NATION

PASSWORD

UK Politics Thread III: Thready McThreadface (+ Jo Cox)

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Which of the following would you prefer to be the next leader of the Conservative Party?

Andrea Leadsom
27
18%
Liam Fox
7
5%
Michael Gove
17
11%
Stephen Crabb
6
4%
Theresa May
38
25%
Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz
57
38%
 
Total votes : 152

User avatar
Wolfmanne2
Senator
 
Posts: 3762
Founded: Sep 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne2 » Fri Jul 08, 2016 5:39 am

Questers wrote:
Wolfmanne2 wrote:I'm not South Asian, I'm half Maltese and half Nicaraguan.
oh right, sorry. i was just going off the slur in your last post.

Wolfmanne2 wrote:Or, along side addressing economic issues, couldn't we also address racial issues, gender issues, LGBT issues at the same time as addressing them?
YES.

but not at the expense of the former.

(i'm not necessarily addressing your position btw)

Well, than I would not like to have a part in such thing. The issues of women and racial minorities are constantly pushed to the side in favour of 'real issues' already. I don't want any part in an ideology that does the same.

Additionally, I do not believe in the viability of hard left socialism and I also find the Marxist analysis to be inherently flawed, so no thanks.
ESFP
United in Labour! Jezbollah and Saint Tony together!


Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Fri Jul 08, 2016 5:42 am

Pretty sure neither me nor Questers promote "hard left socialism", we both call for a return to the socialist-derived models of the postwar era. Which worked pretty well, and were not "hard left socialism".

I would argue that a more just social model is an inherently more receptive environment for gender, race and other progression. The current system is quite clearly opposed.
Demanding that all be pursued at the same time, or that gender and racial etc need more focus than the overall social model is somewhat bizarre, though I understand the sentiment. It's a clear diversion of focus and resources, and will surely lead to a fatigue of progressive issues.
Last edited by Imperializt Russia on Fri Jul 08, 2016 5:44 am, edited 1 time in total.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
CoraSpia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13458
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Anarchy

Postby CoraSpia » Fri Jul 08, 2016 5:49 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:My only solace to take is that I don't quite win privilege bingo in this thread's membership.

Privelege bingo?
GVH has a puppet. It supports #NSTransparency and hosts a weekly zoom call for nsers that you should totally check out

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Fri Jul 08, 2016 5:52 am

my political views aren't difficult to understand.

i believe in an egalitarian, internationalist, environmentalist & rationalist country, with an economy centred around social ownership and equality of outcome.
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Wolfmanne2
Senator
 
Posts: 3762
Founded: Sep 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne2 » Fri Jul 08, 2016 5:56 am

Questers wrote:my political views aren't difficult to understand.

i believe in an egalitarian, internationalist, environmentalist & rationalist country, with an economy centred around social ownership and equality of outcome.

I don't disagree with any of that.
ESFP
United in Labour! Jezbollah and Saint Tony together!


Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Fri Jul 08, 2016 5:56 am

Coraspia wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:My only solace to take is that I don't quite win privilege bingo in this thread's membership.

Privelege bingo?

Privilege bingo is a derogatory term for the implicit "ranking" of how severe people's problems and their validity are.
Since I'm an (ostensibly) straight, white, cis male in a middle class family who went to university and studied two STEM degrees, I'm supposed to be highly privileged.

Some less-rational people would then say that my opinion on many social topics is inherently less valid than someone from a less privileged background from mine. Such mindsets inherently entrench the difficulties and differences that people face, which is clearly not the point.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66776
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Fri Jul 08, 2016 6:00 am

Maybe we need to stop with the oppression olympics and start figuring out what we need to do to fix things.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Wolfmanne2
Senator
 
Posts: 3762
Founded: Sep 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne2 » Fri Jul 08, 2016 6:01 am

Vassenor wrote:Maybe we need to stop with the oppression olympics and start figuring out what we need to do to fix things.

Kill all non-white, non-cisgendered, LGBT and poor people.

No moar people with problems.
ESFP
United in Labour! Jezbollah and Saint Tony together!


Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Fri Jul 08, 2016 6:02 am

Wolfmanne2 wrote:
Questers wrote:my political views aren't difficult to understand.

i believe in an egalitarian, internationalist, environmentalist & rationalist country, with an economy centred around social ownership and equality of outcome.

I don't disagree with any of that.
i'm not convinced, but if it is true, it's funny that we fight so much.

the left was always more divided than the right
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66776
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Fri Jul 08, 2016 6:27 am

Wolfmanne2 wrote:
Vassenor wrote:Maybe we need to stop with the oppression olympics and start figuring out what we need to do to fix things.

Kill all non-white, non-cisgendered, LGBT and poor people.

No moar people with problems.


=/
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Wolfmanne2
Senator
 
Posts: 3762
Founded: Sep 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne2 » Fri Jul 08, 2016 6:32 am

Questers wrote:
Wolfmanne2 wrote:I don't disagree with any of that.
i'm not convinced, but if it is true, it's funny that we fight so much.

the left was always more divided than the right

Differences between us can be summarised here. Fun game: guess whether I'm revisionist or third way.

