NATION

PASSWORD

UK Politics Thread III: Thready McThreadface (+ Jo Cox)

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Which of the following would you prefer to be the next leader of the Conservative Party?

Andrea Leadsom
27
18%
Liam Fox
7
5%
Michael Gove
17
11%
Stephen Crabb
6
4%
Theresa May
38
25%
Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz
57
38%
 
Total votes : 152

User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Mon Jul 11, 2016 2:32 pm

HMS Vanguard wrote:
Great Nepal wrote:You mean to suggest British PM is as elected as EU commissioners are!? Blasphemy; we all know Great Britain is epitome of democracy and commissioners are unaccountable.

EU Commissioners have been about as democratically elected as British PMs for the past 18 months or so, I agree.

You mean since we started having British prime ministers accountable to parliament, and EU started having commissioners?
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
HMS Vanguard
Senator
 
Posts: 3964
Founded: Jan 16, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby HMS Vanguard » Mon Jul 11, 2016 2:34 pm

Great Nepal wrote:
HMS Vanguard wrote:EU Commissioners have been about as democratically elected as British PMs for the past 18 months or so, I agree.

You mean since we started having British prime ministers accountable to parliament, and EU started having commissioners?

British PMs have been nominated by the House of Commons for about 200 years. The President of the EU Commission has been nominated by the EU Parliament for about 18 months (maybe 20 months).
Feelin' brexy

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Mon Jul 11, 2016 2:43 pm

HMS Vanguard wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Causing trouble is not a good thing in any way.

It's the only way progress is ever made.


Not even slightly. Progress happens best in situations of stability. Instability is shit on every level.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
HMS Vanguard
Senator
 
Posts: 3964
Founded: Jan 16, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby HMS Vanguard » Mon Jul 11, 2016 2:46 pm

Salandriagado wrote:
HMS Vanguard wrote:It's the only way progress is ever made.


Not even slightly. Progress happens best in situations of stability. Instability is shit on every level.

Which is why Qing China colonised America and invented the steam engine.
Feelin' brexy

User avatar
Britanno 2
Diplomat
 
Posts: 611
Founded: Apr 08, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Britanno 2 » Mon Jul 11, 2016 2:54 pm

So apparently Philip Hammond could be heading to the Treasury. How exciting.
Centre-left Social Democrat
Admin in the NSGS Senate
Senator Huang Diem of the Labour Party

User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Mon Jul 11, 2016 2:54 pm

HMS Vanguard wrote:
Great Nepal wrote:You mean since we started having British prime ministers accountable to parliament, and EU started having commissioners?

British PMs have been nominated by the House of Commons for about 200 years. The President of the EU Commission has been nominated by the EU Parliament for about 18 months (maybe 20 months).

Didn't know it had been 18 months since 1993.
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Mon Jul 11, 2016 2:54 pm

HMS Vanguard wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Not even slightly. Progress happens best in situations of stability. Instability is shit on every level.

Which is why Qing China colonised America and invented the steam engine.


The colonisation of America was built on the back of one of the most stable political systems that had ever existed. The steam engine (ignoring Hero of Alexandria) was invented in one of the most politically stable countries ever to have existed.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
HMS Vanguard
Senator
 
Posts: 3964
Founded: Jan 16, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby HMS Vanguard » Mon Jul 11, 2016 2:57 pm

Salandriagado wrote:
HMS Vanguard wrote:Which is why Qing China colonised America and invented the steam engine.


The colonisation of America was built on the back of one of the most stable political systems that had ever existed. The steam engine (ignoring Hero of Alexandria) was invented in one of the most politically stable countries ever to have existed.

The UK was absurdly unstable during the period when the American colonisation and the industrial revolution began. The instability that birthed a new system, that was capable of colonising America and inventing steam engines.
Feelin' brexy

User avatar
Wolfmanne2
Senator
 
Posts: 3762
Founded: Sep 02, 2015
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne2 » Mon Jul 11, 2016 2:57 pm

Britanno 2 wrote:So apparently Philip Hammond could be heading to the Treasury. How exciting.

Good. He's reassuringly boring, so probably won't shake things up to much.
ESFP
United in Labour! Jezbollah and Saint Tony together!


Mad hatters in jeans wrote:Yeah precipitating on everyone doesn't go down well usually. You seem patient enough to chat to us, i'm willing to count that as nice.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon Jul 11, 2016 2:57 pm

Baltenstein wrote:
Risottia wrote:Doesn't anybody else find INCREDIBLY ironic that Britain, having left the EU over slogans against the "evil unelected undemocratic EU commission", is getting a new PM not through an election, not even through a public debate at a party meeting, but just by a "hey I'm leaving" "I want No.10, no wait actually not" "Ok then this leaves me" process?


British liberty has been restored.

'Staff have been given the option to fill vacancies at a new factory it will open in Dusseldorf. Forterra blamed its decision to temporarily shut its plants on “current economic uncertainty”.


Wait, wait, wait...they are offering the very people who voted in favor of Brexit a job in a EU country?

Image

err no

If you care to re-read it, it points out that workers in Poole, predominantly EU nationals, now feel unwelcome in Poole, presumably as a result of anti-EU racial sentiments after the vote.
Lush, amidst more general financial concerns, is opening a new factory in Dusseldorf anyway, and is offering to shift these EU nationals there.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Mon Jul 11, 2016 3:08 pm

HMS Vanguard wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
The colonisation of America was built on the back of one of the most stable political systems that had ever existed. The steam engine (ignoring Hero of Alexandria) was invented in one of the most politically stable countries ever to have existed.

The UK was absurdly unstable during the period when the American colonisation and the industrial revolution began. The instability that birthed a new system, that was capable of colonising America and inventing steam engines.


Erm, what? The UK wasn't the main force behind driving American colonisation: that would be Spain (ruled by the Habsburgs, absurdly stable), and Portugal (again, crazy stable). The UK followed along long after. The steam engine was invented either before or after (depending on your definitions) one of the least disruptive political changes on that scale ever. It was put into practical application in the following centuries of stability.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
HMS Vanguard
Senator
 
Posts: 3964
Founded: Jan 16, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby HMS Vanguard » Mon Jul 11, 2016 3:12 pm

The UK drove American colonisation that mattered. I will grant Spain was very stable - in the 1920s it was a very similar society to Spain in the 1720s and consequently completely irrelevant.
Feelin' brexy

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19625
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Mon Jul 11, 2016 3:19 pm

In 2007, May said Gordon Brown lacked the "democratic mandate" to lead after his coronation

lol
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Vassenor
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 68113
Founded: Nov 11, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vassenor » Mon Jul 11, 2016 3:20 pm

Souseiseki wrote:In 2007, May said Gordon Brown lacked the "democratic mandate" to lead after his coronation

lol


IRONY
Jenny / Sailor Astraea
WOMAN

MtF trans and proud - She / Her / etc.
100% Asbestos Free

Team Mystic
#iamEUropean

"Have you ever had a moment online, when the need to prove someone wrong has outweighed your own self-preservation instincts?"

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon Jul 11, 2016 3:23 pm

Souseiseki wrote:In 2007, May said Gordon Brown lacked the "democratic mandate" to lead after his coronation

lol

Shame May's taking over after PMQ's because that'd make for a lovely inaugural roast.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Mon Jul 11, 2016 3:23 pm

Souseiseki wrote:In 2007, May said Gordon Brown lacked the "democratic mandate" to lead after his coronation

lol


Honestly, her speech today read like someone who is trying to curry favour with voters ready for a general election to me. She could just be hedging a bet, but some kind of election while Labour is wrapped up in internal problems could very much be on the cards.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon Jul 11, 2016 3:25 pm

http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/the ... 31081.html

May "a hypocrite" if she doesn't immediately call a snap election, some guy writing in the Independent.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Arkolon
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9498
Founded: May 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Arkolon » Mon Jul 11, 2016 3:26 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/theresa-may-prime-minister-conservative-leader-angela-leadsom-withdraws-immediate-general-election-a7131081.html

May "a hypocrite" if she doesn't immediately call a snap election, some guy writing in the Independent.

It's probably positive for her party anyway, isn't it?
"Revisionism is nothing else than a theoretic generalisation made from the angle of the isolated capitalist. Where does this viewpoint belong theoretically if not in vulgar bourgeois economics?"
Rosa Luxemburg

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon Jul 11, 2016 3:31 pm

Arkolon wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/theresa-may-prime-minister-conservative-leader-angela-leadsom-withdraws-immediate-general-election-a7131081.html

May "a hypocrite" if she doesn't immediately call a snap election, some guy writing in the Independent.

It's probably positive for her party anyway, isn't it?

Probably, they've spent six years gaming the system so even if Labour weren't falling apart they'd comfortably win anyway.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 55272
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Mon Jul 11, 2016 3:38 pm

Vassenor wrote:
Souseiseki wrote:In 2007, May said Gordon Brown lacked the "democratic mandate" to lead after his coronation

lol


IRONY


As Iffy already put it, COBALTY.
Seriously, I'm afraid that with Brexit, we Italians have again taken our ancient place as "EU member with the most ludicrous excuses for politicians".
Last edited by Risottia on Mon Jul 11, 2016 3:40 pm, edited 2 times in total.
.

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nihilistic view » Mon Jul 11, 2016 4:10 pm

Risottia wrote:Doesn't anybody else find INCREDIBLY ironic that Britain, having left the EU over slogans against the "evil unelected undemocratic EU commission", is getting a new PM not through an election, not even through a public debate at a party meeting, but just by a "hey I'm leaving" "I want No.10, no wait actually not" "Ok then this leaves me" process?


No prime minister is elected by the country. A GE is the election of mnay local representatives to carry out a party manifesto.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Souseiseki
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19625
Founded: Apr 12, 2012
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Souseiseki » Mon Jul 11, 2016 4:12 pm

The Nihilistic view wrote:
Risottia wrote:Doesn't anybody else find INCREDIBLY ironic that Britain, having left the EU over slogans against the "evil unelected undemocratic EU commission", is getting a new PM not through an election, not even through a public debate at a party meeting, but just by a "hey I'm leaving" "I want No.10, no wait actually not" "Ok then this leaves me" process?


No prime minister is elected by the country. A GE is the election of mnay local representatives to carry out a party manifesto.


how do you feel about how the media and conservatives (like may) slammed gordon brown as "unelected" and not having a "democratic mandate"?
ask moderation about reading serious moderation candidates TGs without telling them about it until afterwards and/or apparently refusing to confirm/deny the exact timeline of TG reading ~~~ i hope you never sent any of the recent mods or the ones that got really close anything personal!

signature edit: confirmation has been received. they will explicitly do it before and without asking. they can look at TGs basically whenever they want so please keep this in mind when nominating people for moderator or TGing good posters/anyone!
T <---- THE INFAMOUS T

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Mon Jul 11, 2016 4:14 pm

The Nihilistic view wrote:
Risottia wrote:Doesn't anybody else find INCREDIBLY ironic that Britain, having left the EU over slogans against the "evil unelected undemocratic EU commission", is getting a new PM not through an election, not even through a public debate at a party meeting, but just by a "hey I'm leaving" "I want No.10, no wait actually not" "Ok then this leaves me" process?


No prime minister is elected by the country. A GE is the election of mnay local representatives to carry out a party manifesto.

No European commission is elected by the public. A European commission is the outcome of appointments by elected national governments.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
The Nihilistic view
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 11424
Founded: May 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Nihilistic view » Mon Jul 11, 2016 4:15 pm

Souseiseki wrote:
The Nihilistic view wrote:
No prime minister is elected by the country. A GE is the election of mnay local representatives to carry out a party manifesto.


how do you feel about how the media and conservatives (like may) slammed gordon brown as "unelected" and not having a "democratic mandate"?


I think that was an unconservative shit on the constitution. Unfortunate though not unexpected these days.
Slava Ukraini

User avatar
Great Nepal
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 28677
Founded: Jan 11, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Great Nepal » Mon Jul 11, 2016 4:16 pm

The Nihilistic view wrote:
Risottia wrote:Doesn't anybody else find INCREDIBLY ironic that Britain, having left the EU over slogans against the "evil unelected undemocratic EU commission", is getting a new PM not through an election, not even through a public debate at a party meeting, but just by a "hey I'm leaving" "I want No.10, no wait actually not" "Ok then this leaves me" process?


No prime minister is elected by the country. A GE is the election of mnay local representatives to carry out a party manifesto.

So what do you say to those who claimed EU was fundamentally undemocratic because their commissioners were unelected by the public, merely voted in by elected EU parliament?
Last edited by Great Nepal on Sun Nov 29, 1995 7:02 am, edited 1 time in total.


PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: ImSaLiA, Ineva, Keltionialang, Likhinia, Moreistan, Shrillland, Tiami, Tungstan

Advertisement

Remove ads