NATION

PASSWORD

UK Politics Thread III: Thready McThreadface (+ Jo Cox)

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Which of the following would you prefer to be the next leader of the Conservative Party?

Andrea Leadsom
27
18%
Liam Fox
7
5%
Michael Gove
17
11%
Stephen Crabb
6
4%
Theresa May
38
25%
Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz
57
38%
 
Total votes : 152

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Fri Jul 08, 2016 12:28 am

The Nihilistic view wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:Future leader of the Tory party, taking control of the party that actually brought gay marriage to the UK? If she were to take that stance, it'd be a disaster.

The interview was certainly in some relation to the leadership race - couldn't say at what actual stage.


You realise a majority of conservative supporters were against the bill right? And this electorate is made up of 100% conservatives?

Not the electorate of a future GE, to which I was referring.
San Lumen wrote:
Anywhere Else But Here wrote:Corbyn may well still have the support of the party. If his detractors would stop pussying about and actually mount a challenge we'd find out for sure.

I wish he would face a leadership challenge. I think he's unelectable.

He is facing a leadership challenge, at some point.
He'll probably win.
Last edited by Imperializt Russia on Fri Jul 08, 2016 12:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66805
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Fri Jul 08, 2016 12:42 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
San Lumen wrote:I wish he would face a leadership challenge. I think he's unelectable.

He is facing a leadership challenge, at some point.
He'll probably win.


Even the MPs trying to get rid of him admit that.
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Myrensis
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5754
Founded: Oct 05, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Myrensis » Fri Jul 08, 2016 1:15 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
The Nihilistic view wrote:
You realise a majority of conservative supporters were against the bill right? And this electorate is made up of 100% conservatives?

Not the electorate of a future GE, to which I was referring.
San Lumen wrote:I wish he would face a leadership challenge. I think he's unelectable.

He is facing a leadership challenge, at some point.
He'll probably win.


And the Tories are rejoicing that there is no threat to their control for the foreseeable future. :p
Last edited by Myrensis on Fri Jul 08, 2016 1:15 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Dooom35796821595
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9309
Founded: Sep 11, 2011
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Dooom35796821595 » Fri Jul 08, 2016 1:26 am

Myrensis wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:Not the electorate of a future GE, to which I was referring.
He is facing a leadership challenge, at some point.
He'll probably win.


And the Tories are rejoicing that there is no threat to their control for the foreseeable future. :p


They're just lucky were too British to have a revolution. :p
When life gives you lemons, you BURN THEIR HOUSE DOWN!
Anything can be justified if it is cool. If at first you don't succeed, destroy all in your way.
"Your methods are stupid! Your progress has been stupid! Your intelligence is stupid! For the sake of the mission, you must be terminated!”

User avatar
Divitaen
Senator
 
Posts: 4619
Founded: Jan 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Divitaen » Fri Jul 08, 2016 1:29 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
The Nihilistic view wrote:
You realise a majority of conservative supporters were against the bill right? And this electorate is made up of 100% conservatives?

Not the electorate of a future GE, to which I was referring.
San Lumen wrote:I wish he would face a leadership challenge. I think he's unelectable.

He is facing a leadership challenge, at some point.
He'll probably win.


Which is a shame because Corbyn lacks the support or confidence of the Parliamentary Party. He really ought to step aside if he was unable to rally the Labour voters to keep the UK in the EU because of his personal views and his personal history then the Parliamentary Party is right to lose confidence in his leadership. He needs to step down immediately.
Hillary Clinton 2016! Stronger Together!
EU Referendum: Vote Leave = Project Hate #VoteRemain!
Economic Right/Left: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.15
Foreign Policy Non-interventionist/Neo-conservative: -10.00
Cultural Liberal/Conservative: -10.00
Social Democrat:
Cosmopolitan/Nationalistic - 38%
Secular/Fundamentalist - 50%
Visionary/Reactionary - 56%
Anarchistic/Authoritarian - 24%
Communistic/Capitalistic - 58%
Pacifist/Militarist - 39%
Ecological/Anthropocentric - 55%

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Fri Jul 08, 2016 1:30 am

Divitaen wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:Not the electorate of a future GE, to which I was referring.
He is facing a leadership challenge, at some point.
He'll probably win.


Which is a shame because Corbyn lacks the support or confidence of the Parliamentary Party. He really ought to step aside if he was unable to rally the Labour voters to keep the UK in the EU because of his personal views and his personal history then the Parliamentary Party is right to lose confidence in his leadership. He needs to step down immediately.

70% of the labour base voted to Remain.
Is anything short of 90 now somehow unacceptable? Along with the Lib Dem base, it was the highest Remain proportion of all the major parties.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Divitaen
Senator
 
Posts: 4619
Founded: Jan 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Divitaen » Fri Jul 08, 2016 1:34 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Divitaen wrote:
Which is a shame because Corbyn lacks the support or confidence of the Parliamentary Party. He really ought to step aside if he was unable to rally the Labour voters to keep the UK in the EU because of his personal views and his personal history then the Parliamentary Party is right to lose confidence in his leadership. He needs to step down immediately.