Vassenor wrote:
Wolfmanne2 wrote:Kill all non-white, non-cisgendered, LGBT and poor people.

No moar people with problems.


=/

I have a very dark sense of humour.
Last edited by Wolfmanne2 on Fri Jul 08, 2016 6:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
ESFP
United in Labour! Jezbollah and Saint Tony together!


Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66776
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Fri Jul 08, 2016 6:37 am

Wolfmanne2 wrote:
Questers wrote: i'm not convinced, but if it is true, it's funny that we fight so much.

the left was always more divided than the right

Differences between us can be summarised here. Fun game: guess whether I'm revisionist or third way.

Vassenor wrote:
=/

I have a very dark sense of humour.


That and I react badly to jokes involving me getting lynched.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Fri Jul 08, 2016 6:43 am

Wolfmanne2 wrote:
Questers wrote: i'm not convinced, but if it is true, it's funny that we fight so much.

the left was always more divided than the right

Differences between us can be summarised here. Fun game: guess whether I'm revisionist or third way.

You claim to have no real interest in socialism at all, so my gut assumption is third way.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
The Huskar Social Union
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58279
Founded: Apr 04, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Huskar Social Union » Fri Jul 08, 2016 7:55 am

Irish Nationalist from Belfast / Leftwing / Atheist / Alliance Party voter
"I never thought in terms of being a leader, i thought very simply in terms of helping people" - John Hume 1937 - 2020



I like Miniature painting, Tanks, English Gals, Video games and most importantly Cheese.


User avatar
Divitaen
Senator
 
Posts: 4619
Founded: Jan 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Divitaen » Fri Jul 08, 2016 7:57 am

The Huskar Social Union wrote:David Cameron lifted the ban on women in combat roles in the Military: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-36746917?ocid=socialflow_facebook&ns_mchannel=social&ns_campaign=bbcnews&ns_source=facebook


Colonel Richard Kemp said that "this foolish move will reduce the capability of the infantry, undermine our national defences and put lives in danger"....

Wow honestly where do these misogynistic pigs all come from...
Hillary Clinton 2016! Stronger Together!
EU Referendum: Vote Leave = Project Hate #VoteRemain!
Economic Right/Left: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.15
Foreign Policy Non-interventionist/Neo-conservative: -10.00
Cultural Liberal/Conservative: -10.00
Social Democrat:
Cosmopolitan/Nationalistic - 38%
Secular/Fundamentalist - 50%
Visionary/Reactionary - 56%
Anarchistic/Authoritarian - 24%
Communistic/Capitalistic - 58%
Pacifist/Militarist - 39%
Ecological/Anthropocentric - 55%

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Fri Jul 08, 2016 7:59 am

The Huskar Social Union wrote:David Cameron lifted the ban on women in combat roles in the Military: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-36746917?ocid=socialflow_facebook&ns_mchannel=social&ns_campaign=bbcnews&ns_source=facebook

Interesting.

A female friend of mine, who began, then abandoned army officership and now works with Army Headquarters on that study, disagreed with me some time ago that combat roles should be opened, beyond officer/command/staff roles.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Divitaen
Senator
 
Posts: 4619
Founded: Jan 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Divitaen » Fri Jul 08, 2016 8:00 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
The Huskar Social Union wrote:David Cameron lifted the ban on women in combat roles in the Military: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-36746917?ocid=socialflow_facebook&ns_mchannel=social&ns_campaign=bbcnews&ns_source=facebook

Interesting.

A female friend of mine, who began, then abandoned army officership and now works with Army Headquarters on that study, disagreed with me some time ago that combat roles should be opened, beyond officer/command/staff roles.


Uh oh. And what was her reasoning for that?
Hillary Clinton 2016! Stronger Together!
EU Referendum: Vote Leave = Project Hate #VoteRemain!
Economic Right/Left: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.15
Foreign Policy Non-interventionist/Neo-conservative: -10.00
Cultural Liberal/Conservative: -10.00
Social Democrat:
Cosmopolitan/Nationalistic - 38%
Secular/Fundamentalist - 50%
Visionary/Reactionary - 56%
Anarchistic/Authoritarian - 24%
Communistic/Capitalistic - 58%
Pacifist/Militarist - 39%
Ecological/Anthropocentric - 55%

User avatar
The Huskar Social Union
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 58279
Founded: Apr 04, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby The Huskar Social Union » Fri Jul 08, 2016 8:02 am

I personally have no problems with it, i think that if a woman can pass the tests and training required they should be allowed to join the Infantry and other combat roles, if not dont let them in then simple as that. The British Army also according to the article said they dont feel it will adversely affect the capability and cohesions of units in the field so.

Seen some people act like its the end of the world though and that the UK will now get overrun by its enemies.
Irish Nationalist from Belfast / Leftwing / Atheist / Alliance Party voter
"I never thought in terms of being a leader, i thought very simply in terms of helping people" - John Hume 1937 - 2020



I like Miniature painting, Tanks, English Gals, Video games and most importantly Cheese.


