NATION

PASSWORD

US General Election Megathread: Trump vs Clinton

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Who will win the election?

Donald Trump
27
29%
Hillary Clinton
52
55%
Gary Johnson
10
11%
Jill Stein
5
5%
 
Total votes : 94

User avatar
Major-Tom
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15690
Founded: Mar 09, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Major-Tom » Sat Jul 16, 2016 1:00 pm

Idzequitch wrote:Maybe it's just me, but Pence seems pretty solidly in the "Establishment" camp after Trump supporters have spent the past several months railing against fhe establishment.


I think picking Pence for the sake of rallying evangelicals was a horrible decision, evangelicals were going to vote Trump anyways, they love Trump. Sure, some people might've been fervently Cruz, but even they have probably hesitantly joined Trump.

He should've broadened his base if he wanted to win, not solidified a narrow one.

User avatar
Slenderman The CreepyPasta King
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10939
Founded: Jan 11, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Slenderman The CreepyPasta King » Sat Jul 16, 2016 1:03 pm

Arkinesia wrote:
The Stupids wrote:Donald Trump auctioned off the vp spot to the highest bidder. The Koch brothers. Newt and Christie are moody today.

The Kochs aren't supporting Trump.


In fact they pretty much said,"fuck trump, we're supporting Hillary" along with almost every other big money politics buyer
☻/
/▌ The slenderman is always watching.
/ \
http://www.youtube.com/user/ClubPenguinajl
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSTlbpf4Dxo
https://youtu.be/f_GC8wiEuXo
https://youtu.be/mQfcFjzWuX8
Check out my YouTube channel! Some Links are above! ^

User avatar
Idzequitch
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16876
Founded: Apr 22, 2014
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Idzequitch » Sat Jul 16, 2016 1:12 pm

Major-Tom wrote:
Idzequitch wrote:Maybe it's just me, but Pence seems pretty solidly in the "Establishment" camp after Trump supporters have spent the past several months railing against fhe establishment.


I think picking Pence for the sake of rallying evangelicals was a horrible decision, evangelicals were going to vote Trump anyways, they love Trump. Sure, some people might've been fervently Cruz, but even they have probably hesitantly joined Trump.

He should've broadened his base if he wanted to win, not solidified a narrow one.

To be fair, there are a fair number of evangelicals that can't stand him. *raises hand* Not that Pence changes that fact one iota.

I like the pick though, as a #NeverTrump guy. Like you said, it pretty much keeps him in the box he was already in. The more limited his appeal, the better. Maybe this will push some hesitant Trump supporters to Gary Johnson.
Retirement Announcement
I'm temporarily permanently retired from NSG. Maybe.
Twenty-something, male, heterosexual, Protestant Christian. Politically unaffiliated libertarian-ish centrist.
Meyers-Briggs INFP.
Enneagram Type 9.
Political Compass Left/Right 0.13
Libertarian/Authoritarian -5.38
9Axes Results

I once believed in causes too, I had my pointless point of view, and life went on no matter who was wrong or right. - Billy Joel

User avatar
Great Feng
Senator
 
Posts: 4319
Founded: Dec 08, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Feng » Sat Jul 16, 2016 1:14 pm

So who is more likely to win the election do you think?
I'm hoping Johnson or Stein, as I hate Clinton and Trump with a passion.

User avatar
Guy
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1826
Founded: Oct 05, 2011
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Guy » Sat Jul 16, 2016 1:16 pm

Slenderman The CreepyPasta King wrote:
Arkinesia wrote:The Kochs aren't supporting Trump.


In fact they pretty much said,"fuck trump, we're supporting Hillary" along with almost every other big money politics buyer

Kochs are not supporting Clinton.
Commander of the Rejected Realms Army

[violet] wrote:Never underestimate the ability of admin to do nothing.

User avatar
Idzequitch
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16876
Founded: Apr 22, 2014
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Idzequitch » Sat Jul 16, 2016 1:20 pm

Guy wrote:
Slenderman The CreepyPasta King wrote:
In fact they pretty much said,"fuck trump, we're supporting Hillary" along with almost every other big money politics buyer

Kochs are not supporting Clinton.

Let's get 'em behind Johnson and give him a reasonable chance! :p
Retirement Announcement
I'm temporarily permanently retired from NSG. Maybe.
Twenty-something, male, heterosexual, Protestant Christian. Politically unaffiliated libertarian-ish centrist.
Meyers-Briggs INFP.
Enneagram Type 9.
Political Compass Left/Right 0.13
Libertarian/Authoritarian -5.38
9Axes Results

I once believed in causes too, I had my pointless point of view, and life went on no matter who was wrong or right. - Billy Joel

User avatar
Major-Tom
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15690
Founded: Mar 09, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Major-Tom » Sat Jul 16, 2016 1:24 pm

Idzequitch wrote:
Major-Tom wrote:
I think picking Pence for the sake of rallying evangelicals was a horrible decision, evangelicals were going to vote Trump anyways, they love Trump. Sure, some people might've been fervently Cruz, but even they have probably hesitantly joined Trump.

He should've broadened his base if he wanted to win, not solidified a narrow one.

To be fair, there are a fair number of evangelicals that can't stand him. *raises hand* Not that Pence changes that fact one iota.

I like the pick though, as a #NeverTrump guy. Like you said, it pretty much keeps him in the box he was already in. The more limited his appeal, the better. Maybe this will push some hesitant Trump supporters to Gary Johnson.


When I say evangelical, I'm referencing bible beating, gay bashing sorts of folk. You know, the stereotype. Also, Mormons. They ain't evangelical, but all this talk of Utah being a swing state is so silly.

I can see Gary picking up maybe 5%. It'd have been much better if Weld was the nominee, and Johnson the VP nominee. Weld is a much better speaker and fundraiser, I imagine.

User avatar
Idzequitch
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16876
Founded: Apr 22, 2014
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

US General Election Megathread: Trump vs Clinton

Postby Idzequitch » Sat Jul 16, 2016 1:39 pm

Major-Tom wrote:
Idzequitch wrote:To be fair, there are a fair number of evangelicals that can't stand him. *raises hand* Not that Pence changes that fact one iota.

I like the pick though, as a #NeverTrump guy. Like you said, it pretty much keeps him in the box he was already in. The more limited his appeal, the better. Maybe this will push some hesitant Trump supporters to Gary Johnson.


When I say evangelical, I'm referencing bible beating, gay bashing sorts of folk. You know, the stereotype. Also, Mormons. They ain't evangelical, but all this talk of Utah being a swing state is so silly.

I can see Gary picking up maybe 5%. It'd have been much better if Weld was the nominee, and Johnson the VP nominee. Weld is a much better speaker and fundraiser, I imagine.

Fair. Just pointing out that the stereotype isn't how we all are.

I don't know. I feel like Weld has less name recognition. I like him and all, but I knew literally nothing about him when Johnson chose him as his running mate. I'd be satisfied with 5%, but I have to hope that people will get more disenfranchised as we get closer to November. Probably not, but I have to hope.
Retirement Announcement
I'm temporarily permanently retired from NSG. Maybe.
Twenty-something, male, heterosexual, Protestant Christian. Politically unaffiliated libertarian-ish centrist.
Meyers-Briggs INFP.
Enneagram Type 9.
Political Compass Left/Right 0.13
Libertarian/Authoritarian -5.38
9Axes Results

I once believed in causes too, I had my pointless point of view, and life went on no matter who was wrong or right. - Billy Joel

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Sat Jul 16, 2016 1:47 pm

Great Feng wrote:So who is more likely to win the election do you think?
I'm hoping Johnson or Stein, as I hate Clinton and Trump with a passion.


Regardless of what anyone hopes (which I believe was the question), Clinton is significantly more likely to win.

The only way that you could hope for either Stein or Johnson is if you pay no attention to economic policy stances, as they're diametrically opposed in many ways.

User avatar
Novus America
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38385
Founded: Jun 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Novus America » Sat Jul 16, 2016 1:49 pm

Socialist Nordia wrote:
Gauthier wrote:Oh this is rich. Trump just now brayed in his press conference that he's going to abolish the Johnson Amendment and give more political and governmental influence to Evangelicals. Overturn Obergefell v. Hodges, anyone?

Oh god no. Looks like we're headed towards a theocracy.


Not exactly. Overturning Obergefell (something the president cannot do) or the Johnson Ammendment (only Congress can do that) are not theocracy. In a theocracy relgious clergy have the ability to make, interpret and enforce laws.
___|_|___ _|__*__|_

Zombie Ike/Teddy Roosevelt 2020.

Novus America represents my vision of an awesome Atompunk near future United States of America expanded to the entire North American continent, Guyana and the Philippines. The population would be around 700 million.
Think something like prewar Fallout, minus the bad stuff.

Politically I am an independent. I support what is good for the country, which means I cannot support either party.

User avatar
Slenderman The CreepyPasta King
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10939
Founded: Jan 11, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Slenderman The CreepyPasta King » Sat Jul 16, 2016 1:51 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Great Feng wrote:So who is more likely to win the election do you think?
I'm hoping Johnson or Stein, as I hate Clinton and Trump with a passion.


Regardless of what anyone hopes (which I believe was the question), Clinton is significantly more likely to win.

The only way that you could hope for either Stein or Johnson is if you pay no attention to economic policy stances, as they're diametrically opposed in many ways.


Well considering that the people don't trust her, and about 1/30th of democrats are apparently going to vote for trump (that's not good for democrats) if she gets elected by more than 5% then people will probably start thinking that the elections are more rigged than previously believed
☻/
/▌ The slenderman is always watching.
/ \
http://www.youtube.com/user/ClubPenguinajl
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aSTlbpf4Dxo
https://youtu.be/f_GC8wiEuXo
https://youtu.be/mQfcFjzWuX8
Check out my YouTube channel! Some Links are above! ^

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Sat Jul 16, 2016 1:56 pm

Interesting bit of scheduling information from the DNC: Elizabeth Warren, originally scheduled to speak on Monday as the keynote speaker, no longer appears on the roster. Barring some sort of behind the scenes conflict with the DNC (doubtful), or a simple clerical error (possible), the most likely explanation would seem to be that she's been re-scheduled to speak a few nights later as the Vice-Presidential nominee.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Sat Jul 16, 2016 2:00 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Interesting bit of scheduling information from the DNC: Elizabeth Warren, originally scheduled to speak on Monday as the keynote speaker, no longer appears on the roster. Barring some sort of behind the scenes conflict with the DNC (doubtful), or a simple clerical error (possible), the most likely explanation would seem to be that she's been re-scheduled to speak a few nights later as the Vice-Presidential nominee.

it is mean to get a person's hopes up like that, yum.
whatever

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Sat Jul 16, 2016 2:02 pm

Ashmoria wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Interesting bit of scheduling information from the DNC: Elizabeth Warren, originally scheduled to speak on Monday as the keynote speaker, no longer appears on the roster. Barring some sort of behind the scenes conflict with the DNC (doubtful), or a simple clerical error (possible), the most likely explanation would seem to be that she's been re-scheduled to speak a few nights later as the Vice-Presidential nominee.

it is mean to get a person's hopes up like that, yum.


I read the article and it got my own hopes up, so we all get to suffer together if they're wrong.

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Sat Jul 16, 2016 2:10 pm

Gauthier wrote:Oh this is rich. Trump just now brayed in his press conference that he's going to abolish the Johnson Amendment and give more political and governmental influence to Evangelicals. Overturn Obergefell v. Hodges, anyone?

He promised he would try to do that months ago.

He is not a friend of the LGBT+ community.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Sat Jul 16, 2016 2:13 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:it is mean to get a person's hopes up like that, yum.


I read the article and it got my own hopes up, so we all get to suffer together if they're wrong.

Two women up against Trump and Pence? Oh, that would be fun.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Novus America
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38385
Founded: Jun 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Novus America » Sat Jul 16, 2016 2:17 pm

Liriena wrote:
Gauthier wrote:Oh this is rich. Trump just now brayed in his press conference that he's going to abolish the Johnson Amendment and give more political and governmental influence to Evangelicals. Overturn Obergefell v. Hodges, anyone?

He promised he would try to do that months ago.

He is not a friend of the LGBT+ community.


He is no friend of anyone but himself. He will sell anybody out.
___|_|___ _|__*__|_

Zombie Ike/Teddy Roosevelt 2020.

Novus America represents my vision of an awesome Atompunk near future United States of America expanded to the entire North American continent, Guyana and the Philippines. The population would be around 700 million.
Think something like prewar Fallout, minus the bad stuff.

Politically I am an independent. I support what is good for the country, which means I cannot support either party.

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Sat Jul 16, 2016 2:18 pm

The anti-Trump faction within the GOP has allegedly gotten Trump's delegate count down to around 900, which would deny him the nomination ahead of the convention and they're bringing forth John Kasich as an alternative candidate who can replace Trump. He is supposedly going to be the person this last ditch effort is going to pin their hopes on. The only thing left to do is prevail at the rules committee and on that front- they're unsuccessful so far, but they're not giving up. The coup can happen if the Republican convention isn't yet over.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Sat Jul 16, 2016 2:20 pm

Saiwania wrote:The anti-Trump faction within the GOP has allegedly gotten Trump's delegate count down to around 900, which would deny him the nomination ahead of the convention and they're bringing forth John Kasich as an alternative candidate who can replace Trump. He is supposedly going to be the person this last ditch effort is going to pin their hopes on. The only thing left to do is prevail at the rules committee and on that front- they're unsuccessful so far, but they're not giving up. The coup can happen if the Republican convention isn't yet over.


Do you have a source that you could link to?

User avatar
Novus America
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38385
Founded: Jun 02, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Novus America » Sat Jul 16, 2016 2:20 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Interesting bit of scheduling information from the DNC: Elizabeth Warren, originally scheduled to speak on Monday as the keynote speaker, no longer appears on the roster. Barring some sort of behind the scenes conflict with the DNC (doubtful), or a simple clerical error (possible), the most likely explanation would seem to be that she's been re-scheduled to speak a few nights later as the Vice-Presidential nominee.


I simply cannot see her making such a risky choice. Not only is playing it safe her style, but when you are already ahead you play it safe. Trump being far behind needs a Hail Mary pass.

Hillary just needs to run out the clock.
Last edited by Novus America on Sat Jul 16, 2016 2:21 pm, edited 2 times in total.
___|_|___ _|__*__|_

Zombie Ike/Teddy Roosevelt 2020.

Novus America represents my vision of an awesome Atompunk near future United States of America expanded to the entire North American continent, Guyana and the Philippines. The population would be around 700 million.
Think something like prewar Fallout, minus the bad stuff.

Politically I am an independent. I support what is good for the country, which means I cannot support either party.

User avatar
Major-Tom
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15690
Founded: Mar 09, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Major-Tom » Sat Jul 16, 2016 2:20 pm

Saiwania wrote:The anti-Trump faction within the GOP has allegedly gotten Trump's delegate count down to around 900, which would deny him the nomination ahead of the convention and they're bringing forth John Kasich as an alternative candidate who can replace Trump. He is supposedly going to be the person this last ditch effort is going to pin their hopes on. The only thing left to do is prevail at the rules committee and on that front- they're unsuccessful so far, but they're not giving up. The coup can happen if the Republican convention isn't yet over.


Calling bull.

User avatar
Major-Tom
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15690
Founded: Mar 09, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Major-Tom » Sat Jul 16, 2016 2:21 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Interesting bit of scheduling information from the DNC: Elizabeth Warren, originally scheduled to speak on Monday as the keynote speaker, no longer appears on the roster. Barring some sort of behind the scenes conflict with the DNC (doubtful), or a simple clerical error (possible), the most likely explanation would seem to be that she's been re-scheduled to speak a few nights later as the Vice-Presidential nominee.


The democrats would be shooting themselves in the foot with Warren. This is going to be a tight, tight, tight senate election, and Charlie Baker would appoint a Republican in her place. Unless a special election is held shortly soonafter, I don't see why the Dems would risk it.

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Sat Jul 16, 2016 2:22 pm

Novus America wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Interesting bit of scheduling information from the DNC: Elizabeth Warren, originally scheduled to speak on Monday as the keynote speaker, no longer appears on the roster. Barring some sort of behind the scenes conflict with the DNC (doubtful), or a simple clerical error (possible), the most likely explanation would seem to be that she's been re-scheduled to speak a few nights later as the Vice-Presidential nominee.


A simply cannot see her making such a risky choice. Not only is playing it safe her style, but when you are already ahead you play it safe. Trump being far behind needs a Hail Mary pass.

Hillary just needs to run out the clock.


The only risk that Warren comes with is Senate control, and that would likely last for half a year at most, much less if Reid's ideas on how to minimize the damage play out.

User avatar
Yumyumsuppertime
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 28799
Founded: Jun 21, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Yumyumsuppertime » Sat Jul 16, 2016 2:27 pm

Major-Tom wrote:
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Interesting bit of scheduling information from the DNC: Elizabeth Warren, originally scheduled to speak on Monday as the keynote speaker, no longer appears on the roster. Barring some sort of behind the scenes conflict with the DNC (doubtful), or a simple clerical error (possible), the most likely explanation would seem to be that she's been re-scheduled to speak a few nights later as the Vice-Presidential nominee.


The democrats would be shooting themselves in the foot with Warren. This is going to be a tight, tight, tight senate election, and Charlie Baker would appoint a Republican in her place. Unless a special election is held shortly soonafter, I don't see why the Dems would risk it.


A special election would be held within 145 to 160 days, but Harry Reid has supposedly discovered a way to limit the damage to a few months at most. I can see them sacrificing Senate control for a little while longer, especially since the House is going to be GOP, anyway.

User avatar
Major-Tom
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15690
Founded: Mar 09, 2016
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Major-Tom » Sat Jul 16, 2016 2:27 pm

Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Novus America wrote:
A simply cannot see her making such a risky choice. Not only is playing it safe her style, but when you are already ahead you play it safe. Trump being far behind needs a Hail Mary pass.

Hillary just needs to run out the clock.


The only risk that Warren comes with is Senate control, and that would likely last for half a year at most, much less if Reid's ideas on how to minimize the damage play out.


That, and the risk that voters might see it as pandering. Two women? Some independents might think "maybe Hillary is just trying to pander."

She would be the Pence choice for the Democrats, really. Doubling down on a support base.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Cannot think of a name, Cybernetic Union, Fractalnavel, Ifreann, Isomedia, South Africa3, The Free State of Kennedy, The Jamesian Republic, Thermodolia, Uiiop, Umeria, Unitria, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads