Was.
Advertisement


by New Jerzylvania » Sat Jul 16, 2016 3:24 pm

by Bearstin » Sat Jul 16, 2016 3:26 pm

by Galloism » Sat Jul 16, 2016 3:26 pm


by New Jerzylvania » Sat Jul 16, 2016 3:27 pm


by The East Marches » Sat Jul 16, 2016 3:29 pm

by Yumyumsuppertime » Sat Jul 16, 2016 3:29 pm

by New Jerzylvania » Sat Jul 16, 2016 3:30 pm

by Gauthier » Sat Jul 16, 2016 3:34 pm

by Galloism » Sat Jul 16, 2016 3:34 pm
New Jerzylvania wrote:Galloism wrote:Honestly, I am disappointed.
Trumpence still has an on the money definition in all of it's new meaning.![]()
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.p ... d=10002798

by Gauthier » Sat Jul 16, 2016 3:35 pm

by Gauthier » Sat Jul 16, 2016 3:36 pm
Galloism wrote:New Jerzylvania wrote:
Trumpence still has an on the money definition in all of it's new meaning.![]()
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.p ... d=10002798
That blunts the edge a bit.

by New Jerzylvania » Sat Jul 16, 2016 3:38 pm

by New Jerzylvania » Sat Jul 16, 2016 3:41 pm

by Yumyumsuppertime » Sat Jul 16, 2016 3:42 pm

by The East Marches » Sat Jul 16, 2016 3:43 pm
New Jerzylvania wrote:The East Marches wrote:
It depends, I may throw my vote to Johnson instead if not Trump. I like Jim Webb democrats, not Warren. She is too far left.
i have noticed you're a mainstay on the Libertarian thread over the last months. So, I take your likely not to go for Clinton in any case since it's almost definitely not going to be Webb.

by Gauthier » Sat Jul 16, 2016 3:45 pm

by New Jerzylvania » Sat Jul 16, 2016 3:45 pm
The East Marches wrote:New Jerzylvania wrote:
i have noticed you're a mainstay on the Libertarian thread over the last months. So, I take your likely not to go for Clinton in any case since it's almost definitely not going to be Webb.
I've only posted like one or two times there. I'd go Clinton if she chooses somebody who won't rekt the economy with bad decisions like Warren. I normally vote Democrat. I'm a registered party member.

by The East Marches » Sat Jul 16, 2016 3:46 pm
New Jerzylvania wrote:The East Marches wrote:
I've only posted like one or two times there. I'd go Clinton if she chooses somebody who won't rekt the economy with bad decisions like Warren. I normally vote Democrat. I'm a registered party member.
I don't think Warren wants to or will have a chance to wreck* the economy. That's the GOP's job anyway.

by Farnhamia » Sat Jul 16, 2016 3:47 pm
And be it farther enacted, That if any person shall write, print, utter or publish, or shall cause or procure to be written, printed, uttered or published, or shall knowingly and willingly assist or aid in writing, printing, uttering or publishing any false, scandalous and malicious writing or writings against the government of the United States, or either house of the Congress of the United States, or the President of the United States, with intent to defame the said government, or either house of the said Congress, or the said President, or to bring them, or either of them, into contempt or disrepute; or to excite against them, or either or any of them, the hatred of the good people of the United States, or to stir up sedition within the United States, or to excite any unlawful combinations therein, for opposing or resisting any law of the United States, or any act of the President of the United States, done in pursuance of any such law, or of the powers in him vested by the constitution of the United States, or to resist, oppose, or defeat any such law or act, or to aid, encourage or abet any hostile designs of any foreign nation against United States, their people or government, then such person, being thereof convicted before any court of the United States having jurisdiction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars, and by imprisonment not exceeding two years.

by Liriena » Sat Jul 16, 2016 3:47 pm
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by New Jerzylvania » Sat Jul 16, 2016 3:47 pm


by Gauthier » Sat Jul 16, 2016 3:49 pm
Farnhamia wrote:New Jerzylvania wrote:
Trump the phony bows to the weakest form of politically correctness, fear of internet mockery.
Trump is all about political correctness when it comes to him. Look how he bans reporters from his campaign if they write something that displeases him. If he's elected, expect a modern version of this:And be it farther enacted, That if any person shall write, print, utter or publish, or shall cause or procure to be written, printed, uttered or published, or shall knowingly and willingly assist or aid in writing, printing, uttering or publishing any false, scandalous and malicious writing or writings against the government of the United States, or either house of the Congress of the United States, or the President of the United States, with intent to defame the said government, or either house of the said Congress, or the said President, or to bring them, or either of them, into contempt or disrepute; or to excite against them, or either or any of them, the hatred of the good people of the United States, or to stir up sedition within the United States, or to excite any unlawful combinations therein, for opposing or resisting any law of the United States, or any act of the President of the United States, done in pursuance of any such law, or of the powers in him vested by the constitution of the United States, or to resist, oppose, or defeat any such law or act, or to aid, encourage or abet any hostile designs of any foreign nation against United States, their people or government, then such person, being thereof convicted before any court of the United States having jurisdiction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars, and by imprisonment not exceeding two years.

by New Jerzylvania » Sat Jul 16, 2016 3:49 pm
Farnhamia wrote:New Jerzylvania wrote:
Trump the phony bows to the weakest form of politically correctness, fear of internet mockery.
Trump is all about political correctness when it comes to him. Look how he bans reporters from his campaign if they write something that displeases him. If he's elected, expect a modern version of this:And be it farther enacted, That if any person shall write, print, utter or publish, or shall cause or procure to be written, printed, uttered or published, or shall knowingly and willingly assist or aid in writing, printing, uttering or publishing any false, scandalous and malicious writing or writings against the government of the United States, or either house of the Congress of the United States, or the President of the United States, with intent to defame the said government, or either house of the said Congress, or the said President, or to bring them, or either of them, into contempt or disrepute; or to excite against them, or either or any of them, the hatred of the good people of the United States, or to stir up sedition within the United States, or to excite any unlawful combinations therein, for opposing or resisting any law of the United States, or any act of the President of the United States, done in pursuance of any such law, or of the powers in him vested by the constitution of the United States, or to resist, oppose, or defeat any such law or act, or to aid, encourage or abet any hostile designs of any foreign nation against United States, their people or government, then such person, being thereof convicted before any court of the United States having jurisdiction thereof, shall be punished by a fine not exceeding two thousand dollars, and by imprisonment not exceeding two years.

by Farnhamia » Sat Jul 16, 2016 3:51 pm
Gauthier wrote:Farnhamia wrote:Trump is all about political correctness when it comes to him. Look how he bans reporters from his campaign if they write something that displeases him. If he's elected, expect a modern version of this:
Ah, The Mexican Sedition Act, because Trump considers them aliens anyways.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Alcala-Cordel, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Bradfordville, Des-Bal, Elejamie, Grande Germania, Lativs, Saiwana, Stellar Colonies, Thermodolia
Advertisement