70% of the labour base voted to Remain.
Is anything short of 90 now somehow unacceptable? Along with the Lib Dem base, it was the highest Remain proportion of all the major parties.


It's not the number, its the messenger. He opposed joining the EU in the 70s and in 2015 he was very critical of the EU and the ECB, claiming the EU was responsible for the TPP and saying if Cameron succeeded in weakening EU labour laws he would support leaving the EU, which is not the kind of the tone you should strike when trying to desperately get the UK to stay in the EU.
Hillary Clinton 2016! Stronger Together!
EU Referendum: Vote Leave = Project Hate #VoteRemain!
Economic Right/Left: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.15
Foreign Policy Non-interventionist/Neo-conservative: -10.00
Cultural Liberal/Conservative: -10.00
Social Democrat:
Cosmopolitan/Nationalistic - 38%
Secular/Fundamentalist - 50%
Visionary/Reactionary - 56%
Anarchistic/Authoritarian - 24%
Communistic/Capitalistic - 58%
Pacifist/Militarist - 39%
Ecological/Anthropocentric - 55%

User avatar
Baltenstein
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11008
Founded: Jan 25, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Baltenstein » Fri Jul 08, 2016 2:20 am

During the protests against same-sex marriage in 2013, Marine wisely stayed away, while allowing her more old-style conservative right-wing niece Marion (the FN's #3) to participate.


How is she #3 of the FN? Isn't she like 25 years old? Or is the Le Pen family name enough to secure a place in the upper party echelon?
O'er the hills and o'er the main.
Through Flanders, Portugal and Spain.
King George commands and we obey.
Over the hills and far away.


THE NORTH REMEMBERS

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Fri Jul 08, 2016 2:22 am

Baltenstein wrote:
During the protests against same-sex marriage in 2013, Marine wisely stayed away, while allowing her more old-style conservative right-wing niece Marion (the FN's #3) to participate.


How is she #3 of the FN? Isn't she like 25 years old? Or is the Le Pen family name enough to secure a place in the upper party echelon?

Almost certainly the latter.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Fri Jul 08, 2016 3:05 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Baltenstein wrote:
How is she #3 of the FN? Isn't she like 25 years old? Or is the Le Pen family name enough to secure a place in the upper party echelon?

Almost certainly the latter.
yo should read my fb status~
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Fri Jul 08, 2016 3:10 am

Olerand wrote:
Ifreann wrote:But France has élan. All you need is élan



Orchards.

As well as an actual air-craft carrier, the political will to engage abroad, and the political desire -we're trying, haven't succeeded yet but we're trying- to have Germany pay for our military excursions.

And what on earth did I just watch?

tbf QE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
CDG

she is nearly ready soon
Last edited by Questers on Fri Jul 08, 2016 3:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Fri Jul 08, 2016 3:13 am

Questers wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:Almost certainly the latter.
yo should read my fb status~

In what was surely a deception* of your own, it appeared at the top of my news feed when I went to look.

*the status was an article talking about deception and Iraq.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Fri Jul 08, 2016 3:17 am

i prefer maskirovka
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Fri Jul 08, 2016 3:20 am

I assume you have actually read parts of Chilcot then?
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Fri Jul 08, 2016 3:22 am

i read summaries of the "key points" i mean like

i will read it all eventually but chilcot's key points are sufficient
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66805
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Fri Jul 08, 2016 4:35 am

Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Fri Jul 08, 2016 4:38 am


I was hoping it was a troll.

Greatly saddened to learn it isn't.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Divitaen
Senator
 
Posts: 4619
Founded: Jan 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Divitaen » Fri Jul 08, 2016 4:39 am



Oh god did Davidson seriously call Theresay May a "champion for LGBT equality"??

Wtf is happening to this world, this is just sad. May and Leadsom are both self-pronounced anti-gay bigots.
Hillary Clinton 2016! Stronger Together!
EU Referendum: Vote Leave = Project Hate #VoteRemain!
Economic Right/Left: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.15
Foreign Policy Non-interventionist/Neo-conservative: -10.00
Cultural Liberal/Conservative: -10.00
Social Democrat:
Cosmopolitan/Nationalistic - 38%
Secular/Fundamentalist - 50%
Visionary/Reactionary - 56%
Anarchistic/Authoritarian - 24%
Communistic/Capitalistic - 58%
Pacifist/Militarist - 39%
Ecological/Anthropocentric - 55%

User avatar
Wolfmanne2
Senator
 
Posts: 3762
Founded: Sep 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne2 » Fri Jul 08, 2016 4:41 am

The Nihilistic view wrote:LEADSOM!

Am I the only person in this thread who has a vote in this?


Also 2-0 Tories in the not a white male PM stakes. All the progressive SJW affirmative action neo feminist women need a leg up and can't do it for themselves women only shortlist parties can eat it. 8)

Alright, I'll address this for you.

The funny thing about this issue is that it occurs because of Labour being more democratic than the Tories. Cameron was able to impose his A list and parachute women and people from minority backgrounds into safe and winnable marginal seats. Labour, in contrast, is pretty much reliant upon the democratic process. We can impose all-women shortlists and all-BAME shortlists have started to be used to counter regressive attitudes (I had someone at my CLP meeting propose that we appoint a 'Men's Officer', which pretty much the lack of understanding there exists in regards to gender equality).

In regards to the leadership election, it's clear that plenty of Corbynites have a regressive attitude; we had two perfectly capable women - a former Chief Secretary of the Treasury, a former Secretary of Work and Pension, a former Shadow Foreign Secretary and the serving Shadow Home Secretary at the time in the case of Yvette Cooper, whilst in Liz Kendall we had someone with plenty of real life experience mixed with stints in advisory positions to Cabinet ministers and someone who, out of all candidates was the most in-touch with the sort of voters we need to win back - those who left Labour in 2010 and 2015 and voted Tory or UKIP.

The problem obviously was the Corbynist surge. We had a segment of the population with a certain political slant take over our party and vote for a candidate that they could transpose their views onto (Corbyn). They could ignore the arguments about the necessity for a woman leader, the arguments that had emerged in 'the bubble', as a cynic might put it.

Even so, a problem still emerges; no woman has ever finished above a man in a Labour leadership election. Women MPs in Labour still face horrific abuse, particularly from Corbynists - remember how people like Stella Creasy were treated over the Syria vote, or how Jess Phillips has had her views misrepresented (a note, you all hate her because you all decided to listen to Ostroeuropa and have him misrepresent what she had done; having read her articles in Progress, a Labour magazine, she is far from the man-hating radfem you all think she is and has in fact campaigned for men's issues). This isn't just exclusive to the 98% of Labour women on the front-line of Labour politics whom have received sexist abuse online; the Fabians have found that 28% of ordinary Labour women have received sexist abuse online. So yes, plenty of issues exist in regards to women in the party, and I have not even gotten to BAME issues lol...

Oh yeah, except from the A list, we're still better at equality than the Tories :lol:.
ESFP
United in Labour! Jezbollah and Saint Tony together!


Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Fri Jul 08, 2016 4:48 am

I'd argue that a woman in the top job is much less important than many women in senior positions. Such as, say, Corbyn's 50%+1 (original) female Shadow Cabinet.
I don't doubt there has been gendered abuse. I disagree that "Corbynites" that engage in abuse are inherently misogynistic - after all, we're either social justice warriors or misogynists, can't have it both ways.

What I think the problem has been is the absolute hard-line social media activists (which all affiliations have, sadly the far left attracts more, and seemingly more ardent ones, and it saddens me so) who are so heavily ideologically opposed to anyone who isn't Corbyn that they would, and do, hurl abuse at anyone who isn't Corbyn.
In the case of female MPs and party members and public figures against Corbyn, there certainly will be some misogynists, but I feel a significant part of gendered abuse (ie, that used by most people engaging in gendered abuse) is simply because gender and political affiliation are the two most prominent aspects of a public figure, unless race is involved. Women don't seem at all hesitant to engage in gendered abuse against other women, after all.

I also still don't know what was supposed to be the problem with Jess Philips.
Last edited by Imperializt Russia on Fri Jul 08, 2016 4:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Fri Jul 08, 2016 4:52 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:I'd argue that a woman in the top job is much less important than many women in senior positions. Such as, say, Corbyn's 50%+1 (original) female Shadow Cabinet.
this is my position precisely.
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 66805
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Fri Jul 08, 2016 4:57 am

Imperializt Russia wrote:

I was hoping it was a troll.

Greatly saddened to learn it isn't.


Openly lesbian MP invites openly anti-same sex marriage MP to her same-sex wedding for no other reason than to annoy her?
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Fri Jul 08, 2016 5:00 am

Vassenor wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:I was hoping it was a troll.

Greatly saddened to learn it isn't.


Openly lesbian MP invites openly anti-same sex marriage MP to her same-sex wedding for no other reason than to annoy her?

Except that's not what's technically happened.

She squirmed over Leadsom's views and when finally pressed said "well, if she became party leader (and therefore PM), then of course she'd get an invite, because she'd be the PM/Party Leader."
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Questers
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13867
Founded: Antiquity
Ex-Nation

Postby Questers » Fri Jul 08, 2016 5:02 am

we won't go back on our current LGBT laws.

whatever politician wants to, the country won't let them.
Restore the Crown

User avatar
Val Halla
Post Czar
 
Posts: 38977
Founded: Oct 09, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Val Halla » Fri Jul 08, 2016 5:05 am

Questers wrote:we won't go back on our current LGBT laws.

whatever politician wants to, the country won't let them.

Yeah but they'd not where they need to be, and clearly no progress will be made this way

Plus, there's no guarantee of that actually being so. They could easily bring in laws that don't directly attack LGBT people but obviously do them indirectly.
LOVEWHOYOUARE~
WOMAN

She/her

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aguaria Major, American Legionaries, Bear Stearns, Ethel mermania, Lotha Demokratische-Republique, Mavenu, Mtwara, Norse Inuit Union, Ryemarch, Saturn Moons, Tarsonis, The Grand Fifth Imperium, The Jamesian Republic, Vivolkha

Advertisement

Remove ads