User avatar
Minzerland
Minister
 
Posts: 2367
Founded: Apr 08, 2016
Ex-Nation

Postby Minzerland » Fri Jul 08, 2016 8:03 am

Divitaen wrote:
The Huskar Social Union wrote:David Cameron lifted the ban on women in combat roles in the Military: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-36746917?ocid=socialflow_facebook&ns_mchannel=social&ns_campaign=bbcnews&ns_source=facebook


Colonel Richard Kemp said that "this foolish move will reduce the capability of the infantry, undermine our national defences and put lives in danger"....

Wow honestly where do these misogynistic pigs all come from...


Facts are misogynistic?
'Common sense isn't so common.'
-Voltaire

'I Disapprove of What You Say, But I Will Defend to the Death Your Right to Say It.'
-Evelyn Beatrice Hall

I'm a Tribune of the Plebs, so watch out, or I might just veto you. You may call me Minzerland or Sam.
Classical Libertarianism|Constitutional Monarchy|Secularism|Westphalian Sovereignty|
_[' ]_
(-_Q)

Hello, people persistently believe I'm American, I'm here to remedy this; I'm an Australian of English, Swiss-Italian (on my mothers side), Scottish and Irish (on my fathers side) dissent.

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Fri Jul 08, 2016 8:04 am

i believe the dominant argument is that we are barely evolved/over evolved apes with a stupid culture which means we can't have men and women in the same unit without the men treating the women as special snowflakes/trying to fuck them
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Divitaen
Senator
 
Posts: 4619
Founded: Jan 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Divitaen » Fri Jul 08, 2016 8:04 am

Minzerland wrote:
Divitaen wrote:
Colonel Richard Kemp said that "this foolish move will reduce the capability of the infantry, undermine our national defences and put lives in danger"....

Wow honestly where do these misogynistic pigs all come from...


Facts are misogynistic?


And how is it factual that women in combat roles will put "lives in danger"?
Hillary Clinton 2016! Stronger Together!
EU Referendum: Vote Leave = Project Hate #VoteRemain!
Economic Right/Left: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.15
Foreign Policy Non-interventionist/Neo-conservative: -10.00
Cultural Liberal/Conservative: -10.00
Social Democrat:
Cosmopolitan/Nationalistic - 38%
Secular/Fundamentalist - 50%
Visionary/Reactionary - 56%
Anarchistic/Authoritarian - 24%
Communistic/Capitalistic - 58%
Pacifist/Militarist - 39%
Ecological/Anthropocentric - 55%

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Fri Jul 08, 2016 8:05 am

Divitaen wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:Interesting.

A female friend of mine, who began, then abandoned army officership and now works with Army Headquarters on that study, disagreed with me some time ago that combat roles should be opened, beyond officer/command/staff roles.


Uh oh. And what was her reasoning for that?

Physical fitness, basically. On average, women are not as physically capable as men, which isn't an untrue statement.

I remember when she was training for the officer programme, she worked herself nearly to death to get there.
She quit the training at a very early phase because she despised the "break you down to build you up" style of psychological conditioning.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Fri Jul 08, 2016 8:06 am

Minzerland wrote:
Divitaen wrote:
Colonel Richard Kemp said that "this foolish move will reduce the capability of the infantry, undermine our national defences and put lives in danger"....

Wow honestly where do these misogynistic pigs all come from...


Facts are misogynistic?

Those statements aren't factual.

If the standards were significantly lowered (and I mean enormously, and solely for the point of getting all 7,000 female army members into combat units for whatever reason or something), then he would have a point.
But that's what precisely no-one is proposing or has proposed.

Even if the standards were slightly lowered, that is not an inherent loss of capability, so it's still not a factual statement.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
CoraSpia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13458
Founded: Mar 01, 2014
Anarchy

Postby CoraSpia » Fri Jul 08, 2016 8:08 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Divitaen wrote:
Uh oh. And what was her reasoning for that?

Physical fitness, basically. On average, women are not as physically capable as men, which isn't an untrue statement.

I remember when she was training for the officer programme, she worked herself nearly to death to get there.
She quit the training at a very early phase because she despised the "break you down to build you up" style of psychological conditioning.

It's not true, but the solution to that is to get rid of 'average,' and to make it completely genderless. As in, men and women held to the same standards: it wil result in very few women making the grade, but it's the most fair way of doing it while not compromising affectiveness.
GVH has a puppet. It supports #NSTransparency and hosts a weekly zoom call for nsers that you should totally check out

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19622
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Fri Jul 08, 2016 8:08 am

angela eagle continues her brutal "please stand down or i might stand against you eventually maybe how about next week maybe if you feel like it o-oh actually i don't feel like it maybe the week after then" onslaught against corbyn
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cult of Silence, Eahland, Fractalnavel, Ilova, Kaztropol, Mearisse, Reloviskistan, Rusozak, Ryemarch, Techocracy101010, The Black Forrest, The Pirateariat, Thermodolia, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads