meet ya! (Female Pronouns Please)
Also known as Harley
NS Stats are not used here.
<3 Alex's NS Wife <3
Normal is a setting on the dryer

User avatar
Aelex
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11398
Founded: Jun 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aelex » Sat May 14, 2016 12:24 pm

Galloism wrote:Common sense that's only a little over a hundred and fifty years old, you mean?

Bathrooms were desegregated throughout the vast majority of mankind's history.

Not sure ancient Rome nor Middle Age Europe are time period you should quote as being exemple of "gender equality", man.
Citoyen Français. Bonapartiste Républicain (aka De Gaule's Gaullisme) with Keynesian leanings on economics. Latin Christian.

User avatar
Farnhamia
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 111679
Founded: Jun 20, 2006
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Farnhamia » Sat May 14, 2016 12:24 pm

Galloism wrote:
Aelex wrote:If you're talking about forbidding trans from entering bathroom of the sex they're looking like, I can do nothing but to agree as it's just a dick move creating more problem for no reasons.
If you're talking about making all bathroom sex neutral, then sorry but this thing you're talking about isn't "discrimination" but mere common sense.

Common sense that's only a little over a hundred and fifty years old, you mean?

Bathrooms were desegregated throughout the vast majority of mankind's history.

Indeed and in fact, indoor plumbing is a fairly modern innovation. If shared facilities were good enough for our ancestors, they're good enough for us!
Make Earth Great Again: Stop Continental Drift!
And Jesus was a sailor when he walked upon the water ...
"Make yourself at home, Frank. Hit somebody." RIP Don Rickles
My country, right or wrong; if right, to be kept right; and if wrong, to be set right. ~ Carl Schurz
<Sigh> NSG...where even the atheists are Augustinians. ~ The Archregimancy
Now the foot is on the other hand ~ Kannap
RIP Dyakovo ... Ashmoria (Freedom ... or cake)
This is the eighth line. If your signature is longer, it's too long.

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72260
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Sat May 14, 2016 12:25 pm

Aelex wrote:
Galloism wrote:Common sense that's only a little over a hundred and fifty years old, you mean?

Bathrooms were desegregated throughout the vast majority of mankind's history.

Not sure ancient Rome nor Middle Age Europe are time period you should quote as being exemple of "gender equality", man.

Not at all, but the mere point is that there's no proof that segregated facilities are in any way beneficial or necessary.

Farnhamia wrote:
Galloism wrote:Common sense that's only a little over a hundred and fifty years old, you mean?

Bathrooms were desegregated throughout the vast majority of mankind's history.

Indeed and in fact, indoor plumbing is a fairly modern innovation. If shared facilities were good enough for our ancestors, they're good enough for us!


I really see nothing wrong with gender neutral bathrooms. I guarantee that peeing and pooping are pretty mundane activities, all the way around.
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
Aelex
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11398
Founded: Jun 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aelex » Sat May 14, 2016 12:31 pm

Farnhamia wrote:Indeed and in fact, indoor plumbing is a fairly modern innovation. If shared facilities were good enough for our ancestors, they're good enough for us!

Well, I guess that following this logic, so is slavery, marital-rape, inbreeding or this very funny custom of beheading the last young man to arrive on the common place the day of his military service. :)
Leaving the argument itself aside, I however have to say that I'm rather surprised as I would never had expected hearing one of the most staunch and jusqu'au-boutiste progressive on this site argue out of tradition.
Guess this thread was worth existing just for this fact alone. :p
Last edited by Aelex on Sat May 14, 2016 12:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Citoyen Français. Bonapartiste Républicain (aka De Gaule's Gaullisme) with Keynesian leanings on economics. Latin Christian.

User avatar
Aelex
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11398
Founded: Jun 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aelex » Sat May 14, 2016 12:36 pm

Galloism wrote:Not at all, but the mere point is that there's no proof that segregated facilities are in any way beneficial or necessary.

Meh. Anyway, shared bathroom aren't in any way more "beneficial or necessary" than regular ones. And the fact that society who thrived on slavery and viewed women as an object that should be kept at home and never displayed to the eyes of any other man than their husband or brother/father used them don't really sound much like an argument in their favor.
Citoyen Français. Bonapartiste Républicain (aka De Gaule's Gaullisme) with Keynesian leanings on economics. Latin Christian.

User avatar
Sanctissima
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8486
Founded: Jul 16, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Sanctissima » Sat May 14, 2016 12:37 pm

Aelex wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:Indeed and in fact, indoor plumbing is a fairly modern innovation. If shared facilities were good enough for our ancestors, they're good enough for us!

Well, I guess that following this logic, so is slavery, marital-rape, inbreeding or this very funny custom of beheading the last young man to arrive on the common place the day of his military service. :)
Leaving the argument itself aside, I however have say that I'm rather surprised as I would never had expected hearing one of the most staunch and jusqu'au-boutiste progressive on this site argue out of tradition.
Guess this thread was worth existing just for this fact alone. :p


To be frank, is there any actual point in keeping bathrooms sex-segregated?

I don't really see it as a big deal either way, but all things considered, I don't see the harm in simply saying to hell with it all and making all bathrooms unisex.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159100
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Sat May 14, 2016 12:43 pm

Aelex wrote:
Ifreann wrote:When efforts are made to end discrimination, it isn't the people making those efforts starting any resulting shitshow, it's the people discriminating in the first place.

If you're talking about forbidding trans from entering bathroom of the sex they're looking like, I can do nothing but to agree as it's just a dick move creating more problem for no reasons.

That would be what the Obama administration is instructing schools to do, more or less.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Abaro, Ecalpa, El Lazaro, Ethel mermania, Ifreann, La Xinga, Neu California, New Gonch, Port Caverton, Solaryia, Tarsonis, The Black Forrest, The Lund, Uiiop, Valrifall, